Skip to main content

The Social Construction of Disclosure: The Case of Child Abuse in Israeli Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mandatory Reporting Laws and the Identification of Severe Child Abuse and Neglect

Part of the book series: Child Maltreatment ((MALT,volume 4))

Abstract

Based on 40 in-depth qualitative interviews with professionals, including law-enforcement personnel, educators, and mental health and health-care professionals, this chapter presents a study that describes and analyzes an insider’s view of the ways in which child abuse professionals perceive and understand the disclosure of violence. We found that disclosure is a function of social processes related to the values, ideologies, ways of thinking, and interests of the various social agents involved in the process. Thus, disclosure is not an objective fact-finding process and the subsequent assignment of visibility and proper societal reaction, but rather a social construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The quantitative component included a national survey to determine the incidence and prevalence of child abuse and the reasons for disclosure or lack thereof. Correlates of child abuse and types of abuse were also explored. The qualitative component consisted of in-depth interviews with 130 male and female children and youths aged 12–17, victims of neglect and abuse, across various cultural groups living in Israel, including Jews and Arabs. Eighty interviews were conducted with professionals to enable the multifaceted exploration of abuse from the perspective of various participants in the process. The information will be presented to practitioners and researchers in the form of a national database, which can be used for the development of intervention models.

References

  • Ainsworth, F. (2002). Mandatory reporting of child abuse and neglect: Does it really make a difference. Child and Family Social Work, 7, 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alaggia, R. (2004). Many ways of telling: Expanding conceptualizations of child sexual abuse disclosure. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28(11), 1213–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almog, O. (2000). The Sabra: The creation of the new Jew. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Angen, M. J. (2000). Evaluating interpretative inquiry: Reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 378–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, V. (2004). The effect of personal characteristics on reporting child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 985–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research (10th ed.). Belmont: Thomson/Wadsworth Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bal, S., Crombez, G., Bourdeaudhuji, I., & Van Oost, P. (2009). Symptomatology in adolescents following initial disclosure of sexual abuse: The roles of crisis support, appraisals and coping. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 717–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bross, D. C., Ballo, N., & Korfmacher, J. (2000). Client evaluation of a consultation team on crimes against children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(1), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, A., & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: A review of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidov, D., Jack, S., Frost, S., & Coben, J. (2012). Mandatory reporting in the context of home visitation programs: Intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 18(5), 595–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Phelps, F. G. (2005). Gaze aversion: A response to cognitive or social difficulty? Memory and Cognition, 33(4), 727–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egu, C. L., & Weiss, D. J. (2003). The role of race and severity of abuse in teachers’ recognition or reporting of child abuse. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12(4), 465–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, L. G. (1988). Factors that affect a victim’s self-disclosure in father–daughter incest. Child Welfare, 67, 462–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontes, L. A. (2005). Child abuse and culture: Working with diverse families. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1994). Realities and relationship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman-Brown, T. B., Edelstein, R. S., Goodman, G. S., Jones, D. P. H., & Gordon, D. S. (2003). Why children tell: A model of children’s disclosure of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 525–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugaard, J. J. (2000). The challenge of defining child sexual abuse. American Psychologist, 55, 1036–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henwood, K. L., & Pidgeon, N. F. (1992). Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. British Journal of Psychology, 83(2), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D., & Lamb, M. E. (2005). Trends in children’s disclosure of abuse in Israel: A national study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 1203–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Horowitz, D. (2006). Dynamics of forensic interviews with suspected abuse victims who do not disclose abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30, 753–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., & Horowitz, D. (2007). Victimization of children with disabilities. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77, 629–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibaneza, E., Borrego, J., Pembertona, J., & Terao, S. (2006). Cultural factors in decision-making about child physical abuse: Identifying reporter characteristics influencing reporting tendencies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30, 1365–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminer, B. B., Crowe, A. H., & Budde-Giltner, L. (1988). The prevalence and characteristics of multidisciplinary teams for child abuse and neglect: A national survey. In D. C. Bross, R. D. Krugman, M. R. Lenherr, D. A. Rosenber, & B. D. Schmitt (Eds.), The new child protection team handbook (pp. 548–567). New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, C., Hershkowitz, I., Malloy, L. C., Lamb, M. E., Atabaki, A., & Spindler, S. (2012). Non-verbal behavior of children who disclose or do not disclose child abuse in investigative interviews. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36, 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellog, N. D. (2007). The Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics, 119, 1232–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempe, C. H. (1978). Foreword. In B. D. Schmitt (Ed.), The child protection team handbook: A multidisciplinary approach to managing child abuse and neglect. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, M. (2001). Child abuse reporting: Teachers’ perceived deterrents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25(1), 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Gostin, L., & Cole, T. (2012). Child abuse reporting: Rethinking child protection. Journal of the American Medical Association, 308, 1,37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2005). Paradigms and perspectives in contention. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 183–190). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, A. (1981). Universals in human conception. In P. Heelas & J. Lock (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: The anthropology of the self (pp. 19–36). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, K., Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., & Shuman, D. W. (2005). Disclosure of child sexual abuse: What does the research tell us about the ways that children tell? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 194–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, L. C., Lyon, T. D., & Quas, J. A. (2007). Filial dependency and recantation of child sexual abuse allegations. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 162–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, J., Deneyer, M., & Vandenplas, Y. (2012). Detection, diagnosis, and prevention of child abuse: The role of the pediatrician. European Journal of Pediatrics, 171, 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, B., & Walsh, K. (2004a). Queensland teachers’ new legal obligation to report child sexual abuse. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Law and Education, 9(1), 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, B., & Walsh, K. (2004b). Issues in mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse by Australian teachers. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Law and Education, 9(2), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Islands: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, T. (2005). From zero to hero: Masculinity in Jewish nationalism. In E. Fuchs (Ed.), Israel women’s studies (pp. 97–117). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. (2005). Mandated reporting: A policy without reason. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B., & Anderson, D. (2008). From safe sanctuaries to strong communities: The role of communities of faith in child protection. Family & Community Health: The Journal of Health Promotion & Maintenance, 31(2), 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, A. P., Socolar, R., & St Claire, K. (2006). Pediatric residency training in child abuse and neglect in the United States. Pediatrics, 117, 2215–2222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, R., Webster, S. W., O’Toole, A. W., & Lucal, B. (1999). Teachers’ recognition and reporting of child abuse: A factorial survey. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(11), 1083–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, H. (1998). Meaning making as a metaframework for clinical practice. In R. Dorfmam (Ed.), Paradigms of clinical social work (Vol. 2, pp. 257–288). New York: Brunner/Mazel Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand, S. (2009). The invention of the Jewish people. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scannapieco, M., & Connell-Carrick, K. (2005). Understanding child-maltreatment: An ecological and development perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116

  • Segev, T. (1991). The seventh million: The Israelis and the Holocaust. Jerusalem: Maxwell-Macmillan-Keter Publishing House/Domino Press [Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloman, Z. (1995). From denial to recognition: Attitudes toward Holocaust survivors from World War II to the present. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8(2), 215–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, M., & Kitsuse, I. J. (1977). Constructing social problems. Menlo Park: Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller, K. M., & Nelson-Gardell, D. (2005). “A burden in your heart”: Lessons of disclosure from female preadolescent and adolescent survivors of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(12), 1415–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, J., Jr., & Amaya-Jackson, L. (2008). Traumatic stress understanding the behavioral and emotional consequences of child abuse. Pediatrics, 122(3), 667–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terao, S., Borrego, J., & Urquiza, A. (2001). A reporting and response model for culture and child maltreatment. Child Maltreatment, 6(2), 158–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vulliamy, A., & Sullivan, R. (2002). Reporting child abuse: Pediatricians’ experiences with the child protection system. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(11), 1461–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, K., Farrell, A., Bridgstock, R., & Schweitzer, R. (2006). The contested terrain of teachers detecting and reporting child abuse and neglect: The need for empirical research in an Australian state with unique reporting laws. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 4(1), 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, S. W., O’Toole, R., O’Toole, A. W., & Lucal, B. (2005). Overreporting and underreporting of child abuse: Teachers’ use of professional discretion. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(11), 1281–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellman, G. L. (1992). The impact of case characteristics on child abuse reporting decisions. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16(1), 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. (2002). Don’t touch my Holocaust. Haifa: The University of Haifa Press [Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Davidov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eisikovits, Z., Davidov, J., Sigad, L., Lev-Wiesel, R. (2015). The Social Construction of Disclosure: The Case of Child Abuse in Israeli Society. In: Mathews, B., Bross, D. (eds) Mandatory Reporting Laws and the Identification of Severe Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Maltreatment, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9685-9_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics