The Informational Construction of the Self

  • Massimo Durante
Part of the The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology book series (ELTE, volume 18)


The information revolution engendered by the evolution of digital ICTs in our current information societies confronts us with a specific and peculiar problem: how to conceive of our personal identity as it is constructed in the information age. First and foremost, this presupposes that personal identity is constructed. The self (or personal identity) is not a fixed, built-in entity to which one can gain immediate access with no regard to context or purpose. Access to the self (or self-knowledge) is constantly mediated, context-dependent and goal-oriented. In this perspective, the self is constructed through the progressive encapsulation of data and their transformation into meaningful information. Personal identity may therefore be described as the sum of information experienced by an epistemic agent at a given level of abstraction. This implies that the informational construction of the self has to do with the human faculty of imbuing with meaning a reality fashioned from the constraining affordances of data that concern us. This process of the semanticization of reality is not merely idealistic; it is already part of our adaptation to the informational environment.


Informatization Construction Epistemic Agent Personal Identity Florida 2002b Infosphere 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Brandt, R. 1991. D'Artagnan und die Urteilstafel. Über ein Ordnungsprinzip der europäischen Kulturgeschichte. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
  2. Davidson, D. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation [1974]. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Floridi, L. 2010a. Information. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2010b. Information Ethics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, ed. L. Floridi, 77–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 2011a. The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2011b. The Informational Nature of Personal Identity. Minds & Machines 21: 549–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2012. Hyperhistory and the Philosophy of Information Policies. Philosophy and Technology 25: 129–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2013. Information Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. 2014a. The Fourth Revolution. On the Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Our Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———. (ed.). 2014b. The Onlife Manifesto. Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era, Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Heidegger, M. 1997. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 5th ed. enlarged, Trans. R. Taft. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hey, T., S. Tansley, and K. Tolle. 2007. Jim Gray on eScience: A Transformed Scientific Model, accessible online at:
  13. Huxley, A. 1932. Texts & Pretexts: An Anthology with Commentaries. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobs, B. 2003. Kantian Character and the Problem of a Science of Humanity. In Essays on Kant’s Anthropology, ed. B. Jacob. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kallinikos, Y., and N. Tempini. 2012. Post-material Meditations: On Data Tokens, Knowledge and Behavior. Accessible online at:
  16. Lyotard, J.-F. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (1979). Trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mayer-Schonberger, V. 2009. Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Metzinger, T. 2004. Being No One: The Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Minsky, M. 1988. The Society of Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  20. Nielsen, M. 2011. Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pagallo, U., and M. Durante. 2014. Legal Memories and the Right to be Forgotten. In Protection of Information and the Right to Privacy – A New Equilibrium? Law, Governance and Technology Series, ed. L. Floridi, vol. 17, 17–30. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Massimo Durante
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LawUniversity of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations