Advertisement

The Social Construction of Disclosure: The Case of Child Abuse in Israeli Society

  • Zvi Eisikovits
  • Jonathan DavidovEmail author
  • Laura Sigad
  • Rachel Lev-Wiesel
Chapter
Part of the Child Maltreatment book series (MALT, volume 4)

Abstract

Based on 40 in-depth qualitative interviews with professionals, including law-enforcement personnel, educators, and mental health and health-care professionals, this chapter presents a study that describes and analyzes an insider’s view of the ways in which child abuse professionals perceive and understand the disclosure of violence. We found that disclosure is a function of social processes related to the values, ideologies, ways of thinking, and interests of the various social agents involved in the process. Thus, disclosure is not an objective fact-finding process and the subsequent assignment of visibility and proper societal reaction, but rather a social construction.

Keywords

Child abuse Child protection Professionals Decision-making Reporting Values Disclosure Psychology of reporting 

References

  1. Ainsworth, F. (2002). Mandatory reporting of child abuse and neglect: Does it really make a difference. Child and Family Social Work, 7, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alaggia, R. (2004). Many ways of telling: Expanding conceptualizations of child sexual abuse disclosure. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28(11), 1213–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almog, O. (2000). The Sabra: The creation of the new Jew. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angen, M. J. (2000). Evaluating interpretative inquiry: Reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 378–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashton, V. (2004). The effect of personal characteristics on reporting child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 985–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research (10th ed.). Belmont: Thomson/Wadsworth Learning.Google Scholar
  7. Bal, S., Crombez, G., Bourdeaudhuji, I., & Van Oost, P. (2009). Symptomatology in adolescents following initial disclosure of sexual abuse: The roles of crisis support, appraisals and coping. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 717–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bross, D. C., Ballo, N., & Korfmacher, J. (2000). Client evaluation of a consultation team on crimes against children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(1), 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browne, A., & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: A review of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidov, D., Jack, S., Frost, S., & Coben, J. (2012). Mandatory reporting in the context of home visitation programs: Intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 18(5), 595–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Phelps, F. G. (2005). Gaze aversion: A response to cognitive or social difficulty? Memory and Cognition, 33(4), 727–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Egu, C. L., & Weiss, D. J. (2003). The role of race and severity of abuse in teachers’ recognition or reporting of child abuse. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12(4), 465–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farrell, L. G. (1988). Factors that affect a victim’s self-disclosure in father–daughter incest. Child Welfare, 67, 462–468.Google Scholar
  14. Fontes, L. A. (2005). Child abuse and culture: Working with diverse families. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gergen, K. J. (1994). Realities and relationship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Goodman-Brown, T. B., Edelstein, R. S., Goodman, G. S., Jones, D. P. H., & Gordon, D. S. (2003). Why children tell: A model of children’s disclosure of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haugaard, J. J. (2000). The challenge of defining child sexual abuse. American Psychologist, 55, 1036–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henwood, K. L., & Pidgeon, N. F. (1992). Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. British Journal of Psychology, 83(2), 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D., & Lamb, M. E. (2005). Trends in children’s disclosure of abuse in Israel: A national study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 1203–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Horowitz, D. (2006). Dynamics of forensic interviews with suspected abuse victims who do not disclose abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30, 753–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., & Horowitz, D. (2007). Victimization of children with disabilities. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77, 629–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ibaneza, E., Borrego, J., Pembertona, J., & Terao, S. (2006). Cultural factors in decision-making about child physical abuse: Identifying reporter characteristics influencing reporting tendencies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30, 1365–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaminer, B. B., Crowe, A. H., & Budde-Giltner, L. (1988). The prevalence and characteristics of multidisciplinary teams for child abuse and neglect: A national survey. In D. C. Bross, R. D. Krugman, M. R. Lenherr, D. A. Rosenber, & B. D. Schmitt (Eds.), The new child protection team handbook (pp. 548–567). New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Katz, C., Hershkowitz, I., Malloy, L. C., Lamb, M. E., Atabaki, A., & Spindler, S. (2012). Non-verbal behavior of children who disclose or do not disclose child abuse in investigative interviews. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kellog, N. D. (2007). The Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics, 119, 1232–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kempe, C. H. (1978). Foreword. In B. D. Schmitt (Ed.), The child protection team handbook: A multidisciplinary approach to managing child abuse and neglect. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Kenny, M. (2001). Child abuse reporting: Teachers’ perceived deterrents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25(1), 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim, S., Gostin, L., & Cole, T. (2012). Child abuse reporting: Rethinking child protection. Journal of the American Medical Association, 308, 1,37–38.Google Scholar
  29. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2005). Paradigms and perspectives in contention. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 183–190). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Lock, A. (1981). Universals in human conception. In P. Heelas & J. Lock (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: The anthropology of the self (pp. 19–36). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  31. London, K., Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., & Shuman, D. W. (2005). Disclosure of child sexual abuse: What does the research tell us about the ways that children tell? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 194–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Malloy, L. C., Lyon, T. D., & Quas, J. A. (2007). Filial dependency and recantation of child sexual abuse allegations. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 162–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marchand, J., Deneyer, M., & Vandenplas, Y. (2012). Detection, diagnosis, and prevention of child abuse: The role of the pediatrician. European Journal of Pediatrics, 171, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mathews, B., & Walsh, K. (2004a). Queensland teachers’ new legal obligation to report child sexual abuse. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Law and Education, 9(1), 25–40.Google Scholar
  35. Mathews, B., & Walsh, K. (2004b). Issues in mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse by Australian teachers. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Law and Education, 9(2), 3–17.Google Scholar
  36. Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Islands: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Mayer, T. (2005). From zero to hero: Masculinity in Jewish nationalism. In E. Fuchs (Ed.), Israel women’s studies (pp. 97–117). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Melton, G. (2005). Mandated reporting: A policy without reason. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Melton, G. B., & Anderson, D. (2008). From safe sanctuaries to strong communities: The role of communities of faith in child protection. Family & Community Health: The Journal of Health Promotion & Maintenance, 31(2), 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Narayan, A. P., Socolar, R., & St Claire, K. (2006). Pediatric residency training in child abuse and neglect in the United States. Pediatrics, 117, 2215–2222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Toole, R., Webster, S. W., O’Toole, A. W., & Lucal, B. (1999). Teachers’ recognition and reporting of child abuse: A factorial survey. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(11), 1083–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Rosen, H. (1998). Meaning making as a metaframework for clinical practice. In R. Dorfmam (Ed.), Paradigms of clinical social work (Vol. 2, pp. 257–288). New York: Brunner/Mazel Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. Sand, S. (2009). The invention of the Jewish people. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  45. Scannapieco, M., & Connell-Carrick, K. (2005). Understanding child-maltreatment: An ecological and development perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
  47. Segev, T. (1991). The seventh million: The Israelis and the Holocaust. Jerusalem: Maxwell-Macmillan-Keter Publishing House/Domino Press [Hebrew].Google Scholar
  48. Soloman, Z. (1995). From denial to recognition: Attitudes toward Holocaust survivors from World War II to the present. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8(2), 215–228.Google Scholar
  49. Spector, M., & Kitsuse, I. J. (1977). Constructing social problems. Menlo Park: Cummings.Google Scholar
  50. Staller, K. M., & Nelson-Gardell, D. (2005). “A burden in your heart”: Lessons of disclosure from female preadolescent and adolescent survivors of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(12), 1415–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stirling, J., Jr., & Amaya-Jackson, L. (2008). Traumatic stress understanding the behavioral and emotional consequences of child abuse. Pediatrics, 122(3), 667–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Terao, S., Borrego, J., & Urquiza, A. (2001). A reporting and response model for culture and child maltreatment. Child Maltreatment, 6(2), 158–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vulliamy, A., & Sullivan, R. (2002). Reporting child abuse: Pediatricians’ experiences with the child protection system. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(11), 1461–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walsh, K., Farrell, A., Bridgstock, R., & Schweitzer, R. (2006). The contested terrain of teachers detecting and reporting child abuse and neglect: The need for empirical research in an Australian state with unique reporting laws. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 4(1), 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Webster, S. W., O’Toole, R., O’Toole, A. W., & Lucal, B. (2005). Overreporting and underreporting of child abuse: Teachers’ use of professional discretion. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(11), 1281–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zellman, G. L. (1992). The impact of case characteristics on child abuse reporting decisions. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16(1), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zimmerman, M. (2002). Don’t touch my Holocaust. Haifa: The University of Haifa Press [Hebrew].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zvi Eisikovits
    • 1
  • Jonathan Davidov
    • 2
    Email author
  • Laura Sigad
    • 2
  • Rachel Lev-Wiesel
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, the Center for the Study of SocietyUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.The Center for the Study of SocietyUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  3. 3.Graduate School of Creative Art Therapies/Emili Sagol Research Center for CATUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations