Skip to main content

Abstract

The term ‘curriculum’ is used to describe the intended curriculum, the implemented curriculum or the attained curriculum. While the intended curriculum refers to the written or prescribed curriculum, the implemented curriculum refers to curriculum as teachers enact it in classrooms. Consequently, it is difficult to separate the enacted curriculum from teachers' pedagogical practice. Nevertheless, it is both worthwhile and timely to focus on research that specifically addresses curriculum with the recent development of the Australian curriculum for mathematics in the schooling years (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA], 2010a; 2010b). Part of the intent of this chapter is to describe the background and processes used to develop this curriculum as well as point to recent Australasian research which informed its development. We anticipate—as do the Editors of the Review—that increased attention will be given to issues that surround curriculum in the coming years as classroom practitioners and researchers describe the changed practices that will inevitably occur with the introduction of a new curriculum. We acknowledge that New Zealand's national curriculum is not in such a transitional phase although the new curriculum has only been in full implementation since 2010.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ainley, J., Kos, J., & Nicholas, M. (2008). Participation in science, mathematics and technology in Australasian education. [Monograph 4]. Melbourne, Australia: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J (2008) Teachers' motivation to attend voluntary professional development in K-10 mathematics. In: Goos M, Brown R, Makar K (eds) Navigating currents and charting directions (Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. MERGA, Brisbane, QLD, pp 51–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers [AAMT]. (1997). Numeracy = everyone's business. The report of the numeracy education strategy development conference (May 1997) Adelaide. Australia, Author

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers [AAMT] (2010a) AAMT response to the draft K-10 Australian curriculum: Mathematics. Author, Adelaide, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers [AAMT] (2010b) AAMT response to the draft senior secondary Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. Author, Adelaide, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA] (2010) The Australian curriculum mathematics. Author, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2010b). The shape of the Australian curriculum, Version 2.0. Sydney, Australia: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (2011) National professional standards for teachers. Education Services Australia, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Studies NSW (2003). Mathematics K-6 syllabus. Sydney, Australia: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobis, J., Clarke, B., Clarke, D., Thomas, G., Wright, R., Young-Loveridge, J., … Gould, P. (2005). Supporting teachers in the development of young children's mathematical thinking: Three large scale cases. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(3), 27-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callingham R, Pegg J (2010) Using development frameworks to support curriculum outcomes. In: Sparrow L, Kissane B, Hurst C (eds) Shaping the future of mathematics education (Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. MERGA, Fremantle, pp 125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Science, Information and Communication Technology and Mathematics Education in Rural and Regional Australia (SiMERR). (2011). Second chance algebra learning environment (SCALE). Armidale, Australia: University of New England. Retrieved from http://www.une.edu.au/simerr/scale/

  • Cheeseman J, McDonough A, Clarke D (2011) Investigating children's understanding of the measurement of mass. In: Clarke J, Kissane B, Mousley J, Spencer T, Thornton S (eds) Mathematics: Traditions and (new) practices (Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia and the 23rd biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers, Alice Springs. AAMT & MERGA, Adelaide, SA, pp 174–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke D (2008) The mathematics teacher as curriculum maker: Developing knowledge for enacting curriculum. In: Sullivan P, Wood T (eds) Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development. Sense, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp 133–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements DH (2007) Curriculum research: Towards a framework for research-based curricula. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 38:35–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Australian Governments. (2008). National numeracy review report. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from http://www.coag.gov.au/reports/docs/national_numeracy_review.pdf

  • Cowie, B., Hipkins, R., Boyd, S., Bull, A., Keown, P, & McGee, C. (2009). Curriculum implementation exploratory studies: Final report. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Children's Services (2005). South Australian curriculum, standards and accountability framework. Retrieved from http://www.sacsa.edu.au

  • Dickenson-Jones A (2008) Transforming ethnomathematical ideas in western mathematics curriculum texts. Mathematics Education Research Journal 20(3):32–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds-Wathen C (2011) Locating the learner: Indigenous language and mathematics education. In: Clarke J, Kissane B, Mousley J, Spencer T, Thornton S (eds) Mathematics: Traditions and (new) practices (Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia and the 23rd biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers, Alice Springs. AAMT & MERGA, Adelaide, SA, pp 217–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzallen, N., & Watson, J. (2011). Graph creation and interpretation: Putting skills and context together. In J. Clarke, B. Kissane, J. Mousley, T. Spencer, & S. Thornton (Eds.), Mathematics: Traditions and (new) practices (Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia and the 23rd biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers, Alice Springs, pp. 253-260). Adelaide, SA: AAMT & MERGA. mathematics enrolments: Patterns and trends—Past and present. Melbourne, Australia: ICEEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freebody, P. (2007). Literacy education in school: Research perspectives from the past, for the future. Australian Education Review 52. Camberwell, Australia: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos M, Geiger V, Dole S (2010) Auditing the numeracy demands of the middle-years curriculum. In: Sparrow L, Kissane B, Hurst C (eds) Shaping the future of mathematics education (Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. MERGA, Fremantle, pp 210–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos M, Geiger V, Dole S (2011) Teachers' personal conceptions of numeracy. In: Ubuz B (ed) Developing mathematical thinking (Proceedings of the 35th conference of the International Group of the Psychology of Mathematics Education. PME, Ankara, Turkey, pp 457–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Heirdsfield, A., Warren, E., & Dole, S. (2007, November). The use of a new mathematics textbook scheme—support or impediment. Paper presented at the 2007 annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.aare.eduau/07pap/her07131.pdf

  • Higgins J, Parsons R (2009) A successful professional development model in mathematics. Journal of Teacher Education 60(3):231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipkins, R. (2011). Learning to reinvent the school curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/learning-reinvent-school-curriculum.pdf

  • Ho KF (2010) Year 11 advanced mathematics: Hearing from students who buck the trend. In: Sparrow L, Kissane B, Hurst C (eds) Shaping the future of mathematics education (Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. MERGA, Fremantle, SA, pp 248–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth H, Lokan J, McCrae B (2003) Teaching mathematics in Australia: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. ACER, Camberwell, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth H, Pearn C (2011) Towards excellence in mathematics teaching: Forging links between national curriculum and professional standards initiatives. In: Clarke J, Kissane B, Mousley J, Spencer T, Thornton S (eds) Mathematics: Traditions and (new) practices (Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia and the 23rd biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers, Alice Springs. AAMT & MERGA, Adelaide, SA, pp 957–965

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, D. (2010). Forward 2010. In Ministry of Education, Findings from the New Zealand Numeracy Development Projects 2009 (pp. 1-2). Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson-Proctor R, Byrne C (2008) Primary teachers' beliefs about the use of mathematics textbooks. In: Goos M, Brown R, Makar K (eds) Navigating currents and charting directions (Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. MERGA, Brisbane, QLD, pp 295–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen R, Zevenbergen K (2011) Young workers and their dispositions towards mathematics: Tensions of a mathematical habitus in the retail industry. Educational Studies in Mathematics 76:87–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy K (2009) The idea of a national curriculum in Australia: What do Susan Ryan, John Dawkins and Julia Gillard have in common? Curriculum Perspectives 29(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick J, Swafford J, Findell B (eds) (2001) Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb J, Spry G (2009) Leading change in mathematics: The Queensland mathematics syllabus. In: Hunter R, Bicknell B, Burgess T (eds) Crossing divides (Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. MERGA, Palmerston North, NZ, pp 307–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke A, Weir K, Woods A (2008) Development of a set of principles to guide a P-12 syllabus framework: A report to the Queensland Studies Authority. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald A (2010) Young children's measurement knowledge: Understandings about comparison at the commencement of schooling. In: Sparrow L, Kissane B, Hurst C (eds) Shaping the future of mathematics education (Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. MERGA, Fremantle, WA, pp 375–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. (2010a). MERGA response to the Australian curriculum (mathematics). Adelaide, Australia: MERGA. Retrieved from http://www.merga.net.au/node/49

  • Mathematics Education Research Group of Austalasia. (2010b). MERGA feedback: Draft senior years Australian Mathematics Curriculum. Adelaide, Australia: MERGA. Retrieved from http://www.merga.net.au/sites/default/files/editor/documents/MERGA%20Senior%20Mathematics%20CurriculumFeedback300710FF.pdf

  • McPhan, G., Morony, W., Pegg, J., Cooksey, R., & Lynch, T. (2008). Maths? Why Not? Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Canberra, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/publications_resources/profiles/maths_why_not

  • Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs [MCEETYA]. (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Retrieved from http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/National_Declaration_on_the_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf

  • Ministry of Education (2007a) The New Zealand curriculum. Learning Media, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2007b) Achievement objectives by learning areas. Learning Media, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2009) Mathematics standards for years 1—8. Author, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney G (2010) Preparing students for a data rich world: The case for statistical literacy. Curriculum Perspectives 30(1):25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Board NC (2009a) The shape of the Australian curriculum. Author, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Board NC (2009b) Shape of the Australian curriculum: Mathematics. Author, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Studies Authority (2004) Year 1—10 Mathematics Syllabus. Author, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A. (2005). Rethinking national curriculum collaboration: Towards an Australian curriculum. Report for Australian Government Federal Department of Education, Science, and Training. Canberra, Australia: DEST.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid A (2009) Is this a revolution?: A critical analysis of the Rudd government's national education agenda. Curriculum Perspectives 29(3):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Shield, M., & Dole, S. (2009). An analysis of middle-years school mathematics textbooks. In Improving science and mathematics literacy: Theory, innovation and practice (Proceedings for the 3rd International Conference of Science and Mathematics Education). Penang, Malaysia: CoSMed. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/28847/1/28847.pdf

  • Shulman L (1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the reform. Harvard Educational Review 57(1):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Skemp R (1986) The psychology of learning mathematics, 2nd edn. Penguin, Harmondsworth, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey K (2003) The need to increase attention to mathematical reasoning. In: Hollingsworth H, Lokan J, McCrae B (eds) Teaching mathematics in Australia: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. ACER, Melbourne, Australia, pp 119–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey K, Vincent J (2008) Modes of reasoning in explanations in year 8 textbooks. In: Goos M, Brown R, Makar K (eds) Navigating currents and charting directions (Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. MERGA, Brisbane, QLD, pp 475–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens M, Amanto D (2010) How to build powerful learning trajectories for relational thinking in the primary school years. In: Sparrow L, Kissane B, Hurst C (eds) Shaping the future of mathematics education (Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. MERGA, Fremantle, WA, pp 523–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillman G, Galbraith P (2009) Softly, softly: Curriculum change in applications and modelling in the senior secondary curriculum in Queensland. In: Hunter R, Bicknell B, Burgess T (eds) Crossing divides (Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. MERGA, Palmerston North, NZ, pp 515–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P. (2011). Teaching mathematics: Using research-informed strategies.Australian Education Review, 59 Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/aer/13

  • Sullivan, P., & Jorgensen, R. (2009). Education as creating opportunities: The contribution of numeracy. In Future SACE school to work innovation program: Literacy & numeracy final report (pp. 24-30). Adelaide, Australia: South Australian Department of Education and Children's Service and the future SACe Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton S (2009) Speaking with different voices: Knowledge legitimation codes of mathematicians and mathematics educators. In: Hunter R, Bicknell B, Burgess T (eds) Crossing divides (Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. MERGA, Palmerston North, NZ, pp 515–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent J, Stacey K (2008) Do mathematics textbooks cultivate shallow teaching? Applying the TIMSS video study criteria to Australian eighth-grade mathematics textbooks. Mathematics Education Research Journal 20(1):82–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson J, Fitzallen N (2010) The development of graph understanding in the mathematics curriculum: Report for the NSW Department of Education and Training. NSW DET, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P., & Cranitch, M. (2010). The impact on final year pre-service secondary teachers of a unit in teaching literacy and numeracy across the curriculum. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 35(7), 54-63. Retrieved from http://ajte.education.ecu.edu.au/ISSUES/vol357.htm

  • White P, Mitchelmore MC (2010) Teaching for abstraction: A model. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 12(3):205–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson S, McChesney J (2010) "I always feel more confident when I know where things are going": How do pre-service teachers engage with mathematics curriculum documentation? In: Sparrow L, Kissane B, Hurst C (eds) Shaping the future of mathematics education (Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. MERGA, Fremantle, WA, pp 649–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates LYN, Collins C (2010) The absence of knowledge in Australian curriculum reforms. European Journal of Education 45(1):89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young-Loveridge, J. (2010). A decade of reform in mathematics education: Results for 2009 and earlier years. In Ministry of Education, Findings from the New Zealand Numeracy Development Projects 2009 (pp. 15-35). Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen R, Zevenbergen K (2004) Numeracy practices in contemporary work: Changing approaches. In: Putt I, Faragher R, McLean M (eds) Mathematics education for the third millennium: Towards 2010 (Proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Townsville. MERGA, Sydney, NSW, pp 605–612

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, J., White, P., Wong, M. (2012). Mathematics Curriculum in The Schooling Years. In: Perry, B., Lowrie, T., Logan, T., MacDonald, A., Greenlees, J. (eds) Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2008–2011. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-970-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships