Skip to main content

Knowledge Socialism and Universities

Intellectual Commons and Opportunities for ‘Openness’ in the 21st Century with Garett Gietzen

  • Chapter
  • 596 Accesses

Part of the book series: Open Education ((OPEN,volume 1))

Abstract

‘Openness’ is a central contested value of modern liberalism that falls under different political, epistemological and ethical descriptions. In this chapter, we employ ‘openness’ to analyze the spatialization of learning and education. We discuss dimensions of openness and ‘open education’ (Peters & Britez, 2008), beginning with a brief history of openness in education that focuses on the concept of the Open University as it first developed in the United Kingdom during the 1960s, a development we dub Open University 1.0.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Araya, D. & M. A. Peters, (2010). (Eds.). Education in the Creative Economy. New York, Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aucoin, P. (1988). ‘Contraction, Managerialism and Decentralisation in Canadian Government’. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 1(2), 144–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aucoin, P. (1990a). ‘Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums’. In: Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 3(2), 115–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aucoin, P. (1990b). ‘Comment: Assessing Managerial Reforms’. In: Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 3(2) 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S. & G. Kunda. (1992). ‘Design and Devolution: Surges of Rational and Normative Ideologies of Control in Managerial Discourse’. The Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2011). Being a university (foundations and futures of education). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1976). The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Basic Books. (1973 original edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston, J, J. Martin, J. Pollot, & P. Walsh. (1996). Public Management: The New Zealand Model. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston, J. (1996). ‘Origins and destinations: New Zealand’s model of public management and the international transfer of ideas’, in Weller, P. & G. Davis. (Eds.) New Ideas, Better Government. NSW: Allen & Unwin: 107–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston, J., J. Martin, J. Pallot, & P. Walsh. (Eds.). (1991). Reshaping The State: New Zealand’s Bureaucratic Revolution. Auckland: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresser-Pereira, L.C. (2010). ‘The Global Financial Crisis and a New Capitalism?’ Working Paper, 592, Levy Economic Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. & G. Tullock. (1962). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Michigan: Ann Arbor Paperback.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. & Parston, G. (2006). Unlocking Public Value, John Wiley & Sons.s

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, A.M., Burke, G.B. & Pardo, T.A. (2006). Advancing Return on Investment Analysis for Government: A Public Value Framework, The Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. (1996). ‘Making sense of difference? Public choice, politicians and bureacratic change in America and Australia’, in Weller, P. & G. Davis. (Eds.) New Ideas, Better Government. NSW: Allen & Unwin: 305–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. (1997). ‘Implications, consequences and futures’, in Davis, G. B. Sullivan & A. Yeatman (Eds.) The New Contractualism? Melbourne: Macmillan: 224–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1974). Management. London: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1994). Post Capitalist Society. Oxford: Buttertworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P. & Helen Margetts, H. (2006). ‘New Public Management is Dead: Long Live Digital Era Governance’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enteman, W. (1993). Managerialism: The Emergence of a New Ideology. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and Punish: the birth of a prison. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1976). Understanding Organizations. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, B. (1997). ‘A society governed by contract?’, in Davis, G. B. Sullivan & A. Yeatman (Eds.) The New Contractualism? Melbourne: Macmillan: 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D. (1997). ‘The social economy of parent choice and the contract state’. In, Weller, P. & G. Davis, (Eds.). New Ideas, Better Government. NSW: Allen & Unwin: 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1990). ‘De- Sir Humphreyfying the Westminster model of Bureaucracy: A New Style of Governance’? Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 3(2), 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). ‘A Public Management For All Seasons?’. Public Administration, 69(Spring), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1992). ‘The new public management model and its conceptions of performance engineering’. In: The Public Sector Challenge: Defining, Delivering and Reporting Performance. New Zealand Society of Accountants Public Sector Convention. Plaza Hotel, Wellington: 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, D. (1990). Crafting Selves: Power, Gender And Discourses Of Identity In A Japanese Workplace. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipovetsky, G. (2005). Hypermodern times. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. & Olsen, J.P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life.” American Political Science Review, 78, p. 734–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., Murphy, P. & Peters, M.A. (2010). Global Creation: Space, Mobility and Synchrony in the Age of the Knowledge Economy. New York, Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1994). ‘The Role of the State in Administration’. In: Sharp, Andrew (Ed). Leap Into The Dark: The Changing Role of the State in New Zealand Since 1984. Auckland, Auckland University Press: 41–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. (1995). Creating Public Value Strategic Management in Government, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P., Peters, M.A. & Marginson, S. (2010). Imagination: Three Models of Imagination in the Age of the Knowledge Economy. New York, Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1979). Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. London: Scott Forseman and Co. (2nd Edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B.G. (2000). Institutional theory: Problems and prospects. Institute for Advanced Studies, 69, p. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M.A. (2005). ‘The New Prudentialism in Education: Actuarial rationality and the entrepreneurial self,’ Educational Theory, 55(2), 123–137 (15).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M.A. (2007). Knowledge Economy, Development and the Future of Higher Education. Rotterdam, Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M.A. (2010). Three Forms of Knowledge Economy: Learning, Creativity, Openness, British Journal of Educational Studies, 58(1), 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M.A. & Besley, Tina (A.C.) (2006). Building Knowledge Cultures: Education and Development in the Age of Knowledge Capitalism. Lanham, Boulder, NY, Oxford, Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M.A. & Reveley, J. (2012). Retrofitting Drucker: Knowledge work under cognitive capitalism. Unpublished article.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M.A. & Bulut, E. (2011). (Eds.). Cognitive Capitalism, Education and the Question of Digital Labor. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M.A. & Roberts, P. (2011). The Virtues of Openness: Education, Science and Scholarship in a Digital Age. Boulder, Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M.A., Gietzen, G. & Ondercin, D. (2011). ‘Knowledge Socialism: Intellectual Commons and Openness in the University.’ In R. Barnett (Ed.), The Future University. London: Routledge, pp. 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M.A., Murphy, P. & Marginson, S. (2009). Creativity and the Global Knowledge Economy. New York, Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo – American Experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J., 1886. In: Testimony Before the Joint Commission (letter to W. B. Allison,February 26, 1886), 1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusser, B., Kempner, K., Marginson, S. & Ordorika, I. (2010). Universities and the Public Sphere:

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G. (1997). ‘The new institutional economics and reshaping the state in New Zealand’. In Davis, G. B. Sullivan & A. Yeatman (Eds.) The New Contractualism? Melbourne: Macmillan: 154–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, B. (1997). Mapping Contract. In, Davis, G. B. Sullivan & A. Yeatman (Eds.) The New Contractualism? Melbourne: Macmillan: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. (1911). Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peters, M.A., Liu, TC., Ondercin, D.J. (2012). Knowledge Socialism and Universities. In: The Pedagogy of the Open Society. Open Education, vol 1. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-967-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics