Abstract
In the continuing campaign to enhance science instruction one battle we are winning relates to the inclusion of elements of the nature of science (NOS) in official recommendations designed to guide the development of the science curriculum. Increasingly, standards documents in the U.S. states (which effectively control what is taught within their borders), the U.S. national science education standards (NRC, 1996) (which does not have the force of law but is regularly consulted in planning science instruction by the individual states) and many other nations now include explicit requirements to include the nature of science in plans for science learning. We seem to have responded positively to the 1970 call from Carey and Stauss who stated that, “if the teacher’s understanding and philosophy of science are not congruent with the current interpretations of the nature of science, ... then the instructional outcomes will not be representative of science” (p. 363). There is little doubt that NOS should have a central place in the science curriculum and it is time that teachers blend both NOS and more traditional content to ensure that students come to understand what science is and how it functions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. (2000a). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1057-1095.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000b). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665-701.
Allchin, D. (1997). The power of history as a tool for teaching science. In A. Dally, T. Nielsen, & F. Reiss (Eds.), History and philosophy of science: A means to better scientific literacy? (pp. 70-98). Loccum: Evangelische Akadamie Loccum.
Allchin, D. (2003). Scientific myth conceptions. Science education, 87, 329-351.
Allen, G., & Baker, J. (2001). Biology: scientific process and social issues. Maryland, MD: Fitzgerald Science Press.
Baumel, H. B., & Berger, J. J. (1973). Biology: Its people and its papers. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
Becker, B. (2000). Mindworks. San Francisco: WestEd.
Bloom, H. (1994). The western canon: The books and school of the ages. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Bowler, P. J., & Morus I. R. (2005). Making modern science: a historical survey. Chicago and New York: The University of Chicago Press.
Carey, L. R., & Stauss, A. N. (1970). An analysis of the understanding of the nature of science by prospective secondary science teachers. Science Education, 52(4), 358-363.
California Institute of Technology. (1985). The mechanical universe and beyond. Retrieved April 30, 2009, from http://www.learner.org/resources
Cavicchi, E. M. (2008). Historical experiments in students’ hands: Unfragmenting science through action and history. Science & Education, 17, 717-749.
Clough, M. (2008). A very deep question: Just how old is the earth? Part of a new series of “science stories”. Unpublished Document, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Clough, M. P., & Joanne, K. O. (2004). The nature of science: always part of the science story. The Science Teacher, 71, 28-31.
Conant, J. B. (1947). On understanding science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Conant, J. B., & Nash, L. K. (1948). Harvard case histories in experimental science (Vols. I and II). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dagher, Z., & Ford, D. (2005). How are scientists portrayed in children’s science biographies. Science & Education, 14, 377-393.
Darwin, C. (2002). Autobiographies. New York: Penguin Group.
DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.
Education Policies Commission Report. (1944). Education for all American youth. National Education Association of the United States.
Eichman, P. (1996). Using history to teach biology. The American Biology Teacher, 58, 200-202.
Feynman, R. P. (2005). The meaning of it all: Thoughts of a citizen scientist. New York: Basic Books.
Fingon, J. C., & Fingon, S. D. (2009). What about Albert Einstein? Using biographies to promote students’ scientific thinking. Science Scope, 32, 51-55.
Gleick, J. (2003). Isaac Newton. New York: Pantheon Books.
Hakin, J. (2005). The story of science: Newton at the center. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Harre, R. (1981). Great scientific experiments. Twenty experiments that changed our view of the world. Chelmsford, MA: Courier Dover Publications.
Herreid, C. F. (1994). Case Studies in science-A novel method of science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23, 221-229.
Heering, P. (2003). History-science-epistemology: On the use of historical experiments in physics teacher training. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), Proceeding of the 6th international history, philosophy and science teaching group meeting. Denver, USA. [File 58 on CD ROM from IHPST.ORG].
Heering, P. (2000). Getting shocks: Teaching secondary school physics through history. Science & Education, 9, 363-373.
Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teacher’s guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Holton, G. (1969). Harvard project physics: A report on its aims and current status. Physics Education, 4(1), 19-25.
Holton, G. (2003). The project physics course, then and now. Science & Education, 12, 779-785.
Holton, G., & Brush, S. G. (2001). Physics, the human adventure: From Copernicus to Einstein and beyond. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Howe, E. M., & Rudge, D. W. (2005). Recapitulating the history of Sickle-Cell Anemia Research: Improving students’ NOS views explicitly and reflectively. Science & Education, 14(3), 423-441.
Isaacson, W. (2007). Einstein: His life and universe. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Johnson, G. (2009). The ten most beautiful experiments. New York: Knopf.
Judson, H. F. (1996). The eight day of creation. Cold Springs Harbor, NY: Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory Press.
Kampourakis, K., & McComas, W. F. (2009a, in review). Charles Darwin and the human elements of science: Creativity, social influences and subjectivity. Under review by Science & Education.
Kampourakis, K., & McComas, W. F. (2009b). Using the history of biology to illustrate core nature of science ideas. Proceedings of the 5th Greek conference on history, philosophy & teaching of natural sciences: “The great scientific theories in the teaching of natural sciences”, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Kindi, V. (2005). Should science teaching involve the history of science? An assessment of Kuhn’s view. Science & Education, 14, 721-731.
Kipnis, N. (1996). The “historical-investigative” approach to teaching science. Science & Education, 5, 277-292.
Klassen, S. (2006). The application of historical narrative in science learning: The Atlantic cable story. Science & Education, 16, 335-352.
Klopfer, L. E (1964). History of Science Cases (HOSC). Chicago: Science Research Associates.
Kragh, H. (1994). An introduction to the historiography of science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lederman, N. G. (2002). The state of science education: Subject matter without context. Electronic Journal of Science Education [On-Line], 3(2), December. http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/ejse.html.
Leite, L. (2002). History of science in science education: Development and validation of a checklist for analyzing the historical content of science textbooks. Science & Education, 11, 353-359.
Lind, G. (1979). The History of Science Cases (HOSC): Nine units of instruction in the history of science. European Journal of Science Education, 1(3), 293-299.
Maddox, B. (2002). Rosalind Franklin: The dark lady of DNA. New York: HarperCollins.
Matthews, M. (1992). History, philosophy and science teaching: The present rapprochement. Science & Education, 1, 11-47.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching, the role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). A review of the role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 3-39). Kluwer/Springer Academic Publishers.
McComas, W. F. (2008a). Proposals for core nature of science content in popular books on the history and philosophy of science: Lessons for science education. In Y. J. Lee, & A. L. Tan (Eds.), Science education at the nexus of theory and practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
McComas, W. F. (2008b). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17(2/3), 249-263.
McComas, W. F. (1997). The discovery and nature of evolution by natural selection: Misconceptions and lessons learned from the history of science. American Biology Teacher, 59, 492-500.
Monk, M., & Osborne, J. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: a model for the development of pedagogy. Science Education, 81(4), 405-424.
National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692-720.
Public Broadcasting System (PBS). Science programming on air and online. http://pbs.org/wgbh.nova/.
Rasmussen, S. C. (2007). The history of science as a tool to identify and confront pseudo-science. Journal of Chemical Education, 84, 949-951.
Roach, L. E. (1995). Putting people back in science: Using historical vignettes. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 365-370.
Roach, L. E., & Wandersee, J. H. (1993). Short story science. The Science Teacher, 60, 18-21.
Rudge, D. W., & Howe, E. M. (2009). An explicit and reflective approach to the use of history to promote understanding of the nature of science. Science & Education, (online first article).
Serafini, A. (2001). The epic history of biology. Boulder, CO: Perseus Publishing Company.
Shamos, M. (1987). Great experiments in physics. New York: Dover Publications.
Sherratt, W. J. (1982). History of science in the science curriculum: An historical perspective Part I: Early interest and role advocated. School Science Review, 64, 225-236.
Sherratt, W. J. (1983). History of science in the science curriculum: An historical perspective. Part II: Interest shown by teachers. School Science Review, 64, 418-424.
Sobel, D. (1995). Longitude: The true story of along genius who solved the greatest problem of his time. New York: Walker and Co.
Sobel, D. (1999). Galileo’s daughter: A historical memoir of science, faith, and love. New York: Walker and Co.
Steelman, J. R. (1947). Manpower for research: Volume 4 of science and public policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Walker, R. (1993). Historical science experiments on file. New York: Facts on File, Inc.
Watson, J. D. (1996). The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Watson, J. D., & Crick, F. H. C. (1953). Molecular structure of nucleic acids: A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature, 171, 737-738.
Watson, J. D., & Stent, G. S. (Ed.), (1980). Double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Wider, W. (2006). Science as story communicating the nature of science through historical perspectives on science. American Biology Teacher, 68, 200-205.
Whitfield, D. H. (2007). What’s the matter? Readings in physics. Chicago: Great Books Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mccomas, W.F. (2011). The History of Science And The Future of Science Education. In: Kokkotas, P.V., Malamitsa, K.S., Rizaki, A.A. (eds) Adapting Historical Knowledge Production to the Classroom. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-349-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-349-5_3
Publisher Name: SensePublishers
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-349-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)