Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Creativity and Giftedness ((ACAG,volume 5))

Abstract

This essay troubles the definition of creative giftedness, especially as it has impacted gifted education policy. Some states identify creative giftedness through divergent production testing, IQ testing, and the use of checklists. These methods are problematic, not only because of their doubtfulness as means of predicting creative production in adulthood, but also because of the difficulty of scoring and programming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. New York,NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M (1995). Creativity. New York, NY: Harpercollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. (1999). Creativity is forever (4th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. H. (1999). Influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 273–296). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldhusen, J. F., Hoover, S. M., & Sayler, M. F. (1989). Identification of secondary students at the secondary level. Monroe, NY: Trillium Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. Y., & Whiting, G. W. (2008). Recruiting and retaining underrepresented gifted students. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.). Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 293–308). New York NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1975). Varieties of creative giftedness, their measurement and development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 19, 104–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1988). Storytelling as a means of assessing creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 22, 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarosewich, T., Pfeiffer, S. I., & Morris, J. (2002). Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A review of existing instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 322–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatena, J. (1978). The creatively gifted child: Suggestions for parents and teachers. New York, NY: Vantage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatena, J., & Torrance, E. P. (1973). Thinking Creatively with Sounds and Words: Norms-technical manual (research edition). Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatena, J., & Torrance, E. P. (1976). Khatena-Torrance Creative Perception Inventory: Norms-technical manual (research edition). Chicago, IL: Stoelting.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, L. A., Walker, L. M., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189–203. Doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruteskii, V (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. In I. Wirszup & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), J. Teller (Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, J. (2012, January 20). Groupthink: The brainstorming myth. The New Yorker, pp. 22–27).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. (1975). IPAR’s contribution to the conceptualization and study of creativity. In I. A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 60–89). Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makel, M., & Plucker, J. (2008). Creativity. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 249–270). New York NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed). New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRae, R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neihart, M., & Olenchak, F. R. (2002). Creatively gifted children. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 165). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (1991). Encouraging creativity and talent in adolescents. In M. Bireley & J. Genshaft (Eds.), Understanding the gifted adolescent: Educational, developmental, and multicultural issues (pp. 104–121). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (1992). Understanding those who create. Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (1998, March). Feeling boys, thinking girls, and judging teachers: Talented students and the MBTI. Proceedings of the 1998 Conference of the Center for the Application of Personality Types (CAPT) Conference, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (1999). A survey of psychological studies of creativity. In A. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.). Investigating creativity in youth (pp. 10–25). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (2004). Understanding creativity. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (2007). Understanding visual artists. In K. Tirri (Ed.), Values and foundations in gifted education (pp. 29–39). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (2009). Eminence and creativity in selected visual artists. In B. Macfarlane & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Leading change in gifted education (pp. 13–27). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press. Festschrift volume for Joyce VanTassel-Baska.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (2011). Talent and creativity. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 427–434). London, UK: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J., & Keller-Mathers, S. (In preparation). Mary Meeker: A deep commitment to individual differences. In A. Robinson & J. Jolly (Eds.), Gifted education: A century of illuminating lives. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J., & Fraas, J. (2012). A mixed methods comparison of vocational and identified- gifted students on the Overexcitabilities Questionnaire. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35, 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J., Montgomery, D., & May, J. (2008). A comparison of Dabrowki’s overexcitabilities by gender for American and Korean high school gifted students. High Ability Studies, 19, 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J., Montgomery, D., & Fisher, J. (2008, September). Perfectionism and personality: A multiple regression study comparing the NEO-PI-R and the MPS on talented adolescents. European Council for High Ability Conference, Prague, Czech Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J., & Johnson, G. (2004, September). Personality attributes of talented teenagers. Proceedings of European Council for High Ability Conference, Pamplona, Spain. CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches for the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (35–61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, F. C., & Piirto, J. (2007). Honoring and suffering the Thorn: Marking, naming, initiating, and eldering: Depth psychology, II. Roeper Review, 29(5), 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. (1986). Underachievement syndrome: Causes and cures. Watertown, WI: Apple Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity theory and themes: Research, development, and practice. Boston, MA: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B. (2010). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty-year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 361–368. Doi 10.1080/10400419.2010.523393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1998). Scientific genius: The psychology of science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosniak, L. (1985). Becoming an outstanding research neurologist. In B. Bloom (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 348–408). New York, NY: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (2001). Aptitude for learning a foreign language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 90–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Identifying and developing creative giftedness. Roeper Review, 23(2), 60–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. , & Lubart T. I. (1993). Creative giftedness: A multivariate investment approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(1), 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. A. (1976). A retrospective view of creativity investigation. In I. A. Taylor & J. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 1–36). Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1976). Creativity research in education: Still alive. In I. A. Taylor & U. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 278–296). Chicago, IL: Aldine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1979). The search for Satori and creativity. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1987). Teaching for creativity. In S. J. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 190–215). Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P., & Safter, T. (1990). The incubation method of teaching: Getting beyond the Aha! Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanTassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D., & Avery, L. (2002). Using performance tasks in the assessment of disadvantaged and minority youngsters: Findings from Project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 110–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, F (1970). Classroom ideas for encouraging thinking and feeling. Buffalo, NY: D.O.K.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Piirto, J. (2013). But Isn’t Everyone Creative?. In: Kim, K.H., Kaufman, J.C., Baer, J., Sriraman, B. (eds) Creatively Gifted Students are not like Other Gifted Students. Advances in Creativity and Giftedness, vol 5. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-149-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships