Skip to main content

The Moral Face of Postmodernism and Postfoundationalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Globalisation and Comparative Education

Part of the book series: Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research ((GCEP,volume 24))

  • 669 Accesses

Abstract

The major indictments of the postmodern and postfoundational thinking were that they had no soul, and their legacy was so empty that they were impossible to take seriously (Murray 2003). Detractors claimed they playfully supported “chaos, flimsiness, and instability in our experience of reality,” (Lash 1990), and were seen as something cultivated by a “Yuppified post-industrial bourgeoisie” (Lash 1990). They promoted a “secular culture,” and supported Nietzsche’s claim that “God is dead” (Lash 1990), signifying particularly to writers about the spiritual a “regressive and narcissistic flailing about,” (Wilber 1996) in a world where “anything goes” (Feyerabend 1975). Some felt postmodernism in the arts was about decadent expressionism, existentialism, and “empirical, chaotic, and heterogeneous” art, with Andy Warhol and pop art, punk and new wave rock, accompanying a rapidly evolving commercial film tradition that signaled an emergent “aesthetic populism,” (Jameson 1983) and a melding of virtual and common reality. It and postfoundationalism were seen as a phenomenon driven by a heightened sense of superficiality and consumerism (Bauman 1995).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In a similar vein Wittgenstein distinguishes between “empirical propositions” and “norms of description”.

  2. 2.

    Weber, M. (1958). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York, Scribner, Habermas, J. (1984–89). The Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.. These separations are also apparent in earlier works, such as Kant, I. (1990). The Critique of Pure Reason; The Critique of Practical Reason, and Other Ethical Treatises; The Critique of Judgments. Chicago, Encyclopaedia Britannica.

  3. 3.

    Rorty, R. (1989). Postmodern and history. It reflects, but readers are mistaken to align it with relativism. See above.

  4. 4.

    The Economist, June 6, 2002.

References

  • Arnove, R., & Torres, C. (Eds.). (1999). Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1995). Life in fragments: Essays in postmodern morality. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, T. (1987). Max weber's theory of Concept formation. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, R. (1996). Last past the post: Comparative education, modernity, and perhaps post-modernity. Comparative Education, 32(2), 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, M. (1990). Collaborative research, ethnography and comparative and international education in the South Pacific. International Journal of Educational Development, 10(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, M., & Vulliamy, G. (1996). Issues and trends in qualitative research potential for developing countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 16(4), 439–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1975). Beyond method. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York City: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1983). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, A. (2018). Postmodernism didn’t cause Trump. It explains him. Retrieved from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/postmodernism-didnt-causetrump-it-explains-him/2018/08/30/0939f7c4-9b12-11e8-843b-36e177f3081c_story.html

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husen, T. (1988). Research paradigms in education. Interchange, 19, 2–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1983). Postmodernism and consumer society. In H. Foster (Ed.), The anti-aesthetic: Essays on postmodern culture. Seattle: Bay Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism or the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketsdever, N. (2019). What are some good criticisms of postmodernism?. Retrieved from https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-good-criticisms-of-postmodernism

  • Lash, S. (1990). Sociology of Postmodernism. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1988). The differend: Phrases in dispute. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulston, R. (1993). Comparative education as an intellectual field: Mapping the theoretical landscape. Comparative Education, 23(2), 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1968). How to make our ideas clear. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, R. F. (2003). Comparative education redefined? In E. R. Beauchamp (Ed.), Comparative education reader (pp. 95–110). New York/London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1990). The dangers of over-philosophication: Reply to Archilla and Nicholson. Educational Theory, 40, 41–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1931). The scientific outlook. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, V. (1977). Alternatives in education. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, V. (1991). Postmodernism and its comparative education implications. Comparative Education Review, 35, 610–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2003). Globalization and its discontents. London/New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonelson, A. (2000). The race to the bottom. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. C. (2002). The Empirical Stance. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, A. (2003a). Some problems of comparison and the development of theoretical models in education. Comparative Education Review, 6, 177–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, A. (2003b). Technocracy, uncertainty, and ethics. In by R. F. Arnove & C. A. Torres (Eds.),Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (pp. 24–51). Lanham/Boulder: Rowman

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, K. (1996). A brief history of everything. Shambhala: Boston/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. Englewood Cliffs: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (Trans. by D. Pears, & B. McGuinness). London Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature B.V.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zajda, J., Rust, V. (2021). The Moral Face of Postmodernism and Postfoundationalism. In: Globalisation and Comparative Education. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2054-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2054-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-2053-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-2054-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics