Sulphate and ASR Resistance of Concrete Made with Calcined Clay Blended Cements

  • André TrümerEmail author
  • Horst-Michael Ludwig
Conference paper
Part of the RILEM Bookseries book series (RILEM, volume 10)


This paper presents the results of several investigations concerning the durability of mortar and concrete with higher proportion of calcined clays in the cement part. For this purpose, different clays based on kaolinite, montmorillonite and illite were fired at optimum temperatures according to the strength contribution in cement. The raw materials were analyzed chemically (XRF) and mineralogically (XRD). The pore size distribution of the mortars was measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry. Cement pastes were produced in order to calculate the phase composition by XRD/Rietveld and to estimate the microstructure with SEM. The performance tests comprised investigations of the long-term behaviour in case of sulphate attack and alkali silica reaction respectively. The results show that the addition of the calcined clays are able to improve the concrete resistance against these exposures or at least doesn’t affect it negatively compared to the control. It can be followed that the application of cements with higher percentage of calcined clays substituting clinker is not restricted to only slightly loaded concrete constructions.


Pore Size Distribution Ordinary Portland Cement Cement Paste Composite Cement Pozzolanic Reaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ambroise, J., Murat, M., Péra, J.: Hydration reaction and hardening of calcined clays and related minerals V. Extension of the research and general conclusions. Cem. Concr. Res. 15(2), 261–268 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    He, C., Osbaeck, B., Makovicky, E.: Pozzolanic reactions of six principal clay minerals: Activation, reactivity assessments and technological effects. Cem. Concr. Res. 25(8), 1691–1702 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fernandez, R., Martirena, F., Scrivener, K.L.: The origin of the pozzolanic activity of calcined clay minerals: A comparison between kaolinite, illite and montmorillonite. Cem. Concr. Res. 41(1), 113–122 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tironi, A., Trezza, M.A., Scian, A.N., Irassar, E.F.: Assessment of pozzolanic activity of different calcined clays. Cem. Concr. Compos. 37, 319–327 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Danner, T.: Reactivity of Calcined Clays. Dissertation, Trondheim (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Trümer, A., Ludwig, H.-M., Rohloff, K.: Investigations into the application of calcined clays as composite material in cement. ZKG Int. 9, 52–57 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kostuch, J.A., Walters, G.V., Jones, T.R.: High performance concretes incorporating metakaolin—A Review, Paper presented at concrete 2000, University of Dundee (1993)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caldarone, M.A., Gruber, K.A., Burg, R.G.: High-reactivity metakaolin: A new generation mineral admixture. Concr. Int. 16(11), 37–40 (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, M.H., Malhotra, V.M.: Characteristics of a thermally activated alumino-silicate pozzolanic material and its use in concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 25(8), 1713–1725 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gruber, K.A., Ramlochan, T., Boddy, A., Hooton, R.D., Thomas, M.D.A.: Increasing concrete durability with high-reactivity metakaolin. Cem. Concr. Compos. 23(6), 479–484 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stark, J., Erfurt, D.: Alkali-Kieselsäure-Reaktion. Schriftenreihe des F.-A.-Finger-Instituts für Baustoffkunde. Univ.-Verl., Weimar (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stark, J., Freyburg, E., Seyfarth, K., Giebson, C., Erfurt, D.: 70 years of ASR with no end in sight? (Part 1). ZKG Int. 4, 86–95 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lothenbach, B., Scrivener, K., Hooton, R.D.: Supplementary cementitious materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 41(12), 1244–1256 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bauhaus-University WeimarWeimarGermany

Personalised recommendations