Moral Motivation from the Perspective of the Self-Determination Theory and the Person-Object Theory of Interest

  • Andreas Krapp
Part of the Moral Development and Citizenship Education book series (MORA, volume 1)

Abstract

Many researchers working in the tradition of Kohlberg’s theoretical approach to morality have shared his central hypothesis that moral judgment and moral behaviour are closely related. (cf. Kohlberg & Candee, 1984).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achtziger, A., & Gollwitzer, P.M ( 2007). Rubicon model of action phases. In: R.F. Baumeister & K .D. Vohs (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social psychology (pp. 769–770). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Anastasi, A. (1958). Differential psychology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Assor, A. (2012). Autonomous moral motivation: consequences, socializing antecedents, and the unique role of integrated moral principles. In M. Mikulincer & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality. Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 239–255). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  4. Assor, A., Kaplan H., & Roth G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Assor, A., Roth, G., & Deci, E.L. (2004). The emotional costs of parents’ conditional regard: A self determination theory analysis. Journal of Personality, 72(1), 47–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  7. Baumeister, R.F., Vohs, K.D., DeWall, C.N., & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 167–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boekaerts, M. (1996). Personality and the psychology of learning. European Journal of Personality, 10, 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blasi, A. (1983/1999). Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental Review, 3, 178–210. [German Translation: Moralische Kognition und moralisches Handeln. Eine theoretische Perspektive. In D. Garz, F. Oser, & W. Althof (Eds.), Beiträge zur Soziogenese der Handlungsfähigkeit. Moralisches Urteil und Handeln (pp. 47–81). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1999]Google Scholar
  10. Blasi, A. (2005). Moral character: A psychological approach. In D.K. Lapsley & F.C. Power (Eds.), Character psychology and character education (pp. 67–100). Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  11. Blasi, A. (1999). Moralische Kognition und moralisches Handeln. Eine theoretische Perspektive. In D. Garz, F. Oser, & W. Althof (Eds.), Beitrage zur Soziogenese der Handlungsfahigkeit. Moralisches Urteil und Handeln (pp. 47–81). Frankfurt a.M.: SuhrkampGoogle Scholar
  12. Colby, A., & Damon, W. (1992). Some do care: Contemporary lives of moral commitment. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Cofer, C.N. & Appley, M.H. (1964). Motivation: Theory and research. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. DeCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Deci, E.L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deci, E.L. (1998). The relation of interest to motivation and human needs – the self-determination theory viewpoint. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K.A. Renninger & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning. Proceedings of the Seeon-Conference on interest and gender (pp. 146–162). Kiel: IPN.Google Scholar
  17. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 38: Perspectives on Motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  19. Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self- determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  21. Edelstein, W., Nunner-Winkler, G., & Noam, G.G. (Eds.). (1993). Moral und Person. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  22. Efklides, A., Kuhl, J., & Sorrentino, R.M. (2001). Trends and prospects in motivation research. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  23. Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 165–192). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  24. Evans, J.B.T. (2010). Thinking twice: Two minds in one brain. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Esser, H. (1996). Die Definition der Situation. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 48, 1–34.Google Scholar
  26. Heckhausen, H. (1989/1991). Motivation und Handeln. Berlin: Springer. [English Version: Motivation and action. Berlin: Springer, 1991].Google Scholar
  27. Heckhausen. H. (2006). Entwicklungslinien der Motivationsforschung. In J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation und Handeln (pp. 235–253). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heckhausen, H., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Motivation and Emotion, 11(2), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heckhausen, J. (Ed.). (2000). Motivational psychology of human development. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  30. Heckhausen, J., & Heckhausen, H. (2006/2008). Motivation und Handeln. Berlin: Springer. [English Version: Motivation and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008].Google Scholar
  31. Heinrichs, K. (2005). Urteilen und Handeln: Ein Prozessmodell und seine moralpsychologische Spezifizierung. New York u.a.: Lang.Google Scholar
  32. Hofer, M. (2007). Goal conflicts and self-regulation: A new look at pupils’ off-task behaviour in the classroom. Educational Research Review, 2, 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kohlberg, L., & Candee, D. (1984). The relationship of moral judgment to moral action. In W.M. Kurtines & J.L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 52–73). New York: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  34. Krapp, A. (1993). Psychologie der Lernmotivation – Perspektiven der Forschung und Probleme ihrer pädagogischen Rezeption. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 39, 187–206.Google Scholar
  35. Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology in Education, 14, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Krapp, A. (2000). Interest and human development during adolescence: An educational-psychological approach. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development (pp. 109–128). London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Krapp, A. (2002a). An educational-psychological theory of interest and its relation to self-determination theory. In E. Deci & R. Ryan (Eds.), The handbook of self-determination research (pp. 405–427). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  38. Krapp, A. (2002b). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest. Learning and Instruction, 14, 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krapp, A. & Hascher, T. (in press). Theorien der Lern- und Leistungsmotivation. In L. Ahnert (Eds.), Theorien der Entwicklungspsychologie. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer VerlagGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuhl, J. (1983). Motivation, Konflikt und Handlungskontrolle. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kunter, M., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). Effective classroom management and the development of subject-related interest. Learning and Instruction, 17 (5), 494–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Latzko, B. & Malti, T. (2010). Children’s moral emotions and moral cognition: Towards an integrative perspective. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 129, 1–10.Google Scholar
  44. Lewin, K. (1936). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  45. Murray, H.A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D.K. (Eds.) (2009). Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Nisan, M. (1993). Nisan, M., Bilanzierte Identität. Moralität und andere Identitätswerte. In W. Edelstein, G. Nunner-Winkler, & G.G. Noam (Eds.), Moral und Person (pp. 232–258). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  48. Noam, G.G. (1999). Moralisches Verhalten: Brauchen wir ein ,Selbst‘? In D. Garz, F. Oser, & W. Althof (Eds.), Beiträge zur Soziogenese der Handlungsfähigkeit. Moralisches Urteil und Handeln (pp. 340–376). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  49. Nucci, L., & Lee, J. (1993). Moral und personale Autonomie. In W. Edelstein, G. Nunner-Winkler & G.G. Noam (Eds.), Moral und Person (pp. 69–103). Frankfurt a.M.: SuhrkampGoogle Scholar
  50. Nunner-Winkler, G. (1999). Moralische Motivation und moralische Identität. Zur Kluft zwischen Urteil und Handeln. In D. Garz, F. Oser, & W. Althof (Eds.), Beiträge zur Soziogenese der Handlungsfähigkeit. Moralisches Urteil und Handeln (pp. 314–339). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  51. Nunner-Winkler, G. (1993). Die Entwicklung moralischer Motivation. In W. Edelstein, G. Nunner- Winkler, & G.G. Noam (Eds.), Moral und Person (pp. 278–303). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  52. Nuttin, J. (1984). Motivation, planning, and action. Leuven/Louvain (Belgium): Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Oser, F., & Althof, W. (1997). Moralische Selbstbestimmung: Modelle der Entwicklung und Erziehung im Wertebereich. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  54. Oser, F., & Näpflin, C. (2010). Moralentwicklung und Moralförderung. In D.H. Rost (Ed.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 566–577). Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  55. Prenzel, M., Krapp, A. & Schiefele, H. (1986). Grundzüge einer pädagogischen Interessentheorie. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 32, 163–173.Google Scholar
  56. Renkl, A. (1996). Träges Wissen: Wenn Erlerntes nicht genutzt wird. Psychologische Rundschau, 47, 78–92.Google Scholar
  57. Renninger, K.A., Hidi, S.,& Krapp, A. (Eds.). (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  58. Rest, J.R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  59. Rest, J.R. (1999). Die Rolle des moralischen Urteilens im moralischen Handeln. In D. Garz, F. Oser& W. Althof (Eds.), Beiträge zur Soziogenese der Handlungsfähigkeit. Moralisches Urteil und Handeln (pp. 82–116). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  60. Ryan, R.M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative process. Journal of Personality, 63(3), 397–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ryan, R.M., & Connell, J.P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality an internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality an Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-Determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectice perspective. In E.L. Deci & R.M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  64. Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K.R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197–222). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  65. Silvia, P.J. (2006). Exploring the psychology of interest. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sun, R. (2002). Duality of the mind. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  67. Tsai, Y., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O.,Trautwein, U. & Ryan, R. (2008). What makes lessons interesting? The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 460–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tyler, L.E. (1965). The psychology of human differences. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  69. Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  70. Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R.M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. White, R.W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Krapp
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychologie und ErziehungswissenschaftenUniversity of the Bundeswehr MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations