Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender, Entrepreneurship, and Firm Performance: Recent Research and Considerations of Context

  • Chapter
Handbook on Well-Being of Working Women

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life ((IHQL))

Abstract

Conventional wisdom asserts that women-owned firms underperform firms owned by men. Studies reveal, however, that women and men do not differ in measures of firm survival or profitability when we control for factors such as industry, firm size, and firm age. Gender differences persist, however, in measures of firm size and growth. Recent research suggests that this continued discrepancy is due to gender differences in resource attributes combined with differences in motivations, goals, and attitudes. Thus, the performance of women-owned firms needs to be viewed within the context of the goals and objectives that women establish for their firms as well as where they are in their life cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The 5 Cs of credit include (1) the character or reputation of the borrower, (2) her capacity to repay the loan, (3) her available capital, (4) collateral that can be pledged to secure the loan, and (5) the conditions of the loan including the loan amount and interest rate (http://www.investopedia.com).

References

  • 2007 Survey of Business Owners. Retrieved at http://www.census.gov on Sept 1 2013.

  • 5 Cs of credit. Retrieved at http://www.investopedia.com on Jan 1 2014.

  • Ahl, H. (2006, September). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsos, G. A., Isaksen, E. J., & Ljunggren, E. (2006, September). New venture financing and subsequent business growth in men- and women-led businesses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 667–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anna, A. L., Chandler, G. N., Jansen, E., & Mero, N. P. (1999). Women business owners in traditional and non-traditional industries. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 279–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, L., Laschever, S., Gelfand, M., & Small, D. (2003, October). Nice girls don’t ask. Harvard Business Review, 81(10), 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajtelsmit, V. L., & VanDerhei, J. L. (1997). Risk aversion and pension investment choices. In M. S. Gordon, O. S. Mitchell, & M. M. Twinney (Eds.), Positioning pensions for the twenty-first century (pp. 45–66). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajtelsmit, V. L., Bernasek, A., & Jianakoplos, N. A. (1999). Gender differences in defined contribution pension decisions. Financial Services Review, 8, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Blease, J. R., & Sohl, J. E. (2007). Do women-owned businesses have equal access to angel capital? Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 503–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, M. K. (2006). Gendered lending: Gender, context and the rules of business lending. Venture Capital, 8(2), 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, M. K., & Hanson, S. (2005). Rethinking innovation: Context and gender. Environment and Planning, 37, 681–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobbitt-Zeher, D. (2007). The gender income gap and the role of education. Sociology of Education, 80(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boden, R. J., Jr. (1999). Flexible working hours, family responsibilities, and female self-employment: Gender differences in self-employment selection. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(1), 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boden, R. J., Jr., & Nucci, A. R. (2000). On the survival prospects of men’s and women’s new business ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, A., Gherardi, S., & Poggio, B. (2004). Doing gender, doing entrepreneurship: An ethnographic account of intertwined practices. Gender, Work and Organization, 11(4), 406–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, V., Holland, D. V., Shepherd, D. A., & Wiklund, J. (2008). The role of human capital in loan officers’ decision policies. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32(3), 485–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C. G., & Chaganti, R. (1998). Businesses without glamour? An analysis of resources on performance by size and age in small service and retail firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 14, 233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C. G., Greene, P. G., & Hart, M. M. (2001a). From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 64–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C., Carter, N., Gatewood, E., Greene, P., & Hart, M. (2001b). The Diana project: Women business owners and equity capital: The myths dispelled. Kansas City: Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C., Carter, N., Gatewood, E., Greene, P., & Hart, M. (2004). Gatekeepers of venture growth: A Diana project report on the role and participation of women in the venture capital industry. Kansas City: Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C. G., de Bruin, A., & Welter, F. (2009). A gender-aware framework for women’s entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 8–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnizares, S. M. S., & Garcia, F. J. F. (2010). Gender differences in entrepreneurial attitudes. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 29(8), 766–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N. M., & Allen, K. R. (1997). Size determinants of women-owned businesses: Choice or barriers to resources. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 9, 211–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N. M., Williams, M., & Reynolds, P. D. (1997). Discontinuance among new firms in retail: The influence of initial resources, strategy, and gender. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G., & Gatewood, E. J. (2003). The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 13–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S., Shaw, E., Wilson, F., & Lam, W. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurship and bank lending: The criteria and processes used by bank loan officers in assessing applications. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(3), 427–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C., Greene, P. C., & Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, J. E. (1998). Does one size fit all? exploring the relationship between attitudes toward growth, gender, and business size. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 523–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. (2000). Access to capital and terms of credit: A comparison of men- and women-owned small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 38(3), 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. (2002). Characteristics and borrowing behavior of small, women-owned firms: Evidence from the 1998 survey of small business finances. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. (2003). Women and risk: An analysis of attitudes and investment behavior. The Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 7(2), 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. (2007). The role of human and financial capital on the profitability and growth of women-owned firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 45(3), 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S., & Robb, A. (2009). A comparison of new firm financing by gender: Evidence from the Kauffman firm survey data. Small Business Economics, 33, 397–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S., & Robb, A. (2012a). A rising tide: Financing strategies for women-owned firms. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S., & Robb, A. (2012b). Gender-based performance differences in the United States: Examining the roles of financial capital and motivations. In K. D. Hughes & J. E. Jennings (Eds.), Showcasing the diversity of women’s entrepreneurship research (pp. 75–92). New York: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S., & Robb, A. (2014). Gender differences in innovation among U.S. entrepreneurs. In J. Watson (Ed.), Women’s entrepreneurship in the 21st century: An international multi-level research analysis (pp. 117–137). New York: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinidis, C., Cornet, A., & Asandei, S. (2006). Financing of women-owned ventures: The impact of gender and other owner- and firm-related variables. Venture Capital, 8(2), 133–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. C., Gimeno-Gascon, J. F., & Woo, C. Y. (1994). Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 371–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, C., & Linehan, M. (2006). Barriers in advancing female careers in the high tech sector: Empirical evidence from Ireland. Women in Management Review, 21(1), 28–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, T. A. (2004). The exodus of women from the corporate workplace to self-owned businesses. Employment Relations Today, 30(4), 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiPrete, T. A., & Buckmann, C. (2013). The rise of women: The growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drnovsek, M., Wincent, J., & Cardon, M. S. (2010). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and business start-up: Developing a multi-dimensional definition. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 16(4), 329–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Rietz, A., & Henrekson, M. (2000). Testing the female underperformance hypothesis. Small Business Economics, 14, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, P., & Aromaa, E. (2012). Co-construction of innovation and gender: A critical review of research articles. Paper presented at the gender, work, and organization conference, June 2012, Keele University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabowale, L., Orser, B., & Riding, A. (1995, Summer). Gender, structural factors, and credit terms between Canadian small businesses and financial institutions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19(4), 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, R. W., & Robb, A. M. (2009). Gender differences in business performance: Evidence from the characteristics of business owners survey. Small Business Economics, 33, 375–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, E. M., Rebecca Reuber, A., & Dyke, L. S. (1993). A theoretical overview and extension of research on sex, gender, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(2), 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., Gruber, M., Harhoff, D., & Henkel, J. (2008, May). Venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams: Trade-offs, knock-out criteria, and the impact of VC experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 459–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, P. G., Brush, C. G., Hart, M. M., & Saparito, P. (2001). Patterns of venture capital funding: Is gender a factor? Venture Capital, 3(1), 63–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundry, L. K., & Welsch, H. P. (2001). The ambitious entrepreneur: High growth strategies of women-owned enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, D., & Saunders, C. (2007). Marshaling resources to form small new ventures: Toward a more holistic understanding of entrepreneurial support. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(4), 619–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrihan, G., Chapman, K. S., & Domain, D. L. (2000). Risk tolerance and asset allocations for investors nearing retirement. Financial Services Review, 8, 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. T., & Mason, C. M. (2007). Does gender matter? Women business angels and the supply of entrepreneurial finance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(3), 445–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinz, R. P., McCarthy, D. D., & Turner, J. A. (1997). Are women conservative investors? Gender differences in participant-directed pension investments. In M. S. Gordon, O. S. Mitchell, & M. M. Twinney (Eds.), Positioning pensions for the twenty-first century (pp. 99–106). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, K. (2006). The new labor market segmentation: Labor market dualism in the new economy. Social Science Research, 36, 286–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 36(4), 620–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L., & Leicht, K. T. (1991). Gender and organizational performance: Determinants of small business survival and success. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 136–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, D. J., Brush, C. G., Greene, P. G., & Litovsky, Y. (2012). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2012 women’s report. Babson Park: Babson University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kephart, P., & Schumacher, L. (2005). Has the ‘Glass Ceiling’ cracked? an exploration of women’s entrepreneurship. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 12(1), 2–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepler, E., & Shane, S. (2007, September). Are male and female entrepreneurs really that different? SBA Office of Advocacy. http://www.sba.gov/advo

  • Kirkwood, J. (2009). Is a lack of self-confidence hindering women entrepreneurs? International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 118–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koellinger, P., Minniti, M., & Schade, C. (2008). Seeing the world with different eyes: Gender differences in perceptions and the propensity to start a business (Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, TI 2008-035/3). Available at http://www.tinbergen.nl

  • Loscocco, K. A., Robinson, J., Hall, R. H., & Allen, J. K. (1991). Gender and small business success: An inquiry into women’s relative disadvantage. Social Forces, 70(1), 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrey, Y. (2010). Gender and establishment dynamics, 2002–2006. Retrieved at http://www.sba.gov/advo on Sept 23 2013.

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlow, S. (2002). Women and self employment: A part of or apart from theoretical construct? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 3(2), 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlow, S., Shaw, E., & Carter, S. (2008). Constructing female entrepreneurship policy in the UK: Is the U.S. A relevant benchmark? Environment and Planning, 26, 335–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzies, T. V., Diochon, M., & Gasse, Y. (2004). Examining venture-related myths concerning women entrepreneurs. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 9(2), 89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Miyasaki, N. N., Watters, C. E., & Coombes, S. M. (2006). The dilemma of growth: Understanding venture size choices of women entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T., & Levesque, L. L. (2007, September). The status of women in corporate governance in high-growth, high potential firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(2), 209–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orser, B., & Hogarth-Scott, S. (2002). Opting for growth: Gender dimensions of choosing enterprise development. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 19(3), 284–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orser, B. J., Riding, A. L., & Manley, K. (2006, September). Women entrepreneurs and financial capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30(5), 643–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2010). Athena in the world of techne: The gender dimension of technology, innovation and entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 5(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robb, A. M. (2002). Entrepreneurial performance by women and minorities: The case of new firms. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7(4), 383–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb, A., & Watson, J. (2010). Comparing the performance of female- and male-controlled SMEs: Evidence from the united states and Australia. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 30(8), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roomi, M. A., Harrison, P., & Beaumont-Kerridge, J. (2009). Women-owned small and medium enterprises in England: Analysis of factors influencing the growth process. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 16(2), 270–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, P., Carter, S., & Hamilton, D. (1996). Gender as a determinant of small business performance: Insights from a British study. Small Business Economics, 8, 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabarwal, S., & Terrell, K. (2008). Does gender matter for firm performance? Evidence from the East European and Central Asian region (IPC Working Paper Series No. 73). http://ssrn.com/abstract=1223454

  • Schooley, D. K., & Worden, D. D. (1996). Risk aversion measures: Comparing attitudes and asset allocation. Financial Services Review, 5(2), 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E., Marlow, S., Lam, W., & Carter, S. (2009). Gender and entrepreneurial capital: Implications for firm performance. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003, Summer). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjogren, F., & Lindberg, M. (2012). Gendering innovation. Paper presented at the gender, work, and organization conference, June 2012, Keele University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Still, L. V., & Walker, E. A. (2006). The self-employed woman owner and her business. Women in Management Review, 21(4), 294–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunden, A. E., & Surette, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 207–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai, A. R., & Sims, R. L. (2005). The perception of the glass ceiling in high technology companies. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 12(1), 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson-Keasey, C. (1990). The working lives of Terman’s gifted women. In H. Y. Grossman & N. L. Chester (Eds.), The experience and meaning of work in women’s lives (pp. 213–240). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treanor, L., Henry, C., & Miahj, F. (2010, August 3–4). Supporting women-led new venture creation in the bio-sciences: The role of the incubator. Paper presented at the 2010 Diana international conference on women’s entrepreneurship, Banff, Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheul, I., & Thurik, R. (2001). Start-up capital: “Does Gender Matter?”. Small Business Economics, 16(4), 329–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E., & Webster, B. (2004). Gender issues in home-based businesses. Women in Management Review, 19(7/8), 404–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E., Wang, C., & Redmond, J. (2008). Women and work-life balance: Is home-based business ownership the solution? Equal Opportunities International, 27(3), 258–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q. (2013). The industrial concentration of ethnic minority- and women-owned businesses in the united states. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 26(3), 299–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (2002). Comparing the performance of male- and female-controlled businesses: Relating outputs to inputs. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 26(3), 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (2003). Failure rates for female-controlled businesses: Are they any different? Journal of Small Business Management, 41(3), 262–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (2006). External funding and firm growth: Comparing female- and male-controlled SMEs. Venture Capital, 8(1), 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (2011). Networking: Gender differences and the association with firm performance. International Small Business Journal, 30(5), 536–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J., & Newby, R. (2005). Biological sex, stereotypical sex-roles, and SME owner characteristics. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 11(2), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J., & Robinson, S. (2003). Adjusting for risk in comparing the performances of male- and female-controlled SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 773–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F., Kickul, J., & Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(3), 387–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafar, B. (2009, February). College major choice and the gender gap (Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report No. 364).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Barney School of Business, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT, USA

    Susan Coleman

Authors
  1. Susan Coleman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Coleman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management College of Business Administration, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa, USA

    Mary L. Connerley

  2. Department of Management and Marketing School of Management, Rhode Island College, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

    Jiyun Wu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coleman, S. (2016). Gender, Entrepreneurship, and Firm Performance: Recent Research and Considerations of Context. In: Connerley, M., Wu, J. (eds) Handbook on Well-Being of Working Women. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9897-6_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9897-6_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9896-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9897-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation