Skip to main content

Models of Ethics Deliberation and Consultation

  • 319 Accesses

Part of the The International Library of Bioethics book series (ILB,volume 93)

Abstract

In this chapter, we describe the origins of institutional healthcare ethics consultation services and the development of healthcare ethics committees in the US, Switzerland and elsewhere. We discuss some of the landmark situations, cases and macro-political and social frameworks that have contributed to their genesis. Next, we describe common models of ethical decision-making. While this list is not meant to be exhaustive, it covers approaches to ethical decision-making that are commonly used in clinical ethics, and which also can be found in the nursing ethics literature. We examine the roles that healthcare ethics committees fill in some hospitals in the US, including collaborative and consultative functions for clinical ethics issues and organizational ethics questions. We all note that in other countries ethics deliberations are not necessarily carried out only this way, for example in Switzerland. Also noted is the role that nurses with advanced education and ethical expertise can play in supporting and empowering point of care nurses and other clinicians to address moral distress as discussed in other chapters. Finally, we describe preventive ethics, and the critical role of nurses in the early recognition of emerging problems and calling attention to them before they escalate to intractable conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-94-024-2155-2_5
  • Chapter length: 30 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-94-024-2155-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Ackermann, S., Balsiger, L., Salathé, M. (2016). Ethikstrukturen an Akutspitälern, Psychiatrischen Kliniken und Rehabilitationskliniken der Schweiz. Dritte, erweiterte Umfrage der Schweizerischen Akademie der Medizinischen Wissenschaften. Bioethica Forum, 9(2), 52–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Advanced Care Planning International Society. (2021). https://www.acp-i.org/society/

  • Allen, R. S., Allen, J. Y., Hilgeman, M. M., & DeCoster, J. (2008). End-of-life decision-making, decisional conflict, and enhanced information: Race effects. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56(10), 1904–1909. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01929.x

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • American Medical Association. (2019). Ethics committees in health care institutions. Retrieved from Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 10.7 website: https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/ethics-committees-health-care-institutions

  • American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH). (2011). Core competencies for healthcare ethics consultation (second). American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH). (2014). Code of ethics and professional responsibilities for healthcare ethics consultants. Improving competencies in clinical ethics consultation: An education guide.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH). (2015). Improving competencies in clinical ethics consultation: An education guide (Second). American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annas, G. (1990). Nancy Cruzan and the right to die. New England Journal of Medicine, 323(10), 670–673.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Aulisio, M. P., Chaitin, E., & Arnold, R. M. (2004). Ethics and palliative care consultation in the intensive care unit. Critical Care Clinics, 20(3), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2004.03.006

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Aulisio, M. A. R. K. P., Moore, J., Blanchard, M., Bailey, M., & Smith, D. (2009). Clinical ethics consultation and ethics integration in an urban public hospital. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 18(4), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180109090574

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Barazzetti, G., Bondolfi, A., Hurst, S., & Mauron, A. (2014). Switzerland (entry). In H. ten Have & B. Gordijn (Eds.), Handbook of global bioethics (pp. 1537–1557). Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, B., Yeager, A., & Simon, A. (2012). Conversation transformation. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C. R., Smith, M. L., Hizlan, S., & Sharp, R. R. (2011). A systematic review of activities at a high-volume ethics consultation service. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 22(2), 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (2005). The end of autonomy. Improving End of Life Care: Why Has It Been So Difficult? Hastings Center Report Special Report, 34(6), S9–S13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L., Parks, S., & Winter, L. (2006). The state of advance care planning: One decade after SUPPORT. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 23(5), 378–384.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, B., Brockman, M., Garrett, J., Knackstedt, A., & Lantos, J. (2018, June). Why are there so few ethics consults in children’s hospitals? HEC Forum, 30(2), 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, L., & Hudson, L. D. (1999). Why don’t physicians use ethics consultation? Journal of Clinical Ethics, 10(2), 116–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Veterans Affairs. (2018). IntegratedEThics. https://www.ethics.va.gov

  • DeSante-Bertkau, J., McGowan, M., & Antommaria, A. (2018). Systematic review of typologies used to characterize clinical ethics consultations. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 29(4), 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detering, K., Hancock, A., Reade, M., & Silvester, W. (2010). The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: Randomized controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 340, 1–9.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, E. (2007). End-of-life decisions: Influence of advance directives on patient care. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 33(10), 50–56.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Downar, J., Sibbald, R. W., Bailey, T. M., & Kavanagh, B. P. (2016). Withholding and withdrawing treatment in Canada: Implications of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in the Rasouli case. CMAJ, 186(16), E622–E626.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, L. (2001). Clinical ethics committees and the formulation of health care policy. Journal of Medical Ethics, 27(SUPPL. 1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.27.suppl_1.i44

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dubler, N., & Liebman, C. (2004). Bioethics mediation: A guide to shaping shared solutions (second). United Hospital Fund of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, E. G. (2012). Preventive ethics in the intensive care unit. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 23(2), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCI.0b013e31824b3b9b

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerlin, A., & Schneider, C. (2004). Enough: The failure of the living will. Hastings Center Report, 34(1), 30–42.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, B. R., Twaddle, M. L., Melnick, A., & Meier, D. E. (2018). National consensus project clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care guidelines (4th ed.). Journal of Palliative Medicine, 21(12), 1684–1689. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2018.0431

  • Foglia, M. B., Fox, E., Chanko, B., & Bottrell, M. M. (2012). Preventive ethics: Addressing ethics quality gaps on a systems level. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 38(3), 103–111.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, V. (2015). Clinical ethics: Methods (reference work entry). In: H. ten Have (Ed.), Encyclopedia of global bioethics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2

  • Forrow, L., Arnold, R., & Parker, L. (1994). Preventive ethics: Expanding the horizons of clinical ethics. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 4(4), 287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E., Bottrell, M. M., Berkowitz, K. A., Chanko, B. L., Foglia, M. B., & Pearlman, R. A. (2010). Integratedethics: An innovative program to improve ethics quality in health care. Innovation Journal, 15(2), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E., Myers, S., & Pearlman, R. A. (2007). Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: A national survey. American Journal of Bioethics, 7(2), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160601109085

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Frewer, A. (2012). Klinische Ethik und Ethikberatung. In A. Frewer, F. Bruns, & A. May (Eds.), Ethikberatung in der Medizin (pp. 8–18). Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, J. R. (2016). The poverty of value clarification: Using ethical theory to critique and transcend the “Givens” of Clinical Ethics Consultation. The American Journal of Bioethics, 16(9), 48–51.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudine, A., Lamb, M., LeFort, S. M., & Thorne, L. (2011). Barriers and facilitators to consulting hospital clinical ethics committees. Nursing Ethics, 18(6), 767–780.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gedge, E., Giacomini, M., & Cook, D. (2007). Withholding and withdrawing life support in critical care settings: Ethical issues concerning consent. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(4), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.017038

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goold, S., Kamil, L., Cohan, N., & Sefansky, S. (2000). Outline of a process for organizational ethics consultation. HEC Forum, 12(1), 69–77.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, E., & Hamric, A. (2006). The courage to stand up: The cultural politics of nurses’ access to ethics consultation. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 17(3), 231–254. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cin20&AN=105950423&site=ehost-live.

  • Gorka, C., Craig, J., & Spielman, B. (2017). Growing an ethics consultation service: A longitudinal study examining two decades of practice. American Journal of Bioethics, 8(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2017.1292327

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, P. J. (2004). Ethics in the clinical encounter. In S. K. Chase (Ed.), Clinical judgement and communication in nurse practitioner practice (pp. 295–332). F. A. Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, P. J. (2018). Nursing ethics and professional responsibility in advanced practice (3rd ed.). Jones and Bartlett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, C., & Hillebrand, I. (2009). Sterbehilfe. Rechtliche und ethische Aspekte. Freiburg, Karl Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajibabaee, F., Joolaee, S., Cheraghi, M. A., Salari, P., & Rodney, P. (2016). Hospital/clinical ethics committees’ notion: An overview. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, 9, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvard Pilgrim Health Care. (2019). The Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Ethics Program. https://www.harvardpilgrim.org/public/the-harvard-pilgrim-health-care-ethics-program

  • Hendriks, A. C. (2019). End-of-life decisions. Recent jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. ERA Forum, 19(4), 561–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester, M., & Schonfeld, T. (2012). Guidance for healthcare ethics committees. Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, S., Hammes, B., Moss, A., & Tolle, S. (2005). Hope for the future: Achieving the original intent of advance directives. Improving End of Life Care: Why Has It Been So Difficult? Hastings Center Report Special Report, 34(6), S26–S30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, S., Nelson, C., Perrin, N., Moss, A., Hammes, B., & Tolle, S. (2010). A comparison of methods to communicate treatment preferences in nursing facilities: Traditional practices versus the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment program. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 58(7), 1241–1248.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, S. (2016). Umstrittene Körperteile. Eine Geschichte der Organspende in der Schweiz. Bielefeld, transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, S. (2007). Policy-making in pluralistic societies. In B. Steinbock (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of bioethics (pp. 153–174). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, S. A., Reiter-Theil, S., Perrier, A. et al. (2007). Physicians’ access to ethics support services in four European countries. Health Care Analysis, 15, 321–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, S. A., Reiter-Theil, S., Baumann-Hölzle, R., Foppa, C., Malacrida, R., Bosshard, G., Salathé, M., & Mauron, A. (2008). The growth of clinical ethics in a multilingual country: Challenges and opportunities. Bioethica Forum, 1(1), 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, A. R., Siegler, M., & Winslade, W. J. (2010). Clinical ethics: A practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesselheim, J. C., Johnson, J., & Joffe, S. (2010). Ethics consultation in children’s hospitals: Results from a survey of pediatric clinical ethicists. Pediatrics, 125(4), 742–746.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kockler, N. J., & Dirksen, K. (2015). Competencies required for clinical ethics consultation as coaching. https://www.chausa.org/docs/default-source/hceusa/kockler---formatted.pdf?sfvrsn=12

  • Kohlen, H. (2009). Conflicts of care: Hospital ethics committees in the USA and Germany. Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman, L. M. (2009). Bioethics as public discourse and second-order discipline. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 34(3), 261–273.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Krones, T. (2006). The scope of the recent bioethics debate in Germany: Kant, crisis, and no confidence in society. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 15, 273–281.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kuczewski, M. G. (1999). When your healthcare ethics committee “Fails to Thrive.” HEC Forum, 11(3), 197–207.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • LaPuma, J., Stocking, C. B., Silverstein, M. D., Dimartini, A., & Siegler, M. (1988). An ethics consultation service in a teaching hospital: Utilization and evaluation. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 260(6), 808–811. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410060078031

  • Lo, B. (2015). Resolving ethical dilemmas: A guide for clinicians (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, T., Connor, S., & Clark, D. (2013). Mapping levels of palliative care development: A global update. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 45(6), 1094–1106.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lynne, J., & Goldstein, N. (2003). Advance care planning for fatal chronic illness: Avoiding commonplace errors and unwarranted suffering. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138(10), 812–818.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Magelssen, M., Miljeteig, I., Pedersen, R., & Førde, R. (2017). Roles and responsibilities of clinical ethics committees in priority setting. BMC Medical Ethics, 18(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0226-5

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick-Gendzel, M., & Jurchak, M. (2006). A pathway for moral reasoning in home for moral reasoning in home healthcare. Home Healthcare Now, 24(10), 654–661.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, L. B. (2005). Practicing preventive ethics—They keys to avoiding ethical conflicts in health care. Physician Executive (March/April), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, S. A. M. (2007). What and who are clinical ethics committees for? Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(9), 497–500. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2007.021394

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Messinger, B., Baum, E., & Smith, M. (2009). Advance care planning: Beyond the living will. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 76(5), 276–285.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S., Bailey, M., & Doody, O. (2021). An integrative review to identify how nurses practicing in inpatient specialist palliative care units uphold the values of nursing. BMC Palliative Care, 20, 111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00810-6

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, T., & Jennings, B. (2005). The quest to reform end of life care: Rethinking assumptions and setting new directions. Improving End of Life Care: Why Has It Been So Difficult? Hastings Center Report Special Report, 34(6), S52–S57. Report Special Report, 34(6), S14–S18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlish, C., Brown-Saltzman, K., Hersh, M., Shirk, M., & Nudelman, O. (2011). Early indicators and risk factors for ethical issues in clinical practice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 43(1), 13–21.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlish, C., Brown-Saltzman, K., Fine, A., & Jakel, P. (2013). Making the call: A proactive ethics framework. HEC Forum, 25(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-013-9213-5

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, H. (2007). Controlling death: The false promise of advance directives. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(1), 51–57.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pfafflin, M., Kobert, K., & Reiter-Theil, S. (2009). Evaluating clinical ethics consultation: A European perspective. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 18(4), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180109090604

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, D. J. (1991). Strangers at the bedside: A history of how law and bioethics transformed medical decision-making. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabin, J. E. (2016). How can clinical ethics committees take on organizational ethics? Some practical suggestions. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 27(2), 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabin, J. E., & Cochran, D. (2007). From the field—Confronting trade-offs in health care: Harvard Pilgrim Health Care’s organizational ethics program. Health Affairs, 26(4), 1129–1134. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.1129

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • SAMS Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences. (2012). Ethics support in medicine. Medical ethical guidelines. SAMS. Retrieved January 28th, 2020 https://www.samw.ch/dam/jcr:af42a2d7-9fdd-44ae-a001-70d9bb11d980/guidelines_sams_ethics_support.pdf

  • Schwab, A. (2016). The ASBH code of ethics and the limits of professional healthcare ethics consultations. Journal of Medical Ethics, 42(8), 504–509.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schildmann, J., Gordon, J.-S., & Vollmann, J. (2010). Introduction. In: J. Schildmann, J.-S. Gordon, J. Vollmann (Eds.), Clinical ethics consultation: Theories and methods, implementation, evaluation (pp. 1–7). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöne-Seifert, B., & Rippe, K. P. (1991). Silencing the singer: Antibioethics in Germany. Hastings Center Report, 21(6), 20–27.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shalowitz, D. I., Garrett-Mayer, E., & Wendler, D. (2006). The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: A systematic review. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(5), 493–497.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shelstad, K. (2005). Landmark United States biomedical ethics cases. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 18(2), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1300/j115v18n02_03

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Howell, E. R., Hickman, S. E., Meghani, S. H., Perkins, S. M., & Rawl, S. M. (2016). End-of-life decision making and communication of bereaved family members of African Americans with serious illness. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 19(2), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2015.0314

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sokol, D. K. (2008). The “four quadrants” approach to clinical ethics case analysis; An application and review. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(7), 513–516. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2007.021212

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Suhonen, R., Stolt, M., Virtanen, H., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2011). Organizational ethics: A literature review. Nursing Ethics, 18(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733011401123

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tapper, E. B. (2017). Consults for conflict: The history of ethics consultation. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 26(4), 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2013.11929025

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tarzian, A. J. (2013). Health care ethics consultation: An update on core competencies and emerging standards from the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities’ Core Competencies Update Task Force. American Journal of Bioethics, 13(2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2012.750388

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • The General Medical Council. (2010). Treatment and care towards the end of life. Accessed February 22, 2022 https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors

  • The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. (1995). A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment (SUPPORT). Journal of the American Medical Association, 274(20), 1591–1598.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Torke, A. M., Sachs, G. A., Helft, P. R., Montz, K., Hui, S. L., Slaven, J. E., & Callahan, C. M. (2014). Scope and outcomes of surrogate decision making among hospitalized older adults. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(3), 370–377.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wasson, K., Anderson, E., Hagstrom, E., McCarthy, M., Parsi, K., & Kuczewski, M. (2016). What ethical issues really arise in practice at an academic medical center? A quantitative and qualitative analysis of clinical ethics consultations from 2008 to 2013. HEC Forum, 28(3), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-015-9293-5

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Palliative Care. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-care

  • Wilkinson, D., Truog, R., & Savulescu, J. (2016). In favour of medical dissensus: Why we should agree to disagree about end-of-life decisions. Bioethics, 30(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12162

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, E. C., & Gruen, R. L. (2005). First principles: Substantive ethics for healthcare organizations. Journal of Healthcare Management, 50(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1097/00115514-200503000-00008

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wlody, G. S. (2007). Nursing management and organizational ethics in the intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine, 35(2 SUPPL.). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000252910.70311.66

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aimee Milliken .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A: Example Discussing Advance Care Planning With a Patient

Appendix A: Example Discussing Advance Care Planning With a Patient

What follows is a hypothetical example of the nurse’s role in discussing advance care planning with a patient.

Amina Jordan is a Registered Nurse at a community primary healthcare center in a small Massachusetts town. Prior to her marriage she had worked as a critical care nurse in a busy academic medical center in the North East United States. She was familiar with the problems and conflicts that could arise when patients lost their decision-making capacity (either permanently or temporarily) and it was not known what their values and preferences were related to life sustaining treatments (LST).

Among her practice responsibilities now is educating the practice population about the importance of advance directives for preserving patient’s autonomy even after ability to express values and preferences is lost. To facilitate this Amina completed a continuing education course focused on advance care planning that provided her with the basic knowledge and skills for having such conversations. She also persuaded the practice to allow her to provide classes on the topic for members of the community. This brief presentation demonstrates how Amina introduces the topic to a healthy recently retired patient who just moved into the community. She is married and her husband is also healthy. They have no family in the immediate area. At Clara Darnbrough’s first visit as part of the data-gathering by the Nurse Practitioner she is asked whether she has completed an advanced directive or has appointed a surrogate decision-maker in the event of her inability to express her wishes. She says she has not and always thought her husband would know what to do but was open to discussing this further. An appointment is made for her to talk with Amina. The following is a re-enactment of the discussion.

Amina:

(who has prepared the room so that she is sitting facing Clara with some space but no barriers between them): Welcome Ms. Darnbrough. I’m Amina Jordan, a Registered Nurse here at the practice. My only purpose today is to learn what you know about advance directives and help you to think through what your wishes might be for future healthcare interventions if you became unable to tell people yourself. The staff at this clinic asks every new patient over the age of 18 years whether they have an advance directive and we revisit this every year to see if anything has changed. We believe that having an advance directive is the best way for our patients to exercise their autonomy even when they have lost the ability to express what they want in the way of medical interventions. I am wondering how you would like me to address you today (Clara or Miss, Mrs, Ms. Darnbrough?).

Clara:

Clara is fine.

Amina:

OK Clara it is, Perhaps a good place to start is to ask you what you know about advance care planning?

Clara:

Well I am not sure … I have heard about living wills? I have heard that people who are very sick should probably think about what they want in terms of the doctors ‘doing everything’ to keep the person alive or not. But since I have always been healthy, I thought I would just deal with that at the time. I suppose no-one likes to think about such possibilities especially as one gets older. My hope has always been that death would be fast and I would not be aware of it happening (laughs … I suppose that could also be called me avoiding thinking about it).

Amina:

Yes that is understandable and you are certainly not alone in thinking that. However, as a nurse who used to work in critical care settings, I have seen many situations where people become sick so quickly they do not have time to tell people what they do and don’t want. Then their loved ones are faced with trying to figure it out at a time when they themselves are stressed and may not have a good understanding of the medical situation or options. So in a way you are both trying to make sure that you do not receive the type of treatment that you would not want, and that you do receive the type of treatment you would want. So having thought about this beforehand, you can empower the person who is having to make decisions for you and reassure them that they are choosing what you would want.

There are four main areas of advance care planning – you need not remember them … we can revisit this after you have had time to think about what you want and discuss it with others. I will also give you some information to take home:

  • Deciding who you want to make decisions for you if you become unable – this may or may not be your spouse or partner (it may be too big a burden for them to take on), it may be someone you trust to carry out your wishes.

  • Thinking about what courses of action (treatments/interventions) you would find acceptable and under which conditions

  • Talking things over with others such as your loved ones, your physician/nurse practitioner, a knowledgeable nurse who can walk you through different scenarios

  • Documenting what you would want (most like a living will)

It is important to know that whatever you decide, even if written and witnessed, can be changed by you any time you want to make revisions perhaps as your situation changes—advance directives—your written or spoken wishes, are not permanent.

Clara:

That is good to know. I would hate to think I had committed myself to something I think I want now and that I might not want later.

Amina:

Yes it can be very tricky to sort through everything that could possibly happen and what that would mean and envision what you want. We can talk again after you have had time to discuss with your husband and other family members or friends. You can also bring him or her to our next meeting if you think that would be helpful. Think about what kinds of activities are most important to you, and use those to guide your decision-making. For example perhaps time spent interacting with family is something that brings you joy, and if you were ever in a state where this was not possible, this would not be an acceptable quality of life for you.

There is an easier way of thinking about what you would want that has been prepared by the Aging with Dignity organization. It is in the form of five questions to consider and is called the Five Wishes. Instead of trying to describe what you would want in a range of possible situations the organization has come up with questions to ask oneself. They developed this as a result of their founder’s experiences working in Mother Teresa’s homes for the dying. They wanted to “ensure that every person who was facing problems at the end of life, or with changed circumstances, is given the opportunity to talk about what matters most, and to ensure that their wishes are known:” (https://fivewishes.org/) I will give you some more information on this to take home with you and we can talk a little more about them now and after you have had time to consider what you want.

The first wish is about deciding who you would like to make decisions for you if you lost ability. We talked a little about this earlier. Perhaps think about whether your husband would be the best person or someone else. You could also think of a second person who can support your husband. It is best to have someone who knows you well and is able to put their own worries and needs to the side so they can determine what you would most likely want.

The second wish has to do with what kind of medical treatment you would or would not want. It is often helpful to think about how long you would be okay with certain treatments as well. For example, some people would consider it alright to be on a ventilator to help their breathing for a short time (say, a few weeks) especially if they thought this would allow them to recover enough to do the things they normally like to do. However, they might not want to be on a ventilator for months or years. If you recover your ability to make your wishes known, at any point you can change your mind about what you find acceptable and you have a right to stop the treatment or intervention. The person you appoint to make your decisions only does so for the amount of time that you cannot communicate what you want and your reasons for wanting it.

Third, you can think about how comfortable you would want to be, and in what setting you would be most comfortable. Is being at home very important? Would you be OK with some discomfort if it would allow you to be at an important life event for a loved one (a marriage say, or the birth of a grandchild)? For example, some medications used to treat cancer can weaken you and cause side effects but might extend your life. Or would you prefer to have your pain treated with medications, such as morphine, that provide comfort but do not extend life? Would you be okay being cared for in a facility, if necessary?

This relates to the fourth wish, which has to do with how you want people to treat you. What matters most to you in your care? What would you want your providers to know about you, your values and preferences.

Finally, the fifth wish is about what you want your loved ones to know. What do you want to make sure they are aware of, in the event that you are no longer able to tell them?

Clara:

Well, this has certainly given me a lot to think about. I like the idea of talking about the Five Wishes with my family.

Amina:

That is a great place to start. Here’s some information to help you and some internet resources that you can use. Call the office when you are ready to talk more and think about whether you would like me to help you discuss this with your family. It is something that the people in your life should also be thinking about if they haven’t already.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature B.V.

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Milliken, A., Monteverde, S., Grace, P. (2022). Models of Ethics Deliberation and Consultation. In: Grace, P., Milliken, A. (eds) Clinical Ethics Handbook for Nurses. The International Library of Bioethics, vol 93. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2155-2_5

Download citation