Abstract
To develop a positive attitude towards Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM), the actual experience of doing science is an important contributor. Just telling children that science is fun, will not do the trick, and neither will reading in books about it. However, enthusiasm of the teacher, an interesting explanation, discussion in class and designing and conducting experiments themselves, can lead to emotional involvedness, lasting memories and cognitive understanding (Van Graft & Kemmers, 2007). The teacher is the role model, and the attitude they have towards STEM and towards teaching STEM can have a lasting impact on the children’ attitude (Pell & Jarvis, 2003; Schroeder, Scott, Tolson, Huang, & Lee, 2007).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, R. (2004). Towards dialogic teaching: rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge: Dialogos.
Ball, D.L. (1996). Teaching learning and the mathematics reforms: What do we think we know and what do we need to learn? Phi Delta Kappan 77, 500–508.
Barber, J., Catz, K.N., & Arya, D. (2006). Improving Science Content Acquisition through a Combined Science/Literacy Approach: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California Berkeley.
Bleicher, R.E. (2007). Nurturing confidence in preservice elementary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 841–860.
CTGV (The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt) (1997). The Jasper Project: lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Denessen, E., Vos, N., Damen, T., Koch, S., Louws, M., & Wigboldus, D. (2011). Explicit and implicit measures of teacher attitudes towards STEM. In M.J. de Vries, H. van Keulen, S. Peters & Juliette W. van der Molen (Eds.). Professional development for primary teachers in science and technology The Dutch VTB-Pro project in an international perspective. Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
De Vaan, E., & Marell, J. (2006). Praktische didactiek voor natuuronderwijs. [Practical didactics for teaching science]. Bussum: Coutinho.
Elsäcker, W., Droop, M., Damhuis, R., & Segers, E. (2010). Zaakvakken en taal: twee vliegen in één klap. [Case subjects and languages: two birds with one stone]. Nijmegen: National Center for Language Education.
Gelman, R., & Brenneman, K. (2004). Science learning pathways for young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 150–158.
Graft, M. van, & Kemmers, P. (2007). Onderzoekend en ontwerpend leren: Onderzoekend en ontwerpende leren bij natuurlijk en techniek: basisdocument over de didactiek voor onderzoekend en ontwerpend leren in het primair onderwijs. [Inquiry-based learning and learning by design: basic document in learning in science and technology in primary education]. The Hague: Platform Bèta Technique.
Jarvis, J. (2004). Primary teachers’ changing attitudes and cognition during a two-year science in service programme and their effect on pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1787– 1811.
Jenkins, E. W. (1990). Scientific literacy and school science education. School Science Review, 71, 43–51.
Kinzer, C. K., Cammack, D. W., Labbo, L. D., Teale, W. H., & Sanny, R. (2006). Using technology to conceptualize preservice literacy teacher education. In M. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, R.D. Kieffer & D. Reinking (Eds.). International Handbook of Literacy and Technology Volume II (pp. 211–233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lampert, M. (1988). What can research on teacher education tell us about improving quality in mathematics education? Teaching and Teacher Education, 4 (2), 157–170.
NRP (National Reading Panel) Report (2000).http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/report.cfm
Pell, A., & Jarvis, T. (2003). Developing attitude to science education scales for use with primary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1273–1295.
Schroeder, C. M., Scott, T. P., Tolson, H., Huang, T., & Lee, Y. (2007). A Meta-Analysis of National Research: Effects of Teaching Strategies on Student Achievement in Science in the United States. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1436–1460.
Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic Language and the Challenge of Reading for Learning about Science. Science, 328, 450–452.
Van Goethem, A. A. J., Scholte, R. H. J., & Wiers, R. W. (2010). Explicit- and Implicit Bullying Attitudes in Relation to Bullying Behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 829–842.
Van Keulen, H. (2009). Drijven en zinken. Wetenschap en techniek in het primair onderwijs. [Floating and sinking. Science and technology in primary education]. Oration: Fontys PABO Limburg.
Wilber, Kinzer & Lohnes (2008). Supporting preservice teacher education through a multimedia casebased online learning environment. In C. Kinzer & L. Verhoeven (Eds.). Interactive literacy education (pp. 285–308). Mahwah (CA): Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wilkins, J. L. M. (2008). The relationship among elementary teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 139–164.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Segers, E., Peeters, M., Strating, H., Teunissen, C., Verhoeven, L. (2011). Effects of a Digital Learning Environment on Knowledge and Attitude of Student Teachers. In: Vries, M.J.d., Kuelen, H.v., Peters, S., Molen, J.W.v.d. (eds) Professional Development for Primary Teachers in Science and Technology. International Technology Education Studies, vol 9. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-713-4_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-713-4_20
Publisher Name: SensePublishers
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-713-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)