Skip to main content

Aesthetic Learning, and Learning Through the Aesthetic

  • Chapter
Key Concepts in Theatre/Drama Education

Abstract

The aesthetic is at the heart of all our work in theatre and drama, yet it remains a term that eludes definition, and perhaps rightly so. The art of drama and theatre is complex, culturally situated, and forever renegotiating the expectations and boundaries of previous work. That which excites or moves us in the art is also complex, culturally situated, and escaping definition through words. But because it eludes firm definition does not mean it is not important to consider, describe, and attempt to understand, particularly so because as teachers and community workers we often talk about ‘aesthetic learning’ as something that is not only particular to the arts in education but also of significant value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbs, P. (1987). Towards a Coherent arts aesthetic. In P. Abbs (Ed.), Living powers: The arts in education (pp. 9–65). London & New York: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, P. (2005). Asking the right questions: Accessing children’s experience of aesthetic engagement. Applied Theatre Researcher, 6, Article 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity theory and the social sciences: An introduction. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, D. (1995). The aesthetics of marginality: The theatre of Joan Littlewood and Buzz Goodbody. In K. Laughlin & C. Schuler (Eds.), Theatre and feminist aesthetics. London: Associated Presses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2000). Engaging minds: Learning and teaching in a complex world. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Minton, Balch & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Towards a critical pedagogy of learning. Granby, MA: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J., & Wilson, A. (2006). Te Mauri Pakeaka: A Journey into the Third Space. Auckland: Auckland University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. (2002). History of bicultural theatre: Mapping the Terrain. Christchurch: Christchurch College of Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagendoorn, I. G. (2005). Dance perception and the brain. In S. McKechnie & R. Grove (Eds.), Thinking in four dimensions. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2005). The dialogic and the aesthetic: Some reflections on theatre as a learning medium. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 39(4), 104–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, E. (1790/2000). Critique of the power of judgement (P. Guyer & E. Matthews, Trans.). New York: Cambridge University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, L. (1995). The dis-play’s the thing: Gender, and public sphere in contemporary British drama. In K. Laughlin & C. Schuler (Eds.), Theatre and feminist aesthetics. London: Associated Presses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. (1992). The postmodern explained to children. Sydney: Power Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neelands, J. (2004). Miracles are happening: Beyond the rhetoric of transformation in the western traditions of drama education. Research in Drama Education, 9(1), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, J. (2009). The three pillars of art. In J. O’Toole, M. Stinson, & T. Moore (Eds.), Drama and curriculum. Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostern, A.-L. (2007). The future of arts education: A European perspective. Journal of Artistic and Creative Education, 1(1), 222–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. (1984). The foucault reader. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V., & Rogers-Ramachandran, D. (2006, October). The neurology of aesthetics. Scientific American Mind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. (Ed.). (2005). Managing organisational complexity: Philosophy, theory and application. Greenwick: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechner, R. (1993). The future of ritual. New York: Routledge. Waldrop, M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greenwood, J. (2011). Aesthetic Learning, and Learning Through the Aesthetic. In: Schonmann, S. (eds) Key Concepts in Theatre/Drama Education. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-332-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships