Birds of a feather? Peers, delinquency, and risk

Language and Risk in the Netherlands
  • Deborah Freedman Lustig
  • Kenzo Sung
Part of the Contexts of Education book series (CONT, volume 5)

Abstract

“I know a lot of people think birds of a feather flock together. But that’s not necessarily true.” Benjamin, a 24 year old African American male, described how some of his friends were drug dealers and gang members who were in and out of jail while others were academically successful and ended up in college. Much social science research on youth, peers, and violence has suggested that birds of a feather flock together, as reflected in the common finding that association with delinquent peers is a risk factor for youth violence. In this chapter, we will unpack this statement and show how the lived experiences of youth growing up in a diverse low-income community of Oakland, California complicate this claim.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alameda County Public Health Department. (2006). Violence in Oakland: A public health crisis.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: WW Norton.Google Scholar
  3. Bellair PE. Social interaction and community rime: Examining the importance of neighbor networks. Criminology.. 1997;35(4):677–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bettie J. Women without class: girls, race and identity. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. In: Richardson J, editor. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood; 1986. p. 241–258.Google Scholar
  6. California Department of Corrections. (2000).Google Scholar
  7. California Department of Education. (2009). Dropouts by Grade Oakland Unified 20082009. [Data file]. Retrieved from http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2010, May 31). Youth violence: Risk and protective factors. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/youthviolence/riskprotectivefactors.html
  9. Community and Economic Development Agency, Oakland, California. (2010).Google Scholar
  10. Discovery Channel (2009). Gang Wars: Oakland [Documentary film].Google Scholar
  11. Douglas M. Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Praeger; 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Douglas M. Risk as a forensic resource. Daedalus. 1990;119(4):1–16.Google Scholar
  13. Douglas M. Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. New York: Routledge; 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duster, T. (2010). The diversity project: Final report (2nd ed.). University of California, Berkeley: Institute for the Study of Social Change.Google Scholar
  15. Eckert P. Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 1989.Google Scholar
  16. Gilmore R. Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  17. Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology.. 1973;78(6):1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory. 1983;1:201–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gutiérrez K, Baquedano-López P, Tejeda C. Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, & Activity. 1999;6(4):286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hagan J. Social networks, gender, and immigrant incorporation: Resources and constraints. American Sociological Review. 1998;63(1):55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haynie DL, Osgood DW. Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces. 2005;84(2):1109–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hébert Y, Lee JW, Sun SX, Berti C. Relational citizenship as social networks: immigrant youth’s maps of their friendships. Encounters on Education. 2003;4:83–106.Google Scholar
  23. Institute of Behavioral Sciences. Youth interview schedule: Denver youth survey. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado; 1987.Google Scholar
  24. Institute of Urban and Regional Development (IURD). Planning for the lower San Antonio neighborhood. Casey Foundation Making Connections Planning Committee: Prepared for the Annie E; 2004.Google Scholar
  25. Jeung R. Faith-Based, Multi-Ethnic Tenant Organizing: The Oak Park Story. In: Hondagneu- Sotelo P, editor. Religion and Social Justice for Immigrants. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2006. p. 59–73.Google Scholar
  26. Jones N. Between good and ghetto: African American girls and inner-city violence. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  27. Klein M, Maxson C. Street gang patterns and policies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis A. Race in the schoolyard: Negotiating the color line in classrooms and communities. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  29. Lewis-Charp, H., Yu, H.C., & Friedlander, D. (2004). The influence of intergroup relations on school engagement: Two cases. In M.A. Gibson, P. Gandara, J. P. Koyama (Eds.), School connections : U.S. Mexican youth, peers, and school achievement. (107–128) New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lichterman P. Seeing structure happen: Theory-driven participant observation. In: Klandermans B, Staggenborg S, editors. Social Movement Research. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  31. Luker K. Salsa dancing into the social sciences: Research in an age of info-glut. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  32. Lustig DF. Of Kwanzaa, Cinco de Mayo, and whispering: The need for intercultural education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly. 1997;28:574–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. MacLeod J. Aint no makinit: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder: Westview Press; 1987.Google Scholar
  34. Maly M. Beyond segregation: Multiracial and multiethnic neighborhoods in the United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  35. Marech, R. (2002, May 31). Of race and place: San Antonio/Oakland – Flavors meld in community east of lake. San Francisco Chronicle.Google Scholar
  36. McPherson JM, Smith-Lovin L. Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review. 1987;52:370–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meece M. June 1). The New York Times: Job outlook for teenagers worsens; 2010.Google Scholar
  38. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.Google Scholar
  39. Multisite Violence Prevention Project. (2004). Description of measures: cohort-wide student survey. Available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA. (Unpublished)Google Scholar
  40. Oakland Unified School District. (2010). California healthy kids survey: 20092010 secondary main report.Google Scholar
  41. Olsen L. Made in America: Immigrant students in our public schools. New York, NY: The New Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  42. Ossei-Owusu, S. and N. Lindahl. (2010). Seesaw injustice: At the interface of underpolicing and overpolicing in marginalized neighborhoods. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Society of Criminology.Google Scholar
  43. Payne YA, Brown TM. The educational experiences of street-life-oriented black boys: How black boys use street life as a site of resilience in high school. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 2010;26(3):316–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rios V. The hyper-criminalization of Black and Latino youth in the era of mass incarceration. Souls. 2006;8(2):40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rios V. Punished: Policing the lives of Black and Latino Boys. New York, NY: New York University Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  46. Rose N. Government and control. British Journal of Criminology. 2000;40(2):321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Self R. American Babylon: Race and the struggle for postwar Oakland. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  48. Shaw CR, McKay HD. Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1942.Google Scholar
  49. Simon J. Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  50. Small ML. Unanticipated gains: Origins of network inequality in everyday life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sung, K. (2008). Theorizing race within the politics of culture: The reconstitution of “Blackness” in student discourses. UC Berkeley: Institute for the Study of Social Change. Retrieved from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/2sw8v9bf
  52. Sung, K. (2011). ‘Hella ghetto!’: Constructions of the ghetto space, school and subject in youth discourse. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  53. Thornberry TP. Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology. 1987;25:863–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thornberry TP, Lizotte AJ, Krohn MD, Farnworth M, Jang SJ. Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology. 1994;32:47–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling U.S. — Mexican Youth and the politics of caring. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  56. Warr M. Parents, peers, and delinquency. Social Forces. 1993;22:247–264.Google Scholar
  57. Warr M. Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weiss R. Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press; 1994.Google Scholar
  59. Willis P. Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press; 1982.Google Scholar
  60. Younis M. Chapter 11: San Antonio and Fruitvale. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research.. 1998;4(2):221–244.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah Freedman Lustig
    • 1
  • Kenzo Sung
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for the Study of Societal Issues University of CaliforniaResearch Associate Center for Research on Social ChangeBerkeley
  2. 2.Graduate School of Education University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUS

Personalised recommendations