Skip to main content

Individualised Professional Learning

Mentoring Leaders of School-Based Inquiry Projects

  • Chapter
Processes of Inquiry

Part of the book series: Professional Learning ((PROFL,volume 10))

  • 1890 Accesses

Abstract

In pursuit of more equitable outcomes for students, the curriculum reforms of the early 1990s in New Zealand have required schools to develop strategic plans that align their strengths and needs with goals and activities designed to achieve growth and improvement in teaching and learning (Ministry of Education, 2008a). In support of this change, the Ministry of Education has funded professional learning programmes to address the goals identified by schools (Ministry of Education, 2008b).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Towards a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 3–31). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R., Berryman, M., Cavanagh, T., & Teddy, L. (2009). Te kotahitanga: Addressing educational disparities facing Māori students in New Zealand. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 735–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1998). Teacher research: The question that persists. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1(1), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing students’ perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue and change in education. Education Researcher, 31(4), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Education Associates Ltd. (2006). Literature review: Conducting evaluation research to inform professional learning programmes. Dunedin: Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education and Science Committee. (2008). Report of the Education and Science Committee: Inquiry into making the schooling system work for every child. Presented to the House of Representatives, Wellington, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). What’s worth fighting for in your school? New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I. (1994). Studying curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundy, S. (1998). The curriculum and teaching. In E. Hatton (Ed.), Understanding teaching (2nd ed., pp. 27–37). Sydney: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashweh, M. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: A reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(3), 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. (2003). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as the path to empowerment. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDavid, J. C., & Hawthorn, L. R. L. (2006). Program evaluation and performance management: An introduction to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2007). Literacy learning progressions. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2008a). Schools planning and reporting. Retrieved from http://www.minedu.govt.nz/educationSectors/Schools/SchoolOperations/PlanningAndReporting/SchoolsPlanningReporting.aspx

  • Ministry of Education. (2008b). Ki te Aoturoa: Improving inservice teacher educator learning and practice: Te whakapakari I te ratonga whakangungu kaiwhakaako. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musanti, S. I. (2004). Balancing mentoring and collaboration: Midcareer teachers constructing a new role. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 6(1), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poglinco, S. M., & Bach, A. J. (2004). The heart of the matter: Coaching as a vehicle for professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(5), 398–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In T. Biddle, I. Good, & I. Goodson (Eds.), The international handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 1223–1296). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, A. (2004). Towards a culture of inquiry in DECS. (Occasional paper series no 1). Adelaide: South Australian Department of Education and Children’s Services. Retrieved from http://www.decs.sa.gov.au/corporate/files/links/OP_01.pdf

  • Riddle Buly, M., Coskie, T., Robinson, L., & Egawa, K. (2004). What is a literacy coach? Voices From The Middle, 12(1), 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V., & Lai, M. (2006). Practitioner research for educators: A guide to improving classrooms and schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, M. J. (2005). Mentoring among high school teachers: A dynamic and reciprocal group process. Mentoring and Tutoring, 13(1), 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., Fink, D., & Earl, L. (2003). It’s about learning [and it’s about time]: What’s in it for schools? London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Best evidence synthesis: Professional development and professional learning. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, S., & Coleman, M. (2004). The role of mentoring in promoting use of research-based practices in reading. Remedial and Special Education, 25(1), 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thornley, C., Mcdonald, T. (2011). Individualised Professional Learning. In: Higgins, J., Parsons, R., Bonne, L. (eds) Processes of Inquiry. Professional Learning, vol 10. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-531-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships