Abstract
There are great expectations for higher education as an instrument of social mobility and economic development. Institutions of higher education are widely thought to equalize opportunity for social mobility, to be catalysts for economic development, and to promote the knowledge and values of society from one generation to the next. While the linkages between higher education and economic development are now well established within the international policy discourse on global universities and economic development, the role of the state in ensuring fairness in access to higher education—and the realization of the promise of social mobility—is seldom considered. Before World War II, access to U.S. higher education was limited and was characterized as for the elite, especially opportunities to enroll in four-year colleges (Trow, 1974).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelman, C. (1995). The new college course map and transcript files: Changes in course-taking and achievement, 1972–1993. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Adelman C. (2005). Moving into town and moving on: The community college in the lives of traditionalage students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance (2002). Empty promises: The myth of college access in America. Washington, DC: Author.
Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance (2008). Apply to succeed: Ensuring community college students benefit from need-based financial aid. Report prepared for ACSFA. Washington, DC: Author.
Becker, G.S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. New York: Columbia University Press.
Becker, W.E. (2004). Omitted variables and sample selection in studies of college-going decisions. In E.P. St. John (Ed.), Public policy and college access: Investigating the federal and state roles in equalizing postsecondary opportunity, Readings on equal education Vol. 19 (pp. 65–86). New York: AMS Press, Inc.
Berkner, L., & Chavez, L. (1997). Access to postsecondary education for the 1992 high school graduates. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
Blau, P.M., & Duncan, O.D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: Wiley.
Bound, J., & Turner, S. (2002). Going to War and Going to College: Did World War II and the G.I. Bill Increase Educational Attainment for Returning Veterans? Journal of Labor Economics, 20(4), (784–815).
Bowen, W.G., Chingos, M., & McPherson, M.S. (2009). Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America’s public Universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Choy, S.P. (2002a). Access & persistence: Findings from 10 years of longitudinal research on students. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Choy, S.P. (2002b). Findings from The Condition of Education, 2002: Nontraditional undergraduates. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce (2007). Tough choices, tough times: The report of the new commission on skills of the American workforce. Washington, DC: National Center on Education and the Economy.
Conklin, K.D., & Curran, B.K. (2005). Action agenda for improving America’s high schools. Sponsored by Achieve, Inc., and the National Governors Association: www.achieve.org/achieve.nsf/ActionAgenda_Overview?OpenForm.
Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce (2007). Tough choices, tough times: The report of the new commission on skills of the American workforce. Washington, DC: National Center on Education and the Economy.
Cornia, G.A., & Kiiski, S. (2001). Trends in income distribution in the post-World War II period. Discussion paper #2001/89. World Institute or Development Economic Research, United Nations University, Helsink, Finland.
Fogel, R.W. (2000). The fourth great awakening and the future of egalitarianism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Friedman, B.M. (2005). The moral consequence of economic growth. New York: Vintage.
Friedman, T.L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Galbraith, J.K. (1994). A journey through economic time: A first-hand view. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Goldthorpe, J.H., Llewellyn, & Payne, C. (1987) Social mobility and class structure in modern Britain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Goodchild, L.F. (1997). Contemporary Undergraduate Education: An Era of Alternatives and Reassessment. Theory Into Practice, 36(2), 123–131.
Grubb, W.N. (1994). The long-term effects and proprietary schools: Corrections. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(3), 351–56.
Grubb, W.N. (1996a). Learning to work: The case for reintegrating job training and education. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Grubb, W.N. (1996b). Working in the middle: Strengthening education and training for the mid-skilled labor force. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Heller, D.E. (2004). NCES research on college participation: A critical analysis. In E.P. St. John (Ed.), Public policy and college access: Investigating the federal and state roles in equalizing postsecondary opportunity. Readings on equal education Vol. 19 (pp. 29–64). New York: AMS Press, Inc.
Henry, M., Lingard, B., Rizvi, F., & Taylor, S. (2001). The OECD, globalization and education policy. Amsterdam: Pergamon Press.
Hillmert, S., & Jacob, M. (2003). Social inequality in higher education. Is vocational training a pathway leading to or award from university? Europeans sociological Review, 19, 319–334.
Hoffman, N., Vargas, J., Venezia, A., & Miller, M.S. (Eds.) (2007). Minding the gap: Why integrating high school with college makes sense and how to do it. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
Jackson, G.A. (1978). Financial aid and student enrollment. The Journal of Higher Education, 49(6), 548–574.
Kerr, C. (1963). The uses of the university. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Leslie, L.L., & Brinkman, P.T. (1988). The economic value of higher education. New York: Macmillan.
Lipsett, S.M., & Bendix, R. (1992). Social mobility in industrial society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Manski, C.F., & Wise, D.A. (1983). College choice in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McPherson, M.S. (1978). The demand for higher education. In D.W. Breneman & C.E. Finn, Jr. (Eds.), Public policy and private higher education (pp. 143–146). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
McPherson, M.S., & Schapiro, M.O. (1991). Keeping college affordable: Government and educational opportunity. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
McPherson, M.S., & Schapiro, M.O. (1993). Measuring the effects of student aid: An assessment of some methodological and empirical problems. In M.S. McPherson, M.O. Schapiro, & G.C. Winston (Eds.), Paying the piper: Productivity, incentives, and financing in U.S. higher education (pp. 187–228). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
McPherson, M.S., & Schapiro, M.O. (1998). The student aid game: Meeting need and rewarding talent in American higher education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mendez, J.P., (2006). The History of the ‘Pillsbury Doughboy’: The Essential Elements of the Federal Pell Grant. Ph. D. Dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN. 2006.
National Center for Education Statistics (1970). Projections of education statistics to 1979–80. Washington, DC: Author.
National Center for Education Statistics (1980). Projections of education statistics to 1988–89. By M.M. Frankel & D.E. Gerald. Washington, DC: Author.
Paulsen, M.B. (1996a). Higher education and productivity: An afterword. Thought and action: NEA Higher Education Journal, 12(2), 135–139.
Paulsen, M.B. (1996b). Higher education and state workforce productivity. Thought and Action: NEA Higher Education Journal, 12(1), 55–77.
Pelavin, S.H., & Kane, M.B. (1988). Minority participation in higher education. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Budget and Evaluation. Washington, DC: Pelavin Associates.
Pelavin, S.H., & Kane, M.B. (1990). Changing the odds: Factors increasing access to college. New York: College Board.
Priest, D., & St. John, E.P. (Eds.) (2006). Privatization and public universities. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944, P.L. 78–346.
Smart, A., & Smart, J. (2005). Introduction. In Smart, A. & Smart, J. (Eds.) Petty capitalists and globalization: Flexibility, entrepreneurship, and economic development. (1–22) Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Sommerville, J.C. (2009). Religious ideas for secular universities. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
St. John, E.P. (1991). What really influences minority attendance? Sequential analyses of the high school and beyond sophomore cohort. Research in Higher Education, 32(2), 141–158.
St. John, E.P. (2003). Refinancing the college dream: Access, equal opportunity, and justice for taxpayers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
St. John, E.P. (Ed.) (2006). Public policy and the public interest: School reforms, postsecondary encouragement, and state policies on postsecondary education, Readings on equal education, Vol. 21. New York: AMS Press, Inc.
St. John, E.P. Hu, S., & Fisher, A. (in press). Breaking through the access barrier: How academic capital formation can inform public policy.
St. John, E.P., Kim, J., & Yang, L. (in press). Privatization and inequality: Comparative Studies of College Access, Education Policy, and Public Finance. Globalization and social justice, Vol. 1. New York: AMS Press, Inc.
St. John, E.P., & Moronski, K. (2008). The impact of the Florida Bright Futures Scholarship Program on college preparation and access for low-income and minority students. A paper prepared for ENLACE FLORIDA. http://enlacefl.usf.edu/research/Research%20Briefs/2009/The-Impact-of-FLBrightFuturesScholarship-on-CollegePrep.pdf
St. John, E.P., & Moronski, K. (in press). The Late Great State of California: The Legacy of the Master Plan, the Decline in Access, and a New Crisis. In E.P. St. John, J. Kim, & L. Yang (Eds.) Privatization and Inequality: Comparative Studies of College Access, Education Policy, and Public Finance. Globalization and social justice, Vol. 1. NY: AMS Press.
St. John, E.P., & Masten, C.L. (1990). Return on the federal investment in student financial aid: An assessment of the high school class of 1972. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 20(3), 4–23.
St. John, E.P., & Musoba, G.D. (2010). Pathways to academic success: Expanding opportunity for underrepresented students. New York: Routledge.
St. John, E.P., Pineda, D., & Moronski, K. (in press). Higher Education in the United States: Legal, Financial and Educational Remedies to Racial and Income Inequality in College Access, In E.P. St. John, J. Kim, & L. Yang (Eds.) Privatization and Inequality: Comparative Studies of College Access, Education Policy, and Public Finance. Globalization and social justice, Vol. 1. NY: AMS Press.
St. John, E.P., Ward, J.G., & Laine, S.W.M. (1999). State policy on professional development: Rethinking the linkages to student outcomes. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
Stigliz, J.E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York: Norton.
Taylor, M.C. (2010). Crisis on Campus: A Bold Plan for Reforming Our Colleges and Universities. New York: Knopf.
Taylor, C. (2007). A Secular Age. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Thelin, J.R. (2004). Higher education and the public trough: A historical perspective. In E.P. St. John & M.D. Parsons (Ed.), Public funding of higher education: Changing contexts and new rationales. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Tobin, E. (2009). The Modern Evolution of America’s Flagship Universities. In W.G. Bowen, M. Chingos, & M.S. McPherson (Eds.), Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America’s public Universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
U.S. Department of Education (2006). A Test of Leadership: Changing the Future of U.S. Higher Education, Washington, DC: authors.
Wildavsky, B. (2009). The great brain drain: How global universities are reshaping the world. Princeton, MJ: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
John, E.P.S. (2013). The Legacy of the Gi Bill. In: Meyer, HD., John, E.P.S., Chankseliani, M., Uribe, L. (eds) Fairness in Access to Higher Education in a Global Perspective. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-230-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-230-3_4
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-230-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)