Gender in the Investigation and Politics of ‘Low’ Fertility

  • Leslie KingEmail author
Part of the International Handbooks of Population book series (IHOP, volume 8)


In this review of research on gender and low fertility, I develop three main categories: (1) studies seeking to explain why fertility is low; (2) studies on the efficacy of fertility-related policies; and (3) critical feminist studies that analyze discourses surrounding low fertility and fertility-related policy. I provide examples of each to illustrate how researchers interested in fertility use the concept of gender and to what end. I suggest that by repeatedly asking why fertility is so low and examining possible factors that prevent people from having children, demographic studies often implicitly reinforce the notion that low fertility is undesirable. More critical work points us in different directions, revealing how pronatalist policies – and the discourses surrounding such policies – may have deleterious effects on gender equity. Finally, I discuss work that asks different questions, such as how demographic trends may contribute to shaping state policies and/or other gendered structures. I conclude that future research should analyze how demographic trends and patterns are both shaped by and also shape gender.


  1. Aassve, A., Fuochi, G., Mencarini, L., & Mendola, D. (2015). What is your couple type? Gender ideology, house-work sharing and babies. Demographic Research, 32(30), 835–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allendorf, K. (2012). Like daughter, like son? Fertility decline and the transformation of gender systems in the family. Demographic Research, 27(16), 429–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, G. (2008). A review of policies and practices related to the ‘highest-low fertility of Sweden. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 6, 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arpino, B., & Tavares, L. P. (2013). Fertility and values in Italy and Spain: A look at regional differences within the European context. Population Review, 52(1), 62–86.Google Scholar
  5. Avdeyeva, O. A. (2011). Policy experiment in Russia: Cash-for-babies and fertility change. Social Politics, 8(3), 361–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, G. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In G. S. Becker (Ed.), Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 209–231). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, G. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bernhardt, E., & Goldscheider, F. (2006). Gender equality, parent attitudes, and first births in Sweden. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 4, 19–39.Google Scholar
  9. Boling, P. (2008). Demography, culture, and policy: Understanding Japan’s low fertility. Population and Development Review, 34(2), 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooke, L. P. (2009). Gender equity and fertility in Italy and Spain. Journal of Social Policy, 38(1), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Demeny, P. (2003). Population policy dilemmas in Europe at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Population and Development Review, 29(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duvander, A., Lappegård, T., & Andersson, G. (2010). Family policy and fertility: Fathers’ and mothers’ use of parental leave and continued childbearing in Norway and Sweden. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(1), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gauthier, A. H., & Philipov, D. (2008). Can policies enhance fertility in Europe? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 6, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldscheider, F., Oláh, L. S., & Puur, A. (2010). Reconciling studies of men’s gender attitudes and fertility: Response to Westoff and Higgens. Demographic Research, 22(8), 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Branden, M. (2013). Domestic gender equality and childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Research, 29(40), 1097–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldstone, J. A. (2010). The new population bomb: Four mega-trends that will change the world. Foreign Affairs, 89(1), 31–43.Google Scholar
  17. Greenhalgh, S. (1995). Situating fertility. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenhalgh, S. (1996). The social construction of population science: An intellectual, institutional, and political history of twentieth-century demography. Comparative Studies in Science and History, 38(1), 26–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henninger, A., Wimbauer, C., & Dombrowski, R. (2008). Demography as a push toward gender equality? Current reforms of German family policy. Social Politics, 15(3), 287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  21. Huen, Y. W. P. (2007). Policy response to declining birth rate in Japan: Formation of a ‘gender-equal’ society. East Asia, 24(4), 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kanaaneh, R. A. (2002). Birthing the nation: Strategies of Palestinian women in Israel. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. King, L. (2001). From pronatalism to social welfare? Extending family allowances to minority populations in France and Israel. European Journal of Population, 17(4), 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. King, L. (2002). Demographic trends, pronatalism and nationalist ideologies in the late twentieth century. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25(3), 367–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kohler, H. P., Billari, F. C., & Ortega, J. A. (2006). Low fertility in Europe: Causes, implications and policy options. In F. R. Harris (Ed.), The baby bust: Who will do the work? Who will pay the taxes? (pp. 48–109). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Krause, E. L., & Marchesi, M. (2007). Fertility politics as ‘social viagra’: Reproducing boundaries, social cohesion, and modernity in Italy. American Anthropologist, 109(2), 350–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Le Bras, H. (1993). Marianne et les lapins: l’obsession démographique. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
  28. Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Report 10–696, Population Studies Center, University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maher, J. M. (2007). The fertile fields of policy? Examining fertility decision-making and policy settings. Social Policy and Society, 7(2), 159–172.Google Scholar
  30. Malhotra, A. (2012). Remobilizing the gender and fertility connection: the case for examining the impact of fertility control and fertility declines on gender equality. International Center for Research on Women Fertility and Empowerment Work Paper Series, 001-2012-ICRW-FE (pp. 1–38).Google Scholar
  31. Mason, K. O. (1997). Gender and demographic change: What do we know? In G. W. Jones, R. M. Douglas, J. C. Caldwell, & R. M. D’Souza (Eds.), The continuing demographic transition (pp. 158–182). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  32. McCann, C. R. (2009). Malthusian men and demographic transitions: A case study of hegemonic masculinity in mid-twentieth-century population theory. Frontiers, 30(1), 142–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McDonald, P. (2013). Societal foundations for explaining low fertility: Gender equity. Demographic Research, 28, 981–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miettinen, A., Basten, S., & Rotkirch, A. (2011). Gender equality and fertility intentions revisited: Evidence from Finland. Demographic Research, 24(20), 469–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mills, M., Mencarini, L., Tanturri, M. L., & Begall, K. (2008). Gender equity and fertility intentions in Italy and the Netherlands. Demographic Research, 18(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mishtal, J. (2009). Understanding low fertility in Poland: Demographic consequences of gendered discrimination in employment and postsocialist neoliberal restructuring. Demographic Research, 21(20), 599–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mishtal, J. (2012). Irrational non-reproduction? The ‘dying nation’ and the postsocialist logics of declining motherhood in Poland. Anthropology & Medicine, 19(2), 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morgan, P. S. (2003). Is low fertility a twenty-first century demographic crisis? Demography, 40(4), 589–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Neyer, G. (2011). Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The second ‘NO.’. Demographic Research, 24, 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neyer, G., Lappegård, T., & Vignoli, D. (2013). Gender equality and fertility: Which equality matters? European Journal of Population, 29, 245–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oláh, L. S. (2011). Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The second ‘YES.’. Demographic Research, 24(9), 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peng, I. (2002). Social care in crisis: Gender, demography, and welfare state restructuring in Japan. Social Politics, 9(3), 411–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Perelli-Harris, B. (2005). The path to lowest-low fertility in the Ukraine. Population Studies, 59(1), 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Philipov, D. (2011). Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The first ‘no.’. Demographic Research, 24(8), 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Population Reference Bureau. (2014). World population data sheet. Accessed Nov 2017.
  47. Puur, A., Oláh, L. S., Tazi-Preve, M. I., & Dorbritz, J. (2008). Men’s childbearing desires and views of the male role in Europe at the dawn of the 21st century. Demographic Research, 19(56), 1883–1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Riley, N. E. (1999). Challenging demography: Contributions from feminist theory. Sociological Forum, 14(3), 369–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Riley, N. E., & McCarthy, J. (2003). Demography in the age of the postmodern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rindfuss, R., Guzzo, K. B., & Morgan, S. P. (2003). The changing institutional context of low fertility. Population Research and Policy Review, 22, 411–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rinesi, F., Pinnelli, A., Prati, S., Castagnaro, C., & Iaccarino, C. (2011). The transition to second child in Italy: Expectations and realization. Population, 66(2), 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rivkin-Fish, M. (2010). Pronatalism, gender politics, and the renewal of family support in Russia: Toward a feminist anthropology of ‘maternity capital’. Slavic Review, 69(3), 701–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schad-Seifert, A. (2006). Coping with low fertility? Japan’s government measures for a gender equal society. German Institute for Japanese Studies Working Paper 06/4.Google Scholar
  54. Suzuki, T. (2008). Korea’s strong familism and lowest-low fertility. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 17, 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Torr, B. M., & Short, S. E. (2004). Second births and the second shift: A research note on gender equity and fertility. Population and Development Review, 30(1), 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Toulemon, L. (2011). Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The first ‘YES’. Demographic Research, 24(7), 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2013). World population policies 2013. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  58. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Gender and Generations Programme (2015). Accessed July 2015.
  59. Vikat, A., Spéder, Z., Beets, G., Billari, F. C., Bühler, C., Désesquelles, A., Fokkema, T., Hoem, J. M., MacDonald, A., Neyer, G., Pailhé, A., Pinnelli, A., & Solaz, A. (2007). Generations and gender survey (GGS): Towards a better understanding of relationships and processes in the life course. Demographic Research, 17(14), 389–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Westoff, C. F., & Higgins, J. (2009). Relationships between men’s gender attitudes and fertility: Response to purr et al.’s ‘Men’s childbearing desires and views of the male role in Europe at the dawn of the 21st century. Demographic Research, 21(3), 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Williams, J. R. (2010). Doing feminist-demography. Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(3), 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologySmith CollegeNorthamptonUSA

Personalised recommendations