Skip to main content

Can Trust Be a Factor of Organisational Safety and Security?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Security-Related Advanced Technologies in Critical Infrastructure Protection

Abstract

Safety and security are of increasing importance to all business ventures, but first and foremost for organisations operating as parts of critical infrastructure. Kinetic and cyber tools are being developed and employed, in order to decrease security risks that – in case of critical infrastructure organisations – would have far-fetched consequences not only on a company but on a national level as well. In present paper we endeavour to address the human side of this problem, namely the control function of managers in critical infrastructure organisations. Trust will be addressed as a proxy for external locus of control and described, how a strong and stable superior-subordinate relation can substantially contribute not only to the wellbeing of the employees but to organisational – and in the long run national – safety and security. Since trusting, safety-oriented cultures affect individual decisions not only on a normative but on a subconscious level as well, they can increase not only the willingness of employees to perceive, recognise and tackle safety and security threats, but trigger their eagerness to make good decisions that – through their trusting relations – do not only benefit the individual decision maker, but the organisation and its safety and security as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ackoff, R.: Creating the Corporate Future: Plan or be Planned. Wiley, New York (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Walker-Roberts, S., Hammoudeh, M., Aldabbas, O., Aydin, M., Dehghantanha, A.: Threats on the horizon: understanding security threats in the era of cyber-physical systems. J. Supercomput. 76(4), 2643–2664 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hwang, I., Wakefield, R., Kim, S., Kim, T.: Security awareness: the first step in information security compliance behavior. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 61(4), 345–356 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schuster, D., Wu, S.: Toward cyber workforce development: an exploratory survey of information security professionals. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 62(1), pp. 1242–1246. SAGE, Sage CA: Los Angeles (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nyikes, Z., Kovács, T.A., Tokody, D.: In situ testing of rail damages in accordance with industry 4.0. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. (1742-6588 1742-6596). 1045, 1–6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1045/1/012032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Booz, A.: Hamilton: Convergence of Enterprise Security Organizations. ASIS, ISSA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Balázs, Á., Nyikes, Z., Kovács, T.A.: Building protection with composite materials application. Key Eng. Mater. 755, 286–291 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.755.286. (1013-9826 1662-9795)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Department of Homeland Security (DHS): National strategy for homeland security. http://www.whitehouse.gov/homeland/book. (2002) pdf Accessed 29th Sept 2021

  9. Saxena, M., Chotia, V., Rao, M.: Estimating the efficiency of public infrastructure investment: a state-wise analysis. Glob. Bus. Rev. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wiley, A., McCormac, A., Calic, D.: More than the individual: examining the relationship between culture and information security awareness. Comput. Secur. 88(101640), 1–8 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Da Veiga, A., Astakhova, L.V., Botha, A., Herselman, M.: Defining organisational information security culture—perspectives from academia and industry. Comput Secur. 92(101713), 1–23 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cox, S., Jones, B., Collinson, D.: Trust relations in high-reliability organizations. Risk. Anal. 26(5), 1123–1138 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Giddens, A.: Risk, trust, reflexivity. In: Beck, U., Giddens, A., Lash, S. (eds.) Reflexive Modernization, pp. 184–197. Polity Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nyikes, Z.: Digital competence and the safety awareness base on the assessments results of the Middle East-European generations. Procedia Manuf. (2351-9789). (22), 916–922 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.130

  15. Mastenbroek, W.G.: Conflict Management and Organizational Development. KJK, Budapest (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kindler, J.: Chapters from Decision Theory. Aula, Budapest (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simon, H.A.: Information-processing explanations of understanding. The nature of thought: Essays in honor of DO Hebb, 37–49 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Enyedi, M.: Bevezetés a döntéselméletbe. Ligatura, Budapest (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Joseph, J., Gaba, V.: Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: a retrospective and road map for research. Acad. Manag. Ann. 14(1), 267–302 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kornai, J.: Economic systems theory and general equilibrium theory. Acta Oeconomica, 297–317 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. In: Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I, pp. 99–127 (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Mihályi, P.: János Komai’s anti-equilibrium as an intellectual forerunner of evolutionary economics. Acta Oeconomica. 63(3), 367–375 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Enyedi, M.: Döntéselmélet. Budapest College of Technology, Budapest (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Szikora, P.: Döntések szerepe a vállalkozások fejlesztésében. Vállalkozásfejlesztés a XXI. században, 171–180 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Szikora, P.: A racionalitás szerepe a vállalkozások fejlesztésében. In: Nagy, I. (ed.) Vállakozásfejlesztés a XXI, pp. 179–200. században II, Óbuda University, Budapest (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. March, G.J.: Introduction to Decision Making. Panem Publishing House, Budapest (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bakacsi, Gy.: Szervezeti magatartás és vezetés. KJK Budapest (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nyikes, Z.: Contemporary digital competency review. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems. (1334-4684 1334-4676). 16(1), 124–131 (2018). https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.16.1.9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kertai-Kiss, I.: The Embedded Nature of Entrepreneurship, Monography-V4, pp. 131–147. University of Belgrade (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nyikes, Z.: Creation proposal for the digital competency framework of the middle-east European region. Key Eng. Mater. (1013-9826 1662-9795). 755, 106–111 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.755.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Trompenaars, F., Hampden-Tumer, C.: Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Marosi, I., Duong Van, T.: Comparative analysis of Hungarian and Vietnamese family businesses operating in Hungary. In: Csiszárik-Kocsir (ed.) Vállalkozásfejlesztés a XXI. században, pp. 93–108. Óbuda University, Budapest (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nyikes, Z.: Information Security Issues of RFID. In: Szakál, A. (ed.) SAMI 2016: IEEE 14th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics 2016, pp. 111–114. IEEE, New York (2016) ISBN: 9781467387392

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schein, E.H.: Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Buckowski, P.: The Social Horizon of Knowledge. Rhodopes, Amsterdam (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gribbin, J.: Schrödinger’s Cat – Quantum Physics and Reality. Akkord Publishing House, Budapest (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. European Commission: On the implementation of the Preparatory Action on the enhancement of the European industrial potential in the field of Security research. Commission Communication (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dirks, K.T., Ferrin, D.L.: The role of trust in organizational settings. Organ. Sci. 12(4), 450–467 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McEvily, B., Perrone, V., Zaheer, A.: Trust as an organizing principle. Organ. Sci. 14(1), 91–103 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tsai, W., Goshal, S.: Social capital and value creation: the role of intra-firm networks. Acad. Manag. J. 41, 464–476 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schoorman, F.D., Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H.: Empowerment in veterinary clinics: the role of trust in delegation. In: Paper presented at annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zohar, D.: The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. J. Organ. Behav. 23(1), 75–92 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Clarke, S., Ward, K.: The role of leader influence tactics and safety climate in engaging employees’ safety participation. Risk. Anal. 26(5), 1175–1185 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Arnott, D.C.: Research on trust: a bibliography and brief bibliometric analysis of the special issue submissions. Eur. J. Mark. 41, 1203–1240 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zaheer, A., Harris, J.: Interorganizational trust. In: Shenkar, O., Reuer, J. (eds.) Handbook of Strategic Alliances, pp. 169–198. Sage, London (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Ferrin, D.L., Dirks, K.T., Shah, P.P.: Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. J. Appl. Psychol. 91, 870–883 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., Perrone, V.: Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. 9, 141–159 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Danaj, A., Lazanyi, K., Bilan, Y.: Perceptions and implications of immigration in France – economic, social, political and cultural perspectives. J. Econ. Soc. 11(3), 226–247 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Clemens, E.S., Cook, J.M.: Politics and institutionalism: explaining durability and change. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 25, 441–466 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hardin, R.: The street-level epistemology of trust. Polit. Soc. 21(4), 505–529 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(3), 709–734 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Gallup: Confidence in Institutions. (2014). https://news.gallup.com/poll/1597/confidence-institutions.aspx. Accessed on 29th Sept 2021

  53. Fukuyama, F.: Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Free Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fulmer, C.A., Gelfand, M.J.: At what level and in whom do we trust? Trust across multiple organizational levels. J. Manag. 38, 1167–1230 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Dietz, G., Gillespie, N.: The Recovery of Trust: Case Studies of Organisational Failures and Trust Repair. The Institute of Business Ethics, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Putnam, R.D.: Bowling Alone. Simon and Schuster, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  57. McKendall, M.A., Wagner, J.A.: Motive, opportunity, choice, and corporate illegality. Organ. Sci. 8, 614–645 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Zahra, S., Priem, R.L., Rasheed, A.: The antecedents and consequences of top management fraud. J. Manag. 31, 803–828 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ashforth, B.E., Anand, V.: The normalization of corruption in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 25, 1–52 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kornélia Lazányi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature B.V.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lazányi, K., Danaj, A. (2022). Can Trust Be a Factor of Organisational Safety and Security?. In: Kovács, T.A., Nyikes, Z., Fürstner, I. (eds) Security-Related Advanced Technologies in Critical Infrastructure Protection. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2174-3_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2174-3_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-2173-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-2174-3

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics