Skip to main content

Let Us Listen to the Voice of Women in Management in the Twenty-First Century: A Longitudinal Study

  • Chapter
Handbook on Well-Being of Working Women

Abstract

The role of women in business in terms of their job responsibility has been a topic of interest for many scholars. It has provided extensive discussions about, for instance, their strong and weak management capabilities and possible setbacks to their promotion and consolidation in positions of responsibility. Conciliation between family and work lives has also been a hot topic for researchers.

Considering the role of women in management (WIM) as a central topic, the work of Leonard (2001) analyzed the state-of-the-art, concluding that much of the challenges faced by women had not changed. Similar conclusions were found in more recent research developed by Vázquez-Carrasco et al. (2012). Therefore, taking such studies as reference, it may seem appropriate to readdress the situation of WIM in light of the present economic crash and possible employment relationship variations. This paper develops a longitudinal analysis taking as a reference the context of an occidental and developed country such as Spain. This research analyzes the opinion of a group of women who work in high and intermediate management positions. In this longitudinal study, results seem to indicate that job environment has changed considerably. Employment relationships have taken a somber downturn not experienced before, possibly due to the economic crash.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almerm, E., Cohen, J., & Single, L. (2004). Is it the kids or the schedule? The incremental effect of families and flexible scheduling on perceived career success. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arfken, D., Bellar, S., & Helms, M. (2004). The ultimate glass ceiling revisited: The presence of the women on corporate brands. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E. (2000). All in a day’s work. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwater, L. E., Brett, J. F., & Waldman, D. (2004). Men’s and women’s perceptions of the gender-typing of management subroles. Sex Roles, 50, 191–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, L. (1993). SMR forum: Patterned chaos in human resource management. Sloan Management Review, 34, 77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclays, B. (2000). Women in business: The barriers start to fall. London: Barclays Bank plc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barragan, S., Mills, A., & Runte, M. (2010). The Mexican glass ceiling and the construction of equal opportunities: Narratives of women managers. Journal of Workplace Rights, 15, 255–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, P., & Moen, P. (1999). Scaling back: Dual earner couples’ work-family strategies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 995–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M., Mclaughlin, M., & Sequeira, J. (2002). Discrimination, harassment and the glass ceiling: Women executives as a change agents. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S., & Westhead, P. (1994). A taxonomy of business start-up reasons and their impact on firm growth and size. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 7–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S., Moss, C., & Sanders, P. (1987). Do women entrepreneurs require different training? American Journal of Small Business, 12, 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, D. D., & Hisrich, R. D. (1986). The female entrepreneur: A career development perspective. Academy of Management Review, 11, 393–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyar, S. L., Maertz, C. P., & Pearson, A. W. (2005). The effects of work-family conflict and family-work conflict on nonattendance behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 58, 919–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbridge, A. (1997). Why earnings differentials are different for men and women in retailing. The Services Industries Journal, 17, 221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C. G. (1992). Research on women business owners: Past trends, a new perspective and future directions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 16, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C. G. (1999). Women’s entrepreneurship: A new approach. In S. Birley & D. Muzyka (Eds.), Mastering enterprise: Your single source guide to becoming an entrepreneur. London: Financial Times – Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttner, E. H., & Moore, D. P. (1997). Women’s organisational exodus to entrepreneurship: Self-reported motivations and correlates with success. Journal of Small Business Management, 35, 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calás, M. B., & Smircich, L. (1993). Dangerous liaisons: The “feminine-in-management” meets “globalization.”. Business Horizons, 36, 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cann, A., & Siegfried, W. D. (1990). Gender stereotypes and dimensions of effective leader behavior. Sex Roles, 23, 413–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaganti, R. (1986). Management in women-owned enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 24, 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, S., & Biswas, C. S. (2012). An exploratory analysis of women’s empowerment in India: A structural equation modelling approach. Journal of Development Studies, 48, 164–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesterman, C., Ross-Smith, A., & Peters, M. (2005). Not doable jobs! Exploring senior women’s attitudes to academic leadership roles. Women’s Studies International Forum, 28, 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chetty, S., & Hamilton, R. (1995). The process of exporting in owner-controlled firms. International Small Business Journal, 14, 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christman, J., Casrud, A., Decastro, J., & Herron, L. (1990). A comparison of assistance needs of male and female pre-venture entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Ventures, 5, 235–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chusmir, L., & Parker, B. (1991). Gender and situational differences in managers’ values: A look at work and home lives. Journal of Business Research, 23, 325–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. (2000). Access to capital and terms of credit: A comparison of men- and-women-owned small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 38, 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. (2007). The role of human and financial capital in the profitability and growth of women-owned small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 45, 303–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins-Dodd, C., Gordon, I. M., & Smart, C. (2004). Further evidence on the role of gender in financial performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 42, 395–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coronel, J. M., Moreno, E., & Carrasco, M. J. (2010). Work-family conflicts and the organizational work culture as barriers to women educational managers. Gender, Work and Organization, 18, 219–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danes, S. M., Stafford, K., & Loy, J. T. (2007). Family business performance: The effects of gender and management. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1058–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruin, A., & Lewis, K. (2004). Toward enriching united career theory: Familial entrepreneurship and copreneurship. Career Development International, 9, 638–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • deMartino, R., & Barbato, R. (2003). Differences between women and men MBA entrepreneurs: Exploring family flexibility and wealth creation as career motivators. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 68–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMartino, R., Barbato, R., & Jacques, P. (2006). Exploring the career/achievement and personal life orientations differences between entrepreneurs and nonentrepreneurs: The impact of sex and dependents. Journal of Small Business Management, 44, 350–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal, S. (1998). Silent contributors: Asian female entrepreneurs and women in business. Women’s Studies International Forum, 21, 463–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Rietz, A., & Henrekson, M. (2000). Testing the female underperformance hypothesis. Small Business Economics, 14, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A., & Karau, S. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice towards female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A., Karau, S., & Makhajani, M. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., & Rothbard, N. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25, 178–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R., Foldy, E. A., & Scully, M. A. (2003). Reader in gender, work & organization. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson-Zetterquist, U., & Styhre, A. (2008). Overcoming the glass barriers: Reflection and action in the “Woman to the Top” programme. Gender, Work and Organization, 15, 589–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabowale, L., Orser, B., & Riding, A. (1995). Gender, structural factors and credit terms between Canadian small businesses and financial institutions. Entrepreneurship, Theory & Practice, 19, 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagenson, E. (1990). At the heart of women in management research: Theoretical and methodological approaches and their biases. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 267–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenberg, L., & Monachello, M. (1990). Dual-career and dual-income families: Do they have different needs? Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 339–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. (2004). Why women rule. Fortune Small Business, 14, 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, M., & Folker, C. (2005). Exploring new frontiers in women’s family business leadership. International Journal of Family Business, 2, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullager, J. F., Sumer, H. C., Sverke, M., & Slick, R. (2003). Managerial sex-role stereotyping: A cross-cultural analysis. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 3, 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (1995). Gender, symbolism, and organizational cultures. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glancey, K., Greig, M., & Pettigrew, M. (1998). Entrepreneurial dynamics in the small business service sector. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 4, 249–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffee, R., & Scase, R. (1982). Female entrepreneurs: Some preliminary research findings. The Service Industries Journal, 2, 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, M. (1998). The work of caring for young children: Priceless or worthless? Women’s Studies International Forum, 21, 401–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, P., & Perren, L. (2002). Small business and entrepreneurial research: Meta-theories, paradigms and prejudices. International Small Business Journal, 20, 185–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J., & Parasuraman, S. (1999). Research of work, family and gender: Current status and future directions. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. A., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundry, L. K., & Welsch, H. P. (2001). The ambitious entrepreneur: High growth strategies of women-owned enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 453–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haar, H. M., & O’Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Exploring gender differences in employee attitudes towards work-family practices and use of work-family practices. Equal Opportunities International, 24, 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M., McIntyre, N., Heames, J., & Moeller, M. (2009). Mentoring global female managers in the global marketplace: Traditional, reverse, and reciprocal mentoring. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 1344–1361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: how gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisrich, R. (1989). Women entrepreneurs: Problems and prescriptions for success in the future. In O. Lagan, C. Rivchun, & D. Sexton (Eds.), Women-owned businesses. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisrich, R. D., & Brush, C. (1984). The women entrepreneur: Management skills and business problems. Journal of Small Business Management, 22, 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisrich, R. D., & O’Brien, M. (1981). The woman entrepreneur. In K. H. Vesper (Ed.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Wellesley: Babson Center for Entrepreneurial Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, L. M., & McDonald, K. S. (2003). Career aspirations of non-managerial women: Adjustment and adaptation. Journal of Career Development, 29, 221–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K., & Tullous, R. (2002). Behaviors of pre-venture entrepreneurs and perceptions of their financial needs. Journal of Small Business Management, 40, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A., & Leicht, K. (1991). Gender and organisational performance: Determinants of small business survival and success. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 136–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, E., Ding, D. K., & Charoenwong, C. (2010). Investor reaction to women directors. Journal of Business Research, 63, 888–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. (2000). The gendered society. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., & Kerfoot, D. (2004). Between representations and subjectivity: Gender binaries and the politics of organizational transformation. Gender, Work & Organization, 10, 391–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, H., & Park, D. (2005). A few women-on top management teams. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1712–1720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M. (2001). Old wine in new bottles? Women working inside and outside the household. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24, 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M., & Almor, T. (2002). Relationships among strategic capabilities and the performance of women-owned small ventures. Journal of Small Business Management, 40, 109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lituchy, T. R., & Reavley, M. A. (2004). Women entrepreneurs: A comparison of international small business owners in Poland and the Czech Republic. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2, 61–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D., & Schmied, V. (2002). The right way of doing it all: First-time Australian mothers’ decisions about paid employment. Women’s Studies International Forum, 25, 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclaran, P., & Catterall, M. (2002). Analysing qualitative data: Computer software and the market research practitioner. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 5, 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Man, M. M., Skerlavaj, M., & Dimovski, V. (2009). Is there a “glass ceiling” for mid-level female managers? International Journal of Management and Innovation, 1, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marta, J., Singhapakdi, A., & Kraft, K. (2008). Personal characteristics underlying ethical decisions in marketing situations: A survey of small business managers. Journal of Small Business Management, 46, 589–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (2003). Feminist theory and critical theory: Unexplored synergies. In M. Alvesson & H. Willmott (Eds.), Studying management critically. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, L., Eddleston, K., & Viega, J. (2002). Moderators of the relationship between work-family conflict and career satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 399–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D., & Cava, A. (1993). Ethics and the gender equality dilemma for US multinationals. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 701–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • McColl-Kennedy, J., & Anderson, R. (2005). Subordinate-manager gender combination and perceived leadership style influence on emotions, self-esteem and organizational commitment. Journal of Business Research, 58, 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzies, T., Diochon, M., & Gasse, Y. (2004). Examining venture-related myths concerning women entrepreneurs. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 9, 89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, D. E., & Kolb, D. M. (2000). Moving out of the “armchair”: Developing a framework to bridge the gap between feminist theory and practice. Organization, 7, 553–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, A. J. (1988). Organization, gender and culture. Organization Studies, 9, 351–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, A. J. (2002). Studying the gendering of organizational culture over time: Concerns, issues and strategies. Gender, Work & Organization, 9, 286–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, A. J., & Marjosola, A. (2002). Gender, identity and the culture of organizations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P., & Yu, Y. (2000). Effective work-life strategies: Working couples, work conditions, gender and life quality. Social Problems, 47, 291–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncrief, W. C., Babakus, E., Cravens, D. W., & Johnston, M. W. (2000). Examining gender differences in field sales organizations. Journal of Business Research, 49, 245–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. P., & Buttner, E. H. (1997). Women entrepreneurs: Moving beyond the glass ceiling. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Miyasaki, N. N., & Watters, C. E. (2006). The dilemma of growth: Understanding venture size choices of women entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 44, 221–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nentwich, J. C. (2006). Changing gender: The discursive construction of equal opportunities. Gender, Work and Organization, 13, 499–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, P. (1996). Gender, power and organization: A psychological perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noor, N. (2004). Work-family conflict, work and family-role salience, and women’s well-being. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 389–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, J. (2000). Gender-based barriers to senior management positions: Understanding the scarcity of female CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 321–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orhan, M., & Scott, D. (2001). Why women enter into entrepreneurship: An explanatory model. Women in Management Review, 16, 232–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo-del-Val, M. (2010). Services supporting female entrepreneurs. The Services Industries Journal, 30, 1479–1498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasamar, S., & Valle, R. (2011). Work-life balance in Spanish companies. Myth or reality? Universia Business Review, 1, 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prime, J. L., Carter, N. M., & Welbourne, T. M. (2009). Women “take care”, men “take charge”: Managers’ stereotypic perceptions of women and men leaders. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 12, 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quader, M. S. (2012). A characteristic model of successful women entrepreneurs in the UK. Journal of Services Research, 12, 89–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B., & Padavic, I. (1994). Women and men at work. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, P., Hamilton, D., Carter, S., & Burns, H. (1994). The impact of gender on small business management: Preliminary findings of a British study. International Small Business Journal, 12, 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, H., O’Connell, J., & McGinnity, F. (2009). The impact of flexible working arrangements on work-life conflict and work pressure in Ireland. Gender, Work and Organization, 16, 73–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E., Mueller, R., Lituchy, T., & Liu, J. (1996). Think manager-think male: A global phenomenon? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, E. B. (1976). Entrepreneurship: A new female frontier. Journal of Contemporary Business, 5, 47–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sczesny, S. (2003). A closer look beneath the surface: Various facets of the think-manager-think-male stereotype. Sex Roles, 49, 353–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., Kovereid, L., & Westhead, P. (1991). An exploratory examination of the reasons leading to new firm formation across country and gender. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 431–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, L. M. (2006). Female entrepreneurs, work-family conflict, and venture performance: new insights into the work-family interface. Journal of Small Business Management, 44, 285–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. P., Reynolds, R. G., & Muhammad, S. (2001). A gender-based performance analysis of micro and small enterprises in Java, Indonesia. Journal of Small Business Management, 39, 174–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonfield, M., Lussier, R., Corman, J., & McKinney, M. (2001). Gender comparisons in strategic decision-making: An empirical analysis of the entrepreneurial strategy matrix. Journal of Small Business Management, 39, 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? A critical review. American Psychologist, 60, 950–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, R., Woo, Y., & Cooper, A. C. (1994). Performance determinants for male and female entrepreneurs, frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Wellesley: Center for Entrepreneurial Studies Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (1994). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, J., Riger, S., & Sullivan, M. (1995). Measuring perceptions of the working environment for women in corporate settings. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 533–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strykowska, M. (1995). Women in management in Poland. Women’s Studies International Forum, 18, 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlaner, L., & Thurik, R. (2007). Postmaterialism influencing total entrepreneurial activity across nations. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17, 161–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink, M., Benschop, Y., & Jansen, W. (2010). Transparency in academic recruitment: A problematic tool for gender equality? Organization Studies, 31, 1459–1483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelderen, M., Thurik, R., & Bosman, N. (2006). Success and risk factors in the pre-startup phase. Small Business Economics, 26, 319–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Carrasco, R., López-Pérez, M. A., & Centeno, E. (2012). A qualitative approach to the challenges for women in management: Are they starting in the 21st century? Quality & Quantity, 46, 1337–1357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheul, I., & Thurik, R. (2001). Start-up capital: Does gender matter? Small Business Management, 16, 109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinnel, R., & Hamilton, R. (1999). A historical perspective on small firm development. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E., & Webster, B. (2006). Management competencies of women business owners. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2, 495–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, E., & Miles, M. (1995). Computer programs/or qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, M. (1998). The corporate enigma: Women business owners in New Zealand. Wellington: GP Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F. (2004). The environment for female entrepreneurship in Germany. Journal of Small Business Enterprise Development, 11, 212–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F. M. (1996). Research note: Organizational theory: Blind and deaf to gender? Organizational Studies, 17, 825–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2003). Case study research, design and methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. A. (1999). An evaluative essay on current conceptions of effective leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosario Vázquez Carrasco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carrasco, R.V., Pérez, M.E.L., Centeno, E. (2016). Let Us Listen to the Voice of Women in Management in the Twenty-First Century: A Longitudinal Study. In: Connerley, M., Wu, J. (eds) Handbook on Well-Being of Working Women. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9897-6_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9897-6_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9896-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9897-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics