Skip to main content

Reputation and Egotiation: The Impact of Self-Image on the Negotiator

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Emotion in Group Decision and Negotiation

Part of the book series: Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation ((AGDN,volume 7))

Abstract

Egotiation is a new term in negotiation research, proposed by one of the authors (Meerts in Pinpoints network newsletter, IIASA, Laxenburg, pp. 28–29, 2010). “Ego” will not be used here in the classical psychological/Freudian sense. For the purposes of this chapter, “egotiation” is a factor in international negotiation processes which will work against the material interests of the negotiator and his party. It has an emotional as well as an interest dimension, a unconscious as well as a conscious side, accidental, and purposeful. The ego of the negotiator, meaning the face/honor/status of the negotiator in question, will be a parasite of the negotiation process. It will flourish through the process, but at the detriment of the interests of the party the negotiator is representing. The authors will look at a series of famous negotiators and ask themselves to what extend these actors gave precedence to face saving over the defense of national and other interests. The authors will then ask themselves what the consequences of “egotiation” have been in different cases. They will try to diagnose if “egotiation” is a typical phenomenon to be found among decision makers of higher or lower rank, politicians or diplomats, etc. They will also look at the question if countries have such an ego and if so, what the function of that ego is in international relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avruch, K. (1998). Culture and conflict resolution. Washington DC: US Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaker, M., Giarra, P., & Vogel, E. (2002). Case studies in Japanese negotiating behavior. Washington DC: US Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhite, R. D. (1986). Decisions at Yalta, an appraisal of summit diplomacy. Wilmington, Delaware: Scholarly Resources Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogan, C. G. (2003). French negotiating behavior: Dealing with the ‘grand nation’. Washington DC: US Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (1997). Negotiating across cultures: International communication in an interdependent world. Washington DC: US Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (2001). Negotiating across cultures. In C. A. Crocker, F. O. Hampson, & P. Aall (Eds.), Turbulent peace: The challenges of managing international conflict (pp. 469–482). Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke International Security Conference. (2005). Paris peace conference 1919, minister biographies (pp. 1–10). Durham, US: Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faizullaev, A. (2006). Diplomacy and self. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 17(3), 497–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1997). Arts of power: Statecraft and diplomacy. Washington DC: US Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. L., & Rojot, J. (2003). Negotiation: Theory and practice. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruyter de R. (1993) Once upon a time, a historical and psychological analysis of gorbachev’s reign. Doctoral Thesis, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haffner, S. (2011). Anmerkungen zu Hitler. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemery, J., & Meerts, P. W. (2006). Training for practice, a practical approach. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 1(2), 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O.R. (1968). Cognitive dynamics and images of enemy. In J. C. Farrell & A. P. Smith (Eds.), Image and Reality in World Politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iklè, F. C. (1985). How Nations negotiate. Millwood: Kraus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joll, J. (1982). The ideal and the real, changing concepts of the international system, 1815-1982. International Affairs, 58(2), 210–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson, C. (2012). Psychological causes of incomplete negotiations. In G. O. Faure (Ed.), Unfinished business: Why international negotiations fail (pp. 167–184). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, H. (1969). The Vietnam negotiations. Foreign Affairs, 47, 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laloy J. (1988). Yalta, Hier, aujourd’hui, demain. editions Robert Laffort, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, M. (2001). Peacemakers, the Paris conference of 1919 and its attempt to end war. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerts, P. (2005). Entrapment in international negotiations. In I. W. Zartman & G. O. Faure (Eds.), Escalation and negotiation in international conflicts (pp. 103–130). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerts, P. (2009). Negotiating with the Russian bear: Lessons for the EU?. EU Diplomacy Papers, Vol. 8. College of Europe, Bruges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerts, P. (2010). Egotiation: Ego as a factor in international negotiation processes. In Pinpoints network newsletter (Vol. 35, pp. 28–29). Laxenburg: IIASA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongar, T. M. (1969). Personality and decision making: John F. Kennedy in four crisis decisions. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 2(2), 200–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson, H. (1998). The evolution of diplomatic method, diplomatic studies programme. University of Leicester, (being the Chichele Lectures in Oxford, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordholt, J. W. S. (1992). Woodrow Wilson, Een leven voor de wereldvrede: Een biografie. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearton, M. (1993). The Paris peace conference. In AP. van Goudoever (ed.), Great Peace Conferences in History, 1648–1990, Utrechtse Historische Cahiers, (Vol. 14, # 2). University of Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pronin, E., Gilovich, T. D., & Ross, L. (2004). Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review, 111(3), 781–799.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D. (2007). Summits, six meetings that shaped the twentieth century. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. (1998). Devious objectives and the disputants’ view of international mediation: A theoretical framework. Journal of Peace Research, 35(6), 707–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, A. (2008). The versailles settlement, peacemaking after the first world war, 1919–1929. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyser, W. R. (2002). How Germans negotiate: Logical goals, practical solutions. Washington DC: US Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. H. (1999). Chinese negotiating behavior: Pursuing interests through ‘old friends’. Washington DC: US Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. H., & Quinney, N. (2010). American negotiating behavior: Wheeler-dealers, legal eagles, bullies, and preachers. Washington DC: US Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, S. J. (1997). Spoiler problems in peace processes. International Security, 22(2), 5–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittes, T. C. (2005). How Israelis and Palestinians negotiate: A cross-cultural analysis of the Oslo peace process. Washington DC: US Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, I. W. (2001a). Negotiating identity: From metaphor to process. International Negotiation, 6(2), 137–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, I. W. (2001b). Timing of peace initiatives: Hurting stalemates and ripe moments. Ethnopolitics, 1(1), 8–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, I. W. (2002). What I want to know about negotiation. International Negotiation, 7(1), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, I. W., & Kremenyuk, V. (2005). Peace versus justice: Negotiating forward and backward looking outcomes. Oxford UK: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Vlad Badea for his help in providing part of the literature that made this chapter possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Meerts .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meerts, P., Vuković, S. (2015). Reputation and Egotiation: The Impact of Self-Image on the Negotiator. In: Martinovsky, B. (eds) Emotion in Group Decision and Negotiation. Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9963-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics