Abstract
In the face of climate change impacts projected over the coming century, seaport decision makers have the responsibility to manage risks for a diverse array of stakeholders and enhance seaport resilience against climate and weather impacts. At the single port scale, decision makers such as port managers may consider the uninterrupted functioning of their port the number one priority. But, at the multi-port (regional or national) scale, policy-makers will need to prioritize competing port climate-adaptation needs in order to maximize the efficiency of limited physical and financial resources and maximize the resilience of the marine transportation system as a whole. This chapter provides an overview of a variety of approaches that set out to quantify various aspects of seaport vulnerability. It begins with discussion of the importance of a “multi-port” approach to complement the single case study approach more commonly applied to port assessments. It then addresses the components of climate vulnerability assessments and provides examples of a variety of approaches. Finally, it concludes with recommendations for next steps.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The marine transportation system, or MTS, consists of waterways, ports, and inter-modal land-side connections that allow the various modes of transportation to move people and goods to, from, and on the water. (MARAD 2016)
- 2.
Climate impact, adaptation, and vulnerability (CIAV) decisions are choices, the results of which are expected to affect or be affected by the interactions of the changing climate with ecological, economic, and social systems.
- 3.
Exposure refers to the nature and extent to which a system is subjected to a source of harm, taking no account of any defenses or other adaptation.
- 4.
The Delphi method is an iterative, multistage response process designed to generate expert consensus.
- 5.
United States Army Corps of Engineers.
Further Suggested Readings
Barnett J, Lambert S, Fry I (2008) The hazards of indicators: insights from the environmental vulnerability index. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 98(1):102–119
Becker A, Caldwell MR (2015) Stakeholder perceptions of seaport resilience strategies: a case study of Gulfport (Mississippi) and Providence (Rhode Island). Coast Manag 43(1):1–34
Becker A, Wilson A, Bannon R, McCann J, Robadue D (2010) Rhode Island ports & commercial harbors: a GIS-based inventory of current uses and infrastructure, edited by Susan Kennedy. Rhode Island Statewide Planning Program, US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration
Becker A, Inoue S, Fischer M, Schwegler B (2011a) Climate change impacts on international seaports: knowledge, perceptions, and planning efforts among port administrators. Clim Chang 110(1–2):5–29. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0043-7
Becker A, Newell D, Fischer M, Schwegler B (2011b) Will ports become forts? Climate change impacts, opportunities and challenges. Terra et Aqua 122:11–17
Becker A, Acciaro M, Asariotis R, Cabrera E, Cretegny L, Crist P, Esteban M, Mather A, Messner S, Naruse S, Ng AKY, Rahmstorf S, Savonis M, Song DW, Stenek V, Velegrakis AF (2013) A note on climate change adaptation for seaports: a challenge for global ports, a challenge for global society. Clim Chang 120(4):683–695. doi: DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0843-z
Becker A, Toilliez J, Mitchell T (2015) Considering sea level change when designing marine civil works: recommendations for best practices. In: Esteban M, Takagi H, Shibayama T (eds) Handbook of coastal disaster mitigation for engineers and planners. Elsevier, Waltham
Becker A, Chase NTL, Fischer M, Schwegler B, Mosher K (2016) A method to estimate climate-critical construction materials applied to seaport protection. Glob Environ Chang 40:125–136
Berle Ø, Asbjørnslett BE, Rice JB (2011) Formal vulnerability assessment of a maritime transportation system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(6):696–705
Bright EA, Coleman PR (2003) LandScan 2002. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge
Chhetri P, Corcoran J, Gekara V, Maddox C, McEvoy D (2014) Seaport resilience to climate change: mapping vulnerability to sea-level rise. J Spat Sci 60:1–14. doi:10.1080/14498596.2014.943311
Cox RJ, Panayotou K, Cornwell RM (2013) Climate risk assessment for Avatiu Port and connected infrastructure. Water Research Lab, University of New South Wales
Cutter SL, Burton CG, Emrich CT (2010) Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. J Homeland Secur Emergen Manag 7(1). doi:10.2202/1547-7355.1732
Eriksen SH, Mick Kelly P (2007) Developing credible vulnerability indicators for climate adaptation policy assessment. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 12(4):495–524
ESPO (2010) Work Package 1 (WP1): pre-selection of an initial set of indicators. In: PPRISM: Port PeRformance Indicators: Selection and Measurement. European Sea Ports Organization (ESPO)
ESPO (2011) Work Package 2 (WP2): stakeholders’ dialogue to evaluate and select a shortlist of indicators. In: PPRISM: Port PeRformance Indicators: Selection and Measurement. European Sea Ports Organization (ESPO)
ESPO (2012) Project Executive report (PPRISM WP4 D4.2). In: PPRISM: Port PeRformance Indicators: Selection and Measurement. European Sea Ports Organization (ESPO)
Gallopin GC (1997) Indicators and their use: information for decision-making. In: Boldan B, Bilharz S (eds) Sustainability indicators. A report on the project on indicators of sustainable development. SCOPE, pp 13–27
Gallopín GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):293–303
Gudmundsson H (2003) The policy use of environmental indicators—learning from evaluation research. J Transdiscipl Environ Stud 2(2):1–12
Hanson S, Nicholls R, Ranger N, Hallegatte S, Corfee-Morlot J, Herweijer C, Chateau J (2010) A global ranking of port cities with high exposure to climate extremes. Clim Chang 104(1):89–111. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9977-4
Hinkel J (2011) "Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity": towards a clarification of the science-policy interface. Glob Environ Chang Hum Policy Dimens 21(1):198–208. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.08.002
Hsieh C-H, Tai H-H, Lee Y-N (2013) Port vulnerability assessment from the perspective of critical infrastructure interdependency. Marit Policy Manag 41(6):589–606. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.856523
IMO (2012) International shipping facts and figures – information resources on trade, safety, security, environment. Maritime Knowledge Centre, International Maritime Organization
IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (SREX). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Stocker T, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge/New York
IPCC (2014a) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge/New York
IPCC (2014b) WGII AR5 glossary. In: Fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Geneva
Jharkharia S, Shankar R (2007) Selection of logistics service provider: an analytic network process (ANP) approach. OMEGA Int J Manag Sci 35(3):274–289. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2005.06.005
Klein RJT (2009) Identifying countries that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change: an academic or political challenge. Carbon Climate L Rev,284
Koppe B, Schmidt M, Strotmann T (2012) IAPH-report on seaports and climate change and implementation case study for the port of Hamburg
Linkov I, Bridges T, Creutzig F, Decker J, Fox-Lent C, Kröger W, Lambert JH, Levermann A, Montreuil B, Nathwani J, Nyer R, Renn O, Scharte B, Scheffler A, Schreurs M, Thiel-Clemen T (2014) Changing the resilience paradigm. Nat Clim Chang 4(6):407–409. doi:10.1038/nclimate2227
MARAD (2016) Marine Transportation System (MTS). Maritime Administration. Accessed 0n 25 May 2016. https://www.marad.dot.gov/ports/marine-transportation-system-mts/
McGranahan G, Balk D, Anderson B (2007) The rising tide: assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environ Urban 19(1):17–37
Melillo JM, Richmond TTC, Yohe GW (2014) Climate change impacts in the United States. In The third national climate assessment, US Global Change Research Program
Messner S, Moran L, Reub G, Campbell J (2013) Climate change and sea level rise impacts at ports and a consistent methodology to evaluate vulnerability and risk. ENVIRON International Corp
Morris LL, Sempier T (2016) Ports resilience index: a port management self-assessment. U.S. Department of Commerce, Gulf of Mexico Alliance
Nicholls RJ, Hanson S, Herweijer C, Patmore N, Hallegatte S, Corfee-Morlot J, Château J, Muir-Wood R (2008) Ranking port cities with high exposure and vulnerability to climate extremes: exposure Estimates. In: OECD environment working papers. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris
NOAA OCM (2015) Port tomorrow: port resilience planning tool [Prototype]. NOAA Office for Coastal Management. Accessed on 3 Apr 2015. http://www.coast.noaa.gov/port/
Obama B (2013) Presidential policy directive 21: critical infrastructure security and resilience. Washington, DC
Peduzzi P (2014) Sand, rarer than one thinks. Environ Dev 11:208–218
PIANC Inland Navigation Commission (2010) Performance indicators for inland waterways transport: user guideline, PIANC Report No. 111. The World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure (PIANC), Bruxelles
Preston BL (2012) Climate change vulnerability assessment: from conceptual frameworks to practical heuristics. CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship Working paper
Rosati JD (2015) PhD, PE, D.CE, Coastal & Hydraulics Laboratory, Engineer Research & Development Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Personal Communication. Accessed on 01 Oct 2015
Semppier TT, Swann DL, Emmer R, Sempier SH, Schneider M (2010) Coastal community resilience index: a community self-assessment. Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium
Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):282–292
The National Academies (2012) Disaster resilience: a national imperative. edited by Committee on Increasing National Resilience to Hazards and Disasters; Committee and Engineering on Science, and Public Policy. Washington, DC
USCMTS (2011) Strategic action plan for research and development in the marine transportation system. US Committee on the Marine Transportation System, Washington, DC
USCMTS (2015) Marine transportation system performance measures: executive summary. 1200 New Jersey Ave SE. Washington, DC. 20590: U.S. Committee on the Marine Transportation System, Research and Development Integrated Action Team
USDOT (2014) Impacts of climate change and variability on transportation systems and infrastructure the gulf coast study, phase 2 screening for vulnerability final report, Task 3.1. edited by ICF International. US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
WMO (2015) The state of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere based on global observations through 2014. In: Greenhouse Gas Bulletin. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Duncan McIntosh, R., Becker, A. (2017). Seaport Climate Vulnerability Assessment at the Multi-port Scale: A Review of Approaches. In: Linkov, I., Palma-Oliveira, J. (eds) Resilience and Risk. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1123-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1123-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1122-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1123-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)