Skip to main content

The Role of Bioforensics in Medical Bio-Reconnaissance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Defence Against Bioterrorism

Abstract

Since the 1990s, a broad spectrum of regional conflicts and crises have evolved that have been accompanied by a growing threat of international terrorism. How vulnerable our modern societies would be towards a covert biological attack became evident in the 2001 anthrax letters attack in the United States. Biothreats are currently associated with asymmetric warfare scenarios and non-state actors rather than with state-driven biowarfare facilities. Against this backdrop, NATO has to consider biological warfare and bioterrorism as a serious threat to its forces. In bioterroristic scenarios the deliberate release of a biological agent will most probably remain undetected until a cluster of cases will suggest an unusual outbreak of disease. In military settings it is primarily the responsibility of the Medical Services to recognize the outbreak and to launch an appropriate outbreak investigation. Major goals of a medical bio-reconnaissance mission are to rapidly identify the causative agent of the outbreak and to differentiate between natural and deliberate outbreaks. In contrast to the investigation of overt natural outbreaks, forensic aspects have to be considered and appropriate procedures have to be implemented quite from the beginning when unusual outbreaks are to be investigated. If a biothreat agent is detected, it may be necessary to enter further genetic analysis in order to differentiate between natural and intentional outbreaks and to trace back the origin of the agent. Microbial forensics is mainly concerned with taking molecular fingerprints of biothreat agents by means of molecular typing techniques enabling the investigator to identify and trace back a particular strain by comparing it with the fingerprints stored in a typing database. The bioforensic approach may well be capable of elucidating the source of an outbreak as has been evidenced in the Amerithrax case in 2001. In order to detect molecular differences of microbial strains, a number of sophisticated typing techniques are currently employed, the most recent of which is whole genome sequencing, which has even entered the field laboratories by means of portable next generation sequencing devices like the MinION™.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Read TD, Salzberg SL, Pop M, Shumway M, Umayam L, Jiang L, Holtzapple E, Busch JD, Smith KL, Schupp JM, Solomon D, Keim P, Fraser CM (2002) Comparative genome sequencing for discovery of novel polymorphisms in Bacillus anthracis. Science 296:2028–2033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Ert MN, Easterday WR, Simonson TS, U’Ren JM, Pearson T, Kenefic LJ, Busch JD, Huynh LY, Dukerich M, Trim CB, Beaudry J, Welty-Bernard A, Read T, Fraser CM, Ravel J, Keim P (2007) Strain-specific single-nucleotide polymorphism assays for the Bacillus anthracis Ames strain. J Clin Microbiol 45:47–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Budowle B, Schutzer SE, Roger G, Breeze RG, Keim P, Stephen A, Morse SA (eds) (2010) Microbial forensics. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  4. NATO DTP Lexicon (2017) https://nso.nato.int/nso/. Accessed 23 Sept 2017

  5. Grundmann O (2014) The current state of bioterrorist attack surveillance and preparedness in the US. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 7:177–187

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Holtherm HU (2012) Development of a multinational Deployment Health Surveillance Capability (DHSC) for NATO. Wehrmedizinische Monatsschrift 11–12

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grunow R, Finke EJ (2002) A procedure for differentiating between the intentional release of biological warfare agents and natural outbreaks of disease: its use in analyzing the tularemia outbreak in Kosovo in 1999 and 2000. Clin Microbiol Infect 8:510–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dembek ZF, Kortepeter MG, Pavlin JA (2007) Discernment between deliberate and natural infectious disease outbreaks. Epidemiol Infect 135:353–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wölfel R, Stoecker K, Fleischmann E, Gramsamer B, Wagner M, Molkenthin P, Di Caro A, Günther S, Ibrahim S, Genzel GH, Ozin-Hofsäss AJ, Formenty P, Zöller L (2015) Mobile diagnostics in outbreak response, not only for Ebola: a blueprint for a modular and robust field laboratory. Euro Surveill 20(44)

    Google Scholar 

  10. AEP-66 NATO Standard (2012) NATO handbook for Sampling and Identification of Biological, Chemical and Radiological Agents (SIBCRA) Edition 1, Version 1

    Google Scholar 

  11. Budowle B, Johnson MD, Fraser CM, Leighton TJ, Murch RS, Chakraborty R (2005) Genetic analysis and attribution of microbial forensics evidence. Crit Rev Microbiol 31(4):233–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gilchrist CA, Turner SD, Riley MF, Petri WA Jr, Hewlett EL (2015) Whole-genome sequencing in outbreak analysis. Clin Microbiol Rev 28(3):541–563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Antwerpen MH, Sahl JW, Birdsell D et al (2017) Unexpected relations of historical Anthrax strain. MBio. 2017 Apr 25;8(2). pii: e00440-17

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walter MC, Zwirglmaier K, Vette P, Holowachuk SA, Stoecker K, Genzel GH, Antwerpen MH (2017) MinION as part of a biomedical rapidly deployable laboratory. J Biotechnol 250:16–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanczaruk M, Reischl U, Holzmann T, Frangoulidis D, Wagner DM, Keim PS, Antwerpen MH, Meyer H, Grass G (2014) Injectional anthrax in heroin users, Europe, 2000–2012. Emerg Infect Dis 2:322–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cliff JB, Kreuzer HW, Ehrhardt CJ, Wunschel DS (eds) (2012) Chemical and physical signatures for microbial forensics. Springer Book, Infectious Disease Series. Humana Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lothar Zöller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zöller, L., Genzel, G.H. (2018). The Role of Bioforensics in Medical Bio-Reconnaissance. In: Radosavljevic, V., Banjari, I., Belojevic, G. (eds) Defence Against Bioterrorism. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1263-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics