Abstract
This chapter discusses an advanced form of stakeholder participation to enhance governance for sustainable car mobility. Our dynamic governance perspective is based on the idea that policies should be concerned not only with providing incentives and setting limits but also with providing orientation, stimulating mutual learning, fostering socio-technical alignment, making sure that a wide variety of options is explored, dealing with conflicting claims by technology actors and with learning about the effects of their policies. The perspective on governance of innovation that we take is an alternative to the dominating (static) welfare perspective of internalizing externalities.
Our chapter starts with an evaluation of role of policy and regulation in car mobility on Europe in the last 25 years. We find that policy instruments were mostly applied within a neo-classical economic welfare perspective based on the use of regulation and economic incentives. It has lead mostly to diffusion of technical fixes and incremental innovation of the dominating propulsion technology, internal combustion engines, not to a modal shift or shift to alternative propulsion systems. Attempts to foster electric vehicles have largely failed.
We discuss how an advanced form of stakeholder participation can enhance the effectiveness of governance for sustainable mobility. Although our discussion mostly concerns Europe, the application of our concept is transferrable to other continents and other sectors.
Marc Dijk is a Research Fellow at ICIS (International Centre for Integrated assessment and Sustainable development) of Maastricht University. Email. m.dijk@maastrichtuniversity.nl
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Smoother links between cars, public transport, bikes etc.
References
Adams J (2005) Hypermobility: a challenge to governance. In: Lyall C, Tait J (eds) New modes of governance: developing an integrated policy approach to science, technology, risk and the environment. Ashgate, Aldershot
Ashford N, Hall R (2011) Technology, globalization, and sustainable development. Yale University Press, New Haven
Dijk M (2014) A socio-technical perspective on the electrification of the automobile: niche and regime interaction. Int J Automot Technol Manage 14(2):158–171
Dijk M, Kemp R (2012) Evolutionary policy options for steering transition to low-carbon cars in Europe. In: Nilsson M et al (eds) Paving the road to sustainable transport: Governance and innovation in low-carbon vehicles. Routledge, New York
Dijk M, Montalvo C (2009) Ultra low emission vehicle development: a study on the drivers for car firms and the implications for sustainable development policy. Int J Automot Technol Manag 9(2):191–208
Foxon T, Kemp R (2006) Innovation impacts of environmental policies. In: Marinova D (ed) The international handbook on environmental technology management. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Fuglestvedt J, Berntsen T, Myhre G, Rypdal K, Bieltvedt Skeie R (2008) Climate forcing from the transport sectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(2):454–458
Jacob K, Beise M, Blazejczak J, Edler D, Haum R, Jänicke M, Loew T, Petschow U, Rennings K (2005) Lead markets for environmental innovations. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg/New York
Kemp R (2009) The Dutch energy transition approach. IEEP 7:291–316
Klok PJ (1989) Covenanten als instrument van milieubeleid (Covenants as an instrument in environmental policy), unpublished PhD, Twente University, Enschede
Krzyzanowski M, Kuna-Dibbert B, Schneider J (eds) (2005) Health effects of transport related air pollution. World Health Organization, Copenhagen
Loorbach D (2004) Governance and transitions: a multi-level policy-framework based on complex systems thinking. paper Readen at Conference on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Berlin
Loorbach D (2007) Transition management: new mode of governance for sustainable development. International Books, Utrecht
Loorbach D, Rotmans J (2006) Managing transitions for sustainable development. In: Olshoorn X, Wieczorek AJ (eds) Understanding industrial transformation. Views from different disciplines. Springer, Dordrecht
OECD (2003) Voluntary approaches for environmental policy: effectiveness, efficiency and usage in policy mixes, report. OECD, Paris
Ward WH (1967) The sailing ship effect. Bull Inst Phys Phys Soc 18:169
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dijk, M. (2015). From Government to Multi-stakeholder Governance for Sustainable Mobility. In: Mancebo, F., Sachs, I. (eds) Transitions to Sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9532-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9532-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9531-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9532-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)