Advertisement

Techniques for Participatory Approaches

Chapter
  • 645 Downloads
Part of the Landscape Series book series (LAEC, volume 24)

Abstract

A challenge of comprehensive landscape planning communication processes is to integrate digital information technology into planning processes by matching the present technological capabilities to the specific requirements and tasks of the different planning phases. Web 2.0 technologies hold the potential for supporting landscape planning tasks such as scoping, landscape analysis, assessment, planning concepts, assigning objectives and measures, implementation concepts, implementation support and continuous updates and monitoring. Application fields of crowd sourcing and social media/networks are discussed and recommendations are made for deciding which E-tools best fulfil the interactive functions requested in the planning process.

Keywords

Participation requirements Digital technologies Crowd sourcing Social media E-tools 

References

  1. Abukhater, A., & Walker, D. (2010). Making smart growth smarter with GeoDesign. In: Changing geography by design: Selected readings in GeoDesign. Available via ESRI. http://www.esri.com/library/ebooks/GeoDesign.pdf. Accessed 4 Feb 2016.
  2. Anymals+plants. (2011). Artenvielfalt für ihr Smartphone. https://www.anymals.org. Accessed 8 Feb 2016.
  3. Ardini. (2012). Artenerfassung digital in Niedersachsen. http://www.ardini.de. Accessed 8 Feb 2016.
  4. Fürst, D., & Scholles, F. (2008). Partizipative Planung. In D. Fürst & F. Scholles (Eds.), Handbuch Theorien und Methoden (pp. 161–178). Dortmund: Rohn.Google Scholar
  5. Galler, C., & Gnest, H. (2011). Datenmanagement und Monitoringsysteme im sektoralen Verwaltungsaufbau. Zukunftsfähiger Umgang mit Wasser im Raum. ARL Forschungs- und Sitzungsberichte, 234, 118–122.Google Scholar
  6. Galler, C., Krätzig, S., Warren-Kretzschmar, B., et al. (2014). Integrated approaches in digital/interactive landscape planning. In U. Wissen Hayek, P. Fricker, & E. Buhmann (Eds.), Peer reviewed proceedings of digital landscape architecture 2014 at ETH Zurich (pp. 70–83). VDE VERLAG GMBH, Berlin/Offenbach: Herbert Wichmann Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Gill, L., & Lange, E. (2015). Getting virtual 3D landscapes out of the lab. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54, 356–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. von Haaren, C., & Galler, C. (2012). Landschaftsplanung. Grundlage nachhaltiger Landschaftsentwicklung. Available via Bundesamt für Naturschutz. https://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/MDB/documents/service/Landschaftsplanung_2012.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2016.
  9. Harwood, A. R., Lovett, A. A., & Turner, J. A. (2015). Customising virtual globe tours to enhance community awareness of local landscape benefits. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 106–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kanter, B., & Fine, A. H. (2010). The networked nonprofit. Connecting with social media to drive change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Krätzig, S., & Warren-Kretzschmar, B. (2014). Using interactive web tools in environmental planning to improve communication about sustainable development. Sustainability, 6(1), 236–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kwartler, M., & Longo, G. (2008). Visioning and visualization: People, pixels and plans. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of land Policy.Google Scholar
  13. Lange, E. (2011). 99 volumes later: We can visualise. Now what? Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 403–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lovett, A., Appleton, K., Warren-Kretzschmar, B., et al. (2015). Using 3D visualization methods in landscape planning: An evaluation of options and practical issues. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martini, M., & Fritzsche, S. (2013). Zwischen Öffentlichkeitsauftrag und Gesetzesbindung: zum Dilemma deutscher Behörden bei der Einbindung privater Social-Media-Werkzeuge und Geodatendienste in ihre Internetangebote. Verwaltungsarchiv, 104(4), 449–485.Google Scholar
  16. Schulze-Wolf, T., & Menzel, A. (2007). Neue Wege der Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung in der Raumplanung. Hintergründe, Konzepte und Erfahrungen. In Initiative eParticipation & Stiftung Mitarbeit (Ed.), E-Partizipation. Beteiligungsprojekte im Internet (pp. 120–143). Bonn: Stiftung Mitarbeit.Google Scholar
  17. State Ministry Baden-Württemberg. (2014). Leitfaden für eine neue Planungskultur. https://mitwirkung.bw21.de/Downloads/140304_Planungsleitfaden.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2016.
  18. von Haaren, C., & Warren-Kretzschmar, B. (2006). The interactive landscape plan – Use and benefits of new technologies in landscape planning, including initial results of the interactive Landscape plan Koenigslutter am Elm, Germany. Landscape Research, 31, 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. von Haaren, C., Oppermann, B., Friese, K. I. et al. (2005). Interaktiver Landschaftsplan Königslutter am Elm: Ergebnisse aus dem E+E-Vorhaben “Interaktiver Landschaftsplan Königslutter am Elm” des Bundesamtes für Naturschutz. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn–Bad Godesberg.Google Scholar
  20. Walker, D., & Daniels, T. (2011). The planners guide to communityviz. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Warren-Kretzschmar, B., Haaren, C. V., Hachmann, R. et al. (2012, May 31–June 2). The potential of GeoDesign for linking landscape planning and design. Paper presented at the Digital Landscape Architecture Conference 2012, Anhalt University of Applied Siences, Bernburg/Dessau.Google Scholar
  22. Zeile, P., Exner, J. P., Bergner, B. S., et al. (2013). Humansensorik und Kartierung von Emotionen in der räumlichen Planung. In E. Buhmann, S. M. Ervin, & M. Pietsch (Eds.), Peer review proceedings of digital landscape architecture 2013 at Anhalt University of Applied Sciences. Bernburg, 6–8 June 2013 (pp. 129–141). Berlin/Offenbach: Herbert Wichmann Verlag, VDE VERLAG GMBH.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz University HannoverHannoverGermany
  2. 2.Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Energie und KlimaschutzHannoverGermany
  3. 3.Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental PlanningUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations