Abstract
Few studies have assessed children’s comprehension of the null infinitival subject (PRO) in Obligatory Control complements when the matrix object is implicit. A study on European Portuguese showed that children have poor comprehension of control complements of dizer “tell” with an implicit object controller, displaying high rates of subject control with this verb (Gamas, 2016). Moreover, Mateu (2016) found that both Spanish and English-speaking children performed at adult level with subject control complements of promise-type verbs when the matrix object is implicit. Our experiment tested children’s comprehension of control with prometer “promise” and dizer “tell” with overt and implicit objects. The results show that, in the case of sentences with implicit objects, children obtained significantly higher rates of object control with dizer than with prometer, despite high rates of (non-adult) subject control with dizer. Furthermore, children obeyed the locality of Obligatory Control and were sensitive to the properties of the main verb.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Hornstein and Polinsky (2010) pointed out that there is variation among adult English speakers with regard to the grammaticality of control structures with promise (e.g., Stockwell et al. 1973 characterized a sentence like John promised Mary PRO to wash himself as “only marginally grammatical”). Hornstein and Polinsky (2010) also noted that promise in control sentences occurs more frequently without an overt object.
- 2.
For the comprehension of control structures by atypically developing children acquiring EP, namely children diagnosed with Specific Language Impairment and children diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorders, the reader is referred to Martins et al. (2018).
- 3.
The original Portuguese is as follows:
Test sentence: O cordeirinho consegue encontrar os morangos.
Exp. 2 (using the puppet): Quem é que vai encontrar os morangos?
- 4.
The original Portuguese is as follows:
Test sentence: O canguru diz para pôr a mesa.
Exp. 2 (using the puppet): Quem vai pôr a mesa?
References
Agostinho, C. (2014). The acquisition of control in European Portuguese complement clauses. M.A. thesis, Universidade de Lisboa.
Agostinho, C., Santos, A. L., & Duarte, I. (2018). The acquisition of control in European Portuguese. In A. L. Santos & A. Gonçalves (Eds.), Complement clauses in Portuguese. Syntax and acquisition (pp. 261–294). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bhatt, R., & Pancheva, R. (2017). Implicit arguments. In M. Everaert & H. C. Van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Bresnan, J. (1982). Control and complementation. Linguistic Inquiry, 13(3), 343–434.
Brody, M., & Manzini, R. (1987). On implicit arguments. In R. Kempson (Ed.), Mental representations: The interface between language and reality (pp. 105–139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, C. (1969). The acquisition of syntax from 5 to 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
Costa, J., & Lobo, M. (2007). Clitic omission, null objects or both in the acquisition of European Portuguese? In S. Baauw, F. Drijkoningen, & M. Pinto (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2005 (pp. 59–71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Costa, J., Lobo, M., & Silva, C. (2009). Null objects and early pragmatics in the acquisition of European Portuguese. Probus, 21, 143–162.
Crain, S., & Fodor, J. (1993). Competence and performance. In E. Dromi (Ed.), Language and cognition: A developmental perspective (pp. 141–171). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
Crain, S., & McKee, C. (1985). The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In S. Berman, J.-W. Choe, & J. McDonough (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th north east linguistics society (NELS 16) (94–111). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Cyrino, S., & Matos, G. (2016). Null objects and VP ellipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese. In W. Leo Wetzels, J. Costa, & S. Menuzzi (Eds.), The handbook of Portuguese linguistics (pp. 294–317). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Duarte, I., & Costa, J. (2013). Objecto nulo. In E. Raposo, M. F. Bacelar do Nascimento, M. A. Coelho da Mota, L. Segura, & A. Mendes (Eds.), Gramática do Português (2339–2348). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Eisenberg, S. L., & Cairns, H. S. (1994). The development of infinitives from three to five. Journal of Child Language, 21(3), 723–734.
Gamas, F. (2016). Interpretação de sujeitos nulos em orações completivas seleccionadas pelo verbo dizer no modo conjuntivo, indicativo e infinitivo. M.A. thesis, Universidade de Lisboa.
Gamas, F., Santos, A. L., & Duarte, I. (2017). Querer ‘want’ and dizer ‘tell to’ in EP: Obviation and control. Paper presented at the 13th Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition conference (GALA 13), Palma de Mallorca, September 7–9.
Hornstein, N., & Polinsky, M. (2010). Control as movement: Across languages and constructions. In N. Hornstein & M. Polisnky (Eds.), Movement theory of control (pp. 1–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hsu, J. R., Cairns, H. S., Eisenberg, S., & Schlisselberg, G. (1989). Control and coreference in early child language. Journal of Child Language, 16(3), 599–622.
Hsu, J. R., Cairns, H. S., & Fiengo, R. W. (1985). The development of grammars underlying children’s interpretation of complex sentences. Cognition, 20(1), 25–48.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1984). Control and complementation. Linguistic Inquiry, 15(4), 531–574.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1989). Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & K. J. Safir (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 261–294). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Johnson, D. E. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 359–383.
Kimball, J. P. (1971). Super equi-NP deletion as dative deletion. In D. Adams, M.-A. Campbell, V. Cohen, J. Lovins, E. Maxwell, C. Nygren, & J. Reighard (Eds.), Papers from the 7th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 142–148). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Landau, I. (2000). Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Landau, I. (2010). The explicit syntax of implicit arguments. Linguistic Inquiry, 41(3), 357–388.
Landau, I. (2013). Control in generative grammar. A research companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Landau, I. (2015). A two-tiered theory of control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Longobardi, G. (1994). Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry, 25(4), 609–665.
Martins, A., Santos, A. L., & Duarte, I. (2018). Comprehension of relative clauses versus control structures in SLI and ASD children. In A. B. Bertolini & M. J. Kaplan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 493–506). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Mateu, M. (2016). Intervention effects in the acquisition of raising and control: Evidence from English and Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
McDaniel, D., & Cairns, H. S. (1990a). The child as informant: Eliciting linguistic judgments from young children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19(5), 331–344.
McDaniel, D., & Cairns, H. S. (1990b). The processing and acquisition of control structures by young children. In L. Frazier & J. de Villiers (Eds.), Language processing and language acquisition (pp. 313–325). Dordrecht: Springer.
McDaniel, D., Cairns, H. S., & Hsu, J. R. (1990). Control principles in the grammars of young children. Language Acquisition, 1(4), 297–335.
Postal, P. M. (1970). On coreferential complement subject deletion. Linguistic Inquiry, 1(4), 439–500.
Raposo, E. (1986). On the null object in European Portuguese. In O. Jaeggli & C. Silva-Corvalán (Eds.), Studies in Romance linguistics (pp. 373–390). Dordrecht: Foris.
Raposo, E. (2004). Objectos nulos and CLLD. Revista da ABRALIN 3(1, 2), 41–73.
Rizzi, L. (1986). Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17(3), 501–557.
Roeper, T. (1987). Implicit arguments and the head-complement relation. Linguistic Inquiry, 18(2), 267–310.
Rosenbaum, P. S. (1967). Phrase structure principles of English complex sentence formation. Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 103–118.
Sag, I., & Pollard, C. (1991). An integrated theory of complement control. Language, 67(1), 63–113.
Sherman, J. C. (1983). The acquisition of control in complement sentences: The role of structural and lexical factors. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
Sherman, J. C., & Lust, B. (1993). Children are in control. Cognition, 46, 1–51.
Stockwell, R., Schachter, P., & Partee, B. H. (1973). The major syntactic structures of English. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Williams, E. (1985). PRO and subject of NP. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 3(3), 297–315.
Williams, E. (1987). Implicit arguments, the binding theory and control. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 5(2), 151–180.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to everyone who contributed towards this research with their time, expertise and resources: Ana Lúcia Santos (Universidade de Lisboa), for comments on the methodology and the data, Alice de Jesus, for her help in the recording of the videos used in the experiment, and Amália Mendes, for making available the recording room at the Instituto para a Investigação Interdisciplinar da Universidade de Lisboa. The authors also wish to thank the schools where testing took place, namely Externato da Luz, SASUL—Jardim de Infância dos Serviços Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa, and APIST—Associação de Profissionais do Instituto Superior Técnico. A very special thanks goes to the children who agreed to participate in this experiment and their parents, as well as the adults who volunteered for the control group. Without them this study would not have been possible. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions. This research was supported by the projects La variación en la interfaz léxico-sintaxis (FFI2014-56968-C4-1-P) and Desarrollo, adquisición y mecanismos de variación lingüística (FFI2017-87699-P) of the Centre de Lingüística Teòrica at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agostinho, C., Gavarró, A. (2020). The Acquisition of Implicit Control in European Portuguese. In: Guijarro-Fuentes, P., Suárez-Gómez, C. (eds) New Trends in Language Acquisition Within the Generative Perspective. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1932-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1932-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1931-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1932-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)