Skip to main content

Freedom, Repression and Constraints

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultural Implications of Biosemiotics

Part of the book series: Biosemiotics ((BSEM,volume 15))

Abstract

Semiosis has a tendency to grow, to lead to more semiosis. Yet, organisms often need to decelerate that growth, or repeat parts of it; this occurs through the appearance of invariants. As Peirce argues, it is the “essential function of a sign to render inefficient relations efficient – not to set them into action, but to establish a habit or general rule whereby they will act …” (8.332). Beyond invariance, an important issue in respect of the continuity of nature as it encompasses culture is that of the apparent impediment or blockage to straightforward development of a phenomenon. As will be seen in Chap. 8, the issue is occasionally overlooked in understandings of culture; invariably, though, there will be plenty of evidence to reveal that one or another cultural phenomenon has not had a smooth trajectory delivering it to its current stage of development. Instead, it will have been subject to overdetermination and uneven development. In Chap. 8, it will be shown that the descriptions of nature offered by biosemiotics need to be alive to overdetermination and unevenness, too. In the present chapter, the focus is on the conceptualisation of impediments to development, some of their consequences and how they are played out in relation to one aspect of culture in particular, the interface of the visual and the nonverbal more generally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bentham J. In: Božovič M, editor. The panopticon writings. London: Verso; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdwhistell RL. Kinesics and context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobley P. Sebeok’s panopticon. In: Cobley et al., editors. “Semiotics Continues to Astonish”: how Thomas A. Sebeok shaped the future of the doctrine of signs. Berlin: de Gruyter; 2011. p. 85–114.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C. The origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. 6th ed. London: John Murray; 1872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon TW. Incomplete nature: how mind emerged from matter. New York: Norton; 2012a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon (2011) was in the reference list I submitted = Deacon TW. Consciousness is a matter of constraint. New Scientist. 2011; issue 2840; https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228406-300-consciousness-is-a-matter-ofconstraint/ (last accessed 21 March 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely J, Petrilli S, Ponzio A. The semiotic animal. New York: Legas; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton T. Figures of dissent: critical essays on fish, Spivak, Žižek and others. London: Verso; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkins J. Visual studies: a skeptical introduction. London: Taylor and Francis; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fast J. Body language. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan, Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud S. Repression. In On metapsychology. The theory of psychoanalysis. (Pelican Freud Library 11.) ed. Angela Richards, trans. James Strachey. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1984[1915]. p. 139–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ, Lewontin RC. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond. 1979;B205(1161):581–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ, Vrba ES. Exaptation: a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology. 1982;8:4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall ET. The hidden dimension. New York: Anchor Books; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall JA, Knapp ML, editors. Nonverbal communication. Berlin: de Gruyter; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer J. Semiotics of nature. In: Cobley P, editor. The Routledge companion to semiotics. London: Routledge; 2010b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer J, Kull K. Baldwin and biosemiotics: what intelligence is for. In: Weber BH, Depew DJ, editors. Evolution and learning: the Baldwin effect reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrus I. Culture is becoming more visible and therefore richer. In: Development of estonian cultural space. Tallinn: Estonian Development Report; 2014/2015. p. 222–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson F. Signatures of the visible. London: Routledge; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay M. Downcast eyes: the denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon A. Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levin D. Keeping foucault and derrida in sight: panopticism and the politics of subversion. In: Sites of vision: the discursive construction of sight in the history of philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machin D. Introduction. In: Machin, editor. Visual communication. Berlin: de Gruyter; 2014. p. 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher J. Seeing language in sign: the work of William C. Stokoe. Washington: Gallaudet University Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzoeff N. An introduction to visual culture. London: Routledge; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell WJT. Picture theory: essays on verbal and visual representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS. Guessing. Hound Horn. 1929;2(3):267–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrilli S. Crossing out boundaries with global communication: the problem of the subject. Subj Matter. 2005;2(2):33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrilli S, Ponzio A. Semiotics unbounded: interpretive routes through the open network of signs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponzio A. Signs, dialogue and ideology. Trans. Susan Petrilli. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponzio A. The I questioned: Emmanuel Levinas and the critique of occidental reason. Subj Matter. 2006a;3(1):1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponzio A. The dialogic nature of sign. Trans. Susan Petrilli, New York: Legas; 2006b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie TD, Sedikides C and Skowronski, JJ. Emotions experienced at event recall and the self: Implications for the regulation of self-esteem, self-continuity and meaningfulness. Memory. 2015; 24 (5): 577–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruesch J, Kees W. Nonverbal communication: notes on the visual perception of human relations. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok TA. In what sense is language a ‘primary modeling system’? In: Broms H, Kaufmann R, editors. Semiotics of culture: proceedings of the 25th symposium of the Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics, Imatra, Finland, 27th–29th July, 1987. Helsinki: Arator; 1988. p. 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok TA. A sign is just a sign. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1991c.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok TA. Nonverbal communication. In: Cobley P, editor. The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics. London: Routledge; 2001a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok TA. Global semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2001b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok TA, Umiker-Sebeok J. “You Know My Method”: a juxtaposition of Charles S. Peirce and Sherlock Holmes. Bloomington: Gaslight Publications; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonesson G. Pictorial concepts: inquiries into the semiotic heritage and its relevance for the analysis of the visual world. Lund: Lund University Press/Chartwell-Bratt; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern D. Diary of a baby. New York: Basic Books; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cobley, P. (2016). Freedom, Repression and Constraints. In: Cultural Implications of Biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0858-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics