Abstract
Efficient and effective resource protection from the perspective of society usually involves minimizing costs and capital commitment in any way, while maximizing the percentage of resource utilization. Effective resource management from the perspective of the environment means leaving them in their natural, intact, state. On the other hand, effective and efficient resource protection management activities from the perspective of the army involve efficient resource protection measures during peacetime, emergencies, and even wartime. The aim of this paper is to help develop an adaptive, integrative education model for resource protection, addressing the contemporary needs both within the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and Ministry of environmental protection (MEP) of the Republic of Serbia. The paper offers an in-depth analysis of related core terms: improvement of the current approach to the subject area, nature of the resources that are subject to protection, and different modalities of protection. The applied methodology consists of comparative analysis, statistical methods, and multi-criteria evaluation and assessment. Core determinants (ranking) within the defined model are specified by means of expert judgments method. Obtained results are intended to be used in further implementation processes regarding the developed model.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baker D, Bridges D, Hunter R, Johnson G, Krupa J, Murphy J, Sorenson K (2002) Guidebook to decision-making methods. WSRC-IM-2002-00002, Department of Energy, USA
Ciurean RL, Schroter D, Glade T (2013) Conceptual frameworks of vulnerability assessments for natural disasters reduction, approaches to disaster management – examining the implications of hazards, emergencies and disasters. In: Prof. Tiefenbacher John (ed), InTech. doi:10.5772/55538
EC (2005) Green paper: on a European programme for critical infrastructure protection. Comission of the European Communities. Brussels (Belgium).
EC (2006) Commission of the European Communities from the commission on the European programme for critical infrastructure protection, COM (2006) 786, Final, Brussels (Belgium).
Grozdanovic M, Janackovic G, Stojiljkovic E (2016) The selection of the key ergonomic indicators influencing work efficiency in the railway control rooms. Trans Inst Meas Control 38(10). doi:10.1177/0142331215579948
Haake J (2000) Firm strategies for an environmentally friendly use of materials: an application of the dematerialization concept to the environmental management of industrial firms. Dissertation. Universite de Versailles, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Centre d Economie et d Ethique pour Environnement et le Development (C3ED)
Janackovic G, Savic S, Stankovic M (2013) Selection and ranking of occupational safety indicators based on fuzzy AHP: Case study in road construction companies. S Afr J Ind Eng 24(3). doi:10.7166/24-3-463
Janackovic G, Malenovic NJ, Vasovic D (2014) Effects of mining and thermal power plants and the key aspects of environmental quality ranking by AHP. Commun Depend Qual Manag 17(1)
Janjic A, Savic S, Janackovic G, Stankovic M, Velimirovic L (2016) Multi-criteria assessment of the smart grid efficiency using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process, Facta Universitatis. Series: Electron Energ 29(4). doi:10.2298/FUEE1604631J
Law on Defence, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 116/2007 and 88/2009
Law on Emergency Situations, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 111/2009 and 92/2011
Linkov I, Moberg E (2014) Multi-criteria decision analysis: environmental applications and case studies. CRC Press/Tailor & Francis Group, Boca Raton
Malenovic Nikolic J, Ristovic I, Vasovic D (2015) System modelling for environmental management of mining and energy complex based on the strategy principles of sustainable balanced scorecard method (SBSC). J Environ Prot Ecol 16(3):1082–1090
Malenovic Nikolic J, Vasovic D, Filipovic I, Musicki S, Ristovic I (2016a) Application of Project Management process on environmental management system improvement in mining-energy complexes. Energies 9(12):1071
Malenovic Nikolic J, Vasovic D, Janackovic G, Ilic Petkovic A, Ilic Krstic I (2016b) Improvement of mining and energy complexes based on risk assessment, environmental law and sustainable development principles, J Environ Prot Ecol 17(3)
Musicki S, Kljajevic L, Milanovic M, Cebela M, Milanovic S, Nenadovic S, Nenadovic M (2015) Predicting of lead distribution and immobilization in soil of the region of lignite mining (Rudovci, Serbia). Acta Montanistica Slovaka 20(3):192–199
Musicki M, Nikolic V, Vasovic D (2016) Resource protection – the Serbian Army experience. VI International symposium engineering management and competitiveness (EMC 2016), Kotor, Montenegro.
Nikolic V, Vasovic D (2015) Tailor made education: environmental vs. energy security and sustainable development paradigm. In: Denis Caleta, Vesela Radovic (eds) Comprehensive approach as “Sine qua non for critical infrastructure protection & managing terrorism threats to critical infrastructure challenges for South Eastern Europe”. IOS Press, Amsterdam/Berlin/Tokyo/Washington, NATO SPS Series D: Information and Communication Security
Nikolic V, Zivkovic N (2010) Occupational and environmental safety, emergencies and education Faculty of Occupational Safety, University of Nis, Nis.
Presidential directive PDD-63 (1998) Washington
Saaty TL (1978) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 1:1–104
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Srdjevic Z (2012) Comparison of different multicriteria methods in selecting optimal biomechanical model parameters. ZAMM J Appl Math Mech 92(2):105–112
Srdjevic Z, Cvjeticanin L (2012) Identifying nonlinear biomechanical models by multicriteria analysis. J Sound Vib 331(5):1207–1216
U.S. Army Environmental Command (2007) U.S. Army Commander’s Guide for Mission-Focused Environmental Management Systems
Ustinovichius L, Zavadskas EK, Podvezko V (2007) Application of a quantitative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM-1) approach to the analysis of investments in construction. Control Cybern 36(1):251
Vasovic D, Malenovic Nikolic J, Janackovic G (2016) Evaluation and assessment model for environmental management under the Seveso III, IPPC/IED and water framework directive. J Environ Prot Ecol 17(1):356–365
Yusta JM, Correa GJ, Lacal-Arantegui R (2011) Methodologies and applications for critical infrastructure protection: state-of-the-art. Energ Policy 39:6100–6119
Acknowledgments
The presented research is a part of the projects Development of new information and communication technologies, based on advances mathematical methods, with applications in medicine, telecommunications, power systems, protection of natural heritage and education (Project code III 44006) and Research and development of energy efficient and environment friendly polygeneration systems based on renewable energy sources utilization (Project n III 42006), under the auspices of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vasovic, D., Janackovic, G.L., Musicki, S. (2017). Integrative Education Model for Resources and Critical Infrastructure Protection Based on Risk Assessment, Resources Valorization and Threat Ranking. In: Linkov, I., Palma-Oliveira, J. (eds) Resilience and Risk. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1123-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1123-2_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1122-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1123-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)