Abstract
The under-representation of women in the academic profession can be observed in several countries. In North America, female faculty account for little more than one third of all full-time university faculty (AAUP, 2006; CAUT, 2007; Galaz-Fontes et al., 2008). Academic women also tend to occupy lower ranks and hold fewer upper-level administrative positions than their male counterparts (Bain and Cummings, 2000; Marschke et al., 2007). This is particularly troublesome at a time when North American women are earning doctoral degrees in record numbers (Schoening, 2009; Xu, 2008).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adelman, C. (2009). The spaces between numbers: Getting international comparative data on higher education straight. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy. www.ihep.org/research/GlobalPerformance.cfm
Altbach PG. Comparative higher education: Research trends and bibliography. London: Mansell; 1979.
Altbach PG, editor. The international academic profession: Portraits of fourteen countries. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1996.
Altbach PG, Kelly DH. Higher education in international perspective: A survey and bibliography. London and New York: Mansell Publishing Limited; 1985.
Altbach, P. G.,& Kelly, G.P. (Eds.) (1986). New approaches to comparative education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
American Association of University Professors AAUP. (2006). Gender equity indicators 2006. Available at (page accessed 24 May 2012): http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/research/geneq2006
Bain O, Cummings W. Academe´s glass ceiling: Societal, professional-organizational and institutional barriers to the career advancement of academic women. Comparative Education Review. 2000;44(4):493–514.
Bellas, M.L., & Toutkoushian, R.K. (1999). Faculty time allocations and research productivity. Gender, race, and effects. The review of higher education, 22(4), 367–390.
Bensimon EM, Marshall C. Policy analysis for postsecondary education: Feminist and critical perspectives. In: Marshall C, editor. Feminist critical policy analysis II: A perspective from post-secondary education. London and Washington, DC: The Falmer Press; 1997. p. 1–21.
Bensimon EM, Marshall C. Like it or not feminist critical policy analysis matters. The Journal of Higher Education. 2003;74(3):337–349.
Bentley, P. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity. A comparative analysis of Norway and Australia. Master Thesis, University of Oslo.
Blakely, D. (1989). What Should the goals be? Employment equity for female faculty in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 19(1), 29–48.
Bosetti L, Kawalilak C, Patterson P. Betwixt and between: Academic women in transition. Revue Canadienne d’enseigment superieur. 2008;38(2):95–115.
Canadian Association of University Teachers CAUT. Almanac of post-secondary education in Canada. Ottawa: CAUT Publications; 2007.
Clark CD, Hill JM. Reconciling the tension between the tenure and biological clocks to increase the recruitment and retention of women in academia. Forum on Public Policy on line. 2010;2010(2):1–8.
De Wet CB. Reaching critical mass: Women in faculty and administrative roles. Forum on Public Policy on line. 2010;2010(2):1–11.
Fox MF, Mohapatra S. Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientist in doctoral-granting departments. Journal of Higher Education. 2007;78(5):542–570.
García-Guevara, P. (2004). Mujeres Académicas. El caso de una universidad estatal Mexicana [Academic women. The case of a Mexican state university]. México: Plaza y Valdez, UdeG.
Galaz-Fontes J, Padilla-González L, Gil-Antón M, Sevilla-García JJ, Arcos-Vega JL, Martínez-Stack J. Mexican academics at the turn of the twenty-first century: Who are they, and how do they perceive their work, institutions, and public policies. RHIE, International Seminar Reports. 2008;12:345–361.
Goedegebuure L, van Vught F. Comparative higher education studies: The perspective from the policy sciences. Higher Education. 1996;32(4):194–371.
Goldstein E. Effect of same-sex and cross-sex role models on the subsequent academic productivity of scholars. American Psychologist. 1979;34(5):407–410.
Hartley N, Dobele A. Feathers in the nest: Establishing a supportive environment for women researchers. Australian Educational Researcher. 2009;36(1):43–58.
Jackson J. The story is not in the numbers: Academic socialization and diversifying the faculty. NWSA Journal. 2004;16(1):172–185.
Leahey E, Crockett JL, Hunter LA. Gendered academic careers: Specializing for success? Social Forces. 2008;86(3):1274–1309.
Marschke R, Laursen S, McCarl-Nielsen J, Rankin P. Demographic inertia revisited: An immodest proposal to achieve equitable gender representation among faculty in higher education. Journal of Higher Education. 2007;78(1):1–26.
Maranto C, Griffin A. The antecedents of a ‘chilly climate’ for women faculty in higher education. Human relations. 2010;20(10):1–21.
Menzies H, Newson J. Time, stress and intellectual engagement in academic work: Exploring gender difference. Gender, Work and Organization. 2008;15(5):504–522.
Monk-Turner E, Fogerty R. Chilly environments, stratification, and productivity differences. The American Sociologist. 2010;41(1):3–18.
Ornstein M, Stewart P, Drakich J. Promotion at Canadian universities: The intersection of gender, discipline and institution. Canadian Journal of Higher Education Revue canadienne d’enseignement supérieur. 2007;37(3):1–25.
Padilla-González, L. E., Metcalfe, A. S., Galaz-Fontes, J. F., Fisher, D., & Snee, I. (2011). Gender gaps in North American research productivity: Examining faculty publication rates in Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2011.564799.
Sax L, Serra-Hagedorn L, Arredondo M, Dicrisi FA. Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education. 2002;43(4):423–446.
SEP. (2006). Programa de mejoramiento del profesorado, PROMEP. Un primer análisis de su operación e impactos en el fortalecimiento académico de las universidades públicas. [Program for the improvement of the professoriate. A first analysis of their performance and impact in the academic strengthening of public universities]. México: SEP Secretaría de Educación Pública, Subsecretaría de Educación Superior.
Schoening AM. Women and Tenure: Closing the gap. Journal of women in Educational Leadership. 2009;7(2):77–92.
Side K, Robbins W. Institutionalizing inequalities in Canadian universities: The Canada Research Chairs program. Feminist Formations. 2007;19(3):163–181.
Teodorescu D. Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education. 2000;39(2):200–221.
Wilson, R. (2004). Where the elite teach. It’s still a man’s world. Chronicle of Higher Education, Dec. 3, 2004.
Wolf-Wendel, L., & Ward, K. (2006). Academic life and motherhood: Variations by institutional type.Higher Education, 52(3), 487–521.
Wolfinger NH, Mason MA, Goulden M. Problems in the pipeline: Gender, marriage, and fertility in the ivory tower. The Journal of Higher Education. 2008;79(4):388–405.
Xie Y, Shauman KA. Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. USA: Harvard University; 2003.
Xu YJ. Gender disparity in STEM disciplines: A study of faculty attrition and turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education. 2008;49(7):607–624.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Padilla-González, L.E., Metcalfe, A.S., Galaz-Fontes, J.F., Fisher, D., Snee, I. (2012). Gender Gaps in North American Research Productivity. In: Vukasović, M., Maassen, P., Nerland, M., Stensaker, B., Pinheiro, R., Vabø, A. (eds) Effects of Higher Education Reforms. Higher Education Research in the 21st Century Series, vol 4. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-016-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-016-3_14
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-016-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)