Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intelligence and Creativity

Their Relationship, with Special Attention to Reasoning Ability and Divergent Thinking. Implications for Giftedness Research and Education.

  • Chapter
Creatively Gifted Students are not like Other Gifted Students

Part of the book series: Advances in Creativity and Giftedness ((ACAG,volume 5))

Abstract

Which teachers would not love to have smart children bubbling with ideas in their classes? And, more generally: who would not like to be intelligent and creative? Both characteristics are considered highly desirable attributes and thus worthwhile goals in our culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackerman, P. L. (2007). New developments in understanding skilled performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 235–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2002). Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 567–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (2008). Commentary: Divergent thinking tests have problems, but this is not the solution. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 89–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B., & Lindenberger, U. (1997). Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: A new window to the study of cognitive aging? Psychology and Aging, 12, 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1963). Creativity and psychological health. Princeton, NY: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Intelligence and personality as predictors of divergent thinking: The role of general, fluid and crystallised intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 60–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batey, M., Furnham, A., & Safiullina, X. (2010). Intelligence, general knowledge and personality as predictors of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 532–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudson, T. G., & Preckel, F. (2012). Gifted students as seen by their teachers: Intelligent, creative, and maladjusted? Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birney, D. P., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Intelligence and cognitive abilities as competencies in development. In E. Bialystok & G. Craik (Eds.), Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change (pp. 315–330). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1985). Generalisations about talent development. In B. S. Bloom (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 507–579). New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bös, K., & Schneider, W. (1997). Talententwicklung im Tennis: Eine Reanalyse der Heidelberger Längsschnittstudie [Talent development in tennis: A reanalysis of the Heidelberg Longitudinal Study]. Schorndorf, Germany: Hofmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, C. M. (2005). Identifying gifted children from underrepresented populations. Theory into Practice, 44, 98–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. L., & Laming, L. R. (1974). Giftedness and creativity: Recent attempts at definition: A literature review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 18, 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth, and action. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S. H., Nijenhuis, J. T., van Vianen, A. E. M., Kim, H.-B., & Lee, K. H. (2010). The relationship between diverse components of intelligence and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P. R., Guilford, J. P., & Wilson, R. C. (1957). Relations of creative responses to working time and instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 82–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J. (1968). A note on the Wallach-Kogan test of creativity. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 38, 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using? Roeper Review, 23, 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, person: A systems approach view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. pp. 325–339). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. E., & Kemp, I. A. (2011). Contemporary models of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 58–82). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deary, I. J., Egan, V., Gibson, G. J., Austin, E. J., Brand, C. R., & Kellaghan, T. (1996). Intelligence and the differentiation hypothesis. Intelligence, 23, 105–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detterman, D., & Daniel, D. (1989). Correlations of mental tests with each other and with cognitive variables are highest for low ability groups. Intelligence, 13, 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence—the acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R, T., & Clements, T.-R. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in expert performance. Psychological Review, 103, 363–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Ward, P. (2007). Capturing the naturally occurring superior performance of experts in the laboratory: Toward a science of expert and exceptional performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 346–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. J., & Barron, F. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 62–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, D., Reynolds, C. A., McArdle, J. J., & Pedersen, N. L. (2007). Age changes in processing speed as a leading indicator of cognitive aging. Psychology and Aging, 22, 558–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. R. (2007). What is intelligence? Beyond the Flynn effect. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, G. J., & Stankov, L. (1995). Challenging the “law of diminishing returns.” Intelligence, 21, 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, J. W. (1951). The description of aptitude and achievement tests in terms of rotated factors. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 613–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Batey, M., Anand, K., & Manfield, J. (2008). Personality, hypomania, intelligence and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1060–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2003). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 60–74). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. New York, NY: AMS Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilhooly, K. J., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S. & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 611–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowan, J. C., Khatena, J., & Torrance, E. P. (1979). Educating the ablest—a book of readings on the education of gifted children. Itasca, IL: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 14, 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1972). Intellect and the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 16, 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1973). The one-way relation between creative potential and IQ. Journal of Creative Behavior, 7, 247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P., & Hoepfner, R. (1966). Creative potential is related to measures of IQ and verbal comprehension. Indian Journal of Psychology, 41, 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günçer, B., & Oral, G. (1993). Relationship between creativity and nonconformity to school discipline as perceived by teachers of Turkish elementary school children, by controlling for their grade and sex. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 20, 208–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, J.-E. (1988). Hierarchical models of individual differences in cognitive abilities. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 35–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258–348). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haensly, P. A., & Reynolds, C. R. (1989). Creativity and intelligence. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 111–132). New York, NY: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hany, E. A. (1987). Psychometrische Probleme bei der Identifikation Hochbegabter [Psychometric Issues in Gifted Identification]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 8, 172–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. J., & Bolton, N. (1972). Selecting creativity tests for use in research. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, P., & Teasdale, T. W. (2004). A test of Spearman’s “Law of Diminishing Returns” in two large samples of Danish military draftees. Intelligence, 32, 499–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R. (1989). Cognitive processes in creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 135–146). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A. (1987). Perspektiven einer Hochbegabungsdiagnostik [Perspectives of Giftedness Diagnostics]. Zeitschrift fur Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 8, 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., Perleth, C., & Hany, E. A. (1994). Hochbegabung – ein lange Zeit vernachlässigtes Forschungsthema [Giftedness—a long neglected research issue]. Einsichten. Forschung an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 3(1), 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson, R., & Crutchfield, R. S. (1971). Women mathematicians and the creative personality. Creative Achievements, 32, 210–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, H., & Kuhn, J.-T. (2008). Does intellectual giftedness affect the factor structure of divergent thinking? Evidence from a MG-MACS analysis. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, D. D., & Morgan, D. (1990). Chess expertise in children. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornung, C., Brunner, M., Reuter, R. A. P., & Martin, R. (2011). Children’s working memory: Its structure and relationship to fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 39, 210–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, A. O. (1984). Intelligenzstrukturforschung: Konkurrierende Modelle, neue Entwicklungen, Perspektiven [Research on the structure of intelligence: Competing models, new developments, perspectives]. Psychologische Rundschau, 35, 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, A. O., Holling, H., Preckel, F., Schulze, R., Vock, M., Süß, H.-M., & Beauducel, A. (2006). Berliner Intelligenzstruktur-Test für Jugendliche: Begabungs- und Hochbegabungsdiagnostik (BISHB) [Berlin structure of intelligence test for youth: Asssessment of talent and giftedness]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (2003). Regularities in Spearman’s law of diminishing returns. Intelligence, 31, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, G. A., Morse, L. W., & Morse, D. T. (2001). An analysis of early vs. later responses on a divergent production task across three different time press conditions. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2995). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, A. N. (1983). Relationship of the Ammons’ Quick Test of Intelligence to verbal and nonverbal tests of creativity. Psychological Reports, 52, 747–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Creativity 101. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2006). Intelligence testing with Torrance. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 99–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2011). Intelligence and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 771–783). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. C. (2008). Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 106–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H., Cramond, B., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2010). The relationship between creativity and intelligence. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 395–412). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, N. (2008). Commentary: Divergent-thinking research and the zeitgeist. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 100–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2011). Theories of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvist, A. V., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2008). The relation between fluid intelligence and the general factor as a function of cultural background: A test of Cattell’s investment theory. Intelligence, 36, 422–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, J.-T., & Holling, H. (2009). Exploring the nature of divergent thinking: A multilevel analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 116–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1988). Cognitive modeling of learning abilities: A status report of LAMP. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED327547

  • Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14, 389–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de La Grange, H.-L. (1995). Gustav Mahler. Vienna: The years of challenge (1897–1904) (Vol. 2). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, S.-C., Lindenberger, U., Hommel, B., Aschersleben, G., Prinz, W., & Baltes, P. B. (2004). Transformations in the couplings among intellectual abilities and constituent cognitive processes across the life span. Psychological Science, 15, 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D. F. (2005). The role of nonverbal ability tests in identifying academically gifted students: An aptitude perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 111–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, D. F., & Lakin, J. M. (2011). Intelligence and reasoning. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 419–441). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. I. (1994). Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving (pp. 290–332). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucito, L. J. (1963). Gifted children. In L. M. Dunn (Ed.), Exceptional children in the schools (pp. 179–238). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. W. (1967). Educating for creativity: A modern myth? In P. Heist (Ed.), Education for creativity (pp. 1–20). Berkeley, CA: Center for Research and Development in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland, S. P., Jr. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education and background papers submitted to the U.S. Office of Education. (Government Documents Y4.L 11/2: G36). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshalek, B., Lohman, D. F., & Snow, R. E. (1983). The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence. Intelligence, 7, 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2011). Intelligence and achievement. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 738–747). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell—Horn—Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present, and future. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 136–181). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. A., & Mednick, M. T. (1967). Remote Associates Test: Examiner’s manual. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66, 195–244. (Monograph Supplement 1–V66.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouchiroud, C., & Lubart, T. (2001). Children’s original thinking: An empirical examination of alternative measures derived from divergent thinking tasks. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162, 382–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettelbeck, T. (2011). Basic processes of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 371–393). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer, A. C., & Bucik, V. (1996). The mental speed—IQ relationship: Unitary or modular? Intelligence, 22, 23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (2004). Does class size in first grade relate to children’s academic and social performance or observed classroom processes? Developmental Psychology, 40, 651–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39, 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer, K., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O., & Süß, H.-M. (2005). Working memory and intelligence—their correlation and their relation: Comment on Ackerman, Beuer, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 61–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N. (1981) The mind’s best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (2009). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35–61). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preckel, F., Holling, H., & Wiese, M. (2006). Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and nongifted students: An investigation of threshold theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preckel, F., Wermer, C., & Spinath, F. (2011). The interrelationship between speeded and unspeeded divergent thinking and reasoning, and the role of mental speed. Intelligence, 39, 378–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model of creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (pp. 53–92). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1985). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M. R., & Keith, T. Z. (2007). Spearman’s law of diminishing returns in hierarchical models of intelligence for children and adolescents. Intelligence, 35, 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. L. (1976). A comparison of selected Guilford and Wallach-Kogan Creative Thinking Tests in conjunction with measures of intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 178–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindermann, H., & Neubauer, A. C. (2000). Informationsverarbeitungsgeschwindigkeit und Schulerfolg: Weisen basale Maße der Intelligenz prädiktive Validität auf? [Speed of information processing and academic achievement: Do basal measures of intelligence have predictive validity?] Diagnostica, 46, 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, N. M. (2005). In defense of a psychometric approach to the definition of academic giftedness: A conservative view from a die-hard liberal. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 280–294). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rossmann, B. B., & Horn, J. L. (1972). Cognitive, motivational and temperamental indicants of creativity and intelligence. Journal of Educational Measurement, 9, 265–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1986). Maximal performance on divergent thinking tests by gifted, talented, and nongifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 308–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1993). Operant theories of insight, originality, and creativity. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2005). Creative giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 295–311). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1986). The threshold theory regarding creativity and intelligence: An empirical test with gifted and nongifted children. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 11, 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (2011). Creativity research: A historical view. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg, (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Pezdek, K. (1984). The effect of television and radio on children’s creativity. Human Communications Research, 11, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (2008). Expertiseerwerb [The acquisition of expertise]. In W. Schneider, & M. Hasselhorn (Eds.), Handbuch der Padagogischen Psychologie (pp. 136–144). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, K., & Koch, W. (2002). A revision of Cattell’s investment theory: Cognitive properties influencing learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 57–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. L. (1999). Teachers’ biases toward creative children. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J. (2008a). Creativity and intelligence revisited: A latent variable analysis of Wallach and Kogan (1965). Creativity Research Journal, 20, 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J. (2008b). Another look at creativity and intelligence: Exploring higher-order models and probable confounds. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1012–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., Martin, C., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2009). A snapshot of creativity: Evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., & Willse, J. T. (2008). Rejoinder: The madness to our method: Some thoughts on divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 109–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., Martinez, J. L., & Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sligh, A. C., Conners, F. A., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2005). Relation of creativity to fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. E. (1904). General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. E. (1927). The abilities of man. London, UK: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (2009). What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & O’Hara, L. A. (2009). Creativity and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251–272). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Süß, H.-M., Oberauer, K., Wittmann, W. W., Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002). Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability—and a little bit more. Intelligence, 30, 261–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1967). The Minnesota studies of creative behavior: National and international extensions. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1, 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12, 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Directions guide and scoring manual. Lexington, MA: Personal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1977). Creativity in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2009). Differentiation of cognitive abilities across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1097–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, A., Decker, B., & Mumford, M. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence and expertise. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vartanian, O., Martindale, C., & Matthews, J. (2009). Divergent thinking ability is related to faster relatedness judgments. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vock, M., Preckel, F., & Holling, H. (2011). Mental abilities and school achievement: A test of a mediation hypothesis. Intelligence, 39, 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. A. (1971). The intelligence/creativity distinction. New York, NY: General Learning Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. (1986). Creativity, genius and other myths. New York, NY: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westby, E. L., & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westmeyer, H. (2001). Kreativität: Eine relationale Sichtweise [Creativity: A relational approach]. In E. Stern & J. Guthke (Eds.), Perspektiven der Intelligenzforschung (pp. 233–249). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westmeyer, H. (2008). Das Kreativitätskonstrukt. Zwei Konstruktionen und ihre Konsequenzen [The creativity construct. Two types of construction and their consequences]. In M. Dresler & T. G. Baudson (Eds.), Kreativität. Beiträge aus den Natur- und Geisteswissenschaften (pp. 21–30). Stuttgart, Germany: Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. T. G. Baudson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Preckel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. College of William and Mary, Virginia, USA

    Kyung Hee Kim

  2. California State University, San Bernardino, USA

    James C. Kaufman

  3. Rider University, New Jersey, USA

    John Baer

  4. The University of Montana, USA

    Bharath Sriraman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baudson, T.G., Preckel, F. (2013). Intelligence and Creativity. In: Kim, K.H., Kaufman, J.C., Baer, J., Sriraman, B. (eds) Creatively Gifted Students are not like Other Gifted Students. Advances in Creativity and Giftedness, vol 5. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-149-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships

Search

Navigation