Abstract
Our current society is deeply influenced and shaped by artefacts, ideas and values of science and technology, for example in health care, energy, transportation and communication. Also, issues such as pollution and nuclear energy become objects of public debate. In their jobs, professionals are confronted with an increased use of information and communication technologies and the need for flexibility and life-long learning. ‘Non-sciencejobs’, such as nursing, increasingly require an understanding of science and technology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baartman, L. K. J., & De Bruijn, E. (submitted). Integrating knowledge, skills and attitudes: Conceptualising learning processes towards vocational competence.
Bakker, A., Hoyles, C., Kent, P., & Noss, R. (2006). Improving work processes by making the invisible visible. Journal of Education and Work, 19, 343-361.
Bakker, A., Wijers, M., Akkerman, S., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010). The influence of technology on what vocational students need to learn about statistics: The case of laboratory analysists. Paper presented at the ICOTS 2010.
Bakker, A., Kent, P., Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (2009). Alternative representations of statistical measures in computer tools to promote communication between employees in automotive manufacturing. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 3, 1–31.
Barnett, M. (1995). Literacy, technology and technological literacy. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 5, 119–137.
Benenson, G. (2001). The unrealized potential of everyday technology as a context for learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 730–745.
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., & Rumble, M. (2010). Draft White Paper 1. Developing 21st century skills. University of Melbourne: Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. See:http://www.atc21s.org
Burklund, C., Garvin, K., Lawrence, N., & Yoder, J. (1989). A guide to developing higher order thinking across the curriculum. Des Moines: Iowa Department of Education.
Costa, A. L. (n.d.). Components of a well developed thinking skills program. Downloaded August 11, 2010 from:http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/thinking/costa2.htm
Costa, A. L. (2000). Describing the habits of mind. In A. L. Costa & B. Kallick (Eds.), Discovering & Exploring Habits of Mind (Vol. 1, pp. 21-41). Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD
Dede, C. (2009). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.) 21st Century Skills, pp. 51–76. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
De Vries, M. J. (2005). The nature of technological knowledge: Philosophical reflections and educational consequences. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15, 149–154.
Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603-637.
Ferguson, E. S. (1977). The Mind's Eye: Nonverbal Thought in Technology. Science, 197, 827–836.
Forman, S. L., & Steen, L.A. (1994). Mathematics for work. Bulletin of the International Commission on Mathematical Instruction (ICMI), 37, 1–6. Downloaded January, 4, 2010, from:http://www.stolaf.edu/people/steen/Papers/work.html
Forman, S.L., & Steen, L.A. (2000). Making authentic mathematics work for all students. In A. Bessot& J. Ridgway (Eds.), Education for Mathematics in the Workplace. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Goos, M., & Manning, A. (2007). Lousy and lovely jobs: The rising of polarization of work in Britain. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 118–133.
Gopinathan, S. (1999). Preparing for the next rung: Economic restructuring and educational reform in Singapore. Journal of Education and Work, 12, 295–308.
Gravemeijer, K. (2009). Leren voor later [Learning for the future]. Inaugural address, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands.
Gravemeijer, K. (2010). Mathematics Education and the Information Society. Paper presented at the EIMI Conference, October 2010.
Hancock, C., Kaput, J. J., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1992). Authentic inquiry with data: Critical barriers to classroom implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27, 337–364.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1347–1362.
Kaput, J., & Schorr, R. (2007). Changing representational infrastructures changes most everything: The case of SimCalc, Algebra, and Calculus. In G. Blume & K. Heid (Eds.) Research on technology in the learning and teaching of mathematics: Syntheses and perspectives (pp. 211–253). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 212-218.
Latour, B. (1986). Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together. In H. Kulick (Ed.) Knowledge and Society. Studies in the sociology of the culture past and present, pp. 1–40. Stamford, CT: JAI.
Lesgold, A. (2009). Better schools for the 21st century. What is needed and what will it take to get improvement. University of Pittsburgh.
Levy, F., & Murnane, J. (2005). How computerized work and globalization shape human skill demands. First International Conference on Globalization and Learning. Stockholm, Sweden.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000. Science education for the future. The report of a seminar series funded by the Nuffield Foundation. Retrieved 16 December 2009 from:http://www.kcl.ac.uk/content/1/c6/02/18/24/b2000.pdf
Murphy, C. (2003). Literature review in primary science and ICT. Futurelab Series, report 5. Retrieved October 14, 2009 from:http://www.futurelab.org.uk
Noss, R., Bakker, A., Hoyles, C., & Kent, P. (2007). Situating graphs as workplace knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65, 367–384.
Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3, 173–184.
Pozzi, S., Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1998). Tools in practice, mathematics in use. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 105–122.
Resnick, L.B. (1987). The 1987 presidential address: Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16 (9), 13–20.
Rodrigues, S., Tytler, R., Darby, L., Hubber, P., Symington, D., & Edwards, J. (2007). The usefulness of a science degree: The ‘lost voices’ of science trained professionals. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1411–1433.
Roth, W. M. (2001). Learning science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 768–790.
Roth, W. M. (2005). Mathematical inscriptions and the reflexive elaboration of understanding: An ethnography of graphing and numeracy in a fish hatchery. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7, 75–110.
Savelsbergh, E. (2007). Dynamisch modelleren. Aanzet tot een curriculum [Dynamic modelling. The start of a curriculum]. Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde, 8, 207–213.
Slangen, L., Van Keulen, H., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010). What pupils can learn from working with robotic direct manipulation environments. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. DOI 10.1007/s10798-010-9130-8.
Van der Kooij, H. (2002). Wiskundig vaardig. De bijdrage van wiskunde aan (technische) beroepscompetenties [The contribution of mathematicsto (technical) professional competence]. Exacte vakken en competenties in het beroepsonderwijs. ’s Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands: Cinop.
Van Eijck, M., & Claxton, N.X. (2008). Rethinking the notion of technology in education: Technoepistemology as a feature inherent to human praxis. ScienceEducation, 93, 218–232.
Van Keulen. H., & Walma van der Molen, J. (Eds.). Onderzoek naar wetenschap en techniek in het Nederlandse basisonderwijs [Research into science and technology in Dutch primary education]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Platform Bèta Techniek.
Voogt, J., & Pareja Roblin, H. (2010). 21st Century Skils. Discussion paper. Enschede, the Netherlands: University of Twente.
Wynne, B. (1991). Knowledges in context. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16, 111–121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baartman, L.K.J., Gravemeijer, K. (2011). Science and Technology Education for the Future. In: Vries, M.J.d., Kuelen, H.v., Peters, S., Molen, J.W.v.d. (eds) Professional Development for Primary Teachers in Science and Technology. International Technology Education Studies, vol 9. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-713-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-713-4_3
Publisher Name: SensePublishers
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-713-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)