Advertisement

Difference and Discontinuity – Making Meaning Through Hypertexts

  • Colleen Mckenna
  • Claire Mcavinia
Part of the Educational Futures Rethinking Theory and Practice book series (EDUFUT, volume 50)

Abstract

Digital writing is a practice with which university students engage regularly. Increasingly, students communicate with each other and their lecturers using email, message boards and online posts, among other forms. Unsurprisingly, the research into writing in digital contexts has focused on these types of texts, and although such writing departs in its production from more conventional ‘essayistic’ writing (Lillis 2001), it is still broadly linear in terms of the expression and organisation of knowledge.

Keywords

Virtual Reality Textual Line Information Literacy Academic Writing Student Writing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Antonesa, M. (2007). Can information literacy motivate students to become global citizens? Sconul Focus (42), 28–30.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1988). The dialogic imagination (M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, K. (2002). Reading, writing and teaching creative hypertext: A genre-based pedagogy. Pedagogy, 2(3), 337–356.Google Scholar
  5. Burbules, N. (1998). Essay review: Digital texts and the future of scholarly writing and publication. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(1), 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter, L. (2003). Argument in hypertext: Writing strategies and the problem of order in a nonsequential world. Computers and Composition, 20(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carusi, A. (2006). Textual practitioners: A comparison of hypertext theory and phenomenology of reading. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 5(2), 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dickson, M. (2002). Click here to organize. Pedagogy, 2(2), 253–257.Google Scholar
  9. Goodfellow, R., & Lea, M. (2007). Challenging e-learning in the university: A literacies perspective. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ingraham, B. (2000). Scholarly rhetoric in digital media. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/00/ingraham/ingraham-t.html/
  11. Kolb, D. (1994). Socrates in the labyrinth. In G. P. Landow (Ed.), Hyper/Text/Theory (pp. 323–342). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kolb, D. (2008). The revenge of the page. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www.dkolb.org/fp002.kolb.pdf
  13. Kolb, D. (2004). Twin media. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www.dkolb.org/twin.media.ht04/covershe.html
  14. Kress, G. (1982). Learning to write. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen. (2006). Reading images. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  18. Landow, G. (1997). Hypertext 2.0. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 11(3), 182–199.Google Scholar
  20. Lillis, T. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Lillis, T., & Turner, J. (2001). Student writing in higher education: Contemporary confusion, traditional concerns. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(1), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McKenna, C. (2005). Words, bridges and dialogue: Issues of audience and addressivity in online communication. In R. Land & S. Bayne (Ed.), Education in cyberspace (pp. 140–162). Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  23. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5).Google Scholar
  24. Russell, G. (1998). Elements and implications of a hypertext pedagogy. Computers and Education, 31(2), 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Secker, J., Boden, D., & Price, G. (2007). The information literacy cookbook: Recipes for success. Oxford: Chandos.Google Scholar
  26. Senn Breivik, P., & Gee, E. G. (2006). Higher education in the Internet age: Libraries creating a strategic edge. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colleen Mckenna
    • 1
  • Claire Mcavinia
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for the Advancement of Learning and Teaching University CollegeLondon
  2. 2.Centre for Teaching and Learning National University of IrelandMaynoothIreland

Personalised recommendations