Skip to main content

Biological Control for Weed Management

  • 477 Accesses

Abstract

The biological control of weeds is receiving increased attention worldwide because it could help farmers reduce herbicide use. In this chapter, we review available knowledge on two biotic interactions that may lead to natural weed control, namely weed-sown plant interactions (competition, allelopathy) and weed-insect interactions (herbivory, granivory). We first provide a description of the processes at play and review available evidence of their effect on weed control, with quantitative estimates whenever possible. We then present available knowledge on the farming practices that can be mobilized to enhance these regulations. We conclude that weed-sown plant and weed-insect interactions can significantly affect weed growth and demography, and we show that some agricultural management options, whether implemented in arable fields, in field margins or at the landscape level, can promote biological weed control. We also identify some knowledge gaps that will require further research in the coming years.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akobundu, I.O., U.E. Udensi, and D. Chikoye. 2000. Velvetbean (Mucuna spp.) suppresses speargrass (Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeuschel) and increases maize yield. International Journal of Pest Management 46 (2): 103–108.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Araki, H., and M. Ito. 1999. Soil properties and vegetable production with organic mulch and no-tillage system. Japanese Journal of Farm Work Research 34 (1): 29–37.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bàrbari, P., and M. Mazzoncini. 2001. Changes in weed community composition as influenced by cover crop and management system in continuous corn. Weed Science 49 (4): 491–499.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bergkvist, G., A. Adler, M. Hansson, and M. Weih. 2010. Red fescue undersown in winter wheat suppresses Elytrigia repens. Weed Research 50 (5): 447–455.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Blackshaw, R.E., J.R. Moyer, R.C. Doram, and A.L. Boswell. 2001. Yellow sweetclover, green manure, and its residues effectively suppress weeds during fallow. Weed Science 49 (3): 406–413.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blubaugh, C.K., and I. Kaplan. 2016. Invertebrate seed predators reduce weed emergence following seed rain. Weed Science 64 (1): 80–86.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Blubaugh, C.K., J.R. Hagler, S.A. Matchley, and I. Kaplan. 2016. Cover crops increase foraging activity of omnivorous predators in seed patches and facilitate weed biological control. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 231: 264–270.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bohan, D.A., A. Boursault, D.R. Brooks, and S. Petit. 2011. National-scale regulation of the weed seedbank by carabid predators. Journal of Applied Ecology 48 (4): 888–898.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, D.C., and R.R. Bellinder. 2004. Weed suppression in a broccoli-winter rye intercropping system. Weed Science 52 (2): 281–290.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brandsæter, L.O., J. Netland, and R. Meadow. 1998. Yields, weeds, pests and soil nitrogen in a white cabbage-living mulch system. Biology, Agriculture & Horticulture 16 (3): 291–309.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee-Finley, K.A., S.B. Mirsky, and M.R. Ryan. 2017. Crop biomass not species richness drives weed suppression in warm-season annual grass-legume intercrops in the Northeast. Weed Science 65 (5): 669–680.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Charalabidis, A., F.-X. Dechaume-Moncharmont, B. Carbonne, D.A. Bohan, and S. Petit. 2019. Diversity of foraging strategies and responses to predator interference in seed-eating carabid beetles. Basic and Applied Ecology 36: 13–24.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cordeau, S., S. Petit, X. Reboud, and B. Chauvel. 2012. Sown grass strips harbour high weed diversity but decrease weed richness in adjacent crops. Weed Research 52 (1): 88–97.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cordeau, S., M. Triolet, S. Wayman, C. Steinberg, and J.-P. Guillemin. 2016. Bioherbicides: Dead in the water? A review of the existing products for integrated weed management. Crop Protection 87: 44–49.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cordeau, S., S. Wayman, C. Reibel, F. Strbik, B. Chauvel, and J.-P. Guillemin. 2018. Effects of drought on weed emergence and growth vary with seed burial depth and presence of a cover crop. Weed Biology and Management 18 (1): 12–25.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Creamer, N.G., and K.R. Baldwin. 2000. An evaluation of summer cover crops for use in vegetable production systems in North Carolina. HortScience 35 (4): 600–603.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A.S., and M. Liebman. 2003. Cropping system effects on giant foxtail(Setaria faberi) demography: I. Green manure and tillage timing. Weed Science 51 (6): 919–929.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A.S., D. Daedlow, B.J. Schutte, and P.R. Westerman. 2011. Temporal scaling of episodic point estimates of seed predation to long-term predation rates. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2 (6): 682–692.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • de Albuquerque, M.B., R.C. dos Santos, L.M. Lima, P.D.A. Melo Filho, R.J.M.C. Nogueira, C.A.G. da Câmara, and A.D.R. Ramos. 2011. Allelopathy, an alternative tool to improve cropping systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 31 (2): 379–395.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Diekötter, T., S. Wamser, T. Dörner, V. Wolters, and K. Birkhofer. 2016. Organic farming affects the potential of a granivorous carabid beetle to control arable weeds at local and landscape scales. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 18 (2): 167–173.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Favero, C., I. Jucksch, R.C. Alvarenga, and L.M. da Costa. 2001. Modifications in the population of spontaneous plants in the presence of green manure. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 36 (11): 1355–1362.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C., C. Thies, and T. Tscharntke. 2011. Mixed effects of landscape complexity and farming practice on weed seed removal. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 13 (4): 297–303.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, J.W., O.B. Hesterman, A. Shrestha, J.J. Kells, R.R. Harwood, J.M. Squire, and C.C. Sheaffer. 2001. Weed suppression by annual legume cover crops in no-tillage corn. Agronomy Journal 93 (2): 319–325.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Frei, B., Y. Guenay, D.A. Bohan, M. Traugott, and C. Wallinger. 2019. Molecular analysis indicates high levels of carabid weed seed consumption in cereal fields across Central Europe. Journal of Pest Science 92: 935–942.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fried, G., S. Petit, F. Dessaint, and X. Reboud. 2009. Arable weed decline in Northern France: Crop edges as refugia for weed conservation? Biological Conservation 142 (1): 238–243.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C., A. Ma, O. McLaughlin, S. Petit, G. Woodward, and D.A. Bohan. 2021. Ecological plasticity governs ecosystem services in multilayer networks. Communications Biology 4: 75.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grimmer, O.P., and J.B. Masiunas. 2004. Evaluation of winter-killed cover crops preceding snap pea. HortTechnology 14 (3): 349–355.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Honěk, A., Z. Martinkova, and V. Jarošík. 2003. Ground beetles (Carabidae) as seed predators. European Journal of Entomology 100 (4): 531–544.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jauzein, P. 2001. L’appauvrissement floristique des champs cultivés. Les dossiers de l’environnement de l’Inra 21: 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, D., H.G. Smith, J. Bengtsson, and K. Birkhofer. 2013. Landscape simplification promotes weed seed predation by carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Landscape Ecology 28 (3): 487–494.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kromp, B. 1999. Carabid beetles in sustainable agriculture: A review on pest control efficacy, cultivation impact and enhancement. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 74 (1–3): 187–228.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, S.S., L.M. Dosdall, and C.J. Willenborg. 2015. The role of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in weed seed consumption: A review. Weed Science 63 (2): 355–376.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Labruyere, S., S. Petit, and B. Ricci. 2018. Annual variation of oilseed rape habitat quality and role of grassy field margins for seed eating carabids in arable mosaics. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 20 (2): 234–245.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, E.J.P., V.K. Brown, N.D. Boatman, P.J.W. Lutman, G.R. Squire, and L.K. Ward. 2003. The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Research 43 (2): 77–89.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mirsky, S.B., V.J. Ackroyd, S. Cordeau, W.S. Curran, M. Hashemi, C.S. Reberg-Horton, M.R. Ryan, and J.T. Spargo. 2017. Hairy vetch biomass across the Eastern United States: Effects of latitude, seeding rate and date, and termination timing. Agronomy Journal 109 (4): 1510–1519.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Peachey, R.E., R.D. William, and C. Mallory-Smith. 2004. Effect of no-till or conventional planting and cover crop residues on weed emergence in vegetable row crop. Weed Technology 18 (4): 1023–1030.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Petit, S. 2018. Prédation de graines et régulation biologique des adventices. In Gestion durable de la flore adventice des cultures, ed. B. Chauvel, H. Darmency, N. Munier-Jolain, and A. Rodriguez, 147–158. Versailles: Éditions Quæ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, S., A. Alignier, N. Colbach, A. Joannon, D. Le Cœur, and C. Thenail. 2013. Weed dispersal by farming activities across spatial scales. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 33 (1): 205–217.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Petit, S., N. Munier-Jolain, V. Bretagnolle, C. Bockstaller, S. Gaba, S. Cordeau, M. Lechenet, D. Mézière, and N. Colbach. 2015. Ecological intensification through pesticide reduction: Weed control, weed biodiversity and sustainability in arable farming. Environmental Management 56 (5): 1078–1090.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petit, S., A. Trichard, L. Biju-Duval, Ó.B. McLaughlin, and D.A. Bohan. 2017. Interactions between conservation agricultural practice and landscape composition promote weed seed predation by invertebrates. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 240: 45–53.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Petit, S., S. Cordeau, B. Chauvel, D. Bohan, J.-P. Guillemin, and C. Steinberg. 2018. Biodiversity-based options for arable weed management. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 38: 48.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Purtauf, T., J. Dauber, and V. Wolters. 2005. The response of carabids to landscape simplification differs between trophic groups. Oecologia 142 (3): 458–464.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K.N., and C.H. Koger. 2004. Live and killed hairy vetch cover crop effects on weeds and yield in glyphosate-resistant corn. Weed Technology 18 (3): 835–840.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, B., C. Lavigne, A. Alignier, S. Aviron, L. Biju-Duval, J.C. Bouvier, J.-P. Choisis, P. Franck, A. Joannon, S. Ladet, F. Mezerette, M. Plantegenest, G. Savary, C. Thomas, A. Vialatte, and S. Petit. 2019. Local pesticide use intensity conditions landscape effects on biological pest control. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 286 (1904): 20182898.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.M., J.R. King, R.C. Izaurralde, and J.T. O’Donovan. 2001. Weed suppression by seven clover species. Agronomy Journal 93 (4): 820–827.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Skóra, Neto F. 1993. Controle de plantas daninhas através de coberturas verdes consorciadas com milho. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 28 (10): 1165–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stivers-Young, L. 1998. Growth, nitrogen accumulation, and weed suppression by fall cover crops following early harvest of vegetables. HortScience 3 (1): 60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J.R., and C.L. Mohler. 1993. Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agronomy Journal 85 (3): 673–680.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J.R., C.B. Coffman, and R.W. Mangum. 2007. Potential long-term benefits of no-tillage and organic cropping systems for grain production and soil improvement. Agronomy Journal 99 (5): 1297–1305.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westerman, P.R., M. Liebman, A.H. Heggenstaller, and F. Forcella. 2006. Integrating measurements of seed availability and removal to estimate weed losses due to predation. Weed Science 54 (3): 566–574.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wissinger, S.A. 1997. Cyclic colonization in predictably ephemeral habitats: A template for biological control in annual crop systems. Biological Control 10 (1): 4–15.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandrine Petit .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature B.V.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Petit, S., Cordeau, S. (2022). Biological Control for Weed Management. In: Fauvergue, X., et al. Extended Biocontrol. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2150-7_8

Download citation