Abstract
During the past four decades globalization has been widely researched in comparative education and other academic circles. The forum of debate among comparative educators has penetrated to all corners of the world. Earlier, Lynn Davies (2004) argued that comparative education has possibly never had such an important function than in this age of different globalisations. She identified two complementary roles for comparative education for global pedagogies: ‘destroying myths and fighting simplistic or dangerous universalisms; and extracting signs of hope which show how education – both within and regardless of culture, could contribute to a better world’ (Davies 2004, p. 1). In addition, Epstein (2006) suggested that ‘comparative education applies the intellectual tools of history and social sciences to advance our understanding of international issues in education’ (Epstein 2006, p. 579). Numerous books by comparative educators on the subject have been authored and edited not only in the intellectual centers of the world but by scholars in the UK, USA, Sweden, Norway, Australia, Hong Kong, Taiwan and elsewhere (Daun 2002; Daun 2020; Tjeldvoll and Holmesland 1997; Hawkins and Rust 2001; Zajda 2005a, b; Zajda and Rust 2009; Zajda 2020a; Bray 2003a, b; Bray et al. 2007; Hung 2001). Movements usually have a clear context and emerge out of the broader forces that define the direction societies take. In the United States, for example, the curriculum reform movement, with the emergence of the new math, PSSE physics, and chemical-bond chemistry of the late 1950s, was in direct response to the launching of Sputnik on 4 October 1957 by the USSR, and the attempt on the part of the United States to recapture its technological superiority. The educational movement, known variously as humanistic education, the free school movement or ‘alternatives in education’, was an outgrowth of the Vietnam War and the student protest movement of the 1960s.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For example, Lisa Laumann (2000) examined the rich educational programs for girls being conducted in nongovernmental organizaions in Pakistan. See Laumann, L. (2000). Teaching gender: Pakistani nongovernmental organizations and their gender pedagogies. Education. Los Angeles, University of California, Los Angeles.
- 2.
A number of people have developed typologies of theories. Leslie Skair, for example, discusses five different theories of the global system: (i) imperialist (colonialist); (ii) modernization and neo-evolutionist; (iii) neo-Marxist including dependency; (iv) world system theory; and (v) modes of production theory.
- 3.
Ideal types come from Max Weber and makes reference to an analytical construct that serves the investigator as a measuring rod to ascertain similarities as well as deviations in concrete cases. It provides the basic method for comparative study. See Weber (1947).
References
Aburdene, P., & Naisbitt, J. (1990). Megatrends. New York: Fawcett Columbine.
Adams, D., & Bjork, R. (1971). Education in developing areas. New York: McKay.
Albrow, M. (1997). The global age: State and society beyond modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Almanac. (2003). Encyclopedia Britannica Almanac 2002. Chicago/London: Encyclopedia Britannica.
Almond, G., & Coleman, J. (1960). The politics of developing areas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Anderson, A., & Bowman, M. (1965). Education and economic development. Chicago: Aldine Press.
Arnove, R. (1980). Comparative education and world-systems analysis. Comparative Education Review, 24, 48–62.
Arnove, R. (2015). Globalisation and public education policies in Latin America. In J. Zajda (Ed.), Second international handbook of globalisation, education and policy research (pp. 431–441). Dordrecht: Springer.
Barber, B. (1995). Jihad vs. McWorld. New York: Times Books.
Berman, M. (1988). All that is solid melts into air. New York: Penguin Books.
Bergsten, C. F. (1988). America in the world economy: A strategy for the 1990s. Washington, DC.
Bhalla, S. S. (2002). Imagine there’s no country. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Boli, J., & Thomas, G. (Eds.). (1999). Constructing world culture: International nongovernmental organizataiaons since 1875. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bowman, M. J., & Anderson, C. A. (1967). Concerning the role of education in development. In M. J. Bowman & C. A. Anderson (Eds.), Readings in the economics of education. Paris: UNESCO.
Boyd-Barrett, O. (1977). Media imperialism: Towards an international framework for the analysis of media Systems. In J. Curran, M. Gurevitch, & J. Woollacott (Eds.), Mass communication and society (pp. 116–135). London: Edward Arnold.
Boyd-Barrett, O. (1998). Media imperialism reformulated. In D. Thussu (Ed.), Electronic empires: Global media and local resistance (pp. 157–176). London: Arnold.
Bray, M. (2003a). Control of education: Issues and tensions in centralization and recentralization. In R. F. Arnove & C. A. Torres (Eds.), The dialectic of the global and local (pp. 204–228). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bray, M. (2003b). Comparative education: Continuing traditions, new paradigms and new challenges. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (2007). Comparative education research: Approaches and methods. Comparative Education Research Centre, the University of Hong Kong & Springer.
Brembeck, C. (1962). Education for national development. Comparative Education Review, 5, 223–231.
Brenner, R. (1977). The origins of capitalist development: A critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism. New Left Review, 104, 25–92.
Brickman, W. W. (1968). In S. E. Fraser (Ed.), A history of international and comparative education. Boston: Scott, Foresman, and Co.
Cardoso, F. H. (1972). Dependency and development in Latin America. New Left Review, 74, 83–95.
Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Carnoy, M. (1977). Education as cultural imperialism. New York/London: Longman.
Carnoy, M. (1984). The state and political theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Carnoy, M., & Levin, H. (1976). The limits of educational reform. New York: David McKay Co..
Chesterfield, R. (1974). The teaching of food production tasks in a modernizing pre-industrial society, education. Los Angeles: University of California.
Clignet, R., & Foster, P. (1981). French and British Colonial Education in Africa. Comparative Education Review, 8, 191–198.
Coombs, P. (1964). The Adjustment of the educational structure to the requirements of economic development. International Review of Education, 10(1), 53–66.
Coutinho, J. M. (1988). Industrial modernization, education and occupation in Aracruz, Espirito Santo: A survey case study of Brazilian Dependency. PhD Department of Education, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.
Curle, A. (1964). Education, politics, and development. Comparative Education Review, 7, 226–245.
Cutright, P. (1963). National political development: measurement and analysis. American Sociological Review, 28, 25–45.
Daun, H. (Ed.). (2002). Educational restructuring in the context of globalization and national policy. New York/London: Routledge Falmer.
Daun, H. (2020). Globalizations, meta-ideological hegemony and challenges from populism in education. In J. Zajda (Ed.), Globalisation, ideology and education reforms: Emerging paradigms. Dordrecht: Springer.
Davies, D. (2004, January). Comparative education in an increasingly globalised world. Paper presented at the Honk Kong Comparative and international Conference.
Demont-Heinrich, C. (2011). Cultural imperialism versus globalization of culture: Riding the structure-agency dialectic in global communication and media studies. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00401.x
Deutsch, K. (1961). Social mobilization and political development. American Political Science Review, 55, 493–514.
Epstein, E. (2006), Commentary on Carnoy. Comparative Education Review, 50(4), 571–580.
Foster, P. J. (1965). Education and social change in Ghana. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Frank, A. G. (1967). Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.
Garrett, G. (2000). Globalization and national autonomy. In N. Woods (Ed.), The political economy of globalization. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Gibson, M., & Ogbu, J. U. (1978). Minority status and education. New York: Academic.
Giddens, A. (1995). Beyond left and right: The future of radical politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Gómez García, R., & Birkinbine, B. (2018). Cultural imperialism theories. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326132192_Cultural_Imperialism_Theories
Habermas, J. (1990). The philosophical discourse of modernity (F. G. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hall, J. (1965). Changing conceptions of the modernization of Japan. In M. Jensen (Ed.), Changing Japanese attitudes toward modernization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hans, N. (1955). Comparative education: A study of educational factors and traditions. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Hanson, J., & Brembeck, C. (1966). Education and the development of nations. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(Fall).
Harbison, R. W., & Myers, C. (1964). Education, manpower, and economic growth. New York: McGraw Hill.
Harding, S. (1987). Feminism and methodology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hawkins, J., & Rust, V. (2001). Shifting perspectives on comparative research: A view from the USA. Comparative Education, 37(4), 501–506.
Held, D. (Ed.). (1991). Political theory today. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1996a). Introduction. In P. Hirst & G. Thompson (Eds.), Globalisation in question. Oxford: Polity Press.
Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1996b). Globalization in question: The international economy and the possibilities of governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hobsbawm, E. (1994). The age of extremes: A history of the world, 1914–1991. New York: Pantheon.
Hung, W-J (Daisy). (2001). Dialectic process of globalization and localization: Its implication for comparative education. Comparative Education, Chi Nan University, Nanton, Taiwan.
Hunt, F. J. (1969). The study of education in society: Education and development. Comparative Education Review, 13, 217–220.
Huntington, S. (1971). The change to change. Comparative Politics, 3, 283–322.
Inkles, A., & Sirowy, L. (1984). Convergent and divergent trends in national educational systems. In G. Lenski (Ed.), Current issues and research in macrosociology. E. J. Brill: Leiden.
Iriye, A. (2002). Global community: The role of international organizations in the making of the contemporary world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jones, P. (2000). Globalisation and internationalism: Democratic prospects for world education. In N. Stromquist & K. Monkman (Eds.), Globalisation and education: Integration and contestation across cultures. Boulder: Rowman and Littlefield.
Kandel, I. (1933). Comparative education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Kazamias, A. (1966). Education and the quest for modernity in Turkey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
King, A. (Ed.). (1997). Culture, globalization and the world system. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kinsey, D. C. (1971). Efforts for educational synthesis under colonial rule: Egypt and Tunisia. Comparative Education Review, 15, 172–187.
LaBelle, T., & Hawkins, J. (Eds.). (1991). Education and multiethnic integration. New York: Praeger.
Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society. New York: Free Press.
Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53, 69–105.
Lipset, S. M. (1963). Political man: The social bases of politics. Garden City/New York: Doubleday.
Mattelart, A. (1976). Cultural imperialism in the multinationals age. Instant Research on Peace and Violence, 6(4), 160–174.
McClelland, D. (1961). The achieving society. New York: Free Press.
Meyer, J. W., et al. (1977). The world educational revolution, 1950–1970. Sociology of Education, 50, 242–258.
Morrow, R. A., & Torres, C. A. (2003). The state, social movement, and educational reform. In R. A. Morrow & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (pp. 92–114). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Noah, H., & Eckstein, M. (1969). Toward a science of comparative education. London: Collier Macmillan.
Phillips, D. (2015). Policy borrowing in education: Frameworks for analysis. In J. Zajda (Ed.), Second international handbook of globalisation, education and policy research. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ramirez, F., & Boli-Bennett, J. (1982). Global patterns of educational institutionalization. In P. Altbach, R. F. Arnove, & G. Kelly (Eds.), Comparative education (pp. 15–36). New York: McMillan.
Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: Sage.
Rust, V. (1989). The democratic tradition and the evolution of Schooling in Norway. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Rust, V. (1991). Postmodernism and its comparative education implications. Comparative Education Review, 35, 610–626.
Samoff, J. (2003). Institutionalizing international influence. In R. F. Arnove & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Schiller, H. (1976). Communication and cultural domination. White Plains: ME Sharpe.
Schiller, H. (1989). Culture, Inc. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schiller, H. (1992). Mass communication and American empire (2nd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.
Schneider, F. (1961a). Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft. Heidelberg: Quelle und Meyer.
Schneider, F. (1961b). European education. Comparative Education Review, 36(3), 333–342.
Schwartz, K. (1971). Filipino education and Spanish colonialism: Toward an autonomous perspective. Comparative Education Review, 15, 202–218.
Schriewer, J. (1999). Coping with complexity in comparative methodology. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-1-4020-9547-4
Sklair, L. (1991). Sociology of the global system. New York: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
Stromquist, N. (1990). Gender inequality in education: Accounting for women’s subordination. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11, 137–154.
Tjeldvoll, A., & Holmesland, I. (Eds.). (1997). Globalization and education: Essays on quality of equality. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Toffler, A. (1990). Powershift. New York: Bantam.
Tomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
van Elteren, M. (2014). Reconceptualizing ‘cultural imperialism’ in the current era of globalization. In R. S. Fortner & P. M. Fackler (Eds.), The handbook of media and mass communication theory (pp. 400–419). New York: Wiley.
Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modern world system: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic.
Waters, M. (1995). Globalization. London: Routledge.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wehler, H. (1975). Modernisierungstheorie und Geschichte. Goettingen: Vandenjoeck und Ruprecht.
Wilms, W. (1996). Restoring prosperity: How workers and managers are forging a new culture of cooperation. New York: Random House.
Wolf, D. (Ed.). (1996). Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. Boulder: Colorado.
Zajda, J. (2003). Why education reforms fail? European Education, 35(1), 58–88.
Zajda, J. (Ed.). (2005a). The international handbook of globalisation and education policy research. Dordrecht: Springer.
Zajda, J. (2005b). Globalisation, education and policy research. In J. Zajda (Ed.), The international handbook of globalisation and education policy research. Dordrecht: Springer.
Zajda, J. (2012). Globalisation, credentialism and human capital. Educational Practice and Theory, 34(2), 45–60.
Zajda, J. (Ed.). (2015) Second international handbook of globalisation and education policy research. Dordrecht: Springer. Retrieved from: http://www.springer.com/education+%26+language/book/978-94-017-9492-3.
Zajda, J. (2017). Globalisation and national identity in history textbooks: The Russian Federation. Dordrecht: Springer.
Zajda, J. (Ed.). (2020a). Globalisation, ideology and neo-liberal higher education reform. Dordrecht: Springer.
Zajda, J. (Ed.). (2020b). Human rights education globally. Dordrecht: Springer.
Zajda, J., & Freeman, K. (Eds.). (2009). Race, ethnicity and gender in education: Cross-cultural understandings. Dordrecht: Springer.
Zajda, J., & Rust, V. (Eds.). (2009). Globalisation, policy and comparative research: Discourses of globalisation. Dordrecht: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zajda, J., Rust, V. (2021). Globalization and Comparative Education. In: Globalisation and Comparative Education. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2054-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2054-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-2053-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-2054-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)