Skip to main content

What is the Thing We Call Heat? A Study on Diverse Representations of the Basic Thermal Concepts in and for School Science

  • Chapter
Science Education in International Contexts

Abstract

Heat, like many other scientific concepts, is abstract, counterintuitive and thus difficult for students to understand. As a noun, it is frequently used in everyday life, but its meanings may, however, vary from one situation to another. In the Chinese language, the word for heat, Re, used as a noun, is a completely scientific term. In everyday life, Re means “hot”, “heated” or “to heat”, and students do not start to learn Re as a noun - heat – until in school science. It is thus little wonder that many students, and even adults, encounter difficulties in understanding the scientific concept of heat alongside its everyday multiple uses. Furthermore, heat is confusing and controversial in its own scientific meaning, as illustrated in the history of science. Early scientists for a long time conceived of heat as a basic quality of a body, and later on as a kind of substance, a material fluid, or in terms of an ethereal wave. It was as late as the 19th century that the modern concept of heat became accepted. Bearing this in mind, we should not be too surprised at the difficulties students experience while learning the concepts centered on heat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albert, E. (1978). Development of the concept of heat in children. Science Education, 62, 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Misunderstanding emergent processes as causal. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, April 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Implications for learning and discovery in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 15, pp. 129–186). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, E. E., & Driver, R. (1985). Secondary students conceptions of the conduction of heat: Bringing together scientific and personal views. Physics Education, 20(4), 176–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotignola, M. I., Bordogna, C., Punte, G., & Cappannini, O. M. (2002). Difficulties in learning thermodynamic concepts: Are they linked to the historical development of this field? Science & Education, 11, 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. (2006). Bibliography - Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions and Science Education (STCSE). Retrieved February, 2006, from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html

  • Erickson, G. L. (1979). Children’s conceptions of heat and temperature. Science Education, 63(2), 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, G. L. (1980). Children’s viewpoints of heat: A second look. Science Education, 64(3), 323–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, G., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Heat and temperature. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science (pp. 52–83). Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesidou, S., & Duit, R. (1993). Students’ conceptions of the second law of thermodynamics: An interpretive study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Hounsell, D., & Entwistle, N. (Eds.), (1984). The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish academic press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogan, J. H. (1988). The development of a conceptual framework of heat. Science Education, 72, 103–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, R. H. (2001). Heat is not a noun. American Journal of Physics, 69(2), 107–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien, A. (1980). Modes and conditions of learning. An example: The learning of some aspects of the concepts of heat. In W. F. Archenhold, R. H. Driver, A. Orton, & C. Wood-Robinson (Eds.), Cognitive development research in science and mathematics (pp. 288–309). Leeds, UK: University of Leeds Printing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Baeyer, H. C. (1999). Warmth disperses and time passes: The history of heat. New York: The Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiser, M., & Amin, T. (2001). “Is heat hot?” Inducing conceptual change by integrating everyday and scientific perspectives on thermal phenomena. Learning and Instruction, 11, 331–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liu, Sc. (2011). What is the Thing We Call Heat? A Study on Diverse Representations of the Basic Thermal Concepts in and for School Science. In: Cheng, M.M.H., So, W.W.M. (eds) Science Education in International Contexts. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-427-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships