Skip to main content

Every Student Counts

Current Trends in Post Secondary Student Retention

  • Chapter
Critical Issues in Higher Education

Part of the book series: Critical Issues in The Future of Learning and Teaching ((CIFL,volume 8))

  • 1607 Accesses

Abstract

Student retention is critical to the ongoing success of every post-secondary institution. In the context of growing awareness on issues of women’s equality, anti-racism, class-biases, ableism and other isms that have traditionally been criticized as reasons for low enrolment and retention of historically marginalized groups, student retention poses unique questions and challenges for any institution wishing to address the diverse needs of the learning public. This chapter will examine the current trends that influence and guide best practices in the field of student retention at the tertiary level in general and community college in particular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Astin, A. (1974). Preventing students from dropping out. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1985). Achieving educational excellence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, T., & Alfonso, M. (2005). Paths to persistence: An analysis of research on program effectiveness at community colleges. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, T., Calcagno, J. C., Jenkins, D., Kienzl, G., & Leinbach, T. (2005). Community college student success: What institutional characteristics make a difference?. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.usc.edu/dept/chepa/IDApays/publications/CC_Student_Success.pdf

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, J. L., Hutson, B. L. & He, Y. (2008). The appreciative advising revolution. Champaign, Il: Stipes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, H. R. (2009, Spring). Targeted intervention for developmental education students (T.I.D.E.S.). Journal of Developmental Education (32) 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, H. R., Bliss, L. B., & Bonham, B. S. (1997, Spring). Program components and their relationship to student performance. Journal of Developmental Education (20) 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. M., Sullivan, A. V., & Johnson, R. M. (1997). Appraising Tinto’s theory of college student departure. In John C. Smart (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 12. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, K. (2005). Choosing to improve: Voices from colleges and universities with better graduation rates. A report by the education trust. Retrieved from http://www.edtrust.org/dc/publication/choosing-to-improve-voices-from-colleges-and-universities-with-better-graduation-rate.

  • Carlson, D.S., & Perrewe, P.L. (1995). Institutionalization of organizational ethics through transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(10), 829–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A. W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and Identity. (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • College Committee on Disability Issues. (2011). Retrieved from www.disabilityissues.ca.

  • Colleges Ontario. (2010). Ontario’s Colleges: Building a Highly Skilled Workforce. Retrieved from http://www.collegesontario.org/policy-positions/fact-sheets.html.

  • Colleges Ontario (2011). 2011 Environmental Scan: Student and graduate profiles. http://www.collegesontario.org/research/2011environmental scan/2011_scan_students.pdf

  • Derby, D. C. (2007). Predicting degree completion: Examining the interaction between orientation course participation and ethnic background. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 31, 883–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnie, R. (2005). Student debt and early life course outcomes: The effects of borrowing on marriage, children, and savings. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goble, L. J., Rosenbaum, J. E., & Stephan, J. L. (2008). Do institutional attributes predict individuals’ degree success at two-year colleges? New Directions for Community Colleges, 144. doi: 10.1002/cc.346.

  • Hossler, D. Z. M., Moore, J., & Wakhungu, P. K. (2008). The role of institutional practices in college persistence. Association for Institutional Research, Retrieved from http://pas.indiana.edu/cb/docs/CBS_AIR08.pdf.

  • Jenkins, D. (2006, May). What community college management practices are effective in promoting student success? A study of high and low impact institutions. Retrieved from http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/Publication.asp?UID=448

  • Karp, M. M., & Hughes, K. L. (2008). Information networks and integration: Institutional influences on experiences and persistence of beginning students/ new directions for community colleges No. 144. doi 10.1002/cc347.

  • Karp, M. M., Hughes, K. L., & O’Gara, L. (2008). An exploration of Tinto’s integration framework for community college students. CCRC Working Paper No. 12. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, P. M. (2007). Barriers and non-traditional students’ use of academic and social services. College Student Journal, 41(4), 1123–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: inside the national survey of student engagement. Changes, 33(3), 10–17, 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2007). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on college grades and persistence. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H, Whitte, E. J., & Associates (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melius, J. (2011). Student engagement as a factor in academic achievement: The case study of undergraduates at Norfolk State University, Virginia. Lewiston: Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, D. (1993). Older coeds: Predicting who will stay this time. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26, 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, R. (2010). Canada’s demographics and advanced skills crisis: Jobs without peoplepeople without jobs. Retrieved from Association of Canadian Community Colleges: http://www.accc.ca/ftp/briefs-memoires/201008_FinanceBrief.pdf

  • Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J. & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2010). Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly 46: 623 doi: 10.1177/0013161X10378689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, M. (1996). Spotlight falls on drop-outs: United Kingdom colleges of further education, recruitment and retention plans. Times Educational Supplement, 4187, 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Gara, L., Karp, M. M., & Hughes, K. L. (2009). Student success courses in the community college: An exploratory study of student perspectives. Community College Review 36(3), 195–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T. (2001). Identifying excellence in undergraduate education; are we even close? Change, 33 (1), 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, T.A., Arnold, C., Burrow, J., Brown A. (2011). Supporting student success: The role of student services within Ontario’s post-secondary institutions. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergiovanni, T. (2001). Leadership: What’s in it for schools? London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Educational Policy Institute. (2008). Access, persistence, and barriers in postsecondary education: A literature review and outline of future research. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, M. (2004). Understanding the influence of financial context of institutions on student persistence at 4-year colleges and universities: A multilevel approach. Journal of Higher Education, 45(7) 673–699. doi:10:1023/B:RIHE.0000044227.17161.fa

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (2006). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College Student Retention, 8(1) 1–19. Retrieved from http://www.uaa.alaska.edu/governance/facultysenate/upload/JCSR_Tinto_2006-07_Retention.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Visher, M. G., Schneider, E., Wathington, H., & Collado, H. (2010). Scaling up learning communities: The experience of six community colleges. New York: National Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggers, R., & Arnold, C. (2011). Defining, measuring and achieving “student success” in Ontario Colleges and Universities. Toronto: Higher Education Quality of Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidenberg, M., Jenkins, D., & Calcagno, J.C. (2007). Do student success courses actually help community college students succeed? (CCRC Brief No. 36). New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center. Retrieved from http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/Publication.asp?UID=531

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’rourke, C. (2013). Every Student Counts. In: Kompf, M., Denicolo, P.M. (eds) Critical Issues in Higher Education. Critical Issues in The Future of Learning and Teaching, vol 8. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-046-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships