Advertisement

Measuring Community Well-Being and Individual Well-Being for Public Policy: The Case of the Community Well-Being Atlas

  • Yunji Kim
  • Kai Ludwigs
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)

Abstract

The Gross Domestic Product as an indicator of social progress has several limitations. One of the most serious limitations is it equates consumption to progress. Community well-being can be an alternative framework for measuring progress, but there are several barriers to adopting this framework. In this chapter, we focus on the measurement barriers. Measuring community well-being is difficult for the following three reasons. First, the definition of community well-being and its constructs are unclear. Second, its relationship with individual well-being is vague. Third, data at the community level are limited. All of these make it difficult to employ community well-being in policymaking and long-term planning. We introduce the Community Well-being Atlas – an international project to measure community well-being in cities – as a way to overcome these barriers. The Atlas includes theory-driven data on community well-being and individual well-being. Moreover, the use of smartphone technology to collect geographic data and build panels can be useful for policymaking and long-term planning.

Keywords

Community well-being Subjective well-being Well-being indicators Social progress Public policy 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2016S1A3A2924563). The authors thank Lena Henning for her insightful comments on earlier drafts.

References

  1. Aristotle. (2000). In R. Crisp (Ed.), Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cobb, C., Halstead, T., & Rowe, J. (1995, October). If the GDP is up, why is America down? Atlantic Monthly, 59–77.Google Scholar
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Hunter, J. (2003). Happiness in everyday life: The uses of experience sampling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(2), 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., & Prescott, S. (1977). The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 6(3), 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dewey, J. (1954). The public and its problems. Athens: Swallow Press/Ohio.Google Scholar
  7. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.-W., Oishi, S., et al. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ESS. (2014). European Social Survey Round 6 ESS-6 2012 Documentation Report. Edition 1.3. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services.Google Scholar
  12. Finstad, K. (2010). Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: Evidence against 5-point scales. Journal of Usability Studies, 5(3), 104–110.Google Scholar
  13. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frijters, P. (2000). Do individuals try to maximize general satisfaction? Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(3), 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hendriks, M., Ludwigs, K., & Veenhoven, R. (2016). Why are locals happier than internal migrants? The role of daily life. Social Indicators Research. 125(2), 481–508.Google Scholar
  16. Hillier, A. E., & Culhane, D. P. (2005). Integrating and distributing administrative data to support community change. In M. Weil (Ed.), The handbook of community practice (pp. 647–658). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kee, Y., Kim, Y., & Phillips, R. (2015). Modeling community well-being: A multi-dimensional approach. In Y. Kee, Y. Kim, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Learning and community approaches for promoting well-being (pp. 1–16). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330(6006), 932–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim, Y., & Lee, S. (2014). The development and application of a community well-being index in Korean metropolitan cities. Social Indicators Research, 119(2), 533–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuznets, S. (1934). National income, 1929–1932. Senate Report to 73rd US Congress, 2d session, Senate document no. 124. http://library.bea.gov/u?/NI_reports. Accessed 1 Dec 2015.
  23. Lee, S. J. & Kim, Y. (2016). Structure of well-being: An exploratory study of the distinction between individual well-being and community well-being and the importance of intersubjective community well-being. In Y. Kee, S. J. Lee, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Social factors and community well-being. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, S. J., Kim, Y., & Phillips, R. (2015). Exploring the intersection of community well-being and community development. In S. J. Lee, Y. Kim, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Community well-being and community development: Conceptions and applications (Springer Briefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research, pp. 1–8). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. MacKerron, G. (2012). Happiness and environmental quality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/383/. Accessed 19 Apr 2015.
  26. OECD. (2013a). “Suicides” in OECD Factbook 2013: Economic, environmental and social statistics. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/factbook-2013-97-en. Accessed 3 June 2014.
  27. OECD. (2013b). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264191655-en. Accessed 19 Apr 2015.
  28. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Philipsen, D. (2015). The little big number: How GDP came to rule the world and what to do about It. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rässler, S., & Riphahn, R. T. (2006). Survey item nonresponse and its treatment. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv, 90, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2010). Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth (Vol. w16441). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schneider, L., & Schimmack, U. (2009). Self-informant agreement in well-being ratings: A meta-analysis. Social Indicators Research, 94(3), 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steptoe, A., Wardle, J., & Marmot, M. (2005). Positive affect and health-related neuroendocrine, cardiovascular, and inflammatory processes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(18), 6508–6512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2010). Mis-measuring our lives. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  36. Tocqueville, A., Bevan, G., & Kramnick, I. (2003). Democracy in America: And two essays on america. London: Penguin Books Limited.Google Scholar
  37. Urry, H. L., Nitschke, J. B., Dolski, I., Jackson, D. C., Dalton, K. M., Mueller, C. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2004). Making a life worth living neural correlates of well-being. Psychological Science, 15(6), 367–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wolin, S. S. (2010). Democracy incorporated: Managed democracy and the specter of inverted totalitarianism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Happiness Research OrganisationDuesseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations