Skip to main content

Creativity from a Talent Development Perspective

How It Can Be Cultivated in the Schools

  • Chapter
Creatively Gifted Students are not like Other Gifted Students

Part of the book series: Advances in Creativity and Giftedness ((ACAG,volume 5))

Abstract

American creativity is in a crisis, at least according to two respected pop culture authors writing in Newsweek on recent trends in creativity. According to Bronson and Merryman (2010), American creativity scores, once ever-rising, are now in a state of steady decline. They cite in their Newsweek article a study by Kyung Hee Kim (2011) at the College of William & Mary, who analyzed almost 300,000 scores on a popular creativity test—The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (Torrance, 1990, 2008).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amer, A. (2006). Reflections on Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 4, 213–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badke-Schaub, P., Goldschmidt, G., & Meijer M. (2010). How does cognitive conflict in design teams support the development of creative ideas? Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 119–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00553.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity in creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173–177. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1102_7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (2011). Why grand theories of creativity distort, distract, and disappoint. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 21, 73–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J., & Garrett, T. (2010). Teaching for creativity in an era of content standards and accountability. In R.A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 6–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, A. Y. (2010). Creativity: A look outside the box in the classroom. In R.A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 73–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtoldt, M. N., De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & Choi, H. S. (2010). Motivated information processing, social turning, and group creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 622–637. doi: 10.1037/a0019386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2008). Creativity enhancement. In J.A. Plucker & C.M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 139–153). Waco, Texas: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R.A., & Kaufman, J.C. (2010). Broadening conceptions of creativity in the classroom. In R.A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 191–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1996) (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2008). Differences in the development of creative competencies in children schooled in diverse learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 381–389. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I. The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronson, P., & Merryman, A. (2010). The creativity crisis. Newsweek, July 19, 2010 issue, 44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, C. L., Mumford, M. D., Barrett, J. D., & Vessey, W. B. (2009). Examining the leaders of creative efforts: What do they do, and what do they think about? Creativity and Innovation Management, 18, 256–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2009.00532.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byron, K., Khazanchi, S., & Nazarian, D. (2010). The relationship between stressors and creativity: A meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 201–212. doi: 10.1037/a0017868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung (2011). Infusing creativity into Eastern classrooms: Evaluations from student perspectives. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6, 67–87. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2010.05.001

  • Claxton, G., Edwards, L., & Scale-Constantinou, V. (2006). Cultivating creative mentalities: A framework for education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 57–61. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2005.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covington, M. V., Crutchfield, R. S., Davies, L., & Olton, R. M. (1974). The productive thinking program: A course in learning to think. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dane, E., Baer, M., Pratt, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2011). Rational versus intuitive problem solving: How thinking “off the beaten path” can stimulate creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 3–12. doi: 10.1037/a0017698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bono, E. (1970). Lateral thinking: Creativity step by step. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bono, E. (1992). Serious creativity: Using the power of lateral thinking to create new ideas. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., Nigstad, B. A., Bechtoldt, M. N., & Baas, M. (2011). Group creativity and innovation: A motivated information processing perspective. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 81–89. doi: 10.1037/a0017986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, F. A. (2008). Cognitive development. In J.A. Plucker & C.M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 85–95). Waco, Texas: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, E., & Cramond, B. (2010). Infusing creative and critical thinking into the curriculum together. In R.A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 113–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feldhusen, J. F. (1983). The Purdue Creative Thinking Program. In I. S. Sato (Ed.), Creativity research and educational planning (pp.41–46).Los Angeles: Leadership Training Institute for the Gifted and Talented.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Gebauer, D., Reishoger, G., Koschutnig, K., & Ebner, F. (2010). Enhancing creativity by means of cognitive stimulation: Evidence from an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 52, 1687–1695. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, T. S. (2011). Creative thinking in schools: Finding the “just right” challenge for students. Gifted Child Today, 34, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 98–120). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garaigordobil, M. (2006). Intervention in creativity with children aged 10 and 11 years: Impact of a play program on verbal and graphic-figural creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 329–345. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1803_8

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, W. J. (1961). Synetics. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, W. J. (1966). The metaphorical way of learning and knowing. Cambridge, MA: Porpoise Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, W. J. (1981). The new art of the possible: The basic course in Synetics. Cambridge, MA: Porpoise Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gude, O. (2010). Playing, creativity, possibility. Art Education, 63, 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454. doi: 10.1037/h0063487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., & Schwall, A. R. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 90–105. doi: 10.1037/a0018556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernstein, R. J., Nickerson, R. S., de Sánchez, M., & Swets, J. A. (1986). Teaching thinking skills. American Psychologist, 41, 1279–1289. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.11.1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope, S. (2010). Creativity, content, and policy. Arts Education Policy Review, 111, 39–47. doi: 10.1080/10632910903455736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, T. Y. (2005). Fostering creativity: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. (Doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/2338

  • Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Creativity 101. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R. A., Baer, J., & Ivcevic, Z. (2010). Creativity polymathy: What Benjamin Franklin can teach your kindergartener. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 380–387. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H. (2011). The creativity crisis: The decrease in creative thinking scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, S., & Cheung, P. C. (2010). Developmental trends of creativity: What twists of turn do boys and girls take at different grades? Creativity Research Journal, 22, 329–336. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2010.503543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesner, W. J., & Hillman, D. (1983). A developmental schema of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 17, 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, A. K., & Chiu, C. (2010). Multicultural experience, idea receptiveness, and creativity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(5–6), 723–741. doi: 10.1177/0022022110361707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, A. K., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu (2006). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169–181. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.169

  • Longman, J. (2011, May 22). Lionel Messi: Boy genius. New York Times Sports Sunday. pp. 1, 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, H. H. (2006). A synthetic analysis of the effectiveness of single components and packages in creativity training programs. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 435–446. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1804_3

    Google Scholar 

  • Makel, M.C., & Plucker, J.A. (2008). Creativity. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 247–270). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, R., & Nicholl, B. (2011). “If I was going to design a chair, the last thing I would look at is a chair”: Product analysis and the causes of fixation in students’ design work 11–16 years. International Journal if Technology and Design Education, 21, 71–92. doi: 10.1007/s10798-009-9107-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memmert, D., Baker, J., & Bertsch, C. (2010). Play and practice in the development of sport-specific creativity in team ball sports. High Ability Studies, 21, 3–18. doi: 10.1080/13598139.2010.488083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullineaux, P. Y., & Dilalla, L. F. (2009). Preschool pretend play behaviors and early adolescent creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (E.d.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (2010). How to discourage creative thinking in the classroom. In R.A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 1–5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, A. (1963). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. New York: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, S. I. (February, 2008a). Best practices in serving the gifted: Opportunities for school psychology. Professional development workshop at the Annual Convention of the National Association of School Psychologists, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, S. I. (2008b). Handbook of giftedness in children. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, S. I. (July, 2008c). Thinking in-the-future: Hopes, fears and expectations for your gifted child grown up. Invited pre-conference workshop at the 25th Annual Convention of SENG, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, S. I. (in press). Lessons learned in work with high ability students. Gifted Education International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, S. I. (2012 a). Current perspectives on the identification and assessment of gifted students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30 (1), 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, S. I. (2012). Serving the gifted: Evidence-based clinical and psycho-educational practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (2008). Giftedness in nonacademic domains. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 367–386). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, M. (2000). Learning to think, thinking to learn: Models and strategies to develop a classroom culture of chinking. Cheltenham, Vic.: Hawker Brownlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis (n.d.) Research that supports using the Schoolwide Enrichment Model and extensions of gifted education pedagogy to meet the needs of all students. Retrieved from http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/sem/semresearch.html

  • Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2009). The schoolwide enrichment model: A focus on student strengths and interests. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Eckert, Y C. A. Little (Eds.), Systems and models for developing the gifted and talented (2nd ed., pp. 323–352). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (1962). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. (2007). Everyday creativity: Our hidden potential. In R. Richards (Ed.), Everyday creativity and new views of human nature: Psychological, social, and spiritual perspectives (pp. 25–53). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. (2010). Everyday creativity in the classroom: A trip through time with seven suggestions. In R.A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 206–234). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Russ, S. W., & Fiorelli, J. A. (2010). Developmental approaches to creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 233–249). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361–388. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1604_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2010). Learning for creativity. In R.A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 172–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Giftedness as developing expertise: A theory of the interface between high abilities and achieved excellence. High Ability Studies, 12, 159–179. doi: 10.1080/13598130120084311

  • Sternberg, R. (2003). Creative thinking in the classroom. Scandanavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 325–338. doi: 10.1080/0031383032000079281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko. E. L. (2011). Explorations in giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Constraints on creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 467–482). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677–688. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, P.D. (2010). Using constraints to develop creativity in the classroom. In R.A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 88–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F. (2003). A developmental view of giftedness: From being to doing. Roeper Review, 26, 14–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., Edmiston, A. M., Cook, L., & Ross, M. D. (2010). Mentoring for talent development, creativity, social skills, and insider knowledge: The APA Catalyst Program. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 714–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 277–293. doi: 10.1037/a0020952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1990). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, I. P. (2008). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-Technical Manual Figural (Streamlined) Forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treffinger, D. J. (1986). Research on creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 15–19. doi: 10.1177/001698628603000103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westwood, R., & Low, D. R. (2003). The multicultural muse: Culture, creativity and innovation. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3, 235–259. doi: 10.1177/14705958030032006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner, E. (1996). Gifted children. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pfeiffer, S.I., Thompson, T.L. (2013). Creativity from a Talent Development Perspective. In: Kim, K.H., Kaufman, J.C., Baer, J., Sriraman, B. (eds) Creatively Gifted Students are not like Other Gifted Students. Advances in Creativity and Giftedness, vol 5. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-149-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships