Skip to main content

Strategic Aspects of Countering Bioterrorism

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Defence Against Bioterrorism

Abstract

Article is devoted to phenomena of bioterrorism which is not new threat to security, technique and methods of combating this phenomena should be considered carefully in societies today. Authors in article emphasis that first step in combating bioterrorism are strategies which parts clearly explain what should be done. Legal frameworks, common understanding of challenges and threats, standardized rules of operation, improved exchange of information, increased capability to prevent biological attacks are procedures as an integral parts of strategies for combat weapon for mass destruction including bio weapon.

Article is consist of: basic terms which remind us what exactly biological weapon is and explaining that malevolent application of biological agents in terrorist acts to cause infectious diseases of civilians or military personnel, animals and plants, also international legal framework concerning biological terrorism, reasons for strategic approach for countering bioterrorism, as an example how control and prevent this phenomenon. In addition, the strategy can be seen as an expression of the evolution of the control of biological weapons focusing on the projection of future manifestations of bioterrorism, in order to take optimal measures in countering this phenomenon. Different international initiative are good tool for developing strategies as a first step in understanding and preventing use of biological weapon. In article are explained several regional initiatives and their action regarding bio weapon including national approaches to this security problem. Without contemporary thinking and acting, this issue cannot be solved in future years, threat of biological weapon will grow if humanity doesn’t take serious measures in prevention and combating this phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Costa, H., & Baños, J. (2016). Bioterrorism in the literature of the nineteenth century: The case of wells and the stolen bacillus. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 3(1).

  2. 2.

    Foster T George, Focus on Bioterrorism, Nova science Publishers Inc., 2006.

  3. 3.

    International Convention for the Suppression of the terrorist bombings (1997).

  4. 4.

    International Convention for the Suppression of the financing of terrorism (1999) United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004).

  5. 5.

    Clarke, S. C. (2002). Bioterrorism: An overview. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 59(4), 232–4.

  6. 6.

    http://www.who.int/csr/delibepidemics/chapter3.pdf, Public health response to biological and chemical weapons—WHO guidance.

  7. 7.

    Ostfield, M. L. (2004). Bioterrorism as a foreign policy issue. The SAIS Review of International Affairs, 24(1).

  8. 8.

    https://www.un.org/disarmament/geneva/bwc/. The Biological Weapons Convention.

  9. 9.

    Chevrier, Marie Isabelle; Chomiczewski, Krzysztof; Garrigue, Henri, eds. (2004). The Implementation of Legally Binding Measures to Strengthen the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, Held in Budapest, Hungary, 2001. Volume 150 of NATO science series: Mathematics, physics, and chemistry (illustrated ed.). Springer.

  10. 10.

    International Committee of the Red Cross web database: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/150?OpenDocument

  11. 11.

    https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/145?OpenDocument

  12. 12.

    The Final Protocol of the First Geneva Conference (1899): https://ihl.databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Article.xsp?action=openDocument&documentId=8FCF14D950797012C12563CD00515C0A

  13. 13.

    Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, 1925 Geneva Protocol. https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/bio/1925-geneva-protocol

  14. 14.

    Encyclopaedia Britannica, internet edition, League of Nations: https://www.britannica.com/topic/League-of-Nations (30/06/2017).

  15. 15.

    United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA) official web site: https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/bio

  16. 16.

    Clarke, S. C. (2002). Bioterrorism: An overview. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 59(4), 232–4. https://search.proquest.com/docview/220149820?accountid=31553

  17. 17.

    Robery Jay Lifton, Destroying the World to Save It: Aum Shinrikyo, Apocalyptic Violence, and the New Global Terrorism, Picador, London 2000.

  18. 18.

    S. E., Meulenbelt, & M. S. Nieuwenhuizen (2015), 838.

  19. 19.

    Web page of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), American Anthrax Outbreak of 2001: http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/detect/antdetect_intro.html, retrieved 24/06/2017.

  20. 20.

    Fidler, D. P. (2002). Bioterrorism, public health, and international law. Chicago Journal of International Law, 3(1), 7–26.

  21. 21.

    Colonel Katarina Strbac PhD, Emergencies-how to manage them? Institute for Strategic research and The OSCE Mission to Serbia, Belgrade 2009.

  22. 22.

    National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction of USA, published September 17, 2002, https://www.armscontrol.org/print/1184

  23. 23.

    Maddox, P. J. (2001). Bioterrorism: A renewed public health threat. Dermatology Nursing, 13(6), 437–41. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/224832248?accountid=31553

  24. 24.

    https://www.state.gov/t/isn/c10390.htm

  25. 25.

    Official web page of the Proliferation Security Initiative: http://www.psi-online.info

  26. 26.

    https://www.state.gov/t/isn/c10390.htm

  27. 27.

    Statement of Interdiction Principles, presented at the web-page of the U. S. Government: https://www.state.gov/t/isn/c27726.htm

  28. 28.

    Eur-lex, access to European Union law, Communication from the Commission of 2 June 2003 to the Council and the European Parliament on cooperation in the European Union on preparedness and response to Biological and Chemical agent attacks (Health security) [COM(2003) 320,final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM:c11576

  29. 29.

    US National Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health, The European Commission’s Task Force on Bioterrorism. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3033083/

  30. 30.

    Eur-lex, access to European Union law, Communication from the Commission of 2 June 2003 to the Council and the European Parliament on cooperation in the European Union on preparedness and response to Biological and Chemical agent attacks (Health security) [COM(2003) 320,final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM:c11576

  31. 31.

    Legal web portal of the European Union, EURLEX: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=URISERV%3Al33234

  32. 32.

    EU Action Plan on biological and toxin weapons, complementary to the EU Joint Action in support of the BTWC (2006/C 57/01), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.C_.2006.057.01.0001.01.ENG

  33. 33.

    EU New Lines for Action, http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%2017172%202008%20INIT

  34. 34.

    EU non-proliferation consortium, The European Network of Independent Non-proliferation Think Tanks https://www.nonproliferation.eu

  35. 35.

    EU non-proliferation consortium, The European Network of Independent Non-proliferation Think Tanks https://www.nonproliferation.eu/thematics/biological-weapons

  36. 36.

    SIPRI, The European Union and weapons of mass destruction: A follow-on to the global strategy? https://www.sipri.org/publications/2017/eu-non-proliferation-papers/european-union-and-weapons-mass-destruction

  37. 37.

    Strbac Katarina, Branislav Milosavljevic, Boban Radivojevic, Some Aspects of Illegal Migrations, Zborník príspevkov6. medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie, Bezpečné Slovensko A Európska Únia, Vysoká Škola Bezpečnostného Manažérstva V Košiciach, 2012.

  38. 38.

    Strbac Katarina, The Perspective on Challenges and Complementarities of the Standpoints of the Republic of Serbia and the EU, Proceedings “Security and Defence aspects of the Republic of Serbia’s accession to the European union”, Strategic Research Institute and OSCE Mission to Serbia, Belgrade, 2010.

  39. 39.

    Government of the Republic of Croatia, https://vlada.gov.hr/UserDocsImages//Sjednice/Arhiva//71.%20-%206.pdf https://www.google.rs/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwj5k7eMmNfUAhVI0xoKHc_VDbsQFggkMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.un.org%2Fen%2Fsc%2F1540%2Fdocuments%2FCroatia-action-plan.pdf&usg=AFQjCNFy5QbNjPBwhPx3QMsrIr9h3I2M8Q

  40. 40.

    RACVIAC: www.racviac.org

  41. 41.

    Strbac Katarina, Miroslav Mitrovic, Asymmetric threats-common response in Western Balkans, The Review of international Affairs, Belgrade, 2011.

  42. 42.

    Strbac Katarina, Evolving Asymmetric Threats in the Balkans, NATO Science for Peace and Security Series E: Human and Societal Dynamics-Vol 85, 2010.

  43. 43.

    Strbac Katarina, Welcome address: Implications of Climate Change and Disasters on Military Activities NATO Science for Peace and Security Series – C: Environmental Security, Springer, 2016.

Literature

  1. Chevrier MI, Chomiczewski K, Garrigue H (eds) (2004). The implementation of legally binding measures to strengthen the biological and toxin weapons convention: proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, Held in Budapest, Hungary, 2001. Volume 150 of NATO science series: Mathematics, physics, and chemistry, illustrated edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clarke SC (2002) Bioterrorism: an overview. Br J Biomed Sci 59(4):232–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Strbac K (2009) Emergencies-how to manage them? Institute for Strategic research and The OSCE Mission to Serbia, Belgrade

    Google Scholar 

  4. Costa H, Baños J (2016) Bioterrorism in the literature of the nineteenth century: the case of wells and the stolen bacillus. Cogent Arts & Humanit 3(1):1224538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Encyclopaedia Britannica. League of nations. Internet edn

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meier E-C, Nelte K-M, Schaefer H-U (2006) Woerterbuch yur Sichereitspolitik-Deutschland in einem veraenderten internationalen Umfeld. 6. vollstaending ueberarbeitete Auflage. Verlag E.S. Mittler&Sohn, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  7. EU New Lines for Action. http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%2017172%202008%20INIT

  8. European security strategy 2008. http://www.isac-fund.org/download/Evropska%20strategija%20bezbednosti.pdf

  9. Fidler DP (2002) Bioterrorism, public health, and international law. Chicago J Int Law 3(1):7–26

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foster T (2006) George, focus on bioterrorism. Nova Science Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gaćinović R (2005) Terorizam. Draslar, Beograd

    Google Scholar 

  12. Legal web portal of the European Union, EURLEX. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=URISERV%3Al33234

  13. EU Action Plan on biological and toxin weapons, complementary to the EU Joint Action in support of the BTWC (2006/C 57/01). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.C_.2006.057.01.0001.01.ENG

  14. EU non-proliferation consortium, The European Network of Independent Non-proliferation Think Tanks. https://www.nonproliferation.eu

  15. EU non-proliferation consortium, The European Network of Independent Non-proliferation Think Tanks. https://www.nonproliferation.eu/thematics/biological-weapons

  16. SIPRI, The European Union and weapons of mass destruction: A follow-on to the global strategy?

    Google Scholar 

  17. https://ihldatabases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Article.xsp?action=openDocument&documentId=8FCF14D950797012C12563CD00515C0A

    Google Scholar 

  18. International Committee of the Red Cross. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/145?OpenDocument

  19. https://search.proquest.com/docview/220149820?accountid=31553

  20. https://search.proquest.com/docview/237212498?accountid=31553

  21. Government of the Republic of Croatia. https://vlada.gov.hr/UserDocsImages//Sjednice/Arhiva//71.%20-%206.pdf https://www.google.rs/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwj5k7eMmNfUAhVI0xoKHc_VDbsQFggkMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.un.org%2Fen%2Fsc%2F1540%2Fdocuments%2FCroatia-action-plan.pdf&usg=AFQjCNFy5QbNjPBwhPx3QMsrIr9h3I2M8Q

  22. Arms Control Association. https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/cbwprolif. Chemical and Biological weapon at glance

  23. Government of the Republic of Bulgaria. https://www.bbn.gov.pl/ftp/dok/07/BGR_National_Security_Strategy_Republic_Bulgaria_2011.pdf

  24. Government of the Republic of Austria. https://www.bka.gv.at/DocView.axd?CobId=52251

  25. https://www.britannica.com/topic/League-of-Nations (30/06/2017)

  26. US National Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health, The European Commission’s Task Force on Bioterrorism. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3033083/ https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/2016/04/preventing-bioterrorism-risk-and-legal-instruments/

  27. US Department of State. Proliferation Security initiative. https://www.state.gov/t/isn/c10390.htm

  28. Organization of United Nations. The Biological weapon convention. https://www.un.org/disarmament/geneva/bwc/

  29. Organization of United Nations, 1925 Geneva Protocol. https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/bio/1925-geneva-protocol

  30. International Committee of the Red Cross web database. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/150?OpenDocument

  31. International Convention for the Suppression of the financing of terrorism (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  32. International Convention for the Suppression of the terrorist bombings (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jončić V (2010) Međunarodno humanitarno pravo. Pravni fakultet, Beograd

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jović R, Savić A (2004) Bioterorizam, biološki rat. Institut za političke studije, Beograd

    Google Scholar 

  35. Larsen MR (2010) Al qaeda weapons of mass destruction threat:hype or reality. Belfer center for science and international affairs, Cambridge. http://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/files/publication/al-qaeda-wmd-threat.pdf

  36. Legal web portal of the European Union, EURLEX

    Google Scholar 

  37. Maddox PJ (2001) Bioterrorism: a renewed public health threat. Dermatol Nurs 13(6):437–441. https://search.proquest.com/docview/224832248?accountid=31553

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mainuddin RG (2014) Prohibiting chemical and biological weapons: multilateral regimes and their evolution. Choice 51(12):2265–2266. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1548715180?accountid=31553

    Google Scholar 

  39. Meulenbelt SE, Nieuwenhuizen MS (2015) Non-state actors’ pursuit of CBRN weapons: from motivation to potential humanitarian consequences. International Review

    Google Scholar 

  40. National Security Strategy USA. http://nssarchive.us/national-security-strategy-2015/

  41. NATO Glossary of terms and definitions (AAP-6). http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/doctrine/other/aap6.pdf

  42. Meulenbelt ES, Nieuwenhuizen SM (2015) The human cost of nuclear weapons, Nonstate actors pursuit of CBRN weapons:From motivation to humanitarian consequences. Int Rev Red Cross 97(899):831–858

    Google Scholar 

  43. Official web page of the Proliferation Security Initiative. http://www.psi-online.info

  44. Official web-site of the RACVIAC. www.racviac.org

  45. Ostfield ML (2004) Bioterrorism as a foreign policy issue. SAIS Rev Int Aff 24(1):131–146. https://search.proquest.com/docview/231316387?accountid=31553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Paulun M (2003) Weapons of mass destruction, the first responder. Random, New York

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lifton RJ (2000) Destroying the world to save it: Aum Shinrikyo, apocalyptic violence, and the new global terrorism. Picador, London

    Google Scholar 

  48. Statement of Interdiction Principles. Presented at the web-page of the U. S. Government. https://www.state.gov/t/isn/c27726.htm

  49. Katarina S, Milosavljevic B, Radivojevic B (2012) Some Aspects of Illegal Migrations, Zborník príspevkov6. medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie, Bezpečné Slovensko A Európska Únia, Vysoká Škola Bezpečnostného Manažérstva V Košiciach

    Google Scholar 

  50. Strbac Katarina (2010) Evolving asymmetric threats in the Balkans. NATO Science for Peace and security series E: human and societal dynamics, vol 85. IOS Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  51. Katarina S, Mitrovic M (2011) Asymmetric threats-common response in Western Balkans. The Review of International Affairs, Belgrade

    Google Scholar 

  52. Katarina S (2010) The perspective on challenges and complementarities of the standpoints of the Republic of Serbia and the EU. In: Proceedings “Security and Defence aspects of the Republic of Serbia’s accession to the European union”. Strategic Research Institute and OSCE Mission to Serbia, Belgrade

    Google Scholar 

  53. Katarina S (2016) Welcome address: implications of Climate Change and disasters on Military Activities. NATO Science for peace and security series – C: environmental security. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  54. The Final Protocol of the First Geneva Conference (1899)

    Google Scholar 

  55. United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA) official web site. https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/bio

  56. United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Web page of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), American Anthrax Outbreak of 2001. http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/detect/antdetect_intro.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Strbac, K., Milosavljevic, B. (2018). Strategic Aspects of Countering Bioterrorism. In: Radosavljevic, V., Banjari, I., Belojevic, G. (eds) Defence Against Bioterrorism. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1263-5_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics