Abstract
Computation in medicine has recently revolutionized those ideal procedures for translating fundamentally proven mathematical concepts in medical imaging and analysis into relevant routines of algorithms. Modern computational techniques, such as CUDA, a parallel computing platform, enabling direct access to the GPU instruction and parallel processing capability, are currently providing flexibility in the use of high-performance computational approaches. Similarly are the other software optimization procedures that assure low-cost and high-throughput visualization of medical datasets. Without mincing words, significant impact of such hardware and software optimization algorithms in medical image analysis and visualization cannot be overemphasized. In the same vein, acquisition of appropriate clinical datasets plays a great role in the accurate diagnosis of diseases and therapy management. The use of appropriate datasets and suitable image modalities are both important in order to successfully prove the effectiveness of any applied computational approaches in medical image analysis and visualization. Moreover, data reconstruction and representation from 2-D to 3-D usually follow notable mathematical approaches such as Euclidean plane, projective plane, and Cartesian coordinate systems and involve other interactive properties such as rotation, scaling, and translation which are also relying on various renderable concepts of data representation. This chapter documents some of the image procedures for acquiring morphological and functional information of patients with more emphasis on mathematical computations of commonly used techniques, such as X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Interestingly, a typical framework for medical imaging and visualization has been conceptualized in the course of this documentation. Relevant approaches to medical data representation, restructuring, and modeling procedures such as volume segmentation, classification, shading, gradient computation, interpolation, and resampling are presented along with all the significant processes required before generating informative composition of images. In order to facilitate better understanding of some of the concepts introduced in this chapter, real-world examples of CT and MRI datasets in 2-D and in their 3-D correspondence are showcased to depict the significance of the mapped structures in the 2-D.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adeshina AM, Hashim R. ConnectViz: accelerated approach for brain structural connectivity using Delaunay triangulation. Interdisc Sci Comput Life Sci. 20151–13.
Adeshina AM, Hashim R, Khalid NEA, Abidin SZZ. Locating abnormalities in brain blood vessels using parallel computing architecture. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci. 2012;4(3):161–72.
Adeshina AM, Hashim R, Khalid NEA, Abidin SZZ. Multimodal 3-D reconstruction of human anatomical structures using surlens visualization system. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci. 2013;5(1):23–36.
Adeshina AM, Hashim R, Khalid NEA. CAHECA: Computer Aided Hepatocellular Carcinoma therapy planning. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci. 2014;6(3):222–34.
Aldrich MB, Marshall MV, Sevick-Muraca EM, Lanza G, Kotyk J, Culver J, Wang LV, Uddin J, Crews BC, Marnett LJ, Liao JC, Contag C, Crawford JM, Wang K, Reisdorph B, Appelman H, Turgeon DK, Meyer C, Wang T. 2012. Biomedical optics express; 2012. p. 764–776.
Aluru S, Jammula N. A review of hardware acceleration for computational genomics. Hardware Acceleration in Computational Biology. IEEE Publications; 2014.
Bingham K. Mathematics of local X-ray tomography. Master’s thesis. Helsinki University of Technology; 1998.
Butte AJ. Translational bioinformatics: coming of age. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:709–14.
Cabral B, Cam N, Foran J. Accelerated volume rendering and tomographic reconstruction using texture mapping hardware. IEEEl; 1995. p. 91–131.
Chen J, Qian F, Yan W, Shen D. Translational biomedical informatics in the cloud: present and future. BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013:1–8.
Dhawan AP, Huang HK, Kim D-S. Principles and advanced methods in medical imaging and image analysis. Hackensack: World Scientific Publishing; 2008.
Engel K, Kraus M, Ertl, T. High-quality pre-integrated volume rendering Using hardware-accelerated pixel shading. ACM 2001 1-58113-407-X; 2001. p. 9–14.
Fang S, Chen H. Hardware accelerated voxelization. Comput Graph. 2000;24(3):433–42.
Faridani A. Introduction to the mathematics of computed tomography. Inside Out Inverse Prob Appl. 2003;47:1–46.
Faridani A, Ritman EL. High-resolution computed tomography from efficient sampling. Inverse Prob. 2000;16(3):635.
Hege HC, Höllerer T, Stalling D. Volume rendering – mathematicals models and algorithmic aspects. In: Nagel W (Hrsg.) PartielleDifferentialgleichungen, Numerik und Anwendungen. Konferenzen des ForschungszentrumsJülich GmbH, S; 1996. pp 227–255.
Hood L. Systems biology: integrating technology, biology, and computation. Mech Ageing Dev. 2003;124:9–16.
Hornak JP. The basics of NMR. Rochester: Department of Chemistry, Rochester Institute of Technology; 1997.
Jenkins R. X-ray techniques: overview. Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry; 2000. p. 13269–88.
Kalms M. High-performance particle simulation using CUDA. Sweden: Linköping University; 2015.
Leeser M, Mukherjee S, Brock J. Fast reconstruction of 3D volumes from 2D CT projection data with GPUs. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:582.
Liu S, Chen G, Ma C, Han Y. GPGPU acceleration for skeletal animation-comparing Opencl with CUDA and GLSL. J Comput Inf Syst. 2014;10(16):7043–51.
Preim B, Bartz D. Visualization in medicine theory, algorithms, and applications. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Elsevier Inc; 2007.
Prochazkova J. Derivative of B-Spline function. In: Proceedings of the 25th conference on geometry and computer graphics. Prague; 2005.
Radon J. Über die Bestimmung von FunktionendurchihreIntegralwerte längsgewisserMannigfaltigkeiten. Ber Verh Sächs Akad WissLeipzig Math Nat Kl. 1917;69(1917):262–77.
Roentgen WC. On A New Kind of Rays. Ann Phys Chem. 1898;64:1–11.
Röttger S., Kraus M, Ertl T. Hardware-accelerated volume and isosurface Rendering based on cell-projection. In: Proceedings of the conference on visualization. IEEE Computer Society Press; 2000. p. 109–16.
Sato Y, Shiraga N, Nakajima S, Tamura S, Kikinis R. Local Maximum Intensity Projection (LMIP): a new rendering method for vascular visualization. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22(6):912–7.
Schroeder W, Martin K, Lorensen B. The visualization toolkit, an object-oriented approach to 3D graphics. 3rd ed. Clifton Park: Pearson Education, Inc.; 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, Shanghai and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adeshina, A.M. (2017). Computation in Medicine: Medical Image Analysis and Visualization. In: Wei, DQ., Ma, Y., Cho, W., Xu, Q., Zhou, F. (eds) Translational Bioinformatics and Its Application. Translational Medicine Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1045-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1045-7_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1043-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1045-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)