Terrestrial Ecosystem Services in River Basins: An Overview and an Assessment Framework

Abstract

The concept of ecosystem services is a promising approach to assess ecosystems also in river basins, particularly in view of their multifunctional use and sustainable development. The chapter mainly focuses on terrestrial ecosystems. Starting from the definition and classification of these ecosystems, relevant provisioning, regulating and socio-cultural services are listed, together with short descriptions, examples, their relations to water, and with suitable indicators. The EPPS assessment framework (Ecosystem Properties, Potentials and Services) is presented and then illustrated on the example of two very frequently occurring terrestrial ecosystems or land use types: (1) semi-natural grassland, and (2) farmland (with the specification “energy cropping”).

Keywords

Assessment framework Energy crops Indicators Potentials Semi-natural grassland 

References

  1. Bailey RG (2009) Ecosystem geography, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastian O (1997) Gedanken zur Bewertung von Landschaftsfunktionen – unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Habitatfunktion. NNA-Berichte, Schneverdingen 10:106–125Google Scholar
  3. Bastian O, Schreiber K-F (1999) Analyse und ökologische Bewertung der Landschaft, 2nd edn. Spektrum Akadem. Verlag, Heidelberg/BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. Bastian O, Krönert R, Lipsky Z (2006) Landscape diagnosis in different space and time scales – A challenge for landscape planning. Landsc Ecol 21:359–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bastian O, Neruda M, Filipová L, Machová I, Leibenath M (2010) Natura 2000 sites as an asset for rural development: the German-Czech Ore Mountains Green Network Project. J Landsc Ecol 4(2):41–58Google Scholar
  6. Bastian O, Haase D, Grunewald K (2012a) Ecosystem properties, potentials and services – the EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example. Ecol Indic 21:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bastian O, Grunewald K, Syrbe R-U (2012b) Space and time aspects of ecosystem services, using the example of the EU Water Framework Directive. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage 8(1–2):5–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.631941
  8. Bastian O, Syrbe R-U, Rosenberg M, Rahe D, Grunewald K (2013a) The five pillar EPPS framework for quantifying, mapping and managing ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 4:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bastian O, Walz U, Decker A (2013b) Historical landscape elements: part of our cultural heritage – a methodological study from Saxony. In: Kozak J et al (eds) Integrating nature and society towards sustainability. Environmental science and engineering. http://dx.doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12725-0_31. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 441–459
  10. BfN (Bundesamt für Naturschutz) (2009) Erfassungsanleitung für die HNV-Farmland-Probeflächen. BonnGoogle Scholar
  11. Brandt H, Vejre H (2004) Multifunctional landscapes – motives, concepts and perspectives. In: Brandt J, Vejre H (eds) Multifunctional landscapes, vol 1. Theory, values and history. WIT Press, Southampton/BostonGoogle Scholar
  12. Burkhard B, Petrosillo I, Costanza R (2010) Ecosystem services – bridging ecology, economy and social sciences. Ecol Complex 7:257–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic 21:17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill R, Paruelo J et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Bello F, Lavorel S, Diaz S, Harrington R, Cornelissen JHC, Bardgett RD, Berg MP, Cipriotti P, Feld CK, Hering D, Martins da Silva P, Potts SG, Sandin L, Sousa JP, Storkey J, Wardle DA, Harrison PA (2010) Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodivers Conserv 19:2873–2893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Groot RS, Wilson M, Boumans R (2002) A typology for description, classification and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Environ Econ 41:393–408Google Scholar
  17. EEA (2000) Corine land cover technical guide (Addendum 2000) European Environment Agency EEA technical report 40, 105 pp. Prepared by Bossard M, Ferance J, Otahel JGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellenberg H (1973) Ökosystemforschung. Springer, Heidelberg/Berlin/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 68(3):643–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. FNR (2012) Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e.V.: Biogas. www.nachwachsende-rohstoffe.de. Accessed 23 Aug 2012
  21. Fränzle O (1998) Grundlagen und Entwicklung der Ökosystemforschung. Handbuch der Umweltwissenschaften, 3. Erg. Lfg. 12/98, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  22. Grunewald K, Bastian O (2015) Ecosystem services - Concept, methods and case studies. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  23. Haines-Young R, Potschin MB (2008) England’s terrestrial ecosystem services and the rationale for an ecosystem approach. Overview Report, DEFRA 33Google Scholar
  24. Haines-Young R, Potschin MB (2013) Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services 261 (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August–December 2012. Report to the European Environment 262 Agency, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  25. Haines-Young R, Potschin M, Kienast F (2012) Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: mapping marginal changes and trade-offs. Ecol Indic 21:39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hein L, Koppen K, van de Groot RS, van Ierland EC (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57:209–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jørgensen SE (2006–2007) An integrated ecosystem theory. Annals of the European Academy of Science. EAS Publishing House, Liège, pp 19–33Google Scholar
  28. Leser H (1997) Landschaftsökologie, 4th edn. Eugen Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  29. Lugo AE, Brown SL, Dodson R, Smith TS, Shugart HH (1999) The Holdridge life zones of the conterminous United States in relation to ecosystem mapping. J Biogeogr 26:1025–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lupp G, Albrecht J, Darbi M, Bastian O (2011) Ecosystem services in energy crop production – a concept for regulatory measures in spatial planning? J Landsc Ecol 4:49–66Google Scholar
  31. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystem and human well-being: scenarios, vol 2. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Müller F, Burkhard B (2007) An ecosystem based framework to link landscape structures, functions and services. In: Mander Ü, Wiggering H, Helming K (eds) Multifunctional land use – meeting future demands for landscape goods and services. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Naturkapital Deutschland – TEEB DE (2012) Der Wert der Natur für Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft – Eine Einführung.- München, ifuplan: Leipzig, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung – UFZ Bonn, Bundesamt für NaturschutzGoogle Scholar
  34. Naveh Z (2010) Ecosystem and landscapes – a critical comparative appraisal. J Landsc Ecol 3(1):64–81Google Scholar
  35. Neef E (1967) Die theoretischen Grundlagen der Landschaftslehre. Haack, GothaGoogle Scholar
  36. Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Odum EP (1971) Fundamentals of ecology. W.B. Sounders Company Ltd., PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  38. Odum EP (1993) Ecology and our endangered life-support systems. Saunders Associated, Inc. Publishers, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  39. OECD (2008) Strategic environmental assessment and ecosystem services. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/24/54/41882953.pdf
  40. Reutter M, Matzdorf B (2013) Leistungen artenreichen Grünlandes. In: Grunewald K, Bastian O (eds) Ökosystemdienstleistungen. Springer/Spektrum, Heidelberg/Berlin, pp 216–224Google Scholar
  41. Rode M, Schneider C, Ketelhake G, Reißhauer D (2005) Naturschutz-verträgliche Erzeugung und Nutzung von Biomasse zur Wärme- und Stromgewinnung. BfN-Scripten 136, BonnGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmitt E, Schmitt T, Glawion R, Klink H-J (2012) Biogeographie.- Braunschweig: Westermann – Das Geographische SeminarGoogle Scholar
  43. Spangenberg JH, Settele J (2010) Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecol Complex 7:327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Syrbe R-U, Walz U (2012) Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecol Indic 21:80–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tansley AG (1935) The use and abuse of vegetational terms and concepts. Ecology 16(3):284–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. TEEB (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. Edited by Kumar P. Earthscan, London/Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  47. van Oudenhoven APE, Petz K, Alkemade R, Hein L, de Groot RS (2012) Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services. Ecol Indic 21:110–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vandewalle M, Sykes MT, Harrison, PA, Luck GW, Berry P, Bugter R, Dawson TP, Feld CK, Harrington R, Haslett JR, Hering D, Jones KB, Jongman R, Lavorel S, Martins da Silva P, Moora M, Paterson J, Rounsevell MDA, Sandin L, Settele J, Sousa JP, Zobel M (2008) Review paper on concepts of dynamic ecosystems and their services. RUBICODE Deliverable D2.1. http://www.rubicode.net/rubicode/RUBICODEeconferencereport.pdf. Accessed 05 Feb 09
  49. Walz U, Bastian O, Kästner A, Wende W, Schwarze H (2013) Situation des Ehrenamts im Naturschutz. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung (NuL) 45(8):233–240Google Scholar
  50. Wessells NK, Hopson JL (1988) Biology. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Wiggering H, Müller K, Werner A, Helming K (2003) The concept of multifunctionality in sustainable land development. In: Helming K, Wiggering H (eds) Sustainable development of multifunctional landscapes. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olaf Bastian
    • 1
  • Karsten Grunewald
    • 2
  • Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
    • 2
  1. 1.MoritzburgGermany
  2. 2.Leibniz Institute for Ecological Urban and Regional DevelopmentDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations