Skip to main content

Economics, Game Theory and Disability Studies

Towards a fertile dialogue

  • Chapter
Inclusive Communities

Part of the book series: Studies in Inclusive Education ((STUIE,volume 16))

Abstract

This chapter analyses inclusive communities by applying economics, mainly microeconomics and game theory, to disability studies. First, we provide a brief overview of the basics of economics and the key concepts in game theory, including strategic complementarity and network externality, which not only make a departure from the standard price theory but also respond to some of the misguided criticisms against economics, particularly market fundamentalism and the supremacy of the rational agent in economic analysis. Economics affirms the modern view of a human being as an autonomous, rational decision maker. However, some, if not all economists, recognize that in the real world, there is no human being who has such cognitive/computational capacity; rather, human beings are actually influenced by their surrounding socio-cultural environments, and develop some boundedly rational behavior or blindly follow established conventions to resolve the many problems they face.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aoki, M. (2001). Towards a comparative institutional analysis. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ, Hahn FH. General competitive analysis. Inc: Holden-Day; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes C, Mercer G, Shakespeare T. Exploring disability: A sociological introduction. UK: Polity Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis DD, Holt CA. Experimental economics. US: Princeton University Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G. Theory of value. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. & Tirole, J. (1991). Game theory. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons R. Game theory for applied economists. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gode DK, Sunder S. Allocative efficiency of markets with zero-intelligence traders: market as a partial substitute for individual rationality. Journal of Political Economy. 1993;101:119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman I. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. UK: Prentice-Hall; 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D. (2005). Self advocacy: Forming reliable alliances. Keynote address, ASSID 40th Annual Conference, Auckland, Aotearoa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grech S. Disability, poverty and development: critical reflections on the majority world debate. Disability & Society. 2009;24(6):771–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshika, R. (2007). What is disability? Toward a social theory of disability. Seikatsu Shoin (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, J. & Nagase, O. (Eds.). (1999). An invitation to disability studies. Akashi Shoten (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko M, Matsui A. Inductive game theory: Discrimination and prejudices. Journal of Public Economic Theory. 1999;1:101–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawagoe, T. (2009). An experimental study of Basic Income guarantee. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. M. (1990). A course in microeconomic theory. Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning N, editor. Social problems and welfare ideology. Aldershot: Gower; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RM. Experimental economics. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, S. (Ed.). (2008). Disability and development: Perspective on social model of disability in the developing countries. IDE Research Series, No. 567, Institute of Developing Economies-JETRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum MC. Women and human development — The capabilities approach. Cambridge CA: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver M. The politics of disablement. London: Macmillan; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne MJ, Rubinstein A. A course in game theory. US: MIT Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. Choice, welfare and measurement. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. Commodities and capabilities. Oxford: Elsevier Science; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugino, A. (2007). Disability studies: Theoretical issues, background, and scope. University of Tokyo Press (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kawagoe, T., Matsui, A. (2012). Economics, Game Theory and Disability Studies. In: Azzopardi, A., Grech, S. (eds) Inclusive Communities. Studies in Inclusive Education, vol 16. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-849-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships