Skip to main content

Deontic and Responsibility Judgments

An Inferential Analysis

  • Chapter
Handbook of Moral Motivation

Part of the book series: Moral Development and Citizenship Education ((MORA,volume 1))

Abstract

Judgments of responsibility are considered a key component of moral functioning beyond mere deontic judgments. Contrary to most of those concerned with moral “responsibility”, “motivation”, “identity” and the like, the present paper argues that these commitment-yielding processes are part and parcel of moral judgment as such, rather than an obscure additional moral component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aliseda, A. (2006). Abductive reasoning: Logical investigations into discovery and explanation. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, R. (2002). Why be moral? A conceptual model from developmental psychology. Human Development, 45, 104-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbacher, D. (2003). Analytische Einfuhrung in die Ethik. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, A. (1983). Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental Review, 3, 178–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, A. (2004). Moral functioning: Moral understanding and personality. In D.K. Lapsley & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development, self, and identity (pp. 335–347). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, D.G. (2011).On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s inference to the best explanation.Synthese, 180, 419–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T.L., & Sadovsky, A. (2006). Empathy-related responding in children. In M. Killen & J.G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 517–549). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flach, P. A. (2000). Abduction and induction. Essays on their relation and integration. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D.M., & Woods, J. (2005). A practical logic of cognitive systems, Vol. 2: The reach of abduction - insight and trial. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J.C. (2010). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., & Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th ed. (pp. 797–832). Hobeken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, S.A. & Carlo, G. (2005). Identity as a source of moral motivation. Human Development, 48, 232–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, S.A. (2006). Identity, reasoning, and emotion: An empirical comparison of three sources of moral motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 2007–2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1998). What is abduction? The fundamental problem of contemporary epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 34, 503–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., & Candee, D. (1984). The relationship of moral judgment to moral action. In W.M. Kurtines & J.L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 52–73). New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koops, W., Brugman, D., Ferguson, T., & Sanders, A.F. (Eds.) (2010). The development and structure of conscience. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley, D.K., & Narvaez, D. (2006). Character education. In K.A. Renninger& I.E. Sigel (Eds.). Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol 4: Child Psychology in practice (6th ed., pp. 248–296). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (2009). Abductive cognition: The epistemological and eco-cognitive dimensions of hypothetical reasoning. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malti, T., Gummerum, M., Keller, M. & Buchmann, M. (2009). Children’s moral motivation, sympathy, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 80, 442–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnameier, G. (2000). Strukturgenese moralischen Denkens: Eine Rekonstruktion der Piagetschen Entwicklungslogik und ihre moraltheoretischen Folgen. Munster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnameier, G. (2001). A new “stairway to moral heaven”? A systematic reconstruction of stages of moral thinking based on a Piagetian “logic” of cognitive development. Journal of Moral Education, 30, 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnameier, G. (2004). Peirce-suit of truth: Why inference to the best explanation and abduction ought not to be confused. Erkenntnis, 60, 75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnameier, G. (2005). Developmental progress in ancient Greek ethics. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2, 71–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnameier, G. (2009). Measuring moral progress: A neo-Kohlbergian approach and two case studies. Journal of Adult Development, 16, 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnameier, G. (2010a). The problem of moral otivation and the happy victimizer phenomenon: Killing two birds with one stone. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 129, 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnameier, G. (2010b). Abduction, induction, and analogy: On the compound character of analogical inferences. In W. Carnielli, L. Magnani & C. Pizzi (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in science and technology: Abduction, logic, and computational discovery (pp. 107–119). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Minnameier, G. (2010c). The logicality of abduction, deduction, and induction. In M. Bergman, S. Paavola, A.-V. Pietarinen & H. Rydenfelt (Eds.), Ideas in action: Procedures of the Applying Peirce conference(pp. 239–251). Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnameier, G. (submitted). A cognitive approach to the “happy victimiser” and its educational implications, Journal of Moral Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D.K. (Eds.) (2009).Personality, identity and character: Explorations in moral psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nucci, L., & Narvaez, D. (Eds.), (2007). Handbook of moral and character education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunner-Winkler, G. (1999). Development of moral understanding and moral motivation. In F.E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Individual development from 3 to 12: Findings from the Munich longitudinal study (pp. 253–290). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunner-Winkler, G. (2007). Development of moral motivation from childhood to early adulthood. Journal of Moral Education, 36, 399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oser, F. &Reichenbach, R. (2005).Moral resilience: The unhappy moralist. In W. Edelstein & G. Nunner- Winkler (Eds.), Morality in context (pp. 203–224). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oser, F., Schmid, E. & Hattersley, L. (2006). The “unhappy moralist” effect: Emotional conflicts between being good and being successful. In L Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M Boekaerts& S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends (pp. 149–168). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, S. (2005).Peircean abduction: instinct or inference? Semiotica153, 131–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, S. (2006): Hansonian and Harmanian abduction as models of discovery. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 20, 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. (1878/1931). Deduction, induction, and hypothesis. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 2 (pp. 372–388). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. (1903/1934). Lectures on pragmatism. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 5 (pp. 11–131). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. (c. 1893/1931). The grammatical theory of judgment and inference. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 2 (pp. 265–269). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. (c. 1910/1958). To Paul Carus, on “illustrations of the logic of science”. In A.W. Burks (Ed.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 8 (pp. 171–179). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1954/1981). Intelligence and affectivity: Their relationship during child development. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J.R. (1983). Morality. In J.H. Flavell& E.M. Markman (Volume Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (ed. by P.H. Mussen), Vol. III: Cognitive development (4th ed.)(pp. 556–629). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J.R. (1984). The major components of morality. In W.M. Kurtinez& J.L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 24–38). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M.J., & Thoma, S.J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo- Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B.R., Miller, M.L., & Johnson, R.M. (2009). Moral identity, integrity, and personal responsibility. In D. Narvaez & D.K. Lapsley (Eds.), Personality, identity and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 316–340). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G. (2008). Patterns of abduction. Synthese, 164, 201–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (1994/2005). The moral problem. Oxford: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L.J., & Frimer, J.A. (2007). Moral personality of brave and caring exemplars. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 845–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L.J., & Frimer, J. A. (2009). Moral personality exemplified. In D. Narvaez & D. K. Lapsley (Eds.), Personality, identity and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 232–255). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Minnameier, G. (2013). Deontic and Responsibility Judgments. In: Handbook of Moral Motivation. Moral Development and Citizenship Education, vol 1. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-275-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships