Evolutionary Trends of Triassic Ammonoids

Chapter
Part of the Topics in Geobiology book series (TGBI, volume 44)

Abstract

The Triassic represents a key interval in the evolutionary history of ammonoids. Characterized by the dominance of the Ceratitida with their typical suture line indented on the lobes only, the Triassic quasi-monophyletic clade shows a remarkable biostratigraphic and geographic record. However, very few studies have thoroughly investigated their evolutionary trends, except for taxonomic richness. Although Triassic ammonoids show a very large range of morphologies, suture complexity and adult size, little is currently known about their trends, except for peculiar time intervals or taxonomic groups. Nevertheless, it seems that taxonomic diversity and morphological disparity of Triassic ammonoids are uncoupled, at least during part of the Early Triassic recovery. Finally, Triassic ammonoids still have many properties to contribute to evolutionary biology, but going further now requires the construction of quantitative databases of the various morphological characters and reconstruction of Triassic ammonoid phylogeny.

Keywords

Ammonoids Triassic Evolutionary trends Taxonomic diversity Morphological disparity Adult size 

References

  1. Allen EG (2006) New approaches to Fourier analysis of ammonoid sutures and other complex, open curves. Paleobiology 32:299–315Google Scholar
  2. Alroy J (1998) Cope’s rule and the dynamics of body mass evolution in North American fossil mammals. Science 280:731–734Google Scholar
  3. Alroy J, Aberhan M, Bottjer DJ, Foote M, Fürsich FT, Harries PJ, Hendy AJW, Holland SM, Ivany LC, Kiessling W, Kosnik MA, Marshall CR, McGowan AJ, Miller AI, Olszewski TD, Patzkowsky ME, Peters SE, Villier L, Wagner PJ, Bonuso N, Borkow PS, Brenneis B, Clapham ME, Fall LM, Ferguson CA, Hanson VL, Krug AZ, Layou KM, Leckey EH, Nurnberg S, Powers CM, Sessa JA, Simpson C, Tomasovych A, Visaggi CC (2008) Phanerozoic trends in the global diversity of marine invertebrates. Science 321:97–100Google Scholar
  4. Balini M, Lucas SG, Jenks JF, Spielmann JA (2010) Triassic ammonoid biostratigraphy: an overview. In: Lucas SG (ed) The Triassic timescale, vol 334. Geological Society Special Publication, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayer U, McGhee GR (1984) Iterative evolution of Middle Jurassic ammonite faunas. Lethaia 17:1–6Google Scholar
  6. Bayer U, McGhee GR (1985) Evolution in marginal epicontinental basins: the role of phylogenetic and ecological factors. In: Bayer U, Seilacher A (eds) Sedimentary and evolutionary cycles, Lecture Notes in Earth Science 1:163–220Google Scholar
  7. Becker RT, Kullmann J (1996) Paleozoic ammonoids in space and time. In: Landman NH, Tanabe K, Davies RA (eds) Ammonoid paleobiology. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyajian G, Lutz T (1992) Evolution of biological complexity and its relation to taxonomic longevity in the Ammonoidea. Geology 20:983–986Google Scholar
  9. Brayard A, Bucher H (2008) Smithian (Early Triassic) ammonoid faunas from northwestern Guangxi (South China): taxonomy and biochronology. Foss Strata 55:1–179Google Scholar
  10. Brayard A, Bucher H (2015) Permian-Triassic extinctions and rediversifications. This volumeGoogle Scholar
  11. Brayard A, Escarguel G (2013) Untangling phylogenetic, geometric and ornamental imprints on Early Triassic ammonoid biogeography: a similarity-distance decay study. Lethaia 46:19–33Google Scholar
  12. Brayard A, Bucher H, Escarguel G, Fluteau F, Bourquin S, Galfetti T (2006) The Early Triassic ammonoid recovery: paleoclimatic significance of diversity gradients. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 239:374–395Google Scholar
  13. Brayard A, Bucher H, Brühwiler T, Galfetti T, Goudemand N, Guodun K, Escarguel G, Jenks JF (2007a) Proharpoceras Chao: a new ammonoid lineage surviving the end-Permian mass extinction. Lethaia 40:175–181Google Scholar
  14. Brayard A, Escarguel G, Bucher H (2007b) The biogeography of Early Triassic ammonoid faunas: clusters, gradients, and networks. Geobios 40:749–765Google Scholar
  15. Brayard A, Escarguel G, Bucher H, Monnet C, Brühwiler T, Goudemand N, Galfetti T, Guex J (2009) Good genes and good luck: ammonoid diversity and the end-Permian mass extinction. Science 325:1118–1121Google Scholar
  16. Brayard A, Nützel A, Stephen DA, Bylund KG, Jenks JF, Bucher H (2010) Gastropod evidence against the Early Triassic Lilliput effect. Geology 38:147–150Google Scholar
  17. Brayard A, Bylund KG, Jenks JF, Stephen DA, Olivier N, Escarguel G, Fara E, Vennin E (2013) Smithian ammonoid faunas from Utah: implications for Early Triassic biostratigraphy, correlation and basinal paleogeography. Swiss J Palaeont 132:141–219Google Scholar
  18. Brayard A, Escarguel G, Monnet C, Jenks JF, Bucher H (2015) Biogeography of Triassic ammonoids. This volumeGoogle Scholar
  19. Brosse M, Brayard A, Fara E, Neige P (2013) Ammonoid recovery after the Permian-Triassic mass extinction: a re-exploration of morphological and phylogenetic diversity patterns. J Geol Soc (London) 170:225–236Google Scholar
  20. Brühwiler T, Bucher H, Brayard A, Goudemand N (2010) High-resolution biochronology and diversity dynamics of the Early Triassic ammonoid recovery: the Smithian faunas of the Northern Indian Margin. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 297:491–501Google Scholar
  21. Bucher H (2002) Early Anisian (Middle Triassic) ammonoid biostratigraphy of northeastern British Columbia. Eclog Geol Helv 95:277–287Google Scholar
  22. Cecca F (1997) Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous uncoiled ammonites: trophism-related evolutionary processes. C R Acad Sci Ser IIA Earth Planet Sci 325:629–634Google Scholar
  23. Charlesworth B (1984) Some quantitative methods for studying evolutionary patterns in single characters. Paleobiology 10:308–318Google Scholar
  24. Chirat R, Moulton DE, Goreily A (2013) Mechanical basis of morphogenesis and convergent evolution of spiny seashells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:6015–6020Google Scholar
  25. Dagys AS (1988) Major features of the geographic differentiation of Triassic ammonoids. In: Wiedmann J, Kullmann J (eds) Cephalopods present and past. Schweizerbart, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  26. Dagys AS (2001) The ammonoid family Arctohungaritidae from the boreal Lower-Middle Anisian (Triassic) of Arctic Asia. Rev Paleobiol 20:543–641Google Scholar
  27. Dagys AS, Ermakova SV (1996) Induan (Triassic) ammonoids from northeastern Asia. Rev Paleobiol 15:401–447Google Scholar
  28. Daniel TL, Helmuth BS, Saunders WB, Ward PD (1997) Septal complexity in ammonoid cephalopods increased mechanical risk and limited depth. Paleobiology 23:470–481Google Scholar
  29. De Baets K Klug C Korn D Landman NH (2012) Early Evolutionary trends in ammonoid embryonic development. Evolution 66:1788–1806Google Scholar
  30. De Baets K, Bert D, Hoffmann R, Monnet C, Yacobucci MM, Klug C (2015) Ammonoid intraspecific variability. In: Klug C et al (eds) Ammonoid Paleobiology: from anatomy to ecology (Topics in Geobiology 44, Springer, New York, doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9633-0_13)Google Scholar
  31. De Blasio FV (2008) The role of suture complexity in diminishing strain and stress in ammonoid phragmocones. Lethaia 41:15–24Google Scholar
  32. Dommergues JL (1990) Ammonoids. In: McNamara K (ed) Evolutionary trends. Belhaven Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Dommergues JL, Laurin B, Meister C (1996) Evolution of ammonoid morphospace during the Early Jurassic radiation. Paleobiology 22:219–240Google Scholar
  34. Dommergues JL, Montuire S, Neige P (2002) Size patterns through time: the case of the Early Jurassic ammonite radiation. Paleobiology 28:423–434Google Scholar
  35. Embry AF (1997) Global sequence boundaries of the Triassic and their identification in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. Bull Canadian Petrol Geol 45:415–433Google Scholar
  36. Erwin DH (2006) Extinction: how Life on Earth nearly ended 250 million years ago. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  37. Escarguel G, Fara E, Brayard A, Legendre S (2011) Biodiversity is not (and never has been) a bed of roses! C R Biol 334:351–359Google Scholar
  38. Foote M (1993) Discordance and concordance between morphological and taxonomic diversity. Paleobiology 19:185–204Google Scholar
  39. Galfetti T, Bucher H, Brayard A, Hochuli PA, Weissert H, Guodun K, Atudorei V, Guex J (2007a) Late Early Triassic climate change: insights from carbonate carbon isotopes, sedimentary evolution and ammonoid paleobiogeography. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclim Palaeoecol 243:394–411Google Scholar
  40. Galfetti T, Bucher H, Ovtcharova M, Schaltegger U, Brayard A, Brühwiler T, Goudemand N, Weissert H, Hochuli PA, Cordey F, Guodun KA (2007b) Timing of the Early Triassic carbon cycle perturbations inferred from new U-Pb ages and ammonoid biochronozones. Earth Planet Sci Lett 258:593–604Google Scholar
  41. Galfetti T, Hochuli PA, Brayard A, Bucher H, Weissert H, Vigran JO (2007c) Smithian-Spathian boundary event: evidence for global climatic change in the wake of the end-Permian biotic crisis. Geology 35:291–294Google Scholar
  42. Gerber S, Eble G, Neige P (2008) Allometric space and allometric disparity: a developmental perspective in the macroevolutionary analysis of morphological disparity. Evolution 62:1450–1457Google Scholar
  43. Gingerich PD (1993) Quantification and comparison of evolutionary rates. Am J Sci 293:453–478Google Scholar
  44. Glenister BF, Furnish WM (1980) Permian ammonoids. In: House MR, Senior JR (eds) The Ammonoidea, Systematics Association Special, vol 18. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Gould SJ (1988) Trends as changes in variance: a new slant on progress and directionality in evolution. J Paleontol 62:319–329Google Scholar
  46. Gould SJ (1990) Speciation and sorting as the source of evolutionary trends, or things are seldom what they seem. In: McNamara KJ (ed) Evolutionary trends. Belhaven Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Gould SJ (1991) The disparity of the Burgess Shale arthropod fauna and the limits of cladistic analysis: why we must strive to quantify morphospace. Paleobiology 17:411–423Google Scholar
  48. Gould SJ (1996) Full house: the spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin. Harmony Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Gould SJ (1997) Cope’s rule as psychological artefact. Nature 385:199–200Google Scholar
  50. Gould GC, MacFadden BJ (2004) Gigantism, dwarfism and Cope’s rule: ‘nothing in evolution makes sense without a phylogeny’. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 285:219–237Google Scholar
  51. Guex J (2001) Environmental stress and atavism in ammonoid evolution. Eclog Geol Helv 94:321–328Google Scholar
  52. Guex J (2003) A generalization of Cope’s rule. Bull Soc Géol France 174:449–452Google Scholar
  53. Guex J (2006) Reinitialization of evolutionary clocks during sublethal environmental stress in some invertebrates. Earth Planet Sci Lett 243:240–253Google Scholar
  54. Haas O (1942) Recurrence of morphologic types and evolutionary cycles in Mesozoic ammonites. J Paleontol 16:643–650Google Scholar
  55. Hallam A, Wignall PB (1997) Mass extinctions and their aftermath. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  56. Hassan MA, Westermann GEG, Hewitt RA, Dokainish MA (2002) Finite-element analysis of simulated ammonoid septa (extinct Cephalopoda): septal and sutural complexities do not reduce strength. Paleobiology 28:113–126Google Scholar
  57. Hofmann R, Goudemand N, Wasmer M, Bucher H, Hautmann M (2011) New trace fossil evidence for an early recovery signal in the aftermath of the end-Permian mass extinction. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 310:216–226Google Scholar
  58. Hofmann R, Hautmann M, Brayard A, Nützel A, Bylund KG, Jenks JF, Vennin E, Olivier N, Bucher H (2014) Recovery of benthic marine communities from the end-Permian mass extinction at the low-latitudes of Eastern Panthalassa. Palaeontology 57:547–589Google Scholar
  59. Hone DWE, Benton MJ (2005) The evolution of large size: how does Cope’s rule work? Trends Ecol Evol 20:4–6Google Scholar
  60. House MR (1985) The ammonoid time-scale and ammonoid evolution. Memoir Geol Soc (London) 10:273–283Google Scholar
  61. Ifrim C (2013) Paleobiology and paleoecology of the early Turonian (Late Cretaceous) ammonite Pseudaspidoceras flexuosum. Palaios 28:9–22Google Scholar
  62. Jablonski D (1997) Body-size evolution in Cretaceous molluscs and the status of Cope’s rule. Nature 385:250–252Google Scholar
  63. Jenks JF, Spielmann JA, Lucas SG (2007) Triassic ammonoids: a photographic journey. In: Lucas SG, Spielmann JA (eds) Triassic of the American West. New Mexico Mus Nat History and science Bull 40:33–80Google Scholar
  64. Jenks JF, Monnet C, Balini M, Brayard A, Meier M (2015) Biostratigraphy of Triassic ammonoids. This volumeGoogle Scholar
  65. Kennedy WJ (1977) Ammonite evolution In: Hallam A (ed) Patterns of evolution. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  66. Kennedy WJ (1989) Thoughts on the evolution and extinction of Cretaceous ammonites. Proc Geol Assoc 100:251–279Google Scholar
  67. Kennedy WJ, Cobban WA (1976) Aspects of ammonite biology, biogeography, and biostratigraphy. Special Papers Palaeontol 17: 1–94Google Scholar
  68. Kennedy WJ, Wright CW (1985) Evolutionary patterns in Late Cretaceous ammonites. Special Papers Palaeontol 33:131–143Google Scholar
  69. Kirchner JW, Well A (2000) Delayed biological recovery from extinctions throughout the fossil record. Nature 404:177–180Google Scholar
  70. Klug C, Hoffmann R (2015) Ammonoid septa and sutures. In: Klug C et al (eds) Ammonoid Paleobiology: from anatomy to ecology (Topics in Geobiology 44, Springer, New York, doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9633-0_13)Google Scholar
  71. Klug C, Schatz W, Korn D, Reisdorf AG (2005) Morphological fluctuations of ammonoid assemblages from the Muschelkalk (Middle Triassic) of the Germanic Basin—indicators of their ecology, extinctions, and immigrations. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 221:7–34Google Scholar
  72. Konstantinov AG (2008) Triassic ammonoids of Northeast Asia: diversity and evolutionary stages. Stratigr Geol Correl 16:490–502Google Scholar
  73. Korn D (2000) Morphospace occupation of ammonoids over the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary. Paläontol Z 74:247–257Google Scholar
  74. Korn D, Hopkins MJ, Walton SA (2013a) Extinction space—a method for the quantification and classification of changes in morphospace across extinction boundaries. Evolution 67:2795–2810Google Scholar
  75. Korn D, Leda L, Ghaderi A, Hairapetian V, Schobben M (2013b) The Lilliput effect in the latest Permian ammonoids from Iran. Progr Abstr 57th Ann Meeting Palaeont Ass, pp 41–42Google Scholar
  76. Kröger B (2005) Adaptive evolution in Paleozoic coiled Cephalopods. Paleobiology 31:253–268Google Scholar
  77. Kullmann J, Wiedmann J (1970) Significance of sutures in phylogeny of Ammonoidea. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 47, University of Kansas Paleontological Institute, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  78. Kummel B (1973) Lower Triassic (Scythian) molluscs. In: Hallam A (ed) Atlas of paleobiogeography. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  79. Kummel B, Steele G (1962) Ammonites from the Meekoceras gracilitatus zone at Crittenden Spring, Elko County, Nevada. J Paleontol 36:638–703Google Scholar
  80. MacFadden BJ (1986) Fossil horses from “Eohippus” (Hyracotherium) to Equus: scaling, Cope’s law, and the evolution of body size. Paleobiology 12:355–369Google Scholar
  81. MacFadden BJ (1992) Fossils horses: systematics, paleobiology, and evolution of the family equidae. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  82. McGhee GR Jr (1999) Theoretical morphology: the concepts and its applications. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  83. McGhee GR Jr (2007) The geometry of evolution: adaptive landscapes and theoretical morphospaces. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  84. McGowan AJ (2004) Ammonoid taxonomic and morphologic recovery patterns after the Permian-Triassic. Geology 32:665–668Google Scholar
  85. McGowan AJ (2005) Ammonoid recovery from the Late Permian mass extinction event. C R Palevol 4:517–530Google Scholar
  86. McGowan AJ, Smith AB (2007) Ammonoids across the Permian/Triassic boundary: a cladistic perspective. Palaeontology 50:573–590Google Scholar
  87. McKinney ML (1990) Trends in body-size evolution. In: McNamara KJ (ed) Evolutionary trends. Belhaven Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  88. McLearn FH (1960) Ammonoid faunas of the upper Triassic Pardonet formation, Peace River foothills, British Columbia. Geol Surv Canada Memoir 311:1–118Google Scholar
  89. McNamara KJ (1990) Evolutionary trends. Belhaven Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  90. McNamara KJ (2006) Evolutionary trends. In: Encyclopedia of life sciences. Wiley, Chichester. doi:10.1038/npg.els.0004136Google Scholar
  91. McShea DW (1994) Mechanisms of large-scale evolutionary trends. Evolution 48:1747–1763Google Scholar
  92. McShea DW (1996) Metazoan complexity and evolution: is there a trend? Evolution 50:477–492Google Scholar
  93. McShea DW (2000) Trends, tools, and terminology. Paleobiology 26:330–333Google Scholar
  94. Mojsisovics E, Waagen WH, Diener C (1895) Entwurf einer Gliederung der pelagischen Sediments des Trias-Systems. Sitz Ber Akad Wiss Wien math-naturwiss Kl 104:1271–1302Google Scholar
  95. Monnet C, Bucher H (2005) New middle and late Anisian (Middle Triassic) ammonoid faunas from northwestern Nevada (USA): taxonomy and biochronology. Foss Strata 52:1–121Google Scholar
  96. Monnet C, Brack P, Bucher H, Rieber H (2008) Ammonoids of the middle/late Anisian boundary (Middle Triassic) and the transgression of the Prezzo Limestone in eastern Lombardy-Giudicarie (Italy). Swiss J Geosci 101:61–84Google Scholar
  97. Monnet C, Bucher H, Wasmer M, Guex J (2010) Revision of the genus Acrochordiceras Hyatt, 1877 (Ammonoidea, Middle Triassic): morphology, biometry, biostratigraphy and intraspecific variability. Palaeontology 53:961–996Google Scholar
  98. Monnet C, De Baets K, Klug C (2011) Parallel evolution controlled by adaptation and covariation in ammonoid cephalopods. BMC Evol Biol 11:115. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-115Google Scholar
  99. Monnet C, Bucher H, Guex J, Wasmer M (2012) Large-scale evolutionary trends of Acrochordiceratidae Arthaber, 1911 (Ammonoidea, Middle Triassic) and Cope’s rule. Palaeontology 55:87–107Google Scholar
  100. Monnet C, Bucher H, Brayard A, Jenks JF (2013) Globacrochordiceras gen. nov. (Acrochordiceratidae, late Early Triassic) and its significance for stress-induced evolutionary jumps in ammonoid lineages (cephalopods). Fossil Rec 16:197–215Google Scholar
  101. Monnet C, Klug C, De Baets K (2015) Evolutionary patterns of ammonoids: phenotypic trends, convergence, and parallel evolution. In: Klug C et al (eds), Ammonoid Paleobiology: from macroevolution to paleogeography (Topics in Geobiology 44, Springer, New York, doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9633-0_13)Google Scholar
  102. Moulton DE, Goreily A, Chirat R (2012) Mechanical growth and morphogenesis of seashells. J Theor Biol 311:69–79Google Scholar
  103. Moyne S, Neige P (2007) The space-time relationship of taxonomic diversity and morphological disparity in the Middle Jurassic ammonite radiation. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 248:82–95Google Scholar
  104. Neige P, Elmi S, Rulleau L (2001) Existe-t-il une crise au passage Lias–Dogger chez les ammonites? Approche morphométrique par quantification de la disparité morphologique. Bull Soc Geol France 172:125–132Google Scholar
  105. Newell ND (1949) Phyletic size increase, an important trend illustrated by fossil invertebrates. Evolution 3:103–124Google Scholar
  106. Norris RD (1991) Biased extinction and evolutionary trends. Paleobiology 17:388–399Google Scholar
  107. Novack-Gottshall PM, Lanier MA (2008) Scale-dependence of Cope’s rule in body size evolution of Paleozoic brachiopods. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:5430–5434Google Scholar
  108. Ogg JG (2012) Triassic. In: Gradstein FM, Ogg JG, Schmitz MD, Ogg GM (eds) The geologic time scale 2012. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  109. Olóriz F, Palmqvist P (1995) Sutural complexity and bathymetry in ammonites: fact or artifact? Lethaia 28:167–170Google Scholar
  110. Olóriz F, Palmqvist P, Pérez-Claros JA (1999) Recent advances in morphometric approaches to covariation of shell features and the complexity of suture lines in Late Jurassic ammonites, with reference to the major environments colonized. In: Olóriz F, Rodriguez-Tovar FJ (eds) Advancing research on living and fossil cephalopods. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  111. Page KN (1996) Mesozoic ammonoids in space and time. In: Landman NH, Tanabe K, Davies RA (eds) Ammonoid paleobiology. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  112. Payne JL (2005) Evolutionary dynamics of gastropod size across the end-Permian extinction and through the Triassic recovery interval. Paleobiology 31:269–290Google Scholar
  113. Payne JL, Lehrmann DJ, Wei J, Orchard MJ, Schrag DP, Knoll AH (2004) Large perturbations of the carbon cycle during recovery from the end-Permian extinction. Science 305:506–509Google Scholar
  114. Phillips J (1860) Life on the earth: its origin and succession. Macmillan, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  115. Raup DM (1966) Geometric analysis of shell coiling: general problems. J Paleontol 40:1178–1190Google Scholar
  116. Raup DM (1967) Geometrical analysis of shell coiling: coiling in ammonoids. J Paleontol 41:43–65Google Scholar
  117. Raup DM (1979) Size of the Permo-Triassic bottleneck and its evolutionary implications. Science 206:217–218Google Scholar
  118. Raup DM, Crick RE (1981) Evolution of single characters in the Jurassic ammonite Kosmoceras. Paleobiology 7:200–215Google Scholar
  119. Raup DM, Crick RE (1982) Kosmoceras evolutionary jumps and sedimentary breaks. Paleobiology 8:90–100Google Scholar
  120. Raup DM, Sepkoski JJ (1982) Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record. Science 215:1501–1503Google Scholar
  121. Ritterbush KA, Bottjer DJ (2012) Westermann morphospace displays ammonoid shell shape and hypothetical paleoecology. Paleobiology 38:424–446Google Scholar
  122. Romano C, Goudemand N, Vennemann TW, Ware D, Schneebeli-Hermann E, Hochuli PA, Brühwiler T, Brinkmann W, Bucher H (2013) Climate and biotic upheavals following the end-Permian mass extinction. Nat Geosci 6:57–60Google Scholar
  123. Roopnarine PD, Byars G, Fitzgerald P (1999) Anagenetic evolution, stratophenetic patterns, and random walk models. Paleobiology 25:41–57Google Scholar
  124. Roy K, Foote M (1997) Morphological approaches to measuring biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 12:277–281Google Scholar
  125. Saunders WB (1995) The ammonoid suture problem: relationships between shell and septum thickness and suture complexity in Paleozoic ammonoids. Paleobiology 21:343–355Google Scholar
  126. Saunders WB, Swan ARH (1984) Morphology and morphologic diversity of mid-Carboniferous (Namurian) ammonoids in time and space. Paleobiology 10:195–228Google Scholar
  127. Saunders WB, Work DM, Nikolaeva SV (1999) Evolution of complexity in Paleozoic ammonoid sutures. Science 286:760–763Google Scholar
  128. Sepkoski JJ (1993) Ten years in the library: new data confirm paleontological patterns. Paleobiology 19:43–51Google Scholar
  129. Shevyrev AA (2005) Heteromorph ammonoids of the Triassic: a review. Paleontol J 39(5):614–628Google Scholar
  130. Simpson C, Kiessling W (2010) Diversity of life through time. In: Encyclopedia of life sciences (ELS). Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  131. Spinosa C, Furnish WM, Glenister BF (1975) The Xenodiscidae, Permian ceratitoid ammonoids. J Paleontol 49:239–283Google Scholar
  132. Stanley SM (1973) An explanation for Cope’s rule. Evolution 27:1–26Google Scholar
  133. Swan ARH, Saunders WB (1987) Function and shape in late Paleozoic (mid-Carboniferous) ammonoids. Paleobiology 13:297–311Google Scholar
  134. Tozer ET (1980) Triassic ammonoidea: classification, evolution and relationship with Permian and Jurassic forms. In: House MR, Senior JR (eds) The Ammonoidea. Syst Ass Spec 18. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  135. Tozer ET (1982) Marine Triassic faunas of North America: their significance for assessing plate and terrane movements. Geol Rundschau 71:1077–1104Google Scholar
  136. Tozer ET (1984) The Trias and its ammonites: the evolution of a time scale. Geological Survey of Canada (Misc Report 35), pp 1–171Google Scholar
  137. Tozer ET (1994) Canadian Triassic ammonoid faunas. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 467, Ottawa, pp 1–663Google Scholar
  138. Twitchett RJ (2007) The Lilliput effect in the aftermath of the end-Permian extinction event. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 252:132–144Google Scholar
  139. Urlichs M, Mundlos R (1985) Immigrations of cephalopods into the Germanic Muschelkalk basin and its influence on their suture line. In: Bayer U, Seilacher A (eds) Sedimentary and evolutionary cycles, Lecture notes on earth sciences, vol 1. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  140. Vermeij GJ (1987) Evolution and escalation an ecological history of life. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  141. Villier L, Korn D (2004) Morphological disparity of ammonoids and the mark of Permian mass extinctions. Science 306:264–266Google Scholar
  142. Ward P (1980) Comparative shell shape distributions in Jurassic-Cretaceous ammonites and Jurassic-Tertiary nautilids. Paleobiology 6:32–43Google Scholar
  143. Ward PD (1981) Shell sculpture as a defensive adaptation in ammonoids. Paleobiology 7:96–100Google Scholar
  144. Westermann GEG (1971) Form, structure and function of shell and siphuncle in coiled Mesozoic ammonoids, Life science contribution, Series no 78. Royal Ontario Museum, pp 1–39Google Scholar
  145. Wiedmann J (1969) The heteromorphs and ammonoid extinction. Biol Rev 44:563–602Google Scholar
  146. Wiedmann J (1973) Upper Triassic heteromorph ammonites. In Hallam A (ed) Atlas of palaeobiogeography. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  147. Yang F, Wang H (2000) Ammonoid succession model across the Paleozoic-Mesozoic transition in South China. In: Yin H, Dickins JM, Shi GR, Tong J (eds) Permian-Triassic evolution of Tethys and Western Circum-Pacific. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  148. Zakharov YD, Abnavi NM (2013) The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan. Acta Palaeont Pol 58:127–147Google Scholar
  149. Zhang J (2002) From extinction to recovery: Late Triassic and Early–Middle Jurassic ammonoid morphology. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UFR des Sciences de la Terre (SN5)Université de Lille, UMR CNRS 8217 GéosystèmesVilleneuve d’Ascq cedexFrance
  2. 2.UMR CNRS 6282 BiogéosciencesUniversité de BourgogneDijonFrance
  3. 3.Paläontologisches Institut und MuseumUniversität ZürichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations