Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Standing On Darwin’s Shoulders: The Nature of Selection Hypotheses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Current Perspectives on Sexual Selection

Part of the book series: History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences ((HPTL,volume 9))

Abstract

“Standing on Darwin’s Shoulders” is about the information we need to reject or confirm selection hypotheses. Sexual selection remains important, and contrary to very old and recent claims that Darwin’s ideas cannot explain the origins of fancy traits, Darwin was not wrong, even if other hypotheses might also explain fancy traits. The problem seems to be that many readers seem to lack appreciation for the power of a good, that is, a well-constructed, testable hypothesis. To be a good hypothesis does not mean that it needs to be the truth, but only testable (or potentially testable). My main point is that what’s needed to resolve the recent state of conflict over selection of whatever name is to say as precisely as possible the details of the requisite assumptions so we can get on with testing the fundamentals of how selection works. The fundamentals of selection hypotheses are assumptions about (1) heritable variation among the units of selection, (2) the environmental and/or social circumstances that (3) affect differential probabilities of survival and reproductive success of the units of selection. Selection is simple. For example, if traits of individuals are variable, if traits are heritable, if environments (abiotic, biotic, social, etc.) vary so that some individuals have a higher probability of survival or reproduction in the environment they experience because of their trait variation, natural selection has occurred. Likewise, if individuals within a sex in the same species vary, if traits are heritable, if social environments vary so some individuals have more or better mates than others and thus greater probabilities of reproductive success, sexual selection has occurred. Thus, sexual selection hypotheses are not “systems of belief” or an associated chain of cascading ideas as Roughgarden recently claimed, but rather deductive hypotheses, admirably vulnerable to empirical tests of within sex differential fitness associated with “reproductive competition”—a hypothesis against which we can test nature. If we see more or more clearly than Darwin, it is because we stand on his broad and high shoulders!

“the manner in which the individuals of either sex or of both sexes are affected through sexual selection cannot fail to be complex in the highest degree” (Darwin 1871, t. I, p. 296).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alonso-Alvarez C, Doutrelant C, Sorci G (2004) Ultraviolet reflectance affects male-male interactions in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus ultramarinus). Behav Ecol 15:805–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann J (1997) Mate choice and intrasexual reproductive competition: contributions that go beyond acquiring more mates. In: Gowaty P A. (ed) Feminism and evolutionary biology: boundaries intersections and frontiers. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund A, Bisazza A, Pilastro A (1996) Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biol J Linnean Soc 58:385–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell ALB (1875) The sexes throughout nature. New York, G. P. Putnam’s Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumm H, Todt D (2004) Male-male vocal interactions and the adjustment of song amplitude in a territorial bird. Anim Behav 67:281–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss DM (2006) Debating sexual selection and mating strategies. Science 312(5774):690–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll L (2003) Alice’s adventures in wonderland. Penguin, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock T (2007) Sexual selection in males and females. Science 21:882–1885

    Google Scholar 

  • Dall SRX, McNamara JM, Wedell N, Hosken DJ (2006) Debating sexual selection and mating strategies. Science 312:689–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1859) On the Origin of species by means of natural selection. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C, Wallace A (1858) On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. J Proc Linnean Soc London Zool 3(9):45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day T, Houle D, Rowe L (2006) Debating sexual selection and mating strategies. Science 312:691

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (1995) Darwin’s dangerous idea. Simon and Shuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton (NJ)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlow B, Kimball RT, Marshall MC (1998) Are rooster crows honest signals of fighting ability? Auk 115:763–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (2006) Debating sexual selection and mating strategies. Science 312:691–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotmark F (1993) An experimental study of the importance of plumage coloration in breeding males of the white-crowned sparrow. Ornis Scandinavica 24:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA (1981) The aggression of breeding Eastern Bluebirds Sialia sialis toward each other and intra- and inter-specific intruders. Anim Behav 29:1013–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA (1992) Evolutionary biology and feminism. Hum Nat 3(3):217–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty P A (1996) Battles of the sexes and origins of monogamy. In: Black JL (ed) Partnerships in Birds. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA (1997a) Principles of females' perspectives in avian behavioral ecology. J Avian Biol 28:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA (1997b) Sexual dialectics, sexual selection, and variation in mating behavior. In: Gowaty PA (ed) Feminism and evolutionary biology: boundaries, intersections, and frontiers. New York, Chapman Hall

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA (2003a) Power asymmetries between the sexes, mate preferences, and components of fitness. In: Travis C (ed) Women, evolution, and rape. Cambridge, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA (2003b) Sex roles, contests for the control of reproduction, and sexual selection. In: Kappeler PM, Van Schaik CP (eds) Sexual selection in primates: new and comparative perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA, Anderson WW, Bluhm CK, Drickamer LC, Kim Y-K, Moore AJ (2007) The hypothesis of reproductive compensation and its assumptions about mate preferences and offspring viability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(38):15023–15027

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA (2008) Reproductive compensation. J Evol Biol 21:1189–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA (2011) What is sexual selection and the short herstory of female trait variation. Behav Ecol 22:1146–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA, Buschhaus N (1998) Ultimate causation of aggressive and forced copulation in birds: Female resistance, the CODE hypothesis, and social monogamy. Am Zool 38:207–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA, Plissner JH, Williams TG (1989) Behavioral correlates of uncertian parentage: mate guarding and nest guarding by eastern bluebirds, Sialia sialis. Anim Behav 38:272–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagelin JC (2002) The kinds of traits involved in male-male competition: a comparison of plumage, behavior, and body size in quail. Behav Ecol 13:32–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1963) The evolution of altruistic behavior. Am Nat 97:354–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J Theor Biol 7(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy SB (1981) The Woman that never evolved. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd PL (2006) Debating sexual selection and mating strategies. Science 312:692–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LK, Hubbell SP (1984) Male choice: experimental demonstration in a Brentid weevil. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:183–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessells CM, Bennett ATD, Birkhead TR, Colegrave N, Dall SRX, Harvey PH, Hatchwell B, Hosken DJ, Hunt, J, Moore AJ, Parker GA, Pitnick S, Pizzari T, Radwan J, Ritchie M, Sheldon BC, Shuker DM, Simmons LW, Stockley P, Tregenza T, Zuk M (2006) Debating sexual selection and mating strategies. Science 312:689–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1970) The units of selection. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 1:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mateos C, Carranza J (1997) The role of bright plumage in male-male interactions in the ring-necked pheasant. Anim Behav 54:1205–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matos RJ, Mcgregor PK (2002) The effect of the sex of an audience on male-male displays of siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens). Behaviour 139:1211–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1977) Darwin and Natural Selection: How Darwin may have discovered his highly unconventional theory. Am Sci 65:321–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller G (2006) Debating sexual selection and mating strategies. Science 312(5774):693–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker TH, Ligon JD (2002) Dominant male red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) test the dominance status of other males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:20–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzari T, Birkhead TR, Blows MW, Brooks R, Buchanan KL, Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH, Hosken DJ, Jennions MD, Kokko H, Kotiaho JS, Lessells CM, Macias-Garcia C, Moore AJ, Parker GA, Partridge L, Pitnick S, Radwan J, Ritchie M, Sheldon BC, Simmons LW, Snook RR, Stockley P, Zuk M (2006) Debating sexual selection and mating strategies. Science 312(5774):690–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt John R (1964) Strong inference. Science 146:347–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J (2004) Evolution’s rainbow: diversity, gender, and sexuality in animals and people. University of California Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J, Akcay E, Oishi M (2006a) Debating sexual selection and mating strategies—reponse. Science 312(5774):694–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J, Oishi M, Akcay E (2006b) Reproductive social behavior: cooperative games to replace sexual selection. Science 311(5763):965–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J (2007) Challenging Darwin’s theory of sexual selection. Daedalus 136(2):23–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherfey MJ (1966) The nature and evolution of female sexuality. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuker DM, Tregenza T (2006) Debating sexual selection and mating strategies. Science 312(5774):693–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts BB, Smuts RW (1993) Male-Aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman-primates and other mammals: Evidence and theoretical implications. Adv Stud Behav 22:1–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J (2006) Debating sexual selection and mating strategies. Science 312:694–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace AR (1889) Darwinism: an exposition of the theory of natural selection, with some of its applications. Macmillian, London

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (1979) Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. Proc Amer Phil 51:222–234

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (1983) Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q Rev Biol 58:155–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (1984) Sexual selection, competitive communication and species-specific signals in insects. In: Trevor L (ed) Insect Communication: Proc. 12th Symposium Royal Entomol. Soc. London. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Thierry Hoquet for his helpful comments and his patience. I thank Sarah Hrdy, Steve Hubbell, and Therese Markow for comments on an earlier draft. I acknowledge support during the preparation of the manuscript from NSF award IOS‐1121797 and from previous NSF awards for the support of my empirical research discussed herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Institute of Environment and Sustainability, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Patricia Adair Gowaty

  2. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA

    Patricia Adair Gowaty

  3. Polistes Foundation, Belmont, MA, USA

    Patricia Adair Gowaty

Authors
  1. Patricia Adair Gowaty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Adair Gowaty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Philosophy, Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3, Lyon, France

    Thierry Hoquet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gowaty, P. (2015). Standing On Darwin’s Shoulders: The Nature of Selection Hypotheses. In: Hoquet, T. (eds) Current Perspectives on Sexual Selection. History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9585-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation