Skip to main content

Techniques for Participatory Approaches

  • 1224 Accesses

Part of the Landscape Series book series (LAEC,volume 24)

Abstract

A challenge of comprehensive landscape planning communication processes is to integrate digital information technology into planning processes by matching the present technological capabilities to the specific requirements and tasks of the different planning phases. Web 2.0 technologies hold the potential for supporting landscape planning tasks such as scoping, landscape analysis, assessment, planning concepts, assigning objectives and measures, implementation concepts, implementation support and continuous updates and monitoring. Application fields of crowd sourcing and social media/networks are discussed and recommendations are made for deciding which E-tools best fulfil the interactive functions requested in the planning process.

Keywords

  • Participation requirements
  • Digital technologies
  • Crowd sourcing
  • Social media
  • E-tools

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abukhater, A., & Walker, D. (2010). Making smart growth smarter with GeoDesign. In: Changing geography by design: Selected readings in GeoDesign. Available via ESRI. http://www.esri.com/library/ebooks/GeoDesign.pdf. Accessed 4 Feb 2016.

  • Anymals+plants. (2011). Artenvielfalt für ihr Smartphone. https://www.anymals.org. Accessed 8 Feb 2016.

  • Ardini. (2012). Artenerfassung digital in Niedersachsen. http://www.ardini.de. Accessed 8 Feb 2016.

  • Fürst, D., & Scholles, F. (2008). Partizipative Planung. In D. Fürst & F. Scholles (Eds.), Handbuch Theorien und Methoden (pp. 161–178). Dortmund: Rohn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galler, C., & Gnest, H. (2011). Datenmanagement und Monitoringsysteme im sektoralen Verwaltungsaufbau. Zukunftsfähiger Umgang mit Wasser im Raum. ARL Forschungs- und Sitzungsberichte, 234, 118–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galler, C., Krätzig, S., Warren-Kretzschmar, B., et al. (2014). Integrated approaches in digital/interactive landscape planning. In U. Wissen Hayek, P. Fricker, & E. Buhmann (Eds.), Peer reviewed proceedings of digital landscape architecture 2014 at ETH Zurich (pp. 70–83). VDE VERLAG GMBH, Berlin/Offenbach: Herbert Wichmann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, L., & Lange, E. (2015). Getting virtual 3D landscapes out of the lab. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54, 356–362.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • von Haaren, C., & Galler, C. (2012). Landschaftsplanung. Grundlage nachhaltiger Landschaftsentwicklung. Available via Bundesamt für Naturschutz. https://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/MDB/documents/service/Landschaftsplanung_2012.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2016.

  • Harwood, A. R., Lovett, A. A., & Turner, J. A. (2015). Customising virtual globe tours to enhance community awareness of local landscape benefits. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 106–119.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, B., & Fine, A. H. (2010). The networked nonprofit. Connecting with social media to drive change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krätzig, S., & Warren-Kretzschmar, B. (2014). Using interactive web tools in environmental planning to improve communication about sustainable development. Sustainability, 6(1), 236–250.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kwartler, M., & Longo, G. (2008). Visioning and visualization: People, pixels and plans. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of land Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, E. (2011). 99 volumes later: We can visualise. Now what? Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 403–406.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, A., Appleton, K., Warren-Kretzschmar, B., et al. (2015). Using 3D visualization methods in landscape planning: An evaluation of options and practical issues. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 85–94.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Martini, M., & Fritzsche, S. (2013). Zwischen Öffentlichkeitsauftrag und Gesetzesbindung: zum Dilemma deutscher Behörden bei der Einbindung privater Social-Media-Werkzeuge und Geodatendienste in ihre Internetangebote. Verwaltungsarchiv, 104(4), 449–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze-Wolf, T., & Menzel, A. (2007). Neue Wege der Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung in der Raumplanung. Hintergründe, Konzepte und Erfahrungen. In Initiative eParticipation & Stiftung Mitarbeit (Ed.), E-Partizipation. Beteiligungsprojekte im Internet (pp. 120–143). Bonn: Stiftung Mitarbeit.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Ministry Baden-Württemberg. (2014). Leitfaden für eine neue Planungskultur. https://mitwirkung.bw21.de/Downloads/140304_Planungsleitfaden.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2016.

  • von Haaren, C., & Warren-Kretzschmar, B. (2006). The interactive landscape plan – Use and benefits of new technologies in landscape planning, including initial results of the interactive Landscape plan Koenigslutter am Elm, Germany. Landscape Research, 31, 83–105.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • von Haaren, C., Oppermann, B., Friese, K. I. et al. (2005). Interaktiver Landschaftsplan Königslutter am Elm: Ergebnisse aus dem E+E-Vorhaben “Interaktiver Landschaftsplan Königslutter am Elm” des Bundesamtes für Naturschutz. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn–Bad Godesberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D., & Daniels, T. (2011). The planners guide to communityviz. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren-Kretzschmar, B., Haaren, C. V., Hachmann, R. et al. (2012, May 31–June 2). The potential of GeoDesign for linking landscape planning and design. Paper presented at the Digital Landscape Architecture Conference 2012, Anhalt University of Applied Siences, Bernburg/Dessau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeile, P., Exner, J. P., Bergner, B. S., et al. (2013). Humansensorik und Kartierung von Emotionen in der räumlichen Planung. In E. Buhmann, S. M. Ervin, & M. Pietsch (Eds.), Peer review proceedings of digital landscape architecture 2013 at Anhalt University of Applied Sciences. Bernburg, 6–8 June 2013 (pp. 129–141). Berlin/Offenbach: Herbert Wichmann Verlag, VDE VERLAG GMBH.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Krätzig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Krätzig, S., Galler, C., Warren-Kretzschmar, B. (2019). Techniques for Participatory Approaches. In: von Haaren, C., Lovett, A., Albert, C. (eds) Landscape Planning with Ecosystem Services. Landscape Series, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1681-7_28

Download citation