(Co)-Researching with Children

  • Alma FleetEmail author
  • Deborah HarcourtEmail author
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)


This chapter offers a collaborative dialogue between academics and practitioners who have given consideration to the literature, the challenges and illustrations from practice in order to examine the notion of child voice in research. It illuminates the researcher-child relationship with an accent on hearing children’s standpoints through the lens of interested and invested adults. These considerations are intended as further provocations to the growing research base that is attentive to foregrounding children’s perspectives. While the chapter is not co-authored by children, it has been constructed so as to respect children’s voices and to task the research community to further deliberate the complexity of issues involved when positioning research practice as ‘researching with children’. Organised in several sections, the chapter explores ethical issues of assent and/or consent from children, examines issues in relation to children in a range of age cohorts and proposes a number of ways forward for this particular conversation using practice-based strategies such as pedagogical documentation and clarification of language use. These broad concepts are scrutinised through a conversation between examples of cooperation, collaboration and co-research, in an attempt to clarify the ongoing perplexity in this research terrain.


Co-researching with children Children’s voice Ethical consent Children’s rights Pedagogical documentation Reconceptualising research 


  1. Alderson, P. (2008). Children as researchers. Participation rights and research methods. In: P. Christensen, P & A. James (Eds.) Research with children. Perspectives and practices. (2nd Ed) (pp. 276–287) Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Alderson, P., Hawthorne, J. & Killen, M. (2005). The participation rights of premature babies. In H. Van Beers, A. Invernizzi & B. Milne (Eds.) (2008) Beyond Article 12: Essential readings on children’s participation (pp. 57–65). Bangkok: Black and White Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Appadurai, A. (2006). The right to research. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4(2), 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224.Google Scholar
  5. Bae, B. (2005). Troubling the identity of a researcher: methodological and ethical questions in cooperating with teacher-carers in Norway. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(3), 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bae, B. (2010). Realising children’s right to participation in early childhood settings: Some critical issues in a Norwegian context. Early Years, 30(3), 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barry, D. (1996). Artful inquiry: A symbolic constructivist approach to social science research. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(40), 411–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Born, M. (1949). Natural philosophy of cause and chance. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bridges, D. (1998). Research for sale: Moral market or moral maze? British Educational Research Journal, 24(5), 593–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler, U. M. (2009). Freedom, revolt and citizenship: Three pillars of identity for youngsters living on the streets of Rio de Janeiro. Childhood, 16(1), 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Canterbury City Council. (2014). City of Canterbury: State of the children report. Canterbury.Google Scholar
  12. Carr, M., Jones, C., & Lee, W. (2005). Beyond listening: Can assessment practice play a part. In A. Clark, A. Kjørholt, T. Moss, & P. Moss (Eds.), Beyond listening: Children’s perspectives on early childhood services (pp. 129–150). Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Cheeseman, S., & Robertson, J. (2006). Unsure- private conversations publicly recorded. In A. Fleet, C. Patterson, & J. Robertson (Eds.), Insights: Behind early childhood pedagogical documentation (pp. 191–204). Castle Hill: Pademelon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Christensen, P., & Prout, A. (2002). Working with ethical symmetry in social research with children. Childhood, 9(4), 477–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark, A. (2005a). Listening to and involving young children: A review of research and practice. Early Child Development and Care, 175(6), 489–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark, A. (2005b). Talking and listening to young children. In M. Dudek (Ed.), Children’s spaces (pp. 1–13). London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  18. Clark, A. (2005c). Ways of seeing: Using the mosaic approach to listen to young children. In A. Clark, A. Kjørholt, T. Moss, & P. Moss (Eds.), Beyond listening: Children’s perspectives on early childhood services (pp. 29–50). Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark, A. (2010). Young children as protagonists and the role of participatory, visual methods in engaging multiple perspectives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1), 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clark, A. (2011). Multimodal map making with young children: Exploring ethnographic and participatory methods. Qualitative Research, 11(3), 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2001). Listening to young children: The Mosaic approach. London: National Children’s Bureau.Google Scholar
  22. Coleyshaw, L. Whitmarsh, J. Jopling, M., & Hadfield, M. (2010). Listening to children’s perspectives: Improving the quality of provision in early years settings. CeDARE: University of Wolverhampton.Google Scholar
  23. Connors, C., & Stalker, K. (2007). Children’s experiences of disability: Pointers to a social model of childhood disability. Disability & Society, 22(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cremin, H., & Slatter, B. (2004). Is it possible to access the ‘voice’ of pre-school children? Results of a research project in a pre-school setting. Educational Studies, 30(4), 457–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dahlberg, G., & Moss, P. (2005). Ethics and politics in early childhood education. London/New York: Routledge-Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (2007). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Languages of evaluation (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Dalli, C., & Stephenson, A. (2010). Involving children in research in early childhood education stings: Opening up the issues. In J. Loveridge (Ed.), Rationale for involving children in research: Authenticity, listening to children’s voices, and participation (pp. 11–46). Victoria University of Wellington: Jessie Hetherington Centre for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  28. Davidson, S. (2008). What children think about having a thyroid disorder,<> Accessed 17 July 2013.
  29. de Benitez, T. (2011). State of the world’s street children report: research. Street children series 2. Consortium for street children. Available at: Accessed 6.10.14.
  30. Degotardi, S. (2011). Two steps back: Exploring identity and presence while observing infants in the nursery. In E. Johansson & J. White (Eds.), Educational research with our youngest: Voices of infants and toddlers (pp. 15–38). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Delbecq, A. L., & VandeVen, A. H. (1971, July/August). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, VII, 466–491.Google Scholar
  32. Dockett, S. (2009). Engaging in young children in research. In ARACY and NSW Commission for Children and Young People, Research involving children and young people: A compendium of papers and reflections (pp. 52–63). Australian Research Alliance for Children and Young People and the New South Wales Commission for Children and Young People.Google Scholar
  33. Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2005). ‘You need to know how to play safe’: Children’s experiences of starting school. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(1), 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2007). Transitions to school: Perceptions, expectations, experiences. Sydney: University of New South Wales press.Google Scholar
  35. Edwards, R., & Aldred, P. (2000). A topology of parent involvement in education centreing on children and young people. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(1), 435–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (2012a). Introduction. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation (3rd ed., pp. 5–26). Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  37. Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (Eds.). (2012b). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation (3rd ed.). Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  38. Eide, B. J., & Winger, N. (2005). From the children’s point of view: Methodological and ethical challenges. In A. Clark, A. Kjørholt, T. Moss, & P. Moss (Eds.), Beyond listening: Children’s perspectives on early childhood services (pp. 71–90). Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Einarsdóttir, J. (2007). Research with children: Methodological and ethical challenges. European Early Education Journal, 15(2), 197–211.Google Scholar
  40. Einarsdóttir, J. (2014). Children‘s perspectives on play. In L. Brooker, M. Blaise, & S. Edwards (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of play and learning in early childhood (pp. 319–329). London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Elwick, S., Bradley, B., & Sumsion, J. (2014a). Infants as others: Uncertainties, difficulties and (im) possibilities in researching infants’ lives. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Elwick, S., Bradley, B., & Sumsion, J. (2014b). Creating space for infants to influence ECEC practice: The encounter, ecart, reversibility and ethical reflection. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(8), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ennew, J., & Swart-Kruger, J. (2003). Introduction: Homes, places and spaces in the construction of street children and street youth. Children, Youth & Environments, 13(1) Spring. Accessed on 5/11/14 from
  44. Erikson, F. (1979). Mere ethnography: Some problems in its use in educational practice. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 10(3), Fall. 182–187.Google Scholar
  45. Farrell, A. (Ed.). (2005). Ethical research with children. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Fleet, A., & Britt, C. (2011). Seeing spaces, inhabiting places: Hearing school beginners. In D. Harcourt, B. Perry, & T. Waller (Eds.), Researching young children’s perspectives: Debating the ethics and dilemmas of educational research with children (pp. 143–162). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Fleet, A., Patterson, C., & Robertson, J. (Eds.). (2006). Insights: Behind pedagogical documentation. Castle Hill: Pademelon Press.Google Scholar
  48. Fleet, A., Patterson, C., & Robertson, J. (Eds.). (2012). Conversations: Behind early childhood pedagogical documentation. Mt Victoria: Pademelon Press.Google Scholar
  49. Forman, G. (1999) Instant video revisiting: The video camera as a “Tool of the Mind” ECRP (1)2.Google Scholar
  50. Fraser, S., Flewitt, R., & Hammersley, M. (2014). What is research with children and young people? In A. Clark, R. Flewitt, M. Hammersley, & M. Robb (Eds.), Understanding research with children and young people (pp. 34–68). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Frost, N.A. (2009). Pluralism in qualitative research: A report of the work of the PQR project’ Social Psychological Review, 11(1), March 2009.Google Scholar
  52. Gascoyne, S. (2012). Treasure baskets and beyond, realizing the potential of sensory-rich play. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Giudici, C., Rinaldi, C., & Krechevsky, M. (Eds.). (2001). Making learning visible: Children as individual and group learners. Reggio Emilia: Reggio Children.Google Scholar
  54. Gopnik, A. (2009). The philosophical baby. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  55. Goffman, E. (1974) Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (ix) 586.Google Scholar
  56. Goldman, R. (2007). Video representations and the perspectivity framework. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences. Routledge: New York (3) 38.Google Scholar
  57. Gray, C., & Winter, E. (2012). The ethics of participatory research involving young children with special needs. In D. Harcourt, B. Perry, & T. Waller (Eds.), Researching young children’s perspectives (pp. 26–37). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Grover, S. (2004). Why won’t they listen to us? On giving power and voice to children participating in social research. Childhood, 11(1), 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hanna, R. (2006). Rationality and logic. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  60. Harcourt, D. (2011). A phased approach to researching with young children: Lessons from Singapore and beyond. Early Education and Development, 22(5), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Harcourt, D. (2012a). Children’s rights learning book. Castle Hill: Pademelon Press.Google Scholar
  62. Harcourt, D. (2012b). Measuring teacher quality: Listening to young children in Singapore. Global Studies in Childhood, 2(4), 260–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Harcourt, D., & Conroy, H. (2005). Informed assent. Early Child Development and Care, 175(6), 567–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Harcourt, D., & Conroy, H. (2011). Informed consent: Process and procedures seeking research partnerships with young children. In D. Harcourt, B. Perry, & T. Waller (Eds.), Researching young children’s perspectives: Debating the ethics and dilemmas of educational research with children (pp. 38–51). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Harcourt, D., & Einarsdóttir, J. (2011). Introducing children’s perspectives and participation in research. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal., 19(3), 301–307.Google Scholar
  66. Harcourt, D., & Mazzoni, V. (2012). Standpoints on quality: Listening to children in Verona, Italy. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(2), 9–25.Google Scholar
  67. Harcourt, D., Perry, B., & Waller, T. (Eds.). (2011). Researching young children’s perspectives: Debating the ethics and dilemmas of educational research with children. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Harris, P., & Manatakis, H. (2013). Young children’s voices about their local communities. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(3), 68–76.Google Scholar
  69. Hart, R. (1992). Children’s participation from Tokenism to citizenship. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.Google Scholar
  70. Hatch, J. A. (2007). Back to modernity? Early childhood qualitative research in the 21st century. In J. A. Hatch (Ed.), Early childhood qualitative research (pp. 7–24). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Haw, K., & Hadfield, M. (2011). Video in social science research. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Hedges, H. (2001). Teacher/researchers in early childhood: Ethical responsibilities to children, Networks – An On-line Journal for Teacher Research, (4) 2. Accessed on 5/11/14 from
  73. Holmes, J. (1996). Attachment, intimacy, autonomy: Using attachment theory in adult psychotherapy (pp. 2–3). Northvale: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  74. Holt, L. (2004). The ‘Voices’ of children: De-centring empowering research relations. Children’s Geographies, 1, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Hume, D. (1739/1896). A treatise of human nature. (Represented by L.A. Selby-Bigge). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  76. Infant-toddler Centres and Preschools Istituzione of the Municipality of Reggio Emilia. (2010). Indications: Preschools and infant-toddler centres of the municipality of Reggio Emilia. Reggio Emilia: Author.Google Scholar
  77. Isaacs, N. (1944). Children’s ‘why’ questions. In S. Isaacs (Ed.), Intellectual growth in young children (pp. 291–354). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. James, A., & James, A. L. (2008). Key concepts in childhood studies. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  79. Jewitt, C., & Oyama, R. (2001). Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In T. Van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 134–156). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  80. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  81. Kehily, M. J. (Ed.). (2009). An introduction to childhood studies (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Kjørholt, A., Moss, P., & Clark, A. (2005). Beyond listening: Future prospects. In A. Clark, A. Kjørholt, T. Moss, & P. Moss (Eds.), Beyond listening: Children’s perspectives on childhood services (pp. 71–90). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  83. Kumpulainen, K., Lipponen, L., Hilppo, J., & Mikkola, A. (2013). Building on the positive in children’s lives: A co-participatory study on the social construction of children’s sense of agency. Early Child Development and Care, 184(2), 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Laevers, F. (1994). Defining and assessing quality in early childhood education. Studia Paedagogica. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Langsted, O. (1994). Looking at quality from the child’s perspective. In P. Moss & A. Pence (Eds.), Valuing quality in early childhood services: New approaches to defining quality (pp. 28–42). London: Paul Chapman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lawrence, P., & Nicholson, S. (2000). The investigators. London: Curious Productions/Channel 4 Television.Google Scholar
  87. Lees, L. (1999). Critical geography and the opening up of the academy: Lessons from ‘real life’ attempts. Area, 31(4), 377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Lenz-Taguchi, H. (2010). Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education: Introducing an intra-active pedagogy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. MacNaughton, G., Smith, K., & Davis, K. (2007). Researching with children: The challenges and possibilities for building “Child Friendly” research. In: J. Amos Hatch (Ed.), Early childhood qualitative research (pp. 167–184). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  91. Malaguzzi, L. (1993). For an education based on relationships. Young Children, 49(1), 9–11.Google Scholar
  92. McKee, B. (2014). Preventative education: Using young children’s drawings to illustrate knowledge and understanding of safety and help seeking behaviour. Women’s Aid Federation Northern Ireland Management Board.Google Scholar
  93. McLeod, A. (2008). Listening to children A practitioner’s guide. London: Jessica Kingsley Publications.Google Scholar
  94. McTaggart, R. (1991). Principles for participatory action research. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Johnson, F., & Lidstone, J. (2006). Mind-mindedness in children: Individual differences in internal-state talk in middle childhood. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Merewether, J. (2015). Young children’s perspectives of outdoor learning spaces: What matters? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(1), 99–108.Google Scholar
  97. Merewether, J., & Fleet, A. (2014). Seeking children’s perspectives: A respectful layered research approach. Early Child Development and Care, 184(6), 897–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Morrow, V., & Richards, M. (1996). The ethics of social research with children: An overview. Children and Society, 10(2), 90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Moss, P., Clark, A., & Kjørholt, A. T. (2005). Introduction. In A. Clark, A. Kjørholt, T. Moss, & P. Moss (Eds.), Beyond listening: Children’s perspectives on childhood services (pp. 1–16). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  100. Murray, J. (2012). An exploration of young children’s engagements in research behaviour. Thesis. (PhD). University of Northampton, UK.Google Scholar
  101. Nagel, T. (1974) What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review LXXXIII, 4 pp. 435–450 [online]. Available from:<>. Accessed 28 July 2012.
  102. O’Kane, C. (2008). The development of participatory tecniques: Facilitating children’s views about decisions which affect them. In A. James & P. Christensen (Eds.), Researching with children: Perspectives and practices (2nd ed., pp. 125–155). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  103. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Palaiologou, I. (2014). ‘Do we hear what children want to say?’ Ethical praxis when choosing research tools with children under five. Early Child Development and Care, 184(5), 689–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Pascal, C., & Bertram, T. (2009). Listening to young citizens: The struggle to make real a participatory paradigm in research with young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 17(2), 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Pink, S., Mackley, L. K., Mitchell, V., Hanratty, M., Escobar-Tello, C., Bhamra, T., & Morosanu, R. (2013). Applying the lens of sensory ethnography to sustainable HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(4), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Powell, M. (2011). International literature review: Ethical issues undertaking research with children and young people. Prepared for the Childwatch International Research Network. Lismore: Southern Cross University Dunedin: University of Otago.Google Scholar
  108. Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of educational research. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  109. Prosser, J., & Burke, C. (2008). Image-based educational research. In J. G. Knowles & A. Cole (Eds.), The handbook of arts and qualitative research (pp. 407–419). Toronto: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  110. Qvortrup, J., Corsaro, W. A., & Honig, M. S. (Eds.). (2009). The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  111. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2008). The Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  112. Redmond, G. (2008). Children’s perspectives on economic adversity: A review of the literature. SPRC discussion paper No. 149. Sydney: The Social Policy Research Centre.Google Scholar
  113. Reddy, V. (2008). How infants know minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Stray Teletubbies (1997) Broadcast Ragdoll/BBC: BBC Television.Google Scholar
  114. Rhedding-Jones, J., Bae, B., & Winger, N. (2008). Young children and voice. In G. MacNaughton, P. Hughes, & K. Smith (Eds.), Young children as active citizens: Principles, policies and pedagogies (pp. 44–61). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  115. Rinaldi, C. (2005). Documentation and assessment: What is the relationship. In A. Clark, A. Kjørholt, T. Moss, & P. Moss (Eds.), Beyond listening: Children’s perspectives on early childhood services (pp. 17–28). Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching and learning. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social contexts. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  118. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  119. Salamon, A. (2015). Ethical symmetry in participatory research with infants. Early Child Development and Care. Doi:  10.1080/03004430.2014.975224.
  120. Shaw, C., Brady, L. M., & Davey, C. (2011). Guidelines for research with children and young people. London: National Children’s Bureau Research Centre.Google Scholar
  121. Skånfors, L. (2009). Ethics in child research: Children’s agency and researchers’ ‘Ethical Radar’. Childhoods Today, 3(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  122. Smeyers, P. (2008). On the epistemological basis of large- scale population studies and their educational use. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(S1), 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Smith, A. (2011). Respecting children’s rights and agency: Theoretical insights into ethical research procedures. In D. Harcourt, B. Perry, & T. Waller (Eds.), Researching young children’s perspectives: Debating the ethics and dilemmas of educational research with children (pp. 11–25). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  124. Smith, A., & Taylor, N. (2000). Introduction. In A. Smith, N. Taylor, & M. Gollop (Eds.), Children’s voices: Research, policy and practice (pp. ix–xiii). Auckland: Pearson Education New Zealand.Google Scholar
  125. Smith, A., Duncan, J., & Marshall, K. (2005). Children’s perspectives on their learning: Exploring methods. Early Child Development and Care, 175(6), 473–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Sommer, D., Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Hundeide, K. (Eds.). (2010). Child perspectives and children’s perspectives in theory and practice. Milton Keys: Springer.Google Scholar
  127. Speer, S. A. (2002). What can conversation analysis contribute to feminist methodology? Putting reflexivity into practice. Discourse and Society, 13(6), 783–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Stephenson, A. (2009). Horses in the sandpit: Photography, prolonged involvement and ‘stepping back’ as strategies for listening to children’s voices. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Strega, S. (2005). The view from the poststructural margins. In L. Brown & S. Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance (pp. 199–236). Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
  131. Sumsion, J., & Goodfellow, J. (2012). ‘Looking and listening-in’: A methodological approach to generating insights into infants’ experiences of early childhood education and care setting. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 20(3), 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. The Investigators (2000). Broadcast. Curious Productions: Channel 4 Television.Google Scholar
  133. Thomas, G. (2007). Education and theory: Strangers in paradigms. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  134. Thomson, F. (2007). Are methodologies for children keeping them in their place? Children’s Geographies, 5(3), 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Thomson, P. (Ed.). (2008). Doing visual research with children and young people. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  136. Tisdall, E. K. M. (2011a). The challenge and challenging of childhood studies? Learning from disability studies research with disabled children. Available at:[1]ks.pdf. Accessed 9.6.14.
  137. Tisdall, E. K. M. (2011b). Engaging with families and relationships. In L. Jamieson, R. Simpson, & R. Lewis (Eds.), Researching families and relationships: Reflections on process. Palgrave studies in family & intimate life. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  138. Tisdall, E. K. M., & Punch, S. V. (2012). Not so new? Looking critically at childhood studies. Children’s Geographies, 10(1), 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Tobin, J., & Davidson, D. (1990). The ethics of polyvocal ethnography: Empowering vs. textualising children and teachers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3(3), 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Truman, C., Mertens, D., & Humphries, B. (Eds.). (2000). Research and inequality. London: University College London Press.Google Scholar
  141. UK Children’s Commissioners’ Report to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2008). Available at: Accessed 02.10.14.
  142. United Nations. (1989). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  143. Valentine, G. (1999). Being seen and heard? The ethical complexities of working with children and young people at home and at school. Ethics, Place & Environments, 2(2), 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Veale, A. (2005). Creative methodologies in participatory research with children. In S. Greene & D. Hogan (Eds.), Researching children’s experiences: Approaches and methods (pp. 253–272). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  145. Vidich, A., & Lyman, S. (2000). Qualitative methods: Their history in sociology and anthropology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 37–38). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  146. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  147. Waller, T., & Davis, G. (Eds.). (2014). An introduction to early childhood. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  148. Warming, H. (2005). Participant observation: A way to learn about children’s perspectives. In A. Clark, A. Kjørholt, T. Moss, & P. Moss (Eds.), Beyond listening: Children’s perspectives on early childhood services (pp. 51–70). Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Warren, L., & Boxall, K. (2009). Service users in and out of the academy: Collusion in exclusion? Social Work Education, 28(3), 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Whalley, M., Arnold, C., Lawrence, P., & Peerless, S. (2012). The voices of their childhood: Families and early years’ practitioners developing emancipatory methodologies through a Tracer Study. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 20(4), 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. White, S., & Choudhury, S. (2010). Children’s participation in Bangladesh; Issues of agency and structures of violence. In B. Percy-Smith & N. Thomas (Eds.), A handbook of children and young people’s participation (pp. 39–50). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  152. Wiltz, N. W., & Klein, E. L. (2001). What do children do in childcare? Children’s perceptions of high and low quality. Early Child Research Quarterly, 16, 209–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Wood, A., & Davenport, A. (1997). Teletubbies. Ragdoll Productions: BBC Television.Google Scholar
  154. Woodhead, M. (2008). Respecting rights: Implications for early childhood policies and practices. In G. MacNaughton, P. Hughes, & K. Smith (Eds.), Young children as active citizens: Principles, policies and pedagogies (pp. 15–30). Newcastles: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Macquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Australian Catholic UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations