Skip to main content

Science-Technology Cross-Hybridization and its Role in the Crisis of the Scientific Method: An Historical Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks

Part of the book series: History of Mechanism and Machine Science ((HMMS,volume 27))

  • 1258 Accesses

Abstract

Nowadays, in the science-related community, an urgent need has emerged to clarify a crisis of the methodological paradigm known as “Scientific Method”. Such a crisis, arising from some recent striking experimental results achieved in experimental sciences, undermines the very foundations of knowledge, with potential serious consequences to the development of future technological applications. In this work, the crisis is analysed within an historical survey on the evolution of the Scientific Method. Furthermore, the role played by cross-hybridization between sciences and technological development is highlighted, throughout the last three centuries, as a possible factor in overcoming that crisis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hesse (2005).

  2. 2.

    Farrington (2000).

  3. 3.

    Rossi (2001).

  4. 4.

    Koyré (1961) thinks that the “world of approximation” is that of the Aristotelian philosophy, but on a closer inspection, we find that this is not true. Galilean physics does not reject the “world of approximation”, but instead uses it, because it receives suggestions for a glimpse of the “world of precision”.

  5. 5.

    Pisano (2013). See in particular the discussion on the peculiarity of physical mathematics with respect to mathematical physics.

  6. 6.

    Answer to the question “What is the relationship between science and technology?”, retrieved online on April 2013 at the URL: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_relationship_between_science_and_technology.

  7. 7.

    NRC (2012).

  8. 8.

    http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/DSO/Programs/Revolutionizing_Prosthetics.aspx.

  9. 9.

    NRC (2012).

References

  • Barbin E, Pisano R (eds) (2013) The dialectic relation between physics and mathematics in the XIXth century. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes B (1982) The science-technology relationship: a model and a query. Social Studies of Science 12:166–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernal JD (1971) Science in history, volume 1: the emergence of science. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwmeester D, Pan J-W, Mattle K, Eibl M, Weinfurter H, Zeilinger A (1997) Experimental quantum teleportation. Nature 390:575–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britannica (2013) “Ionian school”: entry in the Encyclopaedia Britannica and resources therein. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/292908/Ionian-school. Accessed April 2013

  • Brush SG (1992) How cosmology became a science. Scientific American 267:34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chown M (1988) A cosmic relic in three degrees. New Scientist 119:51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • deCharms C (2008) Applications of real-time fMRI. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9:720–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington B (2000) Greek science: its meaning for us. Spokesman Books, Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilder L (2008) The age of entanglement: when quantum physics was reborn. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene JD, Sommerville RB, Nystrom LE, Darley JM, Cohen JD (2001) An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgement. Science 293:2105–2108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halloun IA, Hestenes D (1985) Common sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics 53:1056–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamburg DA (1984) Science and technology in a world transformed. Science 224:943–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy L (1992) Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, and Lorentz-invariant realistic theories. Physical Review Letters 68:2981–2984

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse MB (2005) Forces and fields: the concept of action at a distance in the history of physics. Dover Publications, Mineola

    Google Scholar 

  • Jammer M (2007) Concepts of time in physics: a synopsis. Physics in Perspective 9:266–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jammer M (2012) Concepts of space: the history of theories of space in physics. Dover Publications, Mineola

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré A (1961) Du monde de l’à peu près à l’univers de la précision. Critique 4, 28:806–823. In Etudes d’histoire de la pensée philosophique, pp 311–329, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullen DK, Smith DH (2013) How artificial arms could connect to the nervous system. Scientific American 308:52–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layton D (1993) Technology’s challenge to science education. Open University Press, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman L (1987) Science and technology policies and priorities: a comparative analysis. Science 237:1125–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma XS, Herbst T, Scheidl T, Wang D, Kropatschek S, Naylor W, Wittmann B, Mech A, Kofler J, Anisimova E, Makarov V, Jennewein T, Ursin R, Zeilinger A (2012) Quantum teleportation over 143 kilometres using active feed-forward. Nature 489:269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer M (2000) Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy 29:409–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller G (2012) Why are you and your brain unique? Science 338:35–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagata K (2008) Classification of local realistic theories. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41:155308–155318

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (2012). National Research Council. A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core Ideas. Committee on a conceptual framework for New K-12 science education standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano R (2013) Historical reflections on the physics mathematics relationship in electromagnetic theory. In: Barbin E, Pisano R (eds) The dialectic relation between physics and mathematics in the XIXth century. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 31–58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Riordan M, Tonelli G, Wu SL (2012) The Higgs at last. Scientific American 307:66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi P (2001) The birth of the modern science. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo L (2004) The forgotten revolution: how science was born in 300 BC and why it had to be reborn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith K (2012) Brain imaging: fMRI 2.0. Nature 484:24–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian AM, Soh P-H (2010) An empirical examination of the science–technology relationship in the biotechnology industry. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 27:160–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood E (2013) How to build a dream-reading machine. Science 340:21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vattimo G, Rovatti PA (eds) (2012) Weak thought. SUNY Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker RJ (1983) Aristotle is not dead: student understanding of trajectory motion. American Journal of Physics 51:352–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Assunta Bonanno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bonanno, A., Camarca, M., Sapia, P. (2015). Science-Technology Cross-Hybridization and its Role in the Crisis of the Scientific Method: An Historical Perspective. In: Pisano, R. (eds) A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks. History of Mechanism and Machine Science, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9645-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9645-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9644-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9645-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics