Skip to main content

Computation in Medicine: Medical Image Analysis and Visualization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Translational Bioinformatics and Its Application

Part of the book series: Translational Medicine Research ((TRAMERE))

  • 2198 Accesses

Abstract

Computation in medicine has recently revolutionized those ideal procedures for translating fundamentally proven mathematical concepts in medical imaging and analysis into relevant routines of algorithms. Modern computational techniques, such as CUDA, a parallel computing platform, enabling direct access to the GPU instruction and parallel processing capability, are currently providing flexibility in the use of high-performance computational approaches. Similarly are the other software optimization procedures that assure low-cost and high-throughput visualization of medical datasets. Without mincing words, significant impact of such hardware and software optimization algorithms in medical image analysis and visualization cannot be overemphasized. In the same vein, acquisition of appropriate clinical datasets plays a great role in the accurate diagnosis of diseases and therapy management. The use of appropriate datasets and suitable image modalities are both important in order to successfully prove the effectiveness of any applied computational approaches in medical image analysis and visualization. Moreover, data reconstruction and representation from 2-D to 3-D usually follow notable mathematical approaches such as Euclidean plane, projective plane, and Cartesian coordinate systems and involve other interactive properties such as rotation, scaling, and translation which are also relying on various renderable concepts of data representation. This chapter documents some of the image procedures for acquiring morphological and functional information of patients with more emphasis on mathematical computations of commonly used techniques, such as X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Interestingly, a typical framework for medical imaging and visualization has been conceptualized in the course of this documentation. Relevant approaches to medical data representation, restructuring, and modeling procedures such as volume segmentation, classification, shading, gradient computation, interpolation, and resampling are presented along with all the significant processes required before generating informative composition of images. In order to facilitate better understanding of some of the concepts introduced in this chapter, real-world examples of CT and MRI datasets in 2-D and in their 3-D correspondence are showcased to depict the significance of the mapped structures in the 2-D.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adeshina AM, Hashim R. ConnectViz: accelerated approach for brain structural connectivity using Delaunay triangulation. Interdisc Sci Comput Life Sci. 20151–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adeshina AM, Hashim R, Khalid NEA, Abidin SZZ. Locating abnormalities in brain blood vessels using parallel computing architecture. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci. 2012;4(3):161–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adeshina AM, Hashim R, Khalid NEA, Abidin SZZ. Multimodal 3-D reconstruction of human anatomical structures using surlens visualization system. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci. 2013;5(1):23–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adeshina AM, Hashim R, Khalid NEA. CAHECA: Computer Aided Hepatocellular Carcinoma therapy planning. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci. 2014;6(3):222–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich MB, Marshall MV, Sevick-Muraca EM, Lanza G, Kotyk J, Culver J, Wang LV, Uddin J, Crews BC, Marnett LJ, Liao JC, Contag C, Crawford JM, Wang K, Reisdorph B, Appelman H, Turgeon DK, Meyer C, Wang T. 2012. Biomedical optics express; 2012. p. 764–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aluru S, Jammula N. A review of hardware acceleration for computational genomics. Hardware Acceleration in Computational Biology. IEEE Publications; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham K. Mathematics of local X-ray tomography. Master’s thesis. Helsinki University of Technology; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butte AJ. Translational bioinformatics: coming of age. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:709–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cabral B, Cam N, Foran J. Accelerated volume rendering and tomographic reconstruction using texture mapping hardware. IEEEl; 1995. p. 91–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Qian F, Yan W, Shen D. Translational biomedical informatics in the cloud: present and future. BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhawan AP, Huang HK, Kim D-S. Principles and advanced methods in medical imaging and image analysis. Hackensack: World Scientific Publishing; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engel K, Kraus M, Ertl, T. High-quality pre-integrated volume rendering Using hardware-accelerated pixel shading. ACM 2001 1-58113-407-X; 2001. p. 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang S, Chen H. Hardware accelerated voxelization. Comput Graph. 2000;24(3):433–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faridani A. Introduction to the mathematics of computed tomography. Inside Out Inverse Prob Appl. 2003;47:1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faridani A, Ritman EL. High-resolution computed tomography from efficient sampling. Inverse Prob. 2000;16(3):635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hege HC, Höllerer T, Stalling D. Volume rendering – mathematicals models and algorithmic aspects. In: Nagel W (Hrsg.) PartielleDifferentialgleichungen, Numerik und Anwendungen. Konferenzen des ForschungszentrumsJülich GmbH, S; 1996. pp 227–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood L. Systems biology: integrating technology, biology, and computation. Mech Ageing Dev. 2003;124:9–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hornak JP. The basics of NMR. Rochester: Department of Chemistry, Rochester Institute of Technology; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins R. X-ray techniques: overview. Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry; 2000. p. 13269–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalms M. High-performance particle simulation using CUDA. Sweden: Linköping University; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeser M, Mukherjee S, Brock J. Fast reconstruction of 3D volumes from 2D CT projection data with GPUs. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:582.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Chen G, Ma C, Han Y. GPGPU acceleration for skeletal animation-comparing Opencl with CUDA and GLSL. J Comput Inf Syst. 2014;10(16):7043–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preim B, Bartz D. Visualization in medicine theory, algorithms, and applications. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Elsevier Inc; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochazkova J. Derivative of B-Spline function. In: Proceedings of the 25th conference on geometry and computer graphics. Prague; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radon J. Ãœber die Bestimmung von FunktionendurchihreIntegralwerte längsgewisserMannigfaltigkeiten. Ber Verh Sächs Akad WissLeipzig Math Nat Kl. 1917;69(1917):262–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roentgen WC. On A New Kind of Rays. Ann Phys Chem. 1898;64:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Röttger S., Kraus M, Ertl T. Hardware-accelerated volume and isosurface Rendering based on cell-projection. In: Proceedings of the conference on visualization. IEEE Computer Society Press; 2000. p. 109–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato Y, Shiraga N, Nakajima S, Tamura S, Kikinis R. Local Maximum Intensity Projection (LMIP): a new rendering method for vascular visualization. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22(6):912–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder W, Martin K, Lorensen B. The visualization toolkit, an object-oriented approach to 3D graphics. 3rd ed. Clifton Park: Pearson Education, Inc.; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adekunle Micheal Adeshina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, Shanghai and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adeshina, A.M. (2017). Computation in Medicine: Medical Image Analysis and Visualization. In: Wei, DQ., Ma, Y., Cho, W., Xu, Q., Zhou, F. (eds) Translational Bioinformatics and Its Application. Translational Medicine Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1045-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics