Abstract
Traditionally, those who provided professional development to teachers were considered to be trainers. Now, their roles have broadened immensely. …they have to be facilitators, assessors, resource brokers, mediators of learning, designers, and coaches, in addition to being trainers when appropriate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
REFERENCES
Alexander, B. (2006). Web2.0: A new wave of innovation of teaching and learning. Edcause Review, 41(2), 32–44.
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Lewes: Falmer.
Caspi, A., & Blau, I. (2008). Social presence in online discussion groups: Testing three conceptions and their relations to perceived learning. Social Psychology of Education, 11(3), 323–346.
Dalton J., & Anderson, D. (2007). PLOT: Professional learning online tool. Retrieved from http://www.plotpd.com.au
Fisher, R., & Sharp, A. (1998). Getting it done: How to lead when you’re not in charge. New York: Harper Collins.
Garmston, R., & Wellman, B. (1999). The adaptive school: A sourcebook for developing collaborative groups. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
Garrison, D. R. (2003). Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition. Retrieved October 8, 2006, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications
Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87–105. Retrieved October 4, 2006, from http://www.communitiesofinquiry.com/documents/CTinTextEnvFinal.pdf
Glickman, C. (2002). Leadership of learning: How to help teachers succeed. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Grant, L. (2006). Using wikis in schools: A case study. Futurelab. Retrieved January 31, 2007, from http://www.futurelab.org.uk/research/discuss/05discuss01.htm
Kotze, D., Myburg, J., Roux, J., & Associates. (2002). Ethical ways of being. Pretoria: Ethics Alive.
Liston, D., & Zeichner, K. (Eds.). (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Loucks-Horsley, S. (1996). Professional development for science education: A critical and immediate challenge. In R. Bybee (Ed.), National standards & the science curriculum. Dubuque, IO: Kendall/Hunt. Retrieved from http://www.nas.edu/rise/backg4a.htm
Maurino, P. S. M. (2007). Looking for critical thinking in online threaded discussions. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(3), 241–260.
Ministry of Education. (2008). Ki Te Aotearoa: Improving inservice teacher educator learning and practice. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
Murphy, E. (2004). Recognising and promoting collaboration in an online asynchronous discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 421–431.
Piez, B. (2003). Practice: Applying research on presence to guide online discussions. The Sloan consortium. Retrieved May 7, 2007, from http://www.sloan-c.org/effective/details3.asp?LE_ID=35
Reio T., & Crim S. (2006). The emergence of social presence as an overlooked factor in asynchronous online learning (pp. 964–971). Paper presented at the Academy of Human Resource Development International conference, Columbus.
Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, wikis, podcasts and other powerful web tools for classrooms. California, CA: Corwin Press.
Robertson, J. (2005). Coaching leadership. Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Archer, W., & Garrison, D. R. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferences. Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 51–70.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115–136.
Thomson, C. (2004). How to make ‘what works’ work: A role for RTLB. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 13, 249–269.
Timperley, H. S. (2001). Mentoring conversations designed to promote student teacher learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 29(2), 111–123.
Timperley, H., & Parr, J. (2004). Using evidence in teaching practice: Implications for professional learning. Auckland: Hodder Moa Beckett.
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration (BES). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, R. S., & Humphrey, R. (2007). Understanding and fostering interaction in threaded discussion. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 129–143.
Wise, A., Chang, J., Duffy, T., & del Valle, R. (2004). The effects of teacher social presence on student satisfaction, engagement and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 247–271 (EJ683696).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davey, R., Ham, V., Stopford, M., Calender, S., Mackay, J. (2011). Mentoring Reflective Practice in Inservice Teacher Education. In: Higgins, J., Parsons, R., Bonne, L. (eds) Processes of Inquiry. Professional Learning, vol 10. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-531-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-531-4_6
Publisher Name: SensePublishers
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-531-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)
